The actual conversion code suggests that we may be creating a shared
list property. However, the assignment code internally won't let that
happen. Test as much.
Amends commit 3108c58b97
Task-number: QTBUG-133047
Change-Id: I66f0f043e0dabd2693aa50a30478461a5db5c5ad
Reviewed-by: Fabian Kosmale <fabian.kosmale@qt.io>
Reviewed-by: Sami Shalayel <sami.shalayel@qt.io>
We have the same conversion code already for lists of value types and
JavaScript arrays. Specialize the common cases of QObjectList and
QQmlListProperty<QObject>.
Pick-to: 6.9 6.8
Fixes: QTBUG-133047
Change-Id: I10826d4a965e18471a486e19befef961ec9a4a6e
Reviewed-by: Olivier De Cannière <olivier.decanniere@qt.io>
They are equal to QList<QString> and QList<QVariant>, respectively. We
cannot express this fact in qmltypes, but since those are builtin, we
can just hardcode it.
Task-number: QTBUG-112227
Change-Id: Iebeb5f6a5350d1c7184b1d9e6a38647e048c3806
Reviewed-by: Fabian Kosmale <fabian.kosmale@qt.io>
In the happy case this just retrieves the internal QList from the list
property. In the sad case it produces a deep copy. That's not worse than
what the interpreter does, though.
Fixes: QTBUG-112227
Change-Id: I8b2b0ac74c90b6dcee876e83a64502756733c1c5
Reviewed-by: Fabian Kosmale <fabian.kosmale@qt.io>
Ulf Hermann