From 4866812020a27dee7cb8e94dc9e13a2793ae966a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Filipe Manana Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2024 12:36:21 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] btrfs: dir-item: remove unnecessary calls to btrfs_mark_buffer_dirty() We have several places explicitly calling btrfs_mark_buffer_dirty() but that is not necessarily since the target leaf came from a path that was obtained for a btree search function that modifies the btree, something like btrfs_insert_empty_item() or anything else that ends up calling btrfs_search_slot() with a value of 1 for its 'cow' argument. These just make the code more verbose, confusing and add a little extra overhead and well as increase the module's text size, so remove them. Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana Signed-off-by: David Sterba --- fs/btrfs/dir-item.c | 2 -- 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/btrfs/dir-item.c b/fs/btrfs/dir-item.c index 1ea5d8fcfbf7..ccf91de29f80 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/dir-item.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/dir-item.c @@ -92,7 +92,6 @@ int btrfs_insert_xattr_item(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, write_extent_buffer(leaf, name, name_ptr, name_len); write_extent_buffer(leaf, data, data_ptr, data_len); - btrfs_mark_buffer_dirty(trans, path->nodes[0]); return ret; } @@ -152,7 +151,6 @@ int btrfs_insert_dir_item(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, name_ptr = (unsigned long)(dir_item + 1); write_extent_buffer(leaf, name->name, name_ptr, name->len); - btrfs_mark_buffer_dirty(trans, leaf); second_insert: /* FIXME, use some real flag for selecting the extra index */