linux-kernelorg-stable/kernel/module/tree_lookup.c

113 lines
2.6 KiB
C
Raw Normal View History

// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later
/*
* Modules tree lookup
*
* Copyright (C) 2015 Peter Zijlstra
* Copyright (C) 2015 Rusty Russell
*/
#include <linux/module.h>
#include <linux/rbtree_latch.h>
#include "internal.h"
/*
* Use a latched RB-tree for __module_address(); this allows us to use
module: Begin to move from RCU-sched to RCU. The RCU usage in module was introduced in commit d72b37513cdfb ("Remove stop_machine during module load v2") and it claimed not to be RCU but similar. Then there was another improvement in commit e91defa26c527 ("module: don't use stop_machine on module load"). It become a mix of RCU and RCU-sched and was eventually fixed 0be964be0d450 ("module: Sanitize RCU usage and locking"). Later RCU & RCU-sched was merged in commit cb2f55369d3a9 ("modules: Replace synchronize_sched() and call_rcu_sched()") so that was aligned. Looking at it today, there is still leftovers. The preempt_disable() was used instead rcu_read_lock_sched(). The RCU & RCU-sched merge was not complete as there is still rcu_dereference_sched() for module::kallsyms. The RCU-list modules and unloaded_tainted_modules are always accessed under RCU protection or the module_mutex. The modules list iteration can always happen safely because the module will not disappear. Once the module is removed (free_module()) then after removing the module from the list, there is a synchronize_rcu() which waits until every RCU reader left the section. That means iterating over the list within a RCU-read section is enough, there is no need to disable preemption. module::kallsyms is first assigned in add_kallsyms() before the module is added to the list. At this point, it points to init data. This pointer is later updated and before the init code is removed there is also synchronize_rcu() in do_free_init(). That means A RCU read lock is enough for protection and rcu_dereference() can be safely used. Convert module code and its users step by step. Update comments and convert print_modules() to use RCU. Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250108090457.512198-3-bigeasy@linutronix.de Signed-off-by: Petr Pavlu <petr.pavlu@suse.com>
2025-01-08 09:04:31 +00:00
* RCU lookups of the address from any context.
*
module: Begin to move from RCU-sched to RCU. The RCU usage in module was introduced in commit d72b37513cdfb ("Remove stop_machine during module load v2") and it claimed not to be RCU but similar. Then there was another improvement in commit e91defa26c527 ("module: don't use stop_machine on module load"). It become a mix of RCU and RCU-sched and was eventually fixed 0be964be0d450 ("module: Sanitize RCU usage and locking"). Later RCU & RCU-sched was merged in commit cb2f55369d3a9 ("modules: Replace synchronize_sched() and call_rcu_sched()") so that was aligned. Looking at it today, there is still leftovers. The preempt_disable() was used instead rcu_read_lock_sched(). The RCU & RCU-sched merge was not complete as there is still rcu_dereference_sched() for module::kallsyms. The RCU-list modules and unloaded_tainted_modules are always accessed under RCU protection or the module_mutex. The modules list iteration can always happen safely because the module will not disappear. Once the module is removed (free_module()) then after removing the module from the list, there is a synchronize_rcu() which waits until every RCU reader left the section. That means iterating over the list within a RCU-read section is enough, there is no need to disable preemption. module::kallsyms is first assigned in add_kallsyms() before the module is added to the list. At this point, it points to init data. This pointer is later updated and before the init code is removed there is also synchronize_rcu() in do_free_init(). That means A RCU read lock is enough for protection and rcu_dereference() can be safely used. Convert module code and its users step by step. Update comments and convert print_modules() to use RCU. Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250108090457.512198-3-bigeasy@linutronix.de Signed-off-by: Petr Pavlu <petr.pavlu@suse.com>
2025-01-08 09:04:31 +00:00
* This is conditional on PERF_EVENTS || TRACING || CFI_CLANG because those can
* really hit __module_address() hard by doing a lot of stack unwinding;
* potentially from NMI context.
*/
static __always_inline unsigned long __mod_tree_val(struct latch_tree_node *n)
{
module: replace module_layout with module_memory module_layout manages different types of memory (text, data, rodata, etc.) in one allocation, which is problematic for some reasons: 1. It is hard to enable CONFIG_STRICT_MODULE_RWX. 2. It is hard to use huge pages in modules (and not break strict rwx). 3. Many archs uses module_layout for arch-specific data, but it is not obvious how these data are used (are they RO, RX, or RW?) Improve the scenario by replacing 2 (or 3) module_layout per module with up to 7 module_memory per module: MOD_TEXT, MOD_DATA, MOD_RODATA, MOD_RO_AFTER_INIT, MOD_INIT_TEXT, MOD_INIT_DATA, MOD_INIT_RODATA, and allocating them separately. This adds slightly more entries to mod_tree (from up to 3 entries per module, to up to 7 entries per module). However, this at most adds a small constant overhead to __module_address(), which is expected to be fast. Various archs use module_layout for different data. These data are put into different module_memory based on their location in module_layout. IOW, data that used to go with text is allocated with MOD_MEM_TYPE_TEXT; data that used to go with data is allocated with MOD_MEM_TYPE_DATA, etc. module_memory simplifies quite some of the module code. For example, ARCH_WANTS_MODULES_DATA_IN_VMALLOC is a lot cleaner, as it just uses a different allocator for the data. kernel/module/strict_rwx.c is also much cleaner with module_memory. Signed-off-by: Song Liu <song@kernel.org> Cc: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Reviewed-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Reviewed-by: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org>
2023-02-07 00:28:02 +00:00
struct module_memory *mod_mem = container_of(n, struct module_memory, mtn.node);
module: replace module_layout with module_memory module_layout manages different types of memory (text, data, rodata, etc.) in one allocation, which is problematic for some reasons: 1. It is hard to enable CONFIG_STRICT_MODULE_RWX. 2. It is hard to use huge pages in modules (and not break strict rwx). 3. Many archs uses module_layout for arch-specific data, but it is not obvious how these data are used (are they RO, RX, or RW?) Improve the scenario by replacing 2 (or 3) module_layout per module with up to 7 module_memory per module: MOD_TEXT, MOD_DATA, MOD_RODATA, MOD_RO_AFTER_INIT, MOD_INIT_TEXT, MOD_INIT_DATA, MOD_INIT_RODATA, and allocating them separately. This adds slightly more entries to mod_tree (from up to 3 entries per module, to up to 7 entries per module). However, this at most adds a small constant overhead to __module_address(), which is expected to be fast. Various archs use module_layout for different data. These data are put into different module_memory based on their location in module_layout. IOW, data that used to go with text is allocated with MOD_MEM_TYPE_TEXT; data that used to go with data is allocated with MOD_MEM_TYPE_DATA, etc. module_memory simplifies quite some of the module code. For example, ARCH_WANTS_MODULES_DATA_IN_VMALLOC is a lot cleaner, as it just uses a different allocator for the data. kernel/module/strict_rwx.c is also much cleaner with module_memory. Signed-off-by: Song Liu <song@kernel.org> Cc: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Reviewed-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Reviewed-by: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org>
2023-02-07 00:28:02 +00:00
return (unsigned long)mod_mem->base;
}
static __always_inline unsigned long __mod_tree_size(struct latch_tree_node *n)
{
module: replace module_layout with module_memory module_layout manages different types of memory (text, data, rodata, etc.) in one allocation, which is problematic for some reasons: 1. It is hard to enable CONFIG_STRICT_MODULE_RWX. 2. It is hard to use huge pages in modules (and not break strict rwx). 3. Many archs uses module_layout for arch-specific data, but it is not obvious how these data are used (are they RO, RX, or RW?) Improve the scenario by replacing 2 (or 3) module_layout per module with up to 7 module_memory per module: MOD_TEXT, MOD_DATA, MOD_RODATA, MOD_RO_AFTER_INIT, MOD_INIT_TEXT, MOD_INIT_DATA, MOD_INIT_RODATA, and allocating them separately. This adds slightly more entries to mod_tree (from up to 3 entries per module, to up to 7 entries per module). However, this at most adds a small constant overhead to __module_address(), which is expected to be fast. Various archs use module_layout for different data. These data are put into different module_memory based on their location in module_layout. IOW, data that used to go with text is allocated with MOD_MEM_TYPE_TEXT; data that used to go with data is allocated with MOD_MEM_TYPE_DATA, etc. module_memory simplifies quite some of the module code. For example, ARCH_WANTS_MODULES_DATA_IN_VMALLOC is a lot cleaner, as it just uses a different allocator for the data. kernel/module/strict_rwx.c is also much cleaner with module_memory. Signed-off-by: Song Liu <song@kernel.org> Cc: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Reviewed-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Reviewed-by: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org>
2023-02-07 00:28:02 +00:00
struct module_memory *mod_mem = container_of(n, struct module_memory, mtn.node);
module: replace module_layout with module_memory module_layout manages different types of memory (text, data, rodata, etc.) in one allocation, which is problematic for some reasons: 1. It is hard to enable CONFIG_STRICT_MODULE_RWX. 2. It is hard to use huge pages in modules (and not break strict rwx). 3. Many archs uses module_layout for arch-specific data, but it is not obvious how these data are used (are they RO, RX, or RW?) Improve the scenario by replacing 2 (or 3) module_layout per module with up to 7 module_memory per module: MOD_TEXT, MOD_DATA, MOD_RODATA, MOD_RO_AFTER_INIT, MOD_INIT_TEXT, MOD_INIT_DATA, MOD_INIT_RODATA, and allocating them separately. This adds slightly more entries to mod_tree (from up to 3 entries per module, to up to 7 entries per module). However, this at most adds a small constant overhead to __module_address(), which is expected to be fast. Various archs use module_layout for different data. These data are put into different module_memory based on their location in module_layout. IOW, data that used to go with text is allocated with MOD_MEM_TYPE_TEXT; data that used to go with data is allocated with MOD_MEM_TYPE_DATA, etc. module_memory simplifies quite some of the module code. For example, ARCH_WANTS_MODULES_DATA_IN_VMALLOC is a lot cleaner, as it just uses a different allocator for the data. kernel/module/strict_rwx.c is also much cleaner with module_memory. Signed-off-by: Song Liu <song@kernel.org> Cc: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Reviewed-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Reviewed-by: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org>
2023-02-07 00:28:02 +00:00
return (unsigned long)mod_mem->size;
}
static __always_inline bool
mod_tree_less(struct latch_tree_node *a, struct latch_tree_node *b)
{
return __mod_tree_val(a) < __mod_tree_val(b);
}
static __always_inline int
mod_tree_comp(void *key, struct latch_tree_node *n)
{
unsigned long val = (unsigned long)key;
unsigned long start, end;
start = __mod_tree_val(n);
if (val < start)
return -1;
end = start + __mod_tree_size(n);
if (val >= end)
return 1;
return 0;
}
static const struct latch_tree_ops mod_tree_ops = {
.less = mod_tree_less,
.comp = mod_tree_comp,
};
static noinline void __mod_tree_insert(struct mod_tree_node *node, struct mod_tree_root *tree)
{
latch_tree_insert(&node->node, &tree->root, &mod_tree_ops);
}
static void __mod_tree_remove(struct mod_tree_node *node, struct mod_tree_root *tree)
{
latch_tree_erase(&node->node, &tree->root, &mod_tree_ops);
}
/*
* These modifications: insert, remove_init and remove; are serialized by the
* module_mutex.
*/
void mod_tree_insert(struct module *mod)
{
module: replace module_layout with module_memory module_layout manages different types of memory (text, data, rodata, etc.) in one allocation, which is problematic for some reasons: 1. It is hard to enable CONFIG_STRICT_MODULE_RWX. 2. It is hard to use huge pages in modules (and not break strict rwx). 3. Many archs uses module_layout for arch-specific data, but it is not obvious how these data are used (are they RO, RX, or RW?) Improve the scenario by replacing 2 (or 3) module_layout per module with up to 7 module_memory per module: MOD_TEXT, MOD_DATA, MOD_RODATA, MOD_RO_AFTER_INIT, MOD_INIT_TEXT, MOD_INIT_DATA, MOD_INIT_RODATA, and allocating them separately. This adds slightly more entries to mod_tree (from up to 3 entries per module, to up to 7 entries per module). However, this at most adds a small constant overhead to __module_address(), which is expected to be fast. Various archs use module_layout for different data. These data are put into different module_memory based on their location in module_layout. IOW, data that used to go with text is allocated with MOD_MEM_TYPE_TEXT; data that used to go with data is allocated with MOD_MEM_TYPE_DATA, etc. module_memory simplifies quite some of the module code. For example, ARCH_WANTS_MODULES_DATA_IN_VMALLOC is a lot cleaner, as it just uses a different allocator for the data. kernel/module/strict_rwx.c is also much cleaner with module_memory. Signed-off-by: Song Liu <song@kernel.org> Cc: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Reviewed-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Reviewed-by: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org>
2023-02-07 00:28:02 +00:00
for_each_mod_mem_type(type) {
mod->mem[type].mtn.mod = mod;
if (mod->mem[type].size)
__mod_tree_insert(&mod->mem[type].mtn, &mod_tree);
}
}
void mod_tree_remove_init(struct module *mod)
{
module: replace module_layout with module_memory module_layout manages different types of memory (text, data, rodata, etc.) in one allocation, which is problematic for some reasons: 1. It is hard to enable CONFIG_STRICT_MODULE_RWX. 2. It is hard to use huge pages in modules (and not break strict rwx). 3. Many archs uses module_layout for arch-specific data, but it is not obvious how these data are used (are they RO, RX, or RW?) Improve the scenario by replacing 2 (or 3) module_layout per module with up to 7 module_memory per module: MOD_TEXT, MOD_DATA, MOD_RODATA, MOD_RO_AFTER_INIT, MOD_INIT_TEXT, MOD_INIT_DATA, MOD_INIT_RODATA, and allocating them separately. This adds slightly more entries to mod_tree (from up to 3 entries per module, to up to 7 entries per module). However, this at most adds a small constant overhead to __module_address(), which is expected to be fast. Various archs use module_layout for different data. These data are put into different module_memory based on their location in module_layout. IOW, data that used to go with text is allocated with MOD_MEM_TYPE_TEXT; data that used to go with data is allocated with MOD_MEM_TYPE_DATA, etc. module_memory simplifies quite some of the module code. For example, ARCH_WANTS_MODULES_DATA_IN_VMALLOC is a lot cleaner, as it just uses a different allocator for the data. kernel/module/strict_rwx.c is also much cleaner with module_memory. Signed-off-by: Song Liu <song@kernel.org> Cc: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Reviewed-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Reviewed-by: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org>
2023-02-07 00:28:02 +00:00
for_class_mod_mem_type(type, init) {
if (mod->mem[type].size)
__mod_tree_remove(&mod->mem[type].mtn, &mod_tree);
}
}
void mod_tree_remove(struct module *mod)
{
module: replace module_layout with module_memory module_layout manages different types of memory (text, data, rodata, etc.) in one allocation, which is problematic for some reasons: 1. It is hard to enable CONFIG_STRICT_MODULE_RWX. 2. It is hard to use huge pages in modules (and not break strict rwx). 3. Many archs uses module_layout for arch-specific data, but it is not obvious how these data are used (are they RO, RX, or RW?) Improve the scenario by replacing 2 (or 3) module_layout per module with up to 7 module_memory per module: MOD_TEXT, MOD_DATA, MOD_RODATA, MOD_RO_AFTER_INIT, MOD_INIT_TEXT, MOD_INIT_DATA, MOD_INIT_RODATA, and allocating them separately. This adds slightly more entries to mod_tree (from up to 3 entries per module, to up to 7 entries per module). However, this at most adds a small constant overhead to __module_address(), which is expected to be fast. Various archs use module_layout for different data. These data are put into different module_memory based on their location in module_layout. IOW, data that used to go with text is allocated with MOD_MEM_TYPE_TEXT; data that used to go with data is allocated with MOD_MEM_TYPE_DATA, etc. module_memory simplifies quite some of the module code. For example, ARCH_WANTS_MODULES_DATA_IN_VMALLOC is a lot cleaner, as it just uses a different allocator for the data. kernel/module/strict_rwx.c is also much cleaner with module_memory. Signed-off-by: Song Liu <song@kernel.org> Cc: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Reviewed-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Reviewed-by: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org>
2023-02-07 00:28:02 +00:00
for_each_mod_mem_type(type) {
if (mod->mem[type].size)
__mod_tree_remove(&mod->mem[type].mtn, &mod_tree);
}
}
struct module *mod_find(unsigned long addr, struct mod_tree_root *tree)
{
struct latch_tree_node *ltn;
ltn = latch_tree_find((void *)addr, &tree->root, &mod_tree_ops);
if (!ltn)
return NULL;
return container_of(ltn, struct mod_tree_node, node)->mod;
}