2019-05-22 07:51:44 +00:00
|
|
|
// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later
|
2014-08-06 23:05:25 +00:00
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* Contiguous Memory Allocator
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* Copyright (c) 2010-2011 by Samsung Electronics.
|
|
|
|
* Copyright IBM Corporation, 2013
|
|
|
|
* Copyright LG Electronics Inc., 2014
|
|
|
|
* Written by:
|
|
|
|
* Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
|
|
|
|
* Michal Nazarewicz <mina86@mina86.com>
|
|
|
|
* Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
|
|
|
|
* Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#define pr_fmt(fmt) "cma: " fmt
|
|
|
|
|
2015-04-15 23:14:50 +00:00
|
|
|
#define CREATE_TRACE_POINTS
|
2014-08-06 23:05:25 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#include <linux/memblock.h>
|
|
|
|
#include <linux/err.h>
|
mm, cma: support multiple contiguous ranges, if requested
Currently, CMA manages one range of physically contiguous memory.
Creation of larger CMA areas with hugetlb_cma may run in to gaps in
physical memory, so that they are not able to allocate that contiguous
physical range from memblock when creating the CMA area.
This can happen, for example, on an AMD system with > 1TB of memory, where
there will be a gap just below the 1TB (40bit DMA) line. If you have set
aside most of memory for potential hugetlb CMA allocation,
cma_declare_contiguous_nid will fail.
hugetlb_cma doesn't need the entire area to be one physically contiguous
range. It just cares about being able to get physically contiguous chunks
of a certain size (e.g. 1G), and it is fine to have the CMA area backed
by multiple physical ranges, as long as it gets 1G contiguous allocations.
Multi-range support is implemented by introducing an array of ranges,
instead of just one big one. Each range has its own bitmap. Effectively,
the allocate and release operations work as before, just per-range. So,
instead of going through one large bitmap, they now go through a number of
smaller ones.
The maximum number of supported ranges is 8, as defined in CMA_MAX_RANGES.
Since some current users of CMA expect a CMA area to just use one
physically contiguous range, only allow for multiple ranges if a new
interface, cma_declare_contiguous_nid_multi, is used. The other
interfaces will work like before, creating only CMA areas with 1 range.
cma_declare_contiguous_nid_multi works as follows, mimicking the
default "bottom-up, above 4G" reservation approach:
0) Try cma_declare_contiguous_nid, which will use only one
region. If this succeeds, return. This makes sure that for
all the cases that currently work, the behavior remains
unchanged even if the caller switches from
cma_declare_contiguous_nid to cma_declare_contiguous_nid_multi.
1) Select the largest free memblock ranges above 4G, with
a maximum number of CMA_MAX_RANGES.
2) If we did not find at most CMA_MAX_RANGES that add
up to the total size requested, return -ENOMEM.
3) Sort the selected ranges by base address.
4) Reserve them bottom-up until we get what we wanted.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20250228182928.2645936-3-fvdl@google.com
Signed-off-by: Frank van der Linden <fvdl@google.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Cc: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Joao Martins <joao.m.martins@oracle.com>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev>
Cc: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Roman Gushchin (Cruise) <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>
Cc: Usama Arif <usamaarif642@gmail.com>
Cc: Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Yu Zhao <yuzhao@google.com>
Cc: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2025-02-28 18:29:03 +00:00
|
|
|
#include <linux/list.h>
|
2014-08-06 23:05:25 +00:00
|
|
|
#include <linux/mm.h>
|
|
|
|
#include <linux/sizes.h>
|
|
|
|
#include <linux/slab.h>
|
|
|
|
#include <linux/log2.h>
|
|
|
|
#include <linux/cma.h>
|
2014-10-09 22:26:47 +00:00
|
|
|
#include <linux/highmem.h>
|
2014-12-13 00:58:31 +00:00
|
|
|
#include <linux/io.h>
|
2018-04-05 23:25:34 +00:00
|
|
|
#include <linux/kmemleak.h>
|
2015-04-15 23:14:50 +00:00
|
|
|
#include <trace/events/cma.h>
|
2014-08-06 23:05:25 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2023-03-21 17:05:02 +00:00
|
|
|
#include "internal.h"
|
2015-04-14 22:44:57 +00:00
|
|
|
#include "cma.h"
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
struct cma cma_areas[MAX_CMA_AREAS];
|
2024-09-27 18:16:37 +00:00
|
|
|
unsigned int cma_area_count;
|
2014-08-06 23:05:25 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2025-04-07 16:54:35 +00:00
|
|
|
static int __init __cma_declare_contiguous_nid(phys_addr_t *basep,
|
mm, cma: support multiple contiguous ranges, if requested
Currently, CMA manages one range of physically contiguous memory.
Creation of larger CMA areas with hugetlb_cma may run in to gaps in
physical memory, so that they are not able to allocate that contiguous
physical range from memblock when creating the CMA area.
This can happen, for example, on an AMD system with > 1TB of memory, where
there will be a gap just below the 1TB (40bit DMA) line. If you have set
aside most of memory for potential hugetlb CMA allocation,
cma_declare_contiguous_nid will fail.
hugetlb_cma doesn't need the entire area to be one physically contiguous
range. It just cares about being able to get physically contiguous chunks
of a certain size (e.g. 1G), and it is fine to have the CMA area backed
by multiple physical ranges, as long as it gets 1G contiguous allocations.
Multi-range support is implemented by introducing an array of ranges,
instead of just one big one. Each range has its own bitmap. Effectively,
the allocate and release operations work as before, just per-range. So,
instead of going through one large bitmap, they now go through a number of
smaller ones.
The maximum number of supported ranges is 8, as defined in CMA_MAX_RANGES.
Since some current users of CMA expect a CMA area to just use one
physically contiguous range, only allow for multiple ranges if a new
interface, cma_declare_contiguous_nid_multi, is used. The other
interfaces will work like before, creating only CMA areas with 1 range.
cma_declare_contiguous_nid_multi works as follows, mimicking the
default "bottom-up, above 4G" reservation approach:
0) Try cma_declare_contiguous_nid, which will use only one
region. If this succeeds, return. This makes sure that for
all the cases that currently work, the behavior remains
unchanged even if the caller switches from
cma_declare_contiguous_nid to cma_declare_contiguous_nid_multi.
1) Select the largest free memblock ranges above 4G, with
a maximum number of CMA_MAX_RANGES.
2) If we did not find at most CMA_MAX_RANGES that add
up to the total size requested, return -ENOMEM.
3) Sort the selected ranges by base address.
4) Reserve them bottom-up until we get what we wanted.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20250228182928.2645936-3-fvdl@google.com
Signed-off-by: Frank van der Linden <fvdl@google.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Cc: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Joao Martins <joao.m.martins@oracle.com>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev>
Cc: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Roman Gushchin (Cruise) <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>
Cc: Usama Arif <usamaarif642@gmail.com>
Cc: Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Yu Zhao <yuzhao@google.com>
Cc: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2025-02-28 18:29:03 +00:00
|
|
|
phys_addr_t size, phys_addr_t limit,
|
|
|
|
phys_addr_t alignment, unsigned int order_per_bit,
|
|
|
|
bool fixed, const char *name, struct cma **res_cma,
|
|
|
|
int nid);
|
|
|
|
|
2015-04-14 22:47:04 +00:00
|
|
|
phys_addr_t cma_get_base(const struct cma *cma)
|
2014-08-06 23:05:25 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
mm, cma: support multiple contiguous ranges, if requested
Currently, CMA manages one range of physically contiguous memory.
Creation of larger CMA areas with hugetlb_cma may run in to gaps in
physical memory, so that they are not able to allocate that contiguous
physical range from memblock when creating the CMA area.
This can happen, for example, on an AMD system with > 1TB of memory, where
there will be a gap just below the 1TB (40bit DMA) line. If you have set
aside most of memory for potential hugetlb CMA allocation,
cma_declare_contiguous_nid will fail.
hugetlb_cma doesn't need the entire area to be one physically contiguous
range. It just cares about being able to get physically contiguous chunks
of a certain size (e.g. 1G), and it is fine to have the CMA area backed
by multiple physical ranges, as long as it gets 1G contiguous allocations.
Multi-range support is implemented by introducing an array of ranges,
instead of just one big one. Each range has its own bitmap. Effectively,
the allocate and release operations work as before, just per-range. So,
instead of going through one large bitmap, they now go through a number of
smaller ones.
The maximum number of supported ranges is 8, as defined in CMA_MAX_RANGES.
Since some current users of CMA expect a CMA area to just use one
physically contiguous range, only allow for multiple ranges if a new
interface, cma_declare_contiguous_nid_multi, is used. The other
interfaces will work like before, creating only CMA areas with 1 range.
cma_declare_contiguous_nid_multi works as follows, mimicking the
default "bottom-up, above 4G" reservation approach:
0) Try cma_declare_contiguous_nid, which will use only one
region. If this succeeds, return. This makes sure that for
all the cases that currently work, the behavior remains
unchanged even if the caller switches from
cma_declare_contiguous_nid to cma_declare_contiguous_nid_multi.
1) Select the largest free memblock ranges above 4G, with
a maximum number of CMA_MAX_RANGES.
2) If we did not find at most CMA_MAX_RANGES that add
up to the total size requested, return -ENOMEM.
3) Sort the selected ranges by base address.
4) Reserve them bottom-up until we get what we wanted.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20250228182928.2645936-3-fvdl@google.com
Signed-off-by: Frank van der Linden <fvdl@google.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Cc: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Joao Martins <joao.m.martins@oracle.com>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev>
Cc: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Roman Gushchin (Cruise) <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>
Cc: Usama Arif <usamaarif642@gmail.com>
Cc: Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Yu Zhao <yuzhao@google.com>
Cc: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2025-02-28 18:29:03 +00:00
|
|
|
WARN_ON_ONCE(cma->nranges != 1);
|
|
|
|
return PFN_PHYS(cma->ranges[0].base_pfn);
|
2014-08-06 23:05:25 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2015-04-14 22:47:04 +00:00
|
|
|
unsigned long cma_get_size(const struct cma *cma)
|
2014-08-06 23:05:25 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
return cma->count << PAGE_SHIFT;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2017-04-18 18:27:03 +00:00
|
|
|
const char *cma_get_name(const struct cma *cma)
|
|
|
|
{
|
2020-08-12 01:31:57 +00:00
|
|
|
return cma->name;
|
2017-04-18 18:27:03 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2015-04-14 22:47:04 +00:00
|
|
|
static unsigned long cma_bitmap_aligned_mask(const struct cma *cma,
|
cma: fix calculation of aligned offset
The align_offset parameter is used by bitmap_find_next_zero_area_off()
to represent the offset of map's base from the previous alignment
boundary; the function ensures that the returned index, plus the
align_offset, honors the specified align_mask.
The logic introduced by commit b5be83e308f7 ("mm: cma: align to physical
address, not CMA region position") has the cma driver calculate the
offset to the *next* alignment boundary. In most cases, the base
alignment is greater than that specified when making allocations,
resulting in a zero offset whether we align up or down. In the example
given with the commit, the base alignment (8MB) was half the requested
alignment (16MB) so the math also happened to work since the offset is
8MB in both directions. However, when requesting allocations with an
alignment greater than twice that of the base, the returned index would
not be correctly aligned.
Also, the align_order arguments of cma_bitmap_aligned_mask() and
cma_bitmap_aligned_offset() should not be negative so the argument type
was made unsigned.
Fixes: b5be83e308f7 ("mm: cma: align to physical address, not CMA region position")
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170628170742.2895-1-opendmb@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Angus Clark <angus@angusclark.org>
Signed-off-by: Doug Berger <opendmb@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Gregory Fong <gregory.0xf0@gmail.com>
Cc: Doug Berger <opendmb@gmail.com>
Cc: Angus Clark <angus@angusclark.org>
Cc: Laura Abbott <labbott@redhat.com>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: Lucas Stach <l.stach@pengutronix.de>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Shiraz Hashim <shashim@codeaurora.org>
Cc: Jaewon Kim <jaewon31.kim@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2017-07-10 22:49:44 +00:00
|
|
|
unsigned int align_order)
|
2014-08-06 23:05:25 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
2014-10-13 22:51:03 +00:00
|
|
|
if (align_order <= cma->order_per_bit)
|
|
|
|
return 0;
|
|
|
|
return (1UL << (align_order - cma->order_per_bit)) - 1;
|
2014-08-06 23:05:25 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2015-03-12 23:25:57 +00:00
|
|
|
/*
|
cma: fix calculation of aligned offset
The align_offset parameter is used by bitmap_find_next_zero_area_off()
to represent the offset of map's base from the previous alignment
boundary; the function ensures that the returned index, plus the
align_offset, honors the specified align_mask.
The logic introduced by commit b5be83e308f7 ("mm: cma: align to physical
address, not CMA region position") has the cma driver calculate the
offset to the *next* alignment boundary. In most cases, the base
alignment is greater than that specified when making allocations,
resulting in a zero offset whether we align up or down. In the example
given with the commit, the base alignment (8MB) was half the requested
alignment (16MB) so the math also happened to work since the offset is
8MB in both directions. However, when requesting allocations with an
alignment greater than twice that of the base, the returned index would
not be correctly aligned.
Also, the align_order arguments of cma_bitmap_aligned_mask() and
cma_bitmap_aligned_offset() should not be negative so the argument type
was made unsigned.
Fixes: b5be83e308f7 ("mm: cma: align to physical address, not CMA region position")
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170628170742.2895-1-opendmb@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Angus Clark <angus@angusclark.org>
Signed-off-by: Doug Berger <opendmb@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Gregory Fong <gregory.0xf0@gmail.com>
Cc: Doug Berger <opendmb@gmail.com>
Cc: Angus Clark <angus@angusclark.org>
Cc: Laura Abbott <labbott@redhat.com>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: Lucas Stach <l.stach@pengutronix.de>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Shiraz Hashim <shashim@codeaurora.org>
Cc: Jaewon Kim <jaewon31.kim@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2017-07-10 22:49:44 +00:00
|
|
|
* Find the offset of the base PFN from the specified align_order.
|
|
|
|
* The value returned is represented in order_per_bits.
|
2015-03-12 23:25:57 +00:00
|
|
|
*/
|
2015-04-14 22:47:04 +00:00
|
|
|
static unsigned long cma_bitmap_aligned_offset(const struct cma *cma,
|
mm, cma: support multiple contiguous ranges, if requested
Currently, CMA manages one range of physically contiguous memory.
Creation of larger CMA areas with hugetlb_cma may run in to gaps in
physical memory, so that they are not able to allocate that contiguous
physical range from memblock when creating the CMA area.
This can happen, for example, on an AMD system with > 1TB of memory, where
there will be a gap just below the 1TB (40bit DMA) line. If you have set
aside most of memory for potential hugetlb CMA allocation,
cma_declare_contiguous_nid will fail.
hugetlb_cma doesn't need the entire area to be one physically contiguous
range. It just cares about being able to get physically contiguous chunks
of a certain size (e.g. 1G), and it is fine to have the CMA area backed
by multiple physical ranges, as long as it gets 1G contiguous allocations.
Multi-range support is implemented by introducing an array of ranges,
instead of just one big one. Each range has its own bitmap. Effectively,
the allocate and release operations work as before, just per-range. So,
instead of going through one large bitmap, they now go through a number of
smaller ones.
The maximum number of supported ranges is 8, as defined in CMA_MAX_RANGES.
Since some current users of CMA expect a CMA area to just use one
physically contiguous range, only allow for multiple ranges if a new
interface, cma_declare_contiguous_nid_multi, is used. The other
interfaces will work like before, creating only CMA areas with 1 range.
cma_declare_contiguous_nid_multi works as follows, mimicking the
default "bottom-up, above 4G" reservation approach:
0) Try cma_declare_contiguous_nid, which will use only one
region. If this succeeds, return. This makes sure that for
all the cases that currently work, the behavior remains
unchanged even if the caller switches from
cma_declare_contiguous_nid to cma_declare_contiguous_nid_multi.
1) Select the largest free memblock ranges above 4G, with
a maximum number of CMA_MAX_RANGES.
2) If we did not find at most CMA_MAX_RANGES that add
up to the total size requested, return -ENOMEM.
3) Sort the selected ranges by base address.
4) Reserve them bottom-up until we get what we wanted.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20250228182928.2645936-3-fvdl@google.com
Signed-off-by: Frank van der Linden <fvdl@google.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Cc: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Joao Martins <joao.m.martins@oracle.com>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev>
Cc: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Roman Gushchin (Cruise) <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>
Cc: Usama Arif <usamaarif642@gmail.com>
Cc: Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Yu Zhao <yuzhao@google.com>
Cc: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2025-02-28 18:29:03 +00:00
|
|
|
const struct cma_memrange *cmr,
|
cma: fix calculation of aligned offset
The align_offset parameter is used by bitmap_find_next_zero_area_off()
to represent the offset of map's base from the previous alignment
boundary; the function ensures that the returned index, plus the
align_offset, honors the specified align_mask.
The logic introduced by commit b5be83e308f7 ("mm: cma: align to physical
address, not CMA region position") has the cma driver calculate the
offset to the *next* alignment boundary. In most cases, the base
alignment is greater than that specified when making allocations,
resulting in a zero offset whether we align up or down. In the example
given with the commit, the base alignment (8MB) was half the requested
alignment (16MB) so the math also happened to work since the offset is
8MB in both directions. However, when requesting allocations with an
alignment greater than twice that of the base, the returned index would
not be correctly aligned.
Also, the align_order arguments of cma_bitmap_aligned_mask() and
cma_bitmap_aligned_offset() should not be negative so the argument type
was made unsigned.
Fixes: b5be83e308f7 ("mm: cma: align to physical address, not CMA region position")
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170628170742.2895-1-opendmb@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Angus Clark <angus@angusclark.org>
Signed-off-by: Doug Berger <opendmb@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Gregory Fong <gregory.0xf0@gmail.com>
Cc: Doug Berger <opendmb@gmail.com>
Cc: Angus Clark <angus@angusclark.org>
Cc: Laura Abbott <labbott@redhat.com>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: Lucas Stach <l.stach@pengutronix.de>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Shiraz Hashim <shashim@codeaurora.org>
Cc: Jaewon Kim <jaewon31.kim@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2017-07-10 22:49:44 +00:00
|
|
|
unsigned int align_order)
|
2014-12-13 00:54:48 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
mm, cma: support multiple contiguous ranges, if requested
Currently, CMA manages one range of physically contiguous memory.
Creation of larger CMA areas with hugetlb_cma may run in to gaps in
physical memory, so that they are not able to allocate that contiguous
physical range from memblock when creating the CMA area.
This can happen, for example, on an AMD system with > 1TB of memory, where
there will be a gap just below the 1TB (40bit DMA) line. If you have set
aside most of memory for potential hugetlb CMA allocation,
cma_declare_contiguous_nid will fail.
hugetlb_cma doesn't need the entire area to be one physically contiguous
range. It just cares about being able to get physically contiguous chunks
of a certain size (e.g. 1G), and it is fine to have the CMA area backed
by multiple physical ranges, as long as it gets 1G contiguous allocations.
Multi-range support is implemented by introducing an array of ranges,
instead of just one big one. Each range has its own bitmap. Effectively,
the allocate and release operations work as before, just per-range. So,
instead of going through one large bitmap, they now go through a number of
smaller ones.
The maximum number of supported ranges is 8, as defined in CMA_MAX_RANGES.
Since some current users of CMA expect a CMA area to just use one
physically contiguous range, only allow for multiple ranges if a new
interface, cma_declare_contiguous_nid_multi, is used. The other
interfaces will work like before, creating only CMA areas with 1 range.
cma_declare_contiguous_nid_multi works as follows, mimicking the
default "bottom-up, above 4G" reservation approach:
0) Try cma_declare_contiguous_nid, which will use only one
region. If this succeeds, return. This makes sure that for
all the cases that currently work, the behavior remains
unchanged even if the caller switches from
cma_declare_contiguous_nid to cma_declare_contiguous_nid_multi.
1) Select the largest free memblock ranges above 4G, with
a maximum number of CMA_MAX_RANGES.
2) If we did not find at most CMA_MAX_RANGES that add
up to the total size requested, return -ENOMEM.
3) Sort the selected ranges by base address.
4) Reserve them bottom-up until we get what we wanted.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20250228182928.2645936-3-fvdl@google.com
Signed-off-by: Frank van der Linden <fvdl@google.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Cc: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Joao Martins <joao.m.martins@oracle.com>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev>
Cc: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Roman Gushchin (Cruise) <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>
Cc: Usama Arif <usamaarif642@gmail.com>
Cc: Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Yu Zhao <yuzhao@google.com>
Cc: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2025-02-28 18:29:03 +00:00
|
|
|
return (cmr->base_pfn & ((1UL << align_order) - 1))
|
cma: fix calculation of aligned offset
The align_offset parameter is used by bitmap_find_next_zero_area_off()
to represent the offset of map's base from the previous alignment
boundary; the function ensures that the returned index, plus the
align_offset, honors the specified align_mask.
The logic introduced by commit b5be83e308f7 ("mm: cma: align to physical
address, not CMA region position") has the cma driver calculate the
offset to the *next* alignment boundary. In most cases, the base
alignment is greater than that specified when making allocations,
resulting in a zero offset whether we align up or down. In the example
given with the commit, the base alignment (8MB) was half the requested
alignment (16MB) so the math also happened to work since the offset is
8MB in both directions. However, when requesting allocations with an
alignment greater than twice that of the base, the returned index would
not be correctly aligned.
Also, the align_order arguments of cma_bitmap_aligned_mask() and
cma_bitmap_aligned_offset() should not be negative so the argument type
was made unsigned.
Fixes: b5be83e308f7 ("mm: cma: align to physical address, not CMA region position")
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170628170742.2895-1-opendmb@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Angus Clark <angus@angusclark.org>
Signed-off-by: Doug Berger <opendmb@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Gregory Fong <gregory.0xf0@gmail.com>
Cc: Doug Berger <opendmb@gmail.com>
Cc: Angus Clark <angus@angusclark.org>
Cc: Laura Abbott <labbott@redhat.com>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: Lucas Stach <l.stach@pengutronix.de>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Shiraz Hashim <shashim@codeaurora.org>
Cc: Jaewon Kim <jaewon31.kim@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2017-07-10 22:49:44 +00:00
|
|
|
>> cma->order_per_bit;
|
2014-12-13 00:54:48 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2015-04-14 22:47:04 +00:00
|
|
|
static unsigned long cma_bitmap_pages_to_bits(const struct cma *cma,
|
|
|
|
unsigned long pages)
|
2014-08-06 23:05:25 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
return ALIGN(pages, 1UL << cma->order_per_bit) >> cma->order_per_bit;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
mm, cma: support multiple contiguous ranges, if requested
Currently, CMA manages one range of physically contiguous memory.
Creation of larger CMA areas with hugetlb_cma may run in to gaps in
physical memory, so that they are not able to allocate that contiguous
physical range from memblock when creating the CMA area.
This can happen, for example, on an AMD system with > 1TB of memory, where
there will be a gap just below the 1TB (40bit DMA) line. If you have set
aside most of memory for potential hugetlb CMA allocation,
cma_declare_contiguous_nid will fail.
hugetlb_cma doesn't need the entire area to be one physically contiguous
range. It just cares about being able to get physically contiguous chunks
of a certain size (e.g. 1G), and it is fine to have the CMA area backed
by multiple physical ranges, as long as it gets 1G contiguous allocations.
Multi-range support is implemented by introducing an array of ranges,
instead of just one big one. Each range has its own bitmap. Effectively,
the allocate and release operations work as before, just per-range. So,
instead of going through one large bitmap, they now go through a number of
smaller ones.
The maximum number of supported ranges is 8, as defined in CMA_MAX_RANGES.
Since some current users of CMA expect a CMA area to just use one
physically contiguous range, only allow for multiple ranges if a new
interface, cma_declare_contiguous_nid_multi, is used. The other
interfaces will work like before, creating only CMA areas with 1 range.
cma_declare_contiguous_nid_multi works as follows, mimicking the
default "bottom-up, above 4G" reservation approach:
0) Try cma_declare_contiguous_nid, which will use only one
region. If this succeeds, return. This makes sure that for
all the cases that currently work, the behavior remains
unchanged even if the caller switches from
cma_declare_contiguous_nid to cma_declare_contiguous_nid_multi.
1) Select the largest free memblock ranges above 4G, with
a maximum number of CMA_MAX_RANGES.
2) If we did not find at most CMA_MAX_RANGES that add
up to the total size requested, return -ENOMEM.
3) Sort the selected ranges by base address.
4) Reserve them bottom-up until we get what we wanted.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20250228182928.2645936-3-fvdl@google.com
Signed-off-by: Frank van der Linden <fvdl@google.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Cc: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Joao Martins <joao.m.martins@oracle.com>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev>
Cc: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Roman Gushchin (Cruise) <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>
Cc: Usama Arif <usamaarif642@gmail.com>
Cc: Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Yu Zhao <yuzhao@google.com>
Cc: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2025-02-28 18:29:03 +00:00
|
|
|
static void cma_clear_bitmap(struct cma *cma, const struct cma_memrange *cmr,
|
|
|
|
unsigned long pfn, unsigned long count)
|
2014-08-06 23:05:25 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
unsigned long bitmap_no, bitmap_count;
|
2021-05-05 01:34:44 +00:00
|
|
|
unsigned long flags;
|
2014-08-06 23:05:25 +00:00
|
|
|
|
mm, cma: support multiple contiguous ranges, if requested
Currently, CMA manages one range of physically contiguous memory.
Creation of larger CMA areas with hugetlb_cma may run in to gaps in
physical memory, so that they are not able to allocate that contiguous
physical range from memblock when creating the CMA area.
This can happen, for example, on an AMD system with > 1TB of memory, where
there will be a gap just below the 1TB (40bit DMA) line. If you have set
aside most of memory for potential hugetlb CMA allocation,
cma_declare_contiguous_nid will fail.
hugetlb_cma doesn't need the entire area to be one physically contiguous
range. It just cares about being able to get physically contiguous chunks
of a certain size (e.g. 1G), and it is fine to have the CMA area backed
by multiple physical ranges, as long as it gets 1G contiguous allocations.
Multi-range support is implemented by introducing an array of ranges,
instead of just one big one. Each range has its own bitmap. Effectively,
the allocate and release operations work as before, just per-range. So,
instead of going through one large bitmap, they now go through a number of
smaller ones.
The maximum number of supported ranges is 8, as defined in CMA_MAX_RANGES.
Since some current users of CMA expect a CMA area to just use one
physically contiguous range, only allow for multiple ranges if a new
interface, cma_declare_contiguous_nid_multi, is used. The other
interfaces will work like before, creating only CMA areas with 1 range.
cma_declare_contiguous_nid_multi works as follows, mimicking the
default "bottom-up, above 4G" reservation approach:
0) Try cma_declare_contiguous_nid, which will use only one
region. If this succeeds, return. This makes sure that for
all the cases that currently work, the behavior remains
unchanged even if the caller switches from
cma_declare_contiguous_nid to cma_declare_contiguous_nid_multi.
1) Select the largest free memblock ranges above 4G, with
a maximum number of CMA_MAX_RANGES.
2) If we did not find at most CMA_MAX_RANGES that add
up to the total size requested, return -ENOMEM.
3) Sort the selected ranges by base address.
4) Reserve them bottom-up until we get what we wanted.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20250228182928.2645936-3-fvdl@google.com
Signed-off-by: Frank van der Linden <fvdl@google.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Cc: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Joao Martins <joao.m.martins@oracle.com>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev>
Cc: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Roman Gushchin (Cruise) <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>
Cc: Usama Arif <usamaarif642@gmail.com>
Cc: Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Yu Zhao <yuzhao@google.com>
Cc: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2025-02-28 18:29:03 +00:00
|
|
|
bitmap_no = (pfn - cmr->base_pfn) >> cma->order_per_bit;
|
2014-08-06 23:05:25 +00:00
|
|
|
bitmap_count = cma_bitmap_pages_to_bits(cma, count);
|
|
|
|
|
2021-05-05 01:34:44 +00:00
|
|
|
spin_lock_irqsave(&cma->lock, flags);
|
mm, cma: support multiple contiguous ranges, if requested
Currently, CMA manages one range of physically contiguous memory.
Creation of larger CMA areas with hugetlb_cma may run in to gaps in
physical memory, so that they are not able to allocate that contiguous
physical range from memblock when creating the CMA area.
This can happen, for example, on an AMD system with > 1TB of memory, where
there will be a gap just below the 1TB (40bit DMA) line. If you have set
aside most of memory for potential hugetlb CMA allocation,
cma_declare_contiguous_nid will fail.
hugetlb_cma doesn't need the entire area to be one physically contiguous
range. It just cares about being able to get physically contiguous chunks
of a certain size (e.g. 1G), and it is fine to have the CMA area backed
by multiple physical ranges, as long as it gets 1G contiguous allocations.
Multi-range support is implemented by introducing an array of ranges,
instead of just one big one. Each range has its own bitmap. Effectively,
the allocate and release operations work as before, just per-range. So,
instead of going through one large bitmap, they now go through a number of
smaller ones.
The maximum number of supported ranges is 8, as defined in CMA_MAX_RANGES.
Since some current users of CMA expect a CMA area to just use one
physically contiguous range, only allow for multiple ranges if a new
interface, cma_declare_contiguous_nid_multi, is used. The other
interfaces will work like before, creating only CMA areas with 1 range.
cma_declare_contiguous_nid_multi works as follows, mimicking the
default "bottom-up, above 4G" reservation approach:
0) Try cma_declare_contiguous_nid, which will use only one
region. If this succeeds, return. This makes sure that for
all the cases that currently work, the behavior remains
unchanged even if the caller switches from
cma_declare_contiguous_nid to cma_declare_contiguous_nid_multi.
1) Select the largest free memblock ranges above 4G, with
a maximum number of CMA_MAX_RANGES.
2) If we did not find at most CMA_MAX_RANGES that add
up to the total size requested, return -ENOMEM.
3) Sort the selected ranges by base address.
4) Reserve them bottom-up until we get what we wanted.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20250228182928.2645936-3-fvdl@google.com
Signed-off-by: Frank van der Linden <fvdl@google.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Cc: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Joao Martins <joao.m.martins@oracle.com>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev>
Cc: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Roman Gushchin (Cruise) <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>
Cc: Usama Arif <usamaarif642@gmail.com>
Cc: Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Yu Zhao <yuzhao@google.com>
Cc: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2025-02-28 18:29:03 +00:00
|
|
|
bitmap_clear(cmr->bitmap, bitmap_no, bitmap_count);
|
mm/cma: export total and free number of pages for CMA areas
Patch series "hugetlb/CMA improvements for large systems", v5.
On large systems, we observed some issues with hugetlb and CMA:
1) When specifying a large number of hugetlb boot pages (hugepages= on
the commandline), the kernel may run out of memory before it even gets
to HVO. For example, if you have a 3072G system, and want to use 3024
1G hugetlb pages for VMs, that should leave you plenty of space for the
hypervisor, provided you have the hugetlb vmemmap optimization (HVO)
enabled. However, since the vmemmap pages are always allocated first,
and then later in boot freed, you will actually run yourself out of
memory before you can do HVO. This means not getting all the hugetlb
pages you want, and worse, failure to boot if there is an allocation
failure in the system from which it can't recover.
2) There is a system setup where you might want to use hugetlb_cma with
a large value (say, again, 3024 out of 3072G like above), and then
lower that if system usage allows it, to make room for non-hugetlb
processes. For this, a variation of the problem above applies: the
kernel runs out of unmovable space to allocate from before you finish
boot, since your CMA area takes up all the space.
3) CMA wants to use one big contiguous area for allocations. Which
fails if you have the aforementioned 3T system with a gap in the middle
of physical memory (like the < 40bits BIOS DMA area seen on some AMD
systems). You then won't be able to set up a CMA area for one of the
NUMA nodes, leading to loss of half of your hugetlb CMA area.
4) Under the scenario mentioned in 2), when trying to grow the number
of hugetlb pages after dropping it for a while, new CMA allocations may
fail occasionally. This is not unexpected, some transient references
on pages may prevent cma_alloc from succeeding under memory pressure.
However, the hugetlb code then falls back to a normal contiguous alloc,
which may end up succeeding. This is not always desired behavior. If
you have a large CMA area, then the kernel has a restricted amount of
memory it can do unmovable allocations from (a well known issue). A
normal contiguous alloc may eat further in to this space.
To resolve these issues, do the following:
* Add hooks to the section init code to do custom initialization of
memmap pages. Hugetlb bootmem (memblock) allocated pages can then be
pre-HVOed. This avoids allocating a large number of vmemmap pages early
in boot, only to have them be freed again later, and also avoids running
out of memory as described under 1). Using these hooks for hugetlb is
optional. It requires moving hugetlb bootmem allocation to an earlier
spot by the architecture. This has been enabled on x86.
* hugetlb_cma doesn't care about the CMA area it uses being one large
contiguous range. Multiple smaller ranges are fine. The only
requirements are that the areas should be on one NUMA node, and
individual gigantic pages should be allocatable from them. So,
implement multi-range support for CMA, avoiding issue 3).
* Introduce a hugetlb_cma_only option on the commandline. This only
allows allocations from CMA for gigantic pages, if hugetlb_cma= is also
specified.
* With hugetlb_cma_only active, it also makes sense to be able to
pre-allocate gigantic hugetlb pages at boot time from the CMA area(s).
Add a rudimentary early CMA allocation interface, that just grabs a
piece of memblock-allocated space from the CMA area, which gets marked
as allocated in the CMA bitmap when the CMA area is initialized. With
this, hugepages= can be supported with hugetlb_cma=, making scenario 2)
work.
Additionally, fix some minor bugs, with one worth mentioning: since
hugetlb gigantic bootmem pages are allocated by memblock, they may span
multiple zones, as memblock doesn't (and mostly can't) know about zones.
This can cause problems. A hugetlb page spanning multiple zones is bad,
and it's worse with HVO, when the de-HVO step effectively sneakily
re-assigns pages to a different zone than originally configured, since the
tail pages all inherit the zone from the first 60 tail pages. This
condition is not common, but can be easily reproduced using ZONE_MOVABLE.
To fix this, add checks to see if gigantic bootmem pages intersect with
multiple zones, and do not use them if they do, giving them back to the
page allocator instead.
The first patch is kind of along for the ride, except that maintaining an
available_count for a CMA area is convenient for the multiple range
support.
This patch (of 27):
In addition to the number of allocations and releases, system management
software may like to be aware of the size of CMA areas, and how many pages
are available in it. This information is currently not available, so
export it in total_page and available_pages, respectively.
The name 'available_pages' was picked over 'free_pages' because 'free'
implies that the pages are unused. But they might not be, they just
haven't been used by cma_alloc
The number of available pages is tracked regardless of CONFIG_CMA_SYSFS,
allowing for a few minor shortcuts in the code, avoiding bitmap
operations.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20250228182928.2645936-2-fvdl@google.com
Signed-off-by: Frank van der Linden <fvdl@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: Joao Martins <joao.m.martins@oracle.com>
Cc: Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev>
Cc: Roman Gushchin (Cruise) <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>
Cc: Usama Arif <usamaarif642@gmail.com>
Cc: Yu Zhao <yuzhao@google.com>
Cc: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
Cc: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2025-02-28 18:29:02 +00:00
|
|
|
cma->available_count += count;
|
2021-05-05 01:34:44 +00:00
|
|
|
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&cma->lock, flags);
|
2014-08-06 23:05:25 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2025-02-28 18:29:24 +00:00
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* Check if a CMA area contains no ranges that intersect with
|
|
|
|
* multiple zones. Store the result in the flags in case
|
|
|
|
* this gets called more than once.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
bool cma_validate_zones(struct cma *cma)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
int r;
|
|
|
|
unsigned long base_pfn;
|
|
|
|
struct cma_memrange *cmr;
|
|
|
|
bool valid_bit_set;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* If already validated, return result of previous check.
|
|
|
|
* Either the valid or invalid bit will be set if this
|
|
|
|
* check has already been done. If neither is set, the
|
|
|
|
* check has not been performed yet.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
valid_bit_set = test_bit(CMA_ZONES_VALID, &cma->flags);
|
|
|
|
if (valid_bit_set || test_bit(CMA_ZONES_INVALID, &cma->flags))
|
|
|
|
return valid_bit_set;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for (r = 0; r < cma->nranges; r++) {
|
|
|
|
cmr = &cma->ranges[r];
|
|
|
|
base_pfn = cmr->base_pfn;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* alloc_contig_range() requires the pfn range specified
|
|
|
|
* to be in the same zone. Simplify by forcing the entire
|
|
|
|
* CMA resv range to be in the same zone.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
WARN_ON_ONCE(!pfn_valid(base_pfn));
|
|
|
|
if (pfn_range_intersects_zones(cma->nid, base_pfn, cmr->count)) {
|
|
|
|
set_bit(CMA_ZONES_INVALID, &cma->flags);
|
|
|
|
return false;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
set_bit(CMA_ZONES_VALID, &cma->flags);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return true;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2020-08-12 01:32:03 +00:00
|
|
|
static void __init cma_activate_area(struct cma *cma)
|
2014-08-06 23:05:25 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
2025-05-09 08:35:28 +00:00
|
|
|
unsigned long pfn, end_pfn, early_pfn[CMA_MAX_RANGES];
|
mm, cma: support multiple contiguous ranges, if requested
Currently, CMA manages one range of physically contiguous memory.
Creation of larger CMA areas with hugetlb_cma may run in to gaps in
physical memory, so that they are not able to allocate that contiguous
physical range from memblock when creating the CMA area.
This can happen, for example, on an AMD system with > 1TB of memory, where
there will be a gap just below the 1TB (40bit DMA) line. If you have set
aside most of memory for potential hugetlb CMA allocation,
cma_declare_contiguous_nid will fail.
hugetlb_cma doesn't need the entire area to be one physically contiguous
range. It just cares about being able to get physically contiguous chunks
of a certain size (e.g. 1G), and it is fine to have the CMA area backed
by multiple physical ranges, as long as it gets 1G contiguous allocations.
Multi-range support is implemented by introducing an array of ranges,
instead of just one big one. Each range has its own bitmap. Effectively,
the allocate and release operations work as before, just per-range. So,
instead of going through one large bitmap, they now go through a number of
smaller ones.
The maximum number of supported ranges is 8, as defined in CMA_MAX_RANGES.
Since some current users of CMA expect a CMA area to just use one
physically contiguous range, only allow for multiple ranges if a new
interface, cma_declare_contiguous_nid_multi, is used. The other
interfaces will work like before, creating only CMA areas with 1 range.
cma_declare_contiguous_nid_multi works as follows, mimicking the
default "bottom-up, above 4G" reservation approach:
0) Try cma_declare_contiguous_nid, which will use only one
region. If this succeeds, return. This makes sure that for
all the cases that currently work, the behavior remains
unchanged even if the caller switches from
cma_declare_contiguous_nid to cma_declare_contiguous_nid_multi.
1) Select the largest free memblock ranges above 4G, with
a maximum number of CMA_MAX_RANGES.
2) If we did not find at most CMA_MAX_RANGES that add
up to the total size requested, return -ENOMEM.
3) Sort the selected ranges by base address.
4) Reserve them bottom-up until we get what we wanted.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20250228182928.2645936-3-fvdl@google.com
Signed-off-by: Frank van der Linden <fvdl@google.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Cc: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Joao Martins <joao.m.martins@oracle.com>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev>
Cc: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Roman Gushchin (Cruise) <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>
Cc: Usama Arif <usamaarif642@gmail.com>
Cc: Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Yu Zhao <yuzhao@google.com>
Cc: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2025-02-28 18:29:03 +00:00
|
|
|
int allocrange, r;
|
|
|
|
struct cma_memrange *cmr;
|
2025-02-28 18:29:25 +00:00
|
|
|
unsigned long bitmap_count, count;
|
mm, cma: support multiple contiguous ranges, if requested
Currently, CMA manages one range of physically contiguous memory.
Creation of larger CMA areas with hugetlb_cma may run in to gaps in
physical memory, so that they are not able to allocate that contiguous
physical range from memblock when creating the CMA area.
This can happen, for example, on an AMD system with > 1TB of memory, where
there will be a gap just below the 1TB (40bit DMA) line. If you have set
aside most of memory for potential hugetlb CMA allocation,
cma_declare_contiguous_nid will fail.
hugetlb_cma doesn't need the entire area to be one physically contiguous
range. It just cares about being able to get physically contiguous chunks
of a certain size (e.g. 1G), and it is fine to have the CMA area backed
by multiple physical ranges, as long as it gets 1G contiguous allocations.
Multi-range support is implemented by introducing an array of ranges,
instead of just one big one. Each range has its own bitmap. Effectively,
the allocate and release operations work as before, just per-range. So,
instead of going through one large bitmap, they now go through a number of
smaller ones.
The maximum number of supported ranges is 8, as defined in CMA_MAX_RANGES.
Since some current users of CMA expect a CMA area to just use one
physically contiguous range, only allow for multiple ranges if a new
interface, cma_declare_contiguous_nid_multi, is used. The other
interfaces will work like before, creating only CMA areas with 1 range.
cma_declare_contiguous_nid_multi works as follows, mimicking the
default "bottom-up, above 4G" reservation approach:
0) Try cma_declare_contiguous_nid, which will use only one
region. If this succeeds, return. This makes sure that for
all the cases that currently work, the behavior remains
unchanged even if the caller switches from
cma_declare_contiguous_nid to cma_declare_contiguous_nid_multi.
1) Select the largest free memblock ranges above 4G, with
a maximum number of CMA_MAX_RANGES.
2) If we did not find at most CMA_MAX_RANGES that add
up to the total size requested, return -ENOMEM.
3) Sort the selected ranges by base address.
4) Reserve them bottom-up until we get what we wanted.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20250228182928.2645936-3-fvdl@google.com
Signed-off-by: Frank van der Linden <fvdl@google.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Cc: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Joao Martins <joao.m.martins@oracle.com>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev>
Cc: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Roman Gushchin (Cruise) <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>
Cc: Usama Arif <usamaarif642@gmail.com>
Cc: Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Yu Zhao <yuzhao@google.com>
Cc: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2025-02-28 18:29:03 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for (allocrange = 0; allocrange < cma->nranges; allocrange++) {
|
|
|
|
cmr = &cma->ranges[allocrange];
|
2025-05-09 08:35:28 +00:00
|
|
|
early_pfn[allocrange] = cmr->early_pfn;
|
mm, cma: support multiple contiguous ranges, if requested
Currently, CMA manages one range of physically contiguous memory.
Creation of larger CMA areas with hugetlb_cma may run in to gaps in
physical memory, so that they are not able to allocate that contiguous
physical range from memblock when creating the CMA area.
This can happen, for example, on an AMD system with > 1TB of memory, where
there will be a gap just below the 1TB (40bit DMA) line. If you have set
aside most of memory for potential hugetlb CMA allocation,
cma_declare_contiguous_nid will fail.
hugetlb_cma doesn't need the entire area to be one physically contiguous
range. It just cares about being able to get physically contiguous chunks
of a certain size (e.g. 1G), and it is fine to have the CMA area backed
by multiple physical ranges, as long as it gets 1G contiguous allocations.
Multi-range support is implemented by introducing an array of ranges,
instead of just one big one. Each range has its own bitmap. Effectively,
the allocate and release operations work as before, just per-range. So,
instead of going through one large bitmap, they now go through a number of
smaller ones.
The maximum number of supported ranges is 8, as defined in CMA_MAX_RANGES.
Since some current users of CMA expect a CMA area to just use one
physically contiguous range, only allow for multiple ranges if a new
interface, cma_declare_contiguous_nid_multi, is used. The other
interfaces will work like before, creating only CMA areas with 1 range.
cma_declare_contiguous_nid_multi works as follows, mimicking the
default "bottom-up, above 4G" reservation approach:
0) Try cma_declare_contiguous_nid, which will use only one
region. If this succeeds, return. This makes sure that for
all the cases that currently work, the behavior remains
unchanged even if the caller switches from
cma_declare_contiguous_nid to cma_declare_contiguous_nid_multi.
1) Select the largest free memblock ranges above 4G, with
a maximum number of CMA_MAX_RANGES.
2) If we did not find at most CMA_MAX_RANGES that add
up to the total size requested, return -ENOMEM.
3) Sort the selected ranges by base address.
4) Reserve them bottom-up until we get what we wanted.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20250228182928.2645936-3-fvdl@google.com
Signed-off-by: Frank van der Linden <fvdl@google.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Cc: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Joao Martins <joao.m.martins@oracle.com>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev>
Cc: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Roman Gushchin (Cruise) <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>
Cc: Usama Arif <usamaarif642@gmail.com>
Cc: Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Yu Zhao <yuzhao@google.com>
Cc: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2025-02-28 18:29:03 +00:00
|
|
|
cmr->bitmap = bitmap_zalloc(cma_bitmap_maxno(cma, cmr),
|
|
|
|
GFP_KERNEL);
|
|
|
|
if (!cmr->bitmap)
|
|
|
|
goto cleanup;
|
|
|
|
}
|
2014-08-06 23:05:25 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2025-02-28 18:29:24 +00:00
|
|
|
if (!cma_validate_zones(cma))
|
|
|
|
goto cleanup;
|
|
|
|
|
mm, cma: support multiple contiguous ranges, if requested
Currently, CMA manages one range of physically contiguous memory.
Creation of larger CMA areas with hugetlb_cma may run in to gaps in
physical memory, so that they are not able to allocate that contiguous
physical range from memblock when creating the CMA area.
This can happen, for example, on an AMD system with > 1TB of memory, where
there will be a gap just below the 1TB (40bit DMA) line. If you have set
aside most of memory for potential hugetlb CMA allocation,
cma_declare_contiguous_nid will fail.
hugetlb_cma doesn't need the entire area to be one physically contiguous
range. It just cares about being able to get physically contiguous chunks
of a certain size (e.g. 1G), and it is fine to have the CMA area backed
by multiple physical ranges, as long as it gets 1G contiguous allocations.
Multi-range support is implemented by introducing an array of ranges,
instead of just one big one. Each range has its own bitmap. Effectively,
the allocate and release operations work as before, just per-range. So,
instead of going through one large bitmap, they now go through a number of
smaller ones.
The maximum number of supported ranges is 8, as defined in CMA_MAX_RANGES.
Since some current users of CMA expect a CMA area to just use one
physically contiguous range, only allow for multiple ranges if a new
interface, cma_declare_contiguous_nid_multi, is used. The other
interfaces will work like before, creating only CMA areas with 1 range.
cma_declare_contiguous_nid_multi works as follows, mimicking the
default "bottom-up, above 4G" reservation approach:
0) Try cma_declare_contiguous_nid, which will use only one
region. If this succeeds, return. This makes sure that for
all the cases that currently work, the behavior remains
unchanged even if the caller switches from
cma_declare_contiguous_nid to cma_declare_contiguous_nid_multi.
1) Select the largest free memblock ranges above 4G, with
a maximum number of CMA_MAX_RANGES.
2) If we did not find at most CMA_MAX_RANGES that add
up to the total size requested, return -ENOMEM.
3) Sort the selected ranges by base address.
4) Reserve them bottom-up until we get what we wanted.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20250228182928.2645936-3-fvdl@google.com
Signed-off-by: Frank van der Linden <fvdl@google.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Cc: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Joao Martins <joao.m.martins@oracle.com>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev>
Cc: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Roman Gushchin (Cruise) <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>
Cc: Usama Arif <usamaarif642@gmail.com>
Cc: Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Yu Zhao <yuzhao@google.com>
Cc: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2025-02-28 18:29:03 +00:00
|
|
|
for (r = 0; r < cma->nranges; r++) {
|
|
|
|
cmr = &cma->ranges[r];
|
2025-05-09 08:35:28 +00:00
|
|
|
if (early_pfn[r] != cmr->base_pfn) {
|
|
|
|
count = early_pfn[r] - cmr->base_pfn;
|
2025-02-28 18:29:25 +00:00
|
|
|
bitmap_count = cma_bitmap_pages_to_bits(cma, count);
|
|
|
|
bitmap_set(cmr->bitmap, 0, bitmap_count);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2025-05-09 08:35:28 +00:00
|
|
|
for (pfn = early_pfn[r]; pfn < cmr->base_pfn + cmr->count;
|
mm, cma: support multiple contiguous ranges, if requested
Currently, CMA manages one range of physically contiguous memory.
Creation of larger CMA areas with hugetlb_cma may run in to gaps in
physical memory, so that they are not able to allocate that contiguous
physical range from memblock when creating the CMA area.
This can happen, for example, on an AMD system with > 1TB of memory, where
there will be a gap just below the 1TB (40bit DMA) line. If you have set
aside most of memory for potential hugetlb CMA allocation,
cma_declare_contiguous_nid will fail.
hugetlb_cma doesn't need the entire area to be one physically contiguous
range. It just cares about being able to get physically contiguous chunks
of a certain size (e.g. 1G), and it is fine to have the CMA area backed
by multiple physical ranges, as long as it gets 1G contiguous allocations.
Multi-range support is implemented by introducing an array of ranges,
instead of just one big one. Each range has its own bitmap. Effectively,
the allocate and release operations work as before, just per-range. So,
instead of going through one large bitmap, they now go through a number of
smaller ones.
The maximum number of supported ranges is 8, as defined in CMA_MAX_RANGES.
Since some current users of CMA expect a CMA area to just use one
physically contiguous range, only allow for multiple ranges if a new
interface, cma_declare_contiguous_nid_multi, is used. The other
interfaces will work like before, creating only CMA areas with 1 range.
cma_declare_contiguous_nid_multi works as follows, mimicking the
default "bottom-up, above 4G" reservation approach:
0) Try cma_declare_contiguous_nid, which will use only one
region. If this succeeds, return. This makes sure that for
all the cases that currently work, the behavior remains
unchanged even if the caller switches from
cma_declare_contiguous_nid to cma_declare_contiguous_nid_multi.
1) Select the largest free memblock ranges above 4G, with
a maximum number of CMA_MAX_RANGES.
2) If we did not find at most CMA_MAX_RANGES that add
up to the total size requested, return -ENOMEM.
3) Sort the selected ranges by base address.
4) Reserve them bottom-up until we get what we wanted.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20250228182928.2645936-3-fvdl@google.com
Signed-off-by: Frank van der Linden <fvdl@google.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Cc: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Joao Martins <joao.m.martins@oracle.com>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev>
Cc: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Roman Gushchin (Cruise) <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>
Cc: Usama Arif <usamaarif642@gmail.com>
Cc: Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Yu Zhao <yuzhao@google.com>
Cc: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2025-02-28 18:29:03 +00:00
|
|
|
pfn += pageblock_nr_pages)
|
|
|
|
init_cma_reserved_pageblock(pfn_to_page(pfn));
|
|
|
|
}
|
2014-08-06 23:05:25 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2021-05-05 01:34:44 +00:00
|
|
|
spin_lock_init(&cma->lock);
|
2015-04-14 22:44:59 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2025-02-10 01:56:06 +00:00
|
|
|
mutex_init(&cma->alloc_mutex);
|
|
|
|
|
2015-04-14 22:44:59 +00:00
|
|
|
#ifdef CONFIG_CMA_DEBUGFS
|
|
|
|
INIT_HLIST_HEAD(&cma->mem_head);
|
|
|
|
spin_lock_init(&cma->mem_head_lock);
|
|
|
|
#endif
|
2025-02-28 18:29:25 +00:00
|
|
|
set_bit(CMA_ACTIVATED, &cma->flags);
|
2015-04-14 22:44:59 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2020-08-12 01:32:03 +00:00
|
|
|
return;
|
2014-08-06 23:05:25 +00:00
|
|
|
|
mm, cma: support multiple contiguous ranges, if requested
Currently, CMA manages one range of physically contiguous memory.
Creation of larger CMA areas with hugetlb_cma may run in to gaps in
physical memory, so that they are not able to allocate that contiguous
physical range from memblock when creating the CMA area.
This can happen, for example, on an AMD system with > 1TB of memory, where
there will be a gap just below the 1TB (40bit DMA) line. If you have set
aside most of memory for potential hugetlb CMA allocation,
cma_declare_contiguous_nid will fail.
hugetlb_cma doesn't need the entire area to be one physically contiguous
range. It just cares about being able to get physically contiguous chunks
of a certain size (e.g. 1G), and it is fine to have the CMA area backed
by multiple physical ranges, as long as it gets 1G contiguous allocations.
Multi-range support is implemented by introducing an array of ranges,
instead of just one big one. Each range has its own bitmap. Effectively,
the allocate and release operations work as before, just per-range. So,
instead of going through one large bitmap, they now go through a number of
smaller ones.
The maximum number of supported ranges is 8, as defined in CMA_MAX_RANGES.
Since some current users of CMA expect a CMA area to just use one
physically contiguous range, only allow for multiple ranges if a new
interface, cma_declare_contiguous_nid_multi, is used. The other
interfaces will work like before, creating only CMA areas with 1 range.
cma_declare_contiguous_nid_multi works as follows, mimicking the
default "bottom-up, above 4G" reservation approach:
0) Try cma_declare_contiguous_nid, which will use only one
region. If this succeeds, return. This makes sure that for
all the cases that currently work, the behavior remains
unchanged even if the caller switches from
cma_declare_contiguous_nid to cma_declare_contiguous_nid_multi.
1) Select the largest free memblock ranges above 4G, with
a maximum number of CMA_MAX_RANGES.
2) If we did not find at most CMA_MAX_RANGES that add
up to the total size requested, return -ENOMEM.
3) Sort the selected ranges by base address.
4) Reserve them bottom-up until we get what we wanted.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20250228182928.2645936-3-fvdl@google.com
Signed-off-by: Frank van der Linden <fvdl@google.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Cc: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Joao Martins <joao.m.martins@oracle.com>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev>
Cc: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Roman Gushchin (Cruise) <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>
Cc: Usama Arif <usamaarif642@gmail.com>
Cc: Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Yu Zhao <yuzhao@google.com>
Cc: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2025-02-28 18:29:03 +00:00
|
|
|
cleanup:
|
|
|
|
for (r = 0; r < allocrange; r++)
|
|
|
|
bitmap_free(cma->ranges[r].bitmap);
|
|
|
|
|
2021-02-26 01:16:37 +00:00
|
|
|
/* Expose all pages to the buddy, they are useless for CMA. */
|
2025-02-28 18:29:24 +00:00
|
|
|
if (!test_bit(CMA_RESERVE_PAGES_ON_ERROR, &cma->flags)) {
|
mm, cma: support multiple contiguous ranges, if requested
Currently, CMA manages one range of physically contiguous memory.
Creation of larger CMA areas with hugetlb_cma may run in to gaps in
physical memory, so that they are not able to allocate that contiguous
physical range from memblock when creating the CMA area.
This can happen, for example, on an AMD system with > 1TB of memory, where
there will be a gap just below the 1TB (40bit DMA) line. If you have set
aside most of memory for potential hugetlb CMA allocation,
cma_declare_contiguous_nid will fail.
hugetlb_cma doesn't need the entire area to be one physically contiguous
range. It just cares about being able to get physically contiguous chunks
of a certain size (e.g. 1G), and it is fine to have the CMA area backed
by multiple physical ranges, as long as it gets 1G contiguous allocations.
Multi-range support is implemented by introducing an array of ranges,
instead of just one big one. Each range has its own bitmap. Effectively,
the allocate and release operations work as before, just per-range. So,
instead of going through one large bitmap, they now go through a number of
smaller ones.
The maximum number of supported ranges is 8, as defined in CMA_MAX_RANGES.
Since some current users of CMA expect a CMA area to just use one
physically contiguous range, only allow for multiple ranges if a new
interface, cma_declare_contiguous_nid_multi, is used. The other
interfaces will work like before, creating only CMA areas with 1 range.
cma_declare_contiguous_nid_multi works as follows, mimicking the
default "bottom-up, above 4G" reservation approach:
0) Try cma_declare_contiguous_nid, which will use only one
region. If this succeeds, return. This makes sure that for
all the cases that currently work, the behavior remains
unchanged even if the caller switches from
cma_declare_contiguous_nid to cma_declare_contiguous_nid_multi.
1) Select the largest free memblock ranges above 4G, with
a maximum number of CMA_MAX_RANGES.
2) If we did not find at most CMA_MAX_RANGES that add
up to the total size requested, return -ENOMEM.
3) Sort the selected ranges by base address.
4) Reserve them bottom-up until we get what we wanted.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20250228182928.2645936-3-fvdl@google.com
Signed-off-by: Frank van der Linden <fvdl@google.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Cc: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Joao Martins <joao.m.martins@oracle.com>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev>
Cc: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Roman Gushchin (Cruise) <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>
Cc: Usama Arif <usamaarif642@gmail.com>
Cc: Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Yu Zhao <yuzhao@google.com>
Cc: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2025-02-28 18:29:03 +00:00
|
|
|
for (r = 0; r < allocrange; r++) {
|
|
|
|
cmr = &cma->ranges[r];
|
2025-02-28 18:29:25 +00:00
|
|
|
end_pfn = cmr->base_pfn + cmr->count;
|
2025-05-09 08:35:28 +00:00
|
|
|
for (pfn = early_pfn[r]; pfn < end_pfn; pfn++)
|
mm, cma: support multiple contiguous ranges, if requested
Currently, CMA manages one range of physically contiguous memory.
Creation of larger CMA areas with hugetlb_cma may run in to gaps in
physical memory, so that they are not able to allocate that contiguous
physical range from memblock when creating the CMA area.
This can happen, for example, on an AMD system with > 1TB of memory, where
there will be a gap just below the 1TB (40bit DMA) line. If you have set
aside most of memory for potential hugetlb CMA allocation,
cma_declare_contiguous_nid will fail.
hugetlb_cma doesn't need the entire area to be one physically contiguous
range. It just cares about being able to get physically contiguous chunks
of a certain size (e.g. 1G), and it is fine to have the CMA area backed
by multiple physical ranges, as long as it gets 1G contiguous allocations.
Multi-range support is implemented by introducing an array of ranges,
instead of just one big one. Each range has its own bitmap. Effectively,
the allocate and release operations work as before, just per-range. So,
instead of going through one large bitmap, they now go through a number of
smaller ones.
The maximum number of supported ranges is 8, as defined in CMA_MAX_RANGES.
Since some current users of CMA expect a CMA area to just use one
physically contiguous range, only allow for multiple ranges if a new
interface, cma_declare_contiguous_nid_multi, is used. The other
interfaces will work like before, creating only CMA areas with 1 range.
cma_declare_contiguous_nid_multi works as follows, mimicking the
default "bottom-up, above 4G" reservation approach:
0) Try cma_declare_contiguous_nid, which will use only one
region. If this succeeds, return. This makes sure that for
all the cases that currently work, the behavior remains
unchanged even if the caller switches from
cma_declare_contiguous_nid to cma_declare_contiguous_nid_multi.
1) Select the largest free memblock ranges above 4G, with
a maximum number of CMA_MAX_RANGES.
2) If we did not find at most CMA_MAX_RANGES that add
up to the total size requested, return -ENOMEM.
3) Sort the selected ranges by base address.
4) Reserve them bottom-up until we get what we wanted.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20250228182928.2645936-3-fvdl@google.com
Signed-off-by: Frank van der Linden <fvdl@google.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Cc: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Joao Martins <joao.m.martins@oracle.com>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev>
Cc: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Roman Gushchin (Cruise) <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>
Cc: Usama Arif <usamaarif642@gmail.com>
Cc: Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Yu Zhao <yuzhao@google.com>
Cc: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2025-02-28 18:29:03 +00:00
|
|
|
free_reserved_page(pfn_to_page(pfn));
|
|
|
|
}
|
2022-03-22 21:46:14 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
2021-02-26 01:16:37 +00:00
|
|
|
totalcma_pages -= cma->count;
|
mm/cma: export total and free number of pages for CMA areas
Patch series "hugetlb/CMA improvements for large systems", v5.
On large systems, we observed some issues with hugetlb and CMA:
1) When specifying a large number of hugetlb boot pages (hugepages= on
the commandline), the kernel may run out of memory before it even gets
to HVO. For example, if you have a 3072G system, and want to use 3024
1G hugetlb pages for VMs, that should leave you plenty of space for the
hypervisor, provided you have the hugetlb vmemmap optimization (HVO)
enabled. However, since the vmemmap pages are always allocated first,
and then later in boot freed, you will actually run yourself out of
memory before you can do HVO. This means not getting all the hugetlb
pages you want, and worse, failure to boot if there is an allocation
failure in the system from which it can't recover.
2) There is a system setup where you might want to use hugetlb_cma with
a large value (say, again, 3024 out of 3072G like above), and then
lower that if system usage allows it, to make room for non-hugetlb
processes. For this, a variation of the problem above applies: the
kernel runs out of unmovable space to allocate from before you finish
boot, since your CMA area takes up all the space.
3) CMA wants to use one big contiguous area for allocations. Which
fails if you have the aforementioned 3T system with a gap in the middle
of physical memory (like the < 40bits BIOS DMA area seen on some AMD
systems). You then won't be able to set up a CMA area for one of the
NUMA nodes, leading to loss of half of your hugetlb CMA area.
4) Under the scenario mentioned in 2), when trying to grow the number
of hugetlb pages after dropping it for a while, new CMA allocations may
fail occasionally. This is not unexpected, some transient references
on pages may prevent cma_alloc from succeeding under memory pressure.
However, the hugetlb code then falls back to a normal contiguous alloc,
which may end up succeeding. This is not always desired behavior. If
you have a large CMA area, then the kernel has a restricted amount of
memory it can do unmovable allocations from (a well known issue). A
normal contiguous alloc may eat further in to this space.
To resolve these issues, do the following:
* Add hooks to the section init code to do custom initialization of
memmap pages. Hugetlb bootmem (memblock) allocated pages can then be
pre-HVOed. This avoids allocating a large number of vmemmap pages early
in boot, only to have them be freed again later, and also avoids running
out of memory as described under 1). Using these hooks for hugetlb is
optional. It requires moving hugetlb bootmem allocation to an earlier
spot by the architecture. This has been enabled on x86.
* hugetlb_cma doesn't care about the CMA area it uses being one large
contiguous range. Multiple smaller ranges are fine. The only
requirements are that the areas should be on one NUMA node, and
individual gigantic pages should be allocatable from them. So,
implement multi-range support for CMA, avoiding issue 3).
* Introduce a hugetlb_cma_only option on the commandline. This only
allows allocations from CMA for gigantic pages, if hugetlb_cma= is also
specified.
* With hugetlb_cma_only active, it also makes sense to be able to
pre-allocate gigantic hugetlb pages at boot time from the CMA area(s).
Add a rudimentary early CMA allocation interface, that just grabs a
piece of memblock-allocated space from the CMA area, which gets marked
as allocated in the CMA bitmap when the CMA area is initialized. With
this, hugepages= can be supported with hugetlb_cma=, making scenario 2)
work.
Additionally, fix some minor bugs, with one worth mentioning: since
hugetlb gigantic bootmem pages are allocated by memblock, they may span
multiple zones, as memblock doesn't (and mostly can't) know about zones.
This can cause problems. A hugetlb page spanning multiple zones is bad,
and it's worse with HVO, when the de-HVO step effectively sneakily
re-assigns pages to a different zone than originally configured, since the
tail pages all inherit the zone from the first 60 tail pages. This
condition is not common, but can be easily reproduced using ZONE_MOVABLE.
To fix this, add checks to see if gigantic bootmem pages intersect with
multiple zones, and do not use them if they do, giving them back to the
page allocator instead.
The first patch is kind of along for the ride, except that maintaining an
available_count for a CMA area is convenient for the multiple range
support.
This patch (of 27):
In addition to the number of allocations and releases, system management
software may like to be aware of the size of CMA areas, and how many pages
are available in it. This information is currently not available, so
export it in total_page and available_pages, respectively.
The name 'available_pages' was picked over 'free_pages' because 'free'
implies that the pages are unused. But they might not be, they just
haven't been used by cma_alloc
The number of available pages is tracked regardless of CONFIG_CMA_SYSFS,
allowing for a few minor shortcuts in the code, avoiding bitmap
operations.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20250228182928.2645936-2-fvdl@google.com
Signed-off-by: Frank van der Linden <fvdl@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: Joao Martins <joao.m.martins@oracle.com>
Cc: Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev>
Cc: Roman Gushchin (Cruise) <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>
Cc: Usama Arif <usamaarif642@gmail.com>
Cc: Yu Zhao <yuzhao@google.com>
Cc: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
Cc: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2025-02-28 18:29:02 +00:00
|
|
|
cma->available_count = cma->count = 0;
|
2020-08-12 01:32:03 +00:00
|
|
|
pr_err("CMA area %s could not be activated\n", cma->name);
|
2014-08-06 23:05:25 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static int __init cma_init_reserved_areas(void)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
int i;
|
|
|
|
|
2020-08-12 01:32:03 +00:00
|
|
|
for (i = 0; i < cma_area_count; i++)
|
|
|
|
cma_activate_area(&cma_areas[i]);
|
2014-08-06 23:05:25 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return 0;
|
|
|
|
}
|
2018-05-23 01:18:21 +00:00
|
|
|
core_initcall(cma_init_reserved_areas);
|
2014-08-06 23:05:25 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2022-03-22 21:46:14 +00:00
|
|
|
void __init cma_reserve_pages_on_error(struct cma *cma)
|
|
|
|
{
|
2025-02-28 18:29:24 +00:00
|
|
|
set_bit(CMA_RESERVE_PAGES_ON_ERROR, &cma->flags);
|
2022-03-22 21:46:14 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
mm, cma: support multiple contiguous ranges, if requested
Currently, CMA manages one range of physically contiguous memory.
Creation of larger CMA areas with hugetlb_cma may run in to gaps in
physical memory, so that they are not able to allocate that contiguous
physical range from memblock when creating the CMA area.
This can happen, for example, on an AMD system with > 1TB of memory, where
there will be a gap just below the 1TB (40bit DMA) line. If you have set
aside most of memory for potential hugetlb CMA allocation,
cma_declare_contiguous_nid will fail.
hugetlb_cma doesn't need the entire area to be one physically contiguous
range. It just cares about being able to get physically contiguous chunks
of a certain size (e.g. 1G), and it is fine to have the CMA area backed
by multiple physical ranges, as long as it gets 1G contiguous allocations.
Multi-range support is implemented by introducing an array of ranges,
instead of just one big one. Each range has its own bitmap. Effectively,
the allocate and release operations work as before, just per-range. So,
instead of going through one large bitmap, they now go through a number of
smaller ones.
The maximum number of supported ranges is 8, as defined in CMA_MAX_RANGES.
Since some current users of CMA expect a CMA area to just use one
physically contiguous range, only allow for multiple ranges if a new
interface, cma_declare_contiguous_nid_multi, is used. The other
interfaces will work like before, creating only CMA areas with 1 range.
cma_declare_contiguous_nid_multi works as follows, mimicking the
default "bottom-up, above 4G" reservation approach:
0) Try cma_declare_contiguous_nid, which will use only one
region. If this succeeds, return. This makes sure that for
all the cases that currently work, the behavior remains
unchanged even if the caller switches from
cma_declare_contiguous_nid to cma_declare_contiguous_nid_multi.
1) Select the largest free memblock ranges above 4G, with
a maximum number of CMA_MAX_RANGES.
2) If we did not find at most CMA_MAX_RANGES that add
up to the total size requested, return -ENOMEM.
3) Sort the selected ranges by base address.
4) Reserve them bottom-up until we get what we wanted.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20250228182928.2645936-3-fvdl@google.com
Signed-off-by: Frank van der Linden <fvdl@google.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Cc: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Joao Martins <joao.m.martins@oracle.com>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev>
Cc: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Roman Gushchin (Cruise) <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>
Cc: Usama Arif <usamaarif642@gmail.com>
Cc: Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Yu Zhao <yuzhao@google.com>
Cc: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2025-02-28 18:29:03 +00:00
|
|
|
static int __init cma_new_area(const char *name, phys_addr_t size,
|
|
|
|
unsigned int order_per_bit,
|
|
|
|
struct cma **res_cma)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
struct cma *cma;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (cma_area_count == ARRAY_SIZE(cma_areas)) {
|
|
|
|
pr_err("Not enough slots for CMA reserved regions!\n");
|
|
|
|
return -ENOSPC;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* Each reserved area must be initialised later, when more kernel
|
|
|
|
* subsystems (like slab allocator) are available.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
cma = &cma_areas[cma_area_count];
|
|
|
|
cma_area_count++;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (name)
|
|
|
|
snprintf(cma->name, CMA_MAX_NAME, "%s", name);
|
|
|
|
else
|
|
|
|
snprintf(cma->name, CMA_MAX_NAME, "cma%d\n", cma_area_count);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
cma->available_count = cma->count = size >> PAGE_SHIFT;
|
|
|
|
cma->order_per_bit = order_per_bit;
|
|
|
|
*res_cma = cma;
|
|
|
|
totalcma_pages += cma->count;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return 0;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static void __init cma_drop_area(struct cma *cma)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
totalcma_pages -= cma->count;
|
|
|
|
cma_area_count--;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2014-10-13 22:51:09 +00:00
|
|
|
/**
|
|
|
|
* cma_init_reserved_mem() - create custom contiguous area from reserved memory
|
|
|
|
* @base: Base address of the reserved area
|
|
|
|
* @size: Size of the reserved area (in bytes),
|
|
|
|
* @order_per_bit: Order of pages represented by one bit on bitmap.
|
2018-04-05 23:24:57 +00:00
|
|
|
* @name: The name of the area. If this parameter is NULL, the name of
|
|
|
|
* the area will be set to "cmaN", where N is a running counter of
|
|
|
|
* used areas.
|
2014-10-13 22:51:09 +00:00
|
|
|
* @res_cma: Pointer to store the created cma region.
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* This function creates custom contiguous area from already reserved memory.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
int __init cma_init_reserved_mem(phys_addr_t base, phys_addr_t size,
|
2015-04-14 22:47:04 +00:00
|
|
|
unsigned int order_per_bit,
|
2017-04-18 18:27:03 +00:00
|
|
|
const char *name,
|
2015-04-14 22:47:04 +00:00
|
|
|
struct cma **res_cma)
|
2014-10-13 22:51:09 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
struct cma *cma;
|
mm, cma: support multiple contiguous ranges, if requested
Currently, CMA manages one range of physically contiguous memory.
Creation of larger CMA areas with hugetlb_cma may run in to gaps in
physical memory, so that they are not able to allocate that contiguous
physical range from memblock when creating the CMA area.
This can happen, for example, on an AMD system with > 1TB of memory, where
there will be a gap just below the 1TB (40bit DMA) line. If you have set
aside most of memory for potential hugetlb CMA allocation,
cma_declare_contiguous_nid will fail.
hugetlb_cma doesn't need the entire area to be one physically contiguous
range. It just cares about being able to get physically contiguous chunks
of a certain size (e.g. 1G), and it is fine to have the CMA area backed
by multiple physical ranges, as long as it gets 1G contiguous allocations.
Multi-range support is implemented by introducing an array of ranges,
instead of just one big one. Each range has its own bitmap. Effectively,
the allocate and release operations work as before, just per-range. So,
instead of going through one large bitmap, they now go through a number of
smaller ones.
The maximum number of supported ranges is 8, as defined in CMA_MAX_RANGES.
Since some current users of CMA expect a CMA area to just use one
physically contiguous range, only allow for multiple ranges if a new
interface, cma_declare_contiguous_nid_multi, is used. The other
interfaces will work like before, creating only CMA areas with 1 range.
cma_declare_contiguous_nid_multi works as follows, mimicking the
default "bottom-up, above 4G" reservation approach:
0) Try cma_declare_contiguous_nid, which will use only one
region. If this succeeds, return. This makes sure that for
all the cases that currently work, the behavior remains
unchanged even if the caller switches from
cma_declare_contiguous_nid to cma_declare_contiguous_nid_multi.
1) Select the largest free memblock ranges above 4G, with
a maximum number of CMA_MAX_RANGES.
2) If we did not find at most CMA_MAX_RANGES that add
up to the total size requested, return -ENOMEM.
3) Sort the selected ranges by base address.
4) Reserve them bottom-up until we get what we wanted.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20250228182928.2645936-3-fvdl@google.com
Signed-off-by: Frank van der Linden <fvdl@google.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Cc: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Joao Martins <joao.m.martins@oracle.com>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev>
Cc: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Roman Gushchin (Cruise) <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>
Cc: Usama Arif <usamaarif642@gmail.com>
Cc: Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Yu Zhao <yuzhao@google.com>
Cc: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2025-02-28 18:29:03 +00:00
|
|
|
int ret;
|
2014-10-13 22:51:09 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* Sanity checks */
|
|
|
|
if (!size || !memblock_is_region_reserved(base, size))
|
|
|
|
return -EINVAL;
|
|
|
|
|
2024-11-13 14:19:54 +00:00
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* CMA uses CMA_MIN_ALIGNMENT_BYTES as alignment requirement which
|
|
|
|
* needs pageblock_order to be initialized. Let's enforce it.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
if (!pageblock_order) {
|
|
|
|
pr_err("pageblock_order not yet initialized. Called during early boot?\n");
|
|
|
|
return -EINVAL;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2022-03-22 21:43:17 +00:00
|
|
|
/* ensure minimal alignment required by mm core */
|
|
|
|
if (!IS_ALIGNED(base | size, CMA_MIN_ALIGNMENT_BYTES))
|
2014-10-13 22:51:09 +00:00
|
|
|
return -EINVAL;
|
|
|
|
|
mm, cma: support multiple contiguous ranges, if requested
Currently, CMA manages one range of physically contiguous memory.
Creation of larger CMA areas with hugetlb_cma may run in to gaps in
physical memory, so that they are not able to allocate that contiguous
physical range from memblock when creating the CMA area.
This can happen, for example, on an AMD system with > 1TB of memory, where
there will be a gap just below the 1TB (40bit DMA) line. If you have set
aside most of memory for potential hugetlb CMA allocation,
cma_declare_contiguous_nid will fail.
hugetlb_cma doesn't need the entire area to be one physically contiguous
range. It just cares about being able to get physically contiguous chunks
of a certain size (e.g. 1G), and it is fine to have the CMA area backed
by multiple physical ranges, as long as it gets 1G contiguous allocations.
Multi-range support is implemented by introducing an array of ranges,
instead of just one big one. Each range has its own bitmap. Effectively,
the allocate and release operations work as before, just per-range. So,
instead of going through one large bitmap, they now go through a number of
smaller ones.
The maximum number of supported ranges is 8, as defined in CMA_MAX_RANGES.
Since some current users of CMA expect a CMA area to just use one
physically contiguous range, only allow for multiple ranges if a new
interface, cma_declare_contiguous_nid_multi, is used. The other
interfaces will work like before, creating only CMA areas with 1 range.
cma_declare_contiguous_nid_multi works as follows, mimicking the
default "bottom-up, above 4G" reservation approach:
0) Try cma_declare_contiguous_nid, which will use only one
region. If this succeeds, return. This makes sure that for
all the cases that currently work, the behavior remains
unchanged even if the caller switches from
cma_declare_contiguous_nid to cma_declare_contiguous_nid_multi.
1) Select the largest free memblock ranges above 4G, with
a maximum number of CMA_MAX_RANGES.
2) If we did not find at most CMA_MAX_RANGES that add
up to the total size requested, return -ENOMEM.
3) Sort the selected ranges by base address.
4) Reserve them bottom-up until we get what we wanted.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20250228182928.2645936-3-fvdl@google.com
Signed-off-by: Frank van der Linden <fvdl@google.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Cc: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Joao Martins <joao.m.martins@oracle.com>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev>
Cc: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Roman Gushchin (Cruise) <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>
Cc: Usama Arif <usamaarif642@gmail.com>
Cc: Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Yu Zhao <yuzhao@google.com>
Cc: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2025-02-28 18:29:03 +00:00
|
|
|
ret = cma_new_area(name, size, order_per_bit, &cma);
|
|
|
|
if (ret != 0)
|
|
|
|
return ret;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
cma->ranges[0].base_pfn = PFN_DOWN(base);
|
2025-02-28 18:29:25 +00:00
|
|
|
cma->ranges[0].early_pfn = PFN_DOWN(base);
|
mm, cma: support multiple contiguous ranges, if requested
Currently, CMA manages one range of physically contiguous memory.
Creation of larger CMA areas with hugetlb_cma may run in to gaps in
physical memory, so that they are not able to allocate that contiguous
physical range from memblock when creating the CMA area.
This can happen, for example, on an AMD system with > 1TB of memory, where
there will be a gap just below the 1TB (40bit DMA) line. If you have set
aside most of memory for potential hugetlb CMA allocation,
cma_declare_contiguous_nid will fail.
hugetlb_cma doesn't need the entire area to be one physically contiguous
range. It just cares about being able to get physically contiguous chunks
of a certain size (e.g. 1G), and it is fine to have the CMA area backed
by multiple physical ranges, as long as it gets 1G contiguous allocations.
Multi-range support is implemented by introducing an array of ranges,
instead of just one big one. Each range has its own bitmap. Effectively,
the allocate and release operations work as before, just per-range. So,
instead of going through one large bitmap, they now go through a number of
smaller ones.
The maximum number of supported ranges is 8, as defined in CMA_MAX_RANGES.
Since some current users of CMA expect a CMA area to just use one
physically contiguous range, only allow for multiple ranges if a new
interface, cma_declare_contiguous_nid_multi, is used. The other
interfaces will work like before, creating only CMA areas with 1 range.
cma_declare_contiguous_nid_multi works as follows, mimicking the
default "bottom-up, above 4G" reservation approach:
0) Try cma_declare_contiguous_nid, which will use only one
region. If this succeeds, return. This makes sure that for
all the cases that currently work, the behavior remains
unchanged even if the caller switches from
cma_declare_contiguous_nid to cma_declare_contiguous_nid_multi.
1) Select the largest free memblock ranges above 4G, with
a maximum number of CMA_MAX_RANGES.
2) If we did not find at most CMA_MAX_RANGES that add
up to the total size requested, return -ENOMEM.
3) Sort the selected ranges by base address.
4) Reserve them bottom-up until we get what we wanted.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20250228182928.2645936-3-fvdl@google.com
Signed-off-by: Frank van der Linden <fvdl@google.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Cc: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Joao Martins <joao.m.martins@oracle.com>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev>
Cc: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Roman Gushchin (Cruise) <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>
Cc: Usama Arif <usamaarif642@gmail.com>
Cc: Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Yu Zhao <yuzhao@google.com>
Cc: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2025-02-28 18:29:03 +00:00
|
|
|
cma->ranges[0].count = cma->count;
|
|
|
|
cma->nranges = 1;
|
2025-02-28 18:29:23 +00:00
|
|
|
cma->nid = NUMA_NO_NODE;
|
mm, cma: support multiple contiguous ranges, if requested
Currently, CMA manages one range of physically contiguous memory.
Creation of larger CMA areas with hugetlb_cma may run in to gaps in
physical memory, so that they are not able to allocate that contiguous
physical range from memblock when creating the CMA area.
This can happen, for example, on an AMD system with > 1TB of memory, where
there will be a gap just below the 1TB (40bit DMA) line. If you have set
aside most of memory for potential hugetlb CMA allocation,
cma_declare_contiguous_nid will fail.
hugetlb_cma doesn't need the entire area to be one physically contiguous
range. It just cares about being able to get physically contiguous chunks
of a certain size (e.g. 1G), and it is fine to have the CMA area backed
by multiple physical ranges, as long as it gets 1G contiguous allocations.
Multi-range support is implemented by introducing an array of ranges,
instead of just one big one. Each range has its own bitmap. Effectively,
the allocate and release operations work as before, just per-range. So,
instead of going through one large bitmap, they now go through a number of
smaller ones.
The maximum number of supported ranges is 8, as defined in CMA_MAX_RANGES.
Since some current users of CMA expect a CMA area to just use one
physically contiguous range, only allow for multiple ranges if a new
interface, cma_declare_contiguous_nid_multi, is used. The other
interfaces will work like before, creating only CMA areas with 1 range.
cma_declare_contiguous_nid_multi works as follows, mimicking the
default "bottom-up, above 4G" reservation approach:
0) Try cma_declare_contiguous_nid, which will use only one
region. If this succeeds, return. This makes sure that for
all the cases that currently work, the behavior remains
unchanged even if the caller switches from
cma_declare_contiguous_nid to cma_declare_contiguous_nid_multi.
1) Select the largest free memblock ranges above 4G, with
a maximum number of CMA_MAX_RANGES.
2) If we did not find at most CMA_MAX_RANGES that add
up to the total size requested, return -ENOMEM.
3) Sort the selected ranges by base address.
4) Reserve them bottom-up until we get what we wanted.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20250228182928.2645936-3-fvdl@google.com
Signed-off-by: Frank van der Linden <fvdl@google.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Cc: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Joao Martins <joao.m.martins@oracle.com>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev>
Cc: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Roman Gushchin (Cruise) <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>
Cc: Usama Arif <usamaarif642@gmail.com>
Cc: Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Yu Zhao <yuzhao@google.com>
Cc: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2025-02-28 18:29:03 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*res_cma = cma;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return 0;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* Structure used while walking physical memory ranges and finding out
|
|
|
|
* which one(s) to use for a CMA area.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
struct cma_init_memrange {
|
|
|
|
phys_addr_t base;
|
|
|
|
phys_addr_t size;
|
|
|
|
struct list_head list;
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* Work array used during CMA initialization.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
static struct cma_init_memrange memranges[CMA_MAX_RANGES] __initdata;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static bool __init revsizecmp(struct cma_init_memrange *mlp,
|
|
|
|
struct cma_init_memrange *mrp)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
return mlp->size > mrp->size;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static bool __init basecmp(struct cma_init_memrange *mlp,
|
|
|
|
struct cma_init_memrange *mrp)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
return mlp->base < mrp->base;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* Helper function to create sorted lists.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
static void __init list_insert_sorted(
|
|
|
|
struct list_head *ranges,
|
|
|
|
struct cma_init_memrange *mrp,
|
|
|
|
bool (*cmp)(struct cma_init_memrange *lh, struct cma_init_memrange *rh))
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
struct list_head *mp;
|
|
|
|
struct cma_init_memrange *mlp;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (list_empty(ranges))
|
|
|
|
list_add(&mrp->list, ranges);
|
|
|
|
else {
|
|
|
|
list_for_each(mp, ranges) {
|
|
|
|
mlp = list_entry(mp, struct cma_init_memrange, list);
|
|
|
|
if (cmp(mlp, mrp))
|
|
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
__list_add(&mrp->list, mlp->list.prev, &mlp->list);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* Create CMA areas with a total size of @total_size. A normal allocation
|
|
|
|
* for one area is tried first. If that fails, the biggest memblock
|
|
|
|
* ranges above 4G are selected, and allocated bottom up.
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* The complexity here is not great, but this function will only be
|
|
|
|
* called during boot, and the lists operated on have fewer than
|
|
|
|
* CMA_MAX_RANGES elements (default value: 8).
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
int __init cma_declare_contiguous_multi(phys_addr_t total_size,
|
|
|
|
phys_addr_t align, unsigned int order_per_bit,
|
|
|
|
const char *name, struct cma **res_cma, int nid)
|
|
|
|
{
|
2025-04-07 16:54:35 +00:00
|
|
|
phys_addr_t start = 0, end;
|
mm, cma: support multiple contiguous ranges, if requested
Currently, CMA manages one range of physically contiguous memory.
Creation of larger CMA areas with hugetlb_cma may run in to gaps in
physical memory, so that they are not able to allocate that contiguous
physical range from memblock when creating the CMA area.
This can happen, for example, on an AMD system with > 1TB of memory, where
there will be a gap just below the 1TB (40bit DMA) line. If you have set
aside most of memory for potential hugetlb CMA allocation,
cma_declare_contiguous_nid will fail.
hugetlb_cma doesn't need the entire area to be one physically contiguous
range. It just cares about being able to get physically contiguous chunks
of a certain size (e.g. 1G), and it is fine to have the CMA area backed
by multiple physical ranges, as long as it gets 1G contiguous allocations.
Multi-range support is implemented by introducing an array of ranges,
instead of just one big one. Each range has its own bitmap. Effectively,
the allocate and release operations work as before, just per-range. So,
instead of going through one large bitmap, they now go through a number of
smaller ones.
The maximum number of supported ranges is 8, as defined in CMA_MAX_RANGES.
Since some current users of CMA expect a CMA area to just use one
physically contiguous range, only allow for multiple ranges if a new
interface, cma_declare_contiguous_nid_multi, is used. The other
interfaces will work like before, creating only CMA areas with 1 range.
cma_declare_contiguous_nid_multi works as follows, mimicking the
default "bottom-up, above 4G" reservation approach:
0) Try cma_declare_contiguous_nid, which will use only one
region. If this succeeds, return. This makes sure that for
all the cases that currently work, the behavior remains
unchanged even if the caller switches from
cma_declare_contiguous_nid to cma_declare_contiguous_nid_multi.
1) Select the largest free memblock ranges above 4G, with
a maximum number of CMA_MAX_RANGES.
2) If we did not find at most CMA_MAX_RANGES that add
up to the total size requested, return -ENOMEM.
3) Sort the selected ranges by base address.
4) Reserve them bottom-up until we get what we wanted.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20250228182928.2645936-3-fvdl@google.com
Signed-off-by: Frank van der Linden <fvdl@google.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Cc: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Joao Martins <joao.m.martins@oracle.com>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev>
Cc: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Roman Gushchin (Cruise) <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>
Cc: Usama Arif <usamaarif642@gmail.com>
Cc: Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Yu Zhao <yuzhao@google.com>
Cc: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2025-02-28 18:29:03 +00:00
|
|
|
phys_addr_t size, sizesum, sizeleft;
|
|
|
|
struct cma_init_memrange *mrp, *mlp, *failed;
|
|
|
|
struct cma_memrange *cmrp;
|
|
|
|
LIST_HEAD(ranges);
|
|
|
|
LIST_HEAD(final_ranges);
|
|
|
|
struct list_head *mp, *next;
|
|
|
|
int ret, nr = 1;
|
|
|
|
u64 i;
|
|
|
|
struct cma *cma;
|
|
|
|
|
2014-10-13 22:51:09 +00:00
|
|
|
/*
|
mm, cma: support multiple contiguous ranges, if requested
Currently, CMA manages one range of physically contiguous memory.
Creation of larger CMA areas with hugetlb_cma may run in to gaps in
physical memory, so that they are not able to allocate that contiguous
physical range from memblock when creating the CMA area.
This can happen, for example, on an AMD system with > 1TB of memory, where
there will be a gap just below the 1TB (40bit DMA) line. If you have set
aside most of memory for potential hugetlb CMA allocation,
cma_declare_contiguous_nid will fail.
hugetlb_cma doesn't need the entire area to be one physically contiguous
range. It just cares about being able to get physically contiguous chunks
of a certain size (e.g. 1G), and it is fine to have the CMA area backed
by multiple physical ranges, as long as it gets 1G contiguous allocations.
Multi-range support is implemented by introducing an array of ranges,
instead of just one big one. Each range has its own bitmap. Effectively,
the allocate and release operations work as before, just per-range. So,
instead of going through one large bitmap, they now go through a number of
smaller ones.
The maximum number of supported ranges is 8, as defined in CMA_MAX_RANGES.
Since some current users of CMA expect a CMA area to just use one
physically contiguous range, only allow for multiple ranges if a new
interface, cma_declare_contiguous_nid_multi, is used. The other
interfaces will work like before, creating only CMA areas with 1 range.
cma_declare_contiguous_nid_multi works as follows, mimicking the
default "bottom-up, above 4G" reservation approach:
0) Try cma_declare_contiguous_nid, which will use only one
region. If this succeeds, return. This makes sure that for
all the cases that currently work, the behavior remains
unchanged even if the caller switches from
cma_declare_contiguous_nid to cma_declare_contiguous_nid_multi.
1) Select the largest free memblock ranges above 4G, with
a maximum number of CMA_MAX_RANGES.
2) If we did not find at most CMA_MAX_RANGES that add
up to the total size requested, return -ENOMEM.
3) Sort the selected ranges by base address.
4) Reserve them bottom-up until we get what we wanted.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20250228182928.2645936-3-fvdl@google.com
Signed-off-by: Frank van der Linden <fvdl@google.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Cc: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Joao Martins <joao.m.martins@oracle.com>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev>
Cc: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Roman Gushchin (Cruise) <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>
Cc: Usama Arif <usamaarif642@gmail.com>
Cc: Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Yu Zhao <yuzhao@google.com>
Cc: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2025-02-28 18:29:03 +00:00
|
|
|
* First, try it the normal way, producing just one range.
|
2014-10-13 22:51:09 +00:00
|
|
|
*/
|
2025-04-07 16:54:35 +00:00
|
|
|
ret = __cma_declare_contiguous_nid(&start, total_size, 0, align,
|
mm, cma: support multiple contiguous ranges, if requested
Currently, CMA manages one range of physically contiguous memory.
Creation of larger CMA areas with hugetlb_cma may run in to gaps in
physical memory, so that they are not able to allocate that contiguous
physical range from memblock when creating the CMA area.
This can happen, for example, on an AMD system with > 1TB of memory, where
there will be a gap just below the 1TB (40bit DMA) line. If you have set
aside most of memory for potential hugetlb CMA allocation,
cma_declare_contiguous_nid will fail.
hugetlb_cma doesn't need the entire area to be one physically contiguous
range. It just cares about being able to get physically contiguous chunks
of a certain size (e.g. 1G), and it is fine to have the CMA area backed
by multiple physical ranges, as long as it gets 1G contiguous allocations.
Multi-range support is implemented by introducing an array of ranges,
instead of just one big one. Each range has its own bitmap. Effectively,
the allocate and release operations work as before, just per-range. So,
instead of going through one large bitmap, they now go through a number of
smaller ones.
The maximum number of supported ranges is 8, as defined in CMA_MAX_RANGES.
Since some current users of CMA expect a CMA area to just use one
physically contiguous range, only allow for multiple ranges if a new
interface, cma_declare_contiguous_nid_multi, is used. The other
interfaces will work like before, creating only CMA areas with 1 range.
cma_declare_contiguous_nid_multi works as follows, mimicking the
default "bottom-up, above 4G" reservation approach:
0) Try cma_declare_contiguous_nid, which will use only one
region. If this succeeds, return. This makes sure that for
all the cases that currently work, the behavior remains
unchanged even if the caller switches from
cma_declare_contiguous_nid to cma_declare_contiguous_nid_multi.
1) Select the largest free memblock ranges above 4G, with
a maximum number of CMA_MAX_RANGES.
2) If we did not find at most CMA_MAX_RANGES that add
up to the total size requested, return -ENOMEM.
3) Sort the selected ranges by base address.
4) Reserve them bottom-up until we get what we wanted.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20250228182928.2645936-3-fvdl@google.com
Signed-off-by: Frank van der Linden <fvdl@google.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Cc: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Joao Martins <joao.m.martins@oracle.com>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev>
Cc: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Roman Gushchin (Cruise) <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>
Cc: Usama Arif <usamaarif642@gmail.com>
Cc: Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Yu Zhao <yuzhao@google.com>
Cc: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2025-02-28 18:29:03 +00:00
|
|
|
order_per_bit, false, name, res_cma, nid);
|
|
|
|
if (ret != -ENOMEM)
|
|
|
|
goto out;
|
2020-08-12 01:31:57 +00:00
|
|
|
|
mm, cma: support multiple contiguous ranges, if requested
Currently, CMA manages one range of physically contiguous memory.
Creation of larger CMA areas with hugetlb_cma may run in to gaps in
physical memory, so that they are not able to allocate that contiguous
physical range from memblock when creating the CMA area.
This can happen, for example, on an AMD system with > 1TB of memory, where
there will be a gap just below the 1TB (40bit DMA) line. If you have set
aside most of memory for potential hugetlb CMA allocation,
cma_declare_contiguous_nid will fail.
hugetlb_cma doesn't need the entire area to be one physically contiguous
range. It just cares about being able to get physically contiguous chunks
of a certain size (e.g. 1G), and it is fine to have the CMA area backed
by multiple physical ranges, as long as it gets 1G contiguous allocations.
Multi-range support is implemented by introducing an array of ranges,
instead of just one big one. Each range has its own bitmap. Effectively,
the allocate and release operations work as before, just per-range. So,
instead of going through one large bitmap, they now go through a number of
smaller ones.
The maximum number of supported ranges is 8, as defined in CMA_MAX_RANGES.
Since some current users of CMA expect a CMA area to just use one
physically contiguous range, only allow for multiple ranges if a new
interface, cma_declare_contiguous_nid_multi, is used. The other
interfaces will work like before, creating only CMA areas with 1 range.
cma_declare_contiguous_nid_multi works as follows, mimicking the
default "bottom-up, above 4G" reservation approach:
0) Try cma_declare_contiguous_nid, which will use only one
region. If this succeeds, return. This makes sure that for
all the cases that currently work, the behavior remains
unchanged even if the caller switches from
cma_declare_contiguous_nid to cma_declare_contiguous_nid_multi.
1) Select the largest free memblock ranges above 4G, with
a maximum number of CMA_MAX_RANGES.
2) If we did not find at most CMA_MAX_RANGES that add
up to the total size requested, return -ENOMEM.
3) Sort the selected ranges by base address.
4) Reserve them bottom-up until we get what we wanted.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20250228182928.2645936-3-fvdl@google.com
Signed-off-by: Frank van der Linden <fvdl@google.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Cc: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Joao Martins <joao.m.martins@oracle.com>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev>
Cc: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Roman Gushchin (Cruise) <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>
Cc: Usama Arif <usamaarif642@gmail.com>
Cc: Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Yu Zhao <yuzhao@google.com>
Cc: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2025-02-28 18:29:03 +00:00
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* Couldn't find one range that fits our needs, so try multiple
|
|
|
|
* ranges.
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* No need to do the alignment checks here, the call to
|
|
|
|
* cma_declare_contiguous_nid above would have caught
|
|
|
|
* any issues. With the checks, we know that:
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* - @align is a power of 2
|
|
|
|
* - @align is >= pageblock alignment
|
|
|
|
* - @size is aligned to @align and to @order_per_bit
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* So, as long as we create ranges that have a base
|
|
|
|
* aligned to @align, and a size that is aligned to
|
|
|
|
* both @align and @order_to_bit, things will work out.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
nr = 0;
|
|
|
|
sizesum = 0;
|
|
|
|
failed = NULL;
|
2020-08-12 01:31:57 +00:00
|
|
|
|
mm, cma: support multiple contiguous ranges, if requested
Currently, CMA manages one range of physically contiguous memory.
Creation of larger CMA areas with hugetlb_cma may run in to gaps in
physical memory, so that they are not able to allocate that contiguous
physical range from memblock when creating the CMA area.
This can happen, for example, on an AMD system with > 1TB of memory, where
there will be a gap just below the 1TB (40bit DMA) line. If you have set
aside most of memory for potential hugetlb CMA allocation,
cma_declare_contiguous_nid will fail.
hugetlb_cma doesn't need the entire area to be one physically contiguous
range. It just cares about being able to get physically contiguous chunks
of a certain size (e.g. 1G), and it is fine to have the CMA area backed
by multiple physical ranges, as long as it gets 1G contiguous allocations.
Multi-range support is implemented by introducing an array of ranges,
instead of just one big one. Each range has its own bitmap. Effectively,
the allocate and release operations work as before, just per-range. So,
instead of going through one large bitmap, they now go through a number of
smaller ones.
The maximum number of supported ranges is 8, as defined in CMA_MAX_RANGES.
Since some current users of CMA expect a CMA area to just use one
physically contiguous range, only allow for multiple ranges if a new
interface, cma_declare_contiguous_nid_multi, is used. The other
interfaces will work like before, creating only CMA areas with 1 range.
cma_declare_contiguous_nid_multi works as follows, mimicking the
default "bottom-up, above 4G" reservation approach:
0) Try cma_declare_contiguous_nid, which will use only one
region. If this succeeds, return. This makes sure that for
all the cases that currently work, the behavior remains
unchanged even if the caller switches from
cma_declare_contiguous_nid to cma_declare_contiguous_nid_multi.
1) Select the largest free memblock ranges above 4G, with
a maximum number of CMA_MAX_RANGES.
2) If we did not find at most CMA_MAX_RANGES that add
up to the total size requested, return -ENOMEM.
3) Sort the selected ranges by base address.
4) Reserve them bottom-up until we get what we wanted.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20250228182928.2645936-3-fvdl@google.com
Signed-off-by: Frank van der Linden <fvdl@google.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Cc: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Joao Martins <joao.m.martins@oracle.com>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev>
Cc: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Roman Gushchin (Cruise) <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>
Cc: Usama Arif <usamaarif642@gmail.com>
Cc: Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Yu Zhao <yuzhao@google.com>
Cc: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2025-02-28 18:29:03 +00:00
|
|
|
ret = cma_new_area(name, total_size, order_per_bit, &cma);
|
|
|
|
if (ret != 0)
|
|
|
|
goto out;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
align = max_t(phys_addr_t, align, CMA_MIN_ALIGNMENT_BYTES);
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* Create a list of ranges above 4G, largest range first.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
for_each_free_mem_range(i, nid, MEMBLOCK_NONE, &start, &end, NULL) {
|
|
|
|
if (upper_32_bits(start) == 0)
|
|
|
|
continue;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
start = ALIGN(start, align);
|
|
|
|
if (start >= end)
|
|
|
|
continue;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
end = ALIGN_DOWN(end, align);
|
|
|
|
if (end <= start)
|
|
|
|
continue;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
size = end - start;
|
|
|
|
size = ALIGN_DOWN(size, (PAGE_SIZE << order_per_bit));
|
|
|
|
if (!size)
|
|
|
|
continue;
|
|
|
|
sizesum += size;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
pr_debug("consider %016llx - %016llx\n", (u64)start, (u64)end);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* If we don't yet have used the maximum number of
|
|
|
|
* areas, grab a new one.
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* If we can't use anymore, see if this range is not
|
|
|
|
* smaller than the smallest one already recorded. If
|
|
|
|
* not, re-use the smallest element.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
if (nr < CMA_MAX_RANGES)
|
|
|
|
mrp = &memranges[nr++];
|
|
|
|
else {
|
|
|
|
mrp = list_last_entry(&ranges,
|
|
|
|
struct cma_init_memrange, list);
|
|
|
|
if (size < mrp->size)
|
|
|
|
continue;
|
|
|
|
list_del(&mrp->list);
|
|
|
|
sizesum -= mrp->size;
|
|
|
|
pr_debug("deleted %016llx - %016llx from the list\n",
|
|
|
|
(u64)mrp->base, (u64)mrp->base + size);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
mrp->base = start;
|
|
|
|
mrp->size = size;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* Now do a sorted insert.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
list_insert_sorted(&ranges, mrp, revsizecmp);
|
|
|
|
pr_debug("added %016llx - %016llx to the list\n",
|
|
|
|
(u64)mrp->base, (u64)mrp->base + size);
|
|
|
|
pr_debug("total size now %llu\n", (u64)sizesum);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* There is not enough room in the CMA_MAX_RANGES largest
|
|
|
|
* ranges, so bail out.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
if (sizesum < total_size) {
|
|
|
|
cma_drop_area(cma);
|
|
|
|
ret = -ENOMEM;
|
|
|
|
goto out;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* Found ranges that provide enough combined space.
|
|
|
|
* Now, sorted them by address, smallest first, because we
|
|
|
|
* want to mimic a bottom-up memblock allocation.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
sizesum = 0;
|
|
|
|
list_for_each_safe(mp, next, &ranges) {
|
|
|
|
mlp = list_entry(mp, struct cma_init_memrange, list);
|
|
|
|
list_del(mp);
|
|
|
|
list_insert_sorted(&final_ranges, mlp, basecmp);
|
|
|
|
sizesum += mlp->size;
|
|
|
|
if (sizesum >= total_size)
|
|
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* Walk the final list, and add a CMA range for
|
|
|
|
* each range, possibly not using the last one fully.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
nr = 0;
|
|
|
|
sizeleft = total_size;
|
|
|
|
list_for_each(mp, &final_ranges) {
|
|
|
|
mlp = list_entry(mp, struct cma_init_memrange, list);
|
|
|
|
size = min(sizeleft, mlp->size);
|
|
|
|
if (memblock_reserve(mlp->base, size)) {
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* Unexpected error. Could go on to
|
|
|
|
* the next one, but just abort to
|
|
|
|
* be safe.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
failed = mlp;
|
|
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
pr_debug("created region %d: %016llx - %016llx\n",
|
|
|
|
nr, (u64)mlp->base, (u64)mlp->base + size);
|
|
|
|
cmrp = &cma->ranges[nr++];
|
|
|
|
cmrp->base_pfn = PHYS_PFN(mlp->base);
|
2025-02-28 18:29:25 +00:00
|
|
|
cmrp->early_pfn = cmrp->base_pfn;
|
mm, cma: support multiple contiguous ranges, if requested
Currently, CMA manages one range of physically contiguous memory.
Creation of larger CMA areas with hugetlb_cma may run in to gaps in
physical memory, so that they are not able to allocate that contiguous
physical range from memblock when creating the CMA area.
This can happen, for example, on an AMD system with > 1TB of memory, where
there will be a gap just below the 1TB (40bit DMA) line. If you have set
aside most of memory for potential hugetlb CMA allocation,
cma_declare_contiguous_nid will fail.
hugetlb_cma doesn't need the entire area to be one physically contiguous
range. It just cares about being able to get physically contiguous chunks
of a certain size (e.g. 1G), and it is fine to have the CMA area backed
by multiple physical ranges, as long as it gets 1G contiguous allocations.
Multi-range support is implemented by introducing an array of ranges,
instead of just one big one. Each range has its own bitmap. Effectively,
the allocate and release operations work as before, just per-range. So,
instead of going through one large bitmap, they now go through a number of
smaller ones.
The maximum number of supported ranges is 8, as defined in CMA_MAX_RANGES.
Since some current users of CMA expect a CMA area to just use one
physically contiguous range, only allow for multiple ranges if a new
interface, cma_declare_contiguous_nid_multi, is used. The other
interfaces will work like before, creating only CMA areas with 1 range.
cma_declare_contiguous_nid_multi works as follows, mimicking the
default "bottom-up, above 4G" reservation approach:
0) Try cma_declare_contiguous_nid, which will use only one
region. If this succeeds, return. This makes sure that for
all the cases that currently work, the behavior remains
unchanged even if the caller switches from
cma_declare_contiguous_nid to cma_declare_contiguous_nid_multi.
1) Select the largest free memblock ranges above 4G, with
a maximum number of CMA_MAX_RANGES.
2) If we did not find at most CMA_MAX_RANGES that add
up to the total size requested, return -ENOMEM.
3) Sort the selected ranges by base address.
4) Reserve them bottom-up until we get what we wanted.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20250228182928.2645936-3-fvdl@google.com
Signed-off-by: Frank van der Linden <fvdl@google.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Cc: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Joao Martins <joao.m.martins@oracle.com>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev>
Cc: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Roman Gushchin (Cruise) <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>
Cc: Usama Arif <usamaarif642@gmail.com>
Cc: Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Yu Zhao <yuzhao@google.com>
Cc: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2025-02-28 18:29:03 +00:00
|
|
|
cmrp->count = size >> PAGE_SHIFT;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
sizeleft -= size;
|
|
|
|
if (sizeleft == 0)
|
|
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (failed) {
|
|
|
|
list_for_each(mp, &final_ranges) {
|
|
|
|
mlp = list_entry(mp, struct cma_init_memrange, list);
|
|
|
|
if (mlp == failed)
|
|
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
memblock_phys_free(mlp->base, mlp->size);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
cma_drop_area(cma);
|
|
|
|
ret = -ENOMEM;
|
|
|
|
goto out;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
cma->nranges = nr;
|
2025-02-28 18:29:23 +00:00
|
|
|
cma->nid = nid;
|
2014-10-13 22:51:09 +00:00
|
|
|
*res_cma = cma;
|
|
|
|
|
mm, cma: support multiple contiguous ranges, if requested
Currently, CMA manages one range of physically contiguous memory.
Creation of larger CMA areas with hugetlb_cma may run in to gaps in
physical memory, so that they are not able to allocate that contiguous
physical range from memblock when creating the CMA area.
This can happen, for example, on an AMD system with > 1TB of memory, where
there will be a gap just below the 1TB (40bit DMA) line. If you have set
aside most of memory for potential hugetlb CMA allocation,
cma_declare_contiguous_nid will fail.
hugetlb_cma doesn't need the entire area to be one physically contiguous
range. It just cares about being able to get physically contiguous chunks
of a certain size (e.g. 1G), and it is fine to have the CMA area backed
by multiple physical ranges, as long as it gets 1G contiguous allocations.
Multi-range support is implemented by introducing an array of ranges,
instead of just one big one. Each range has its own bitmap. Effectively,
the allocate and release operations work as before, just per-range. So,
instead of going through one large bitmap, they now go through a number of
smaller ones.
The maximum number of supported ranges is 8, as defined in CMA_MAX_RANGES.
Since some current users of CMA expect a CMA area to just use one
physically contiguous range, only allow for multiple ranges if a new
interface, cma_declare_contiguous_nid_multi, is used. The other
interfaces will work like before, creating only CMA areas with 1 range.
cma_declare_contiguous_nid_multi works as follows, mimicking the
default "bottom-up, above 4G" reservation approach:
0) Try cma_declare_contiguous_nid, which will use only one
region. If this succeeds, return. This makes sure that for
all the cases that currently work, the behavior remains
unchanged even if the caller switches from
cma_declare_contiguous_nid to cma_declare_contiguous_nid_multi.
1) Select the largest free memblock ranges above 4G, with
a maximum number of CMA_MAX_RANGES.
2) If we did not find at most CMA_MAX_RANGES that add
up to the total size requested, return -ENOMEM.
3) Sort the selected ranges by base address.
4) Reserve them bottom-up until we get what we wanted.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20250228182928.2645936-3-fvdl@google.com
Signed-off-by: Frank van der Linden <fvdl@google.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Cc: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Joao Martins <joao.m.martins@oracle.com>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev>
Cc: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Roman Gushchin (Cruise) <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>
Cc: Usama Arif <usamaarif642@gmail.com>
Cc: Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Yu Zhao <yuzhao@google.com>
Cc: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2025-02-28 18:29:03 +00:00
|
|
|
out:
|
|
|
|
if (ret != 0)
|
|
|
|
pr_err("Failed to reserve %lu MiB\n",
|
|
|
|
(unsigned long)total_size / SZ_1M);
|
|
|
|
else
|
|
|
|
pr_info("Reserved %lu MiB in %d range%s\n",
|
|
|
|
(unsigned long)total_size / SZ_1M, nr,
|
|
|
|
nr > 1 ? "s" : "");
|
|
|
|
return ret;
|
2014-10-13 22:51:09 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2014-08-06 23:05:25 +00:00
|
|
|
/**
|
2020-04-10 21:32:42 +00:00
|
|
|
* cma_declare_contiguous_nid() - reserve custom contiguous area
|
2014-08-06 23:05:25 +00:00
|
|
|
* @base: Base address of the reserved area optional, use 0 for any
|
2014-08-06 23:05:32 +00:00
|
|
|
* @size: Size of the reserved area (in bytes),
|
2014-08-06 23:05:25 +00:00
|
|
|
* @limit: End address of the reserved memory (optional, 0 for any).
|
|
|
|
* @alignment: Alignment for the CMA area, should be power of 2 or zero
|
|
|
|
* @order_per_bit: Order of pages represented by one bit on bitmap.
|
|
|
|
* @fixed: hint about where to place the reserved area
|
2018-04-05 23:24:57 +00:00
|
|
|
* @name: The name of the area. See function cma_init_reserved_mem()
|
2014-08-06 23:05:32 +00:00
|
|
|
* @res_cma: Pointer to store the created cma region.
|
2020-04-10 21:32:42 +00:00
|
|
|
* @nid: nid of the free area to find, %NUMA_NO_NODE for any node
|
2014-08-06 23:05:25 +00:00
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* This function reserves memory from early allocator. It should be
|
|
|
|
* called by arch specific code once the early allocator (memblock or bootmem)
|
|
|
|
* has been activated and all other subsystems have already allocated/reserved
|
|
|
|
* memory. This function allows to create custom reserved areas.
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* If @fixed is true, reserve contiguous area at exactly @base. If false,
|
|
|
|
* reserve in range from @base to @limit.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
2020-04-10 21:32:42 +00:00
|
|
|
int __init cma_declare_contiguous_nid(phys_addr_t base,
|
2014-08-06 23:05:32 +00:00
|
|
|
phys_addr_t size, phys_addr_t limit,
|
2014-08-06 23:05:25 +00:00
|
|
|
phys_addr_t alignment, unsigned int order_per_bit,
|
2020-04-10 21:32:42 +00:00
|
|
|
bool fixed, const char *name, struct cma **res_cma,
|
|
|
|
int nid)
|
mm, cma: support multiple contiguous ranges, if requested
Currently, CMA manages one range of physically contiguous memory.
Creation of larger CMA areas with hugetlb_cma may run in to gaps in
physical memory, so that they are not able to allocate that contiguous
physical range from memblock when creating the CMA area.
This can happen, for example, on an AMD system with > 1TB of memory, where
there will be a gap just below the 1TB (40bit DMA) line. If you have set
aside most of memory for potential hugetlb CMA allocation,
cma_declare_contiguous_nid will fail.
hugetlb_cma doesn't need the entire area to be one physically contiguous
range. It just cares about being able to get physically contiguous chunks
of a certain size (e.g. 1G), and it is fine to have the CMA area backed
by multiple physical ranges, as long as it gets 1G contiguous allocations.
Multi-range support is implemented by introducing an array of ranges,
instead of just one big one. Each range has its own bitmap. Effectively,
the allocate and release operations work as before, just per-range. So,
instead of going through one large bitmap, they now go through a number of
smaller ones.
The maximum number of supported ranges is 8, as defined in CMA_MAX_RANGES.
Since some current users of CMA expect a CMA area to just use one
physically contiguous range, only allow for multiple ranges if a new
interface, cma_declare_contiguous_nid_multi, is used. The other
interfaces will work like before, creating only CMA areas with 1 range.
cma_declare_contiguous_nid_multi works as follows, mimicking the
default "bottom-up, above 4G" reservation approach:
0) Try cma_declare_contiguous_nid, which will use only one
region. If this succeeds, return. This makes sure that for
all the cases that currently work, the behavior remains
unchanged even if the caller switches from
cma_declare_contiguous_nid to cma_declare_contiguous_nid_multi.
1) Select the largest free memblock ranges above 4G, with
a maximum number of CMA_MAX_RANGES.
2) If we did not find at most CMA_MAX_RANGES that add
up to the total size requested, return -ENOMEM.
3) Sort the selected ranges by base address.
4) Reserve them bottom-up until we get what we wanted.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20250228182928.2645936-3-fvdl@google.com
Signed-off-by: Frank van der Linden <fvdl@google.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Cc: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Joao Martins <joao.m.martins@oracle.com>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev>
Cc: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Roman Gushchin (Cruise) <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>
Cc: Usama Arif <usamaarif642@gmail.com>
Cc: Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Yu Zhao <yuzhao@google.com>
Cc: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2025-02-28 18:29:03 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
int ret;
|
|
|
|
|
2025-04-07 16:54:35 +00:00
|
|
|
ret = __cma_declare_contiguous_nid(&base, size, limit, alignment,
|
mm, cma: support multiple contiguous ranges, if requested
Currently, CMA manages one range of physically contiguous memory.
Creation of larger CMA areas with hugetlb_cma may run in to gaps in
physical memory, so that they are not able to allocate that contiguous
physical range from memblock when creating the CMA area.
This can happen, for example, on an AMD system with > 1TB of memory, where
there will be a gap just below the 1TB (40bit DMA) line. If you have set
aside most of memory for potential hugetlb CMA allocation,
cma_declare_contiguous_nid will fail.
hugetlb_cma doesn't need the entire area to be one physically contiguous
range. It just cares about being able to get physically contiguous chunks
of a certain size (e.g. 1G), and it is fine to have the CMA area backed
by multiple physical ranges, as long as it gets 1G contiguous allocations.
Multi-range support is implemented by introducing an array of ranges,
instead of just one big one. Each range has its own bitmap. Effectively,
the allocate and release operations work as before, just per-range. So,
instead of going through one large bitmap, they now go through a number of
smaller ones.
The maximum number of supported ranges is 8, as defined in CMA_MAX_RANGES.
Since some current users of CMA expect a CMA area to just use one
physically contiguous range, only allow for multiple ranges if a new
interface, cma_declare_contiguous_nid_multi, is used. The other
interfaces will work like before, creating only CMA areas with 1 range.
cma_declare_contiguous_nid_multi works as follows, mimicking the
default "bottom-up, above 4G" reservation approach:
0) Try cma_declare_contiguous_nid, which will use only one
region. If this succeeds, return. This makes sure that for
all the cases that currently work, the behavior remains
unchanged even if the caller switches from
cma_declare_contiguous_nid to cma_declare_contiguous_nid_multi.
1) Select the largest free memblock ranges above 4G, with
a maximum number of CMA_MAX_RANGES.
2) If we did not find at most CMA_MAX_RANGES that add
up to the total size requested, return -ENOMEM.
3) Sort the selected ranges by base address.
4) Reserve them bottom-up until we get what we wanted.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20250228182928.2645936-3-fvdl@google.com
Signed-off-by: Frank van der Linden <fvdl@google.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Cc: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Joao Martins <joao.m.martins@oracle.com>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev>
Cc: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Roman Gushchin (Cruise) <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>
Cc: Usama Arif <usamaarif642@gmail.com>
Cc: Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Yu Zhao <yuzhao@google.com>
Cc: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2025-02-28 18:29:03 +00:00
|
|
|
order_per_bit, fixed, name, res_cma, nid);
|
|
|
|
if (ret != 0)
|
|
|
|
pr_err("Failed to reserve %ld MiB\n",
|
|
|
|
(unsigned long)size / SZ_1M);
|
|
|
|
else
|
|
|
|
pr_info("Reserved %ld MiB at %pa\n",
|
|
|
|
(unsigned long)size / SZ_1M, &base);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return ret;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2025-04-07 16:54:35 +00:00
|
|
|
static int __init __cma_declare_contiguous_nid(phys_addr_t *basep,
|
mm, cma: support multiple contiguous ranges, if requested
Currently, CMA manages one range of physically contiguous memory.
Creation of larger CMA areas with hugetlb_cma may run in to gaps in
physical memory, so that they are not able to allocate that contiguous
physical range from memblock when creating the CMA area.
This can happen, for example, on an AMD system with > 1TB of memory, where
there will be a gap just below the 1TB (40bit DMA) line. If you have set
aside most of memory for potential hugetlb CMA allocation,
cma_declare_contiguous_nid will fail.
hugetlb_cma doesn't need the entire area to be one physically contiguous
range. It just cares about being able to get physically contiguous chunks
of a certain size (e.g. 1G), and it is fine to have the CMA area backed
by multiple physical ranges, as long as it gets 1G contiguous allocations.
Multi-range support is implemented by introducing an array of ranges,
instead of just one big one. Each range has its own bitmap. Effectively,
the allocate and release operations work as before, just per-range. So,
instead of going through one large bitmap, they now go through a number of
smaller ones.
The maximum number of supported ranges is 8, as defined in CMA_MAX_RANGES.
Since some current users of CMA expect a CMA area to just use one
physically contiguous range, only allow for multiple ranges if a new
interface, cma_declare_contiguous_nid_multi, is used. The other
interfaces will work like before, creating only CMA areas with 1 range.
cma_declare_contiguous_nid_multi works as follows, mimicking the
default "bottom-up, above 4G" reservation approach:
0) Try cma_declare_contiguous_nid, which will use only one
region. If this succeeds, return. This makes sure that for
all the cases that currently work, the behavior remains
unchanged even if the caller switches from
cma_declare_contiguous_nid to cma_declare_contiguous_nid_multi.
1) Select the largest free memblock ranges above 4G, with
a maximum number of CMA_MAX_RANGES.
2) If we did not find at most CMA_MAX_RANGES that add
up to the total size requested, return -ENOMEM.
3) Sort the selected ranges by base address.
4) Reserve them bottom-up until we get what we wanted.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20250228182928.2645936-3-fvdl@google.com
Signed-off-by: Frank van der Linden <fvdl@google.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Cc: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Joao Martins <joao.m.martins@oracle.com>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev>
Cc: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Roman Gushchin (Cruise) <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>
Cc: Usama Arif <usamaarif642@gmail.com>
Cc: Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Yu Zhao <yuzhao@google.com>
Cc: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2025-02-28 18:29:03 +00:00
|
|
|
phys_addr_t size, phys_addr_t limit,
|
|
|
|
phys_addr_t alignment, unsigned int order_per_bit,
|
|
|
|
bool fixed, const char *name, struct cma **res_cma,
|
|
|
|
int nid)
|
2014-08-06 23:05:25 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
2014-10-09 22:26:47 +00:00
|
|
|
phys_addr_t memblock_end = memblock_end_of_DRAM();
|
2025-04-07 16:54:35 +00:00
|
|
|
phys_addr_t highmem_start, base = *basep;
|
2023-12-05 02:17:51 +00:00
|
|
|
int ret;
|
2014-08-06 23:05:25 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2014-12-10 23:41:12 +00:00
|
|
|
/*
|
2017-01-10 21:35:41 +00:00
|
|
|
* We can't use __pa(high_memory) directly, since high_memory
|
|
|
|
* isn't a valid direct map VA, and DEBUG_VIRTUAL will (validly)
|
|
|
|
* complain. Find the boundary by adding one to the last valid
|
|
|
|
* address.
|
2014-12-10 23:41:12 +00:00
|
|
|
*/
|
mm/cma: make detection of highmem_start more robust
Pratyush Yadav reports the following crash:
------------[ cut here ]------------
kernel BUG at arch/x86/mm/physaddr.c:23!
ception 0x06 IP 10:ffffffff812ebbf8 error 0 cr2 0xffff88903ffff000
CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper Not tainted 6.15.0-rc6+ #231 PREEMPT(undef)
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS Arch Linux 1.16.3-1-1 04/01/2014
RIP: 0010:__phys_addr+0x58/0x60
Code: 01 48 89 c2 48 d3 ea 48 85 d2 75 05 e9 91 52 cf 00 0f 0b 48 3d ff ff ff 1f 77 0f 48 8b 05 20 54 55 01 48 01 d0 e9 78 52 cf 00 <0f> 0b 90 0f 1f 44 00 00 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90
RSP: 0000:ffffffff82803dd8 EFLAGS: 00010006 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000000
RAX: 000000007fffffff RBX: 00000000ffffffff RCX: 0000000000000000
RDX: 000000007fffffff RSI: 0000000280000000 RDI: ffffffffffffffff
RBP: ffffffff82803e68 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
R10: ffffffff83153180 R11: ffffffff82803e48 R12: ffffffff83c9aed0
R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 0000001040000000 R15: 0000000000000000
FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:0000000000000000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
CR2: ffff88903ffff000 CR3: 0000000002838000 CR4: 00000000000000b0
Call Trace:
<TASK>
? __cma_declare_contiguous_nid+0x6e/0x340
? cma_declare_contiguous_nid+0x33/0x70
? dma_contiguous_reserve_area+0x2f/0x70
? setup_arch+0x6f1/0x870
? start_kernel+0x52/0x4b0
? x86_64_start_reservations+0x29/0x30
? x86_64_start_kernel+0x7c/0x80
? common_startup_64+0x13e/0x141
The reason is that __cma_declare_contiguous_nid() does:
highmem_start = __pa(high_memory - 1) + 1;
If dma_contiguous_reserve_area() (or any other CMA declaration) is
called before free_area_init(), high_memory is uninitialized. Without
CONFIG_DEBUG_VIRTUAL, it will likely work but use the wrong value for
highmem_start.
The issue occurs because commit e120d1bc12da ("arch, mm: set high_memory
in free_area_init()") moved initialization of high_memory after the call
to dma_contiguous_reserve() -> __cma_declare_contiguous_nid() on several
architectures.
In the case CONFIG_HIGHMEM is enabled, some architectures that actually
support HIGHMEM (arm, powerpc and x86) have initialization of high_memory
before a possible call to __cma_declare_contiguous_nid() and some
initialized high_memory late anyway (arc, csky, microblase, mips, sparc,
xtensa) even before the commit e120d1bc12da so they are fine with using
uninitialized value of high_memory.
And in the case CONFIG_HIGHMEM is disabled high_memory essentially becomes
the first address after memory end, so instead of relying on high_memory
to calculate highmem_start use memblock_end_of_DRAM() and eliminate the
dependency of CMA area creation on high_memory in majority of
configurations.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20250519171805.1288393-1-rppt@kernel.org
Fixes: e120d1bc12da ("arch, mm: set high_memory in free_area_init()")
Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport (Microsoft) <rppt@kernel.org>
Reported-by: Pratyush Yadav <ptyadav@amazon.de>
Tested-by: Pratyush Yadav <ptyadav@amazon.de>
Tested-by: Alexandre Ghiti <alexghiti@rivosinc.com>
Reviewed-by: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2025-05-19 17:18:05 +00:00
|
|
|
if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_HIGHMEM))
|
|
|
|
highmem_start = __pa(high_memory - 1) + 1;
|
|
|
|
else
|
|
|
|
highmem_start = memblock_end_of_DRAM();
|
2014-10-24 10:18:42 +00:00
|
|
|
pr_debug("%s(size %pa, base %pa, limit %pa alignment %pa)\n",
|
|
|
|
__func__, &size, &base, &limit, &alignment);
|
2014-08-06 23:05:25 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (cma_area_count == ARRAY_SIZE(cma_areas)) {
|
|
|
|
pr_err("Not enough slots for CMA reserved regions!\n");
|
|
|
|
return -ENOSPC;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (!size)
|
|
|
|
return -EINVAL;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (alignment && !is_power_of_2(alignment))
|
|
|
|
return -EINVAL;
|
|
|
|
|
2023-07-12 07:47:58 +00:00
|
|
|
if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_NUMA))
|
|
|
|
nid = NUMA_NO_NODE;
|
|
|
|
|
2022-03-22 21:43:17 +00:00
|
|
|
/* Sanitise input arguments. */
|
|
|
|
alignment = max_t(phys_addr_t, alignment, CMA_MIN_ALIGNMENT_BYTES);
|
2019-07-16 23:26:24 +00:00
|
|
|
if (fixed && base & (alignment - 1)) {
|
|
|
|
pr_err("Region at %pa must be aligned to %pa bytes\n",
|
|
|
|
&base, &alignment);
|
mm, cma: support multiple contiguous ranges, if requested
Currently, CMA manages one range of physically contiguous memory.
Creation of larger CMA areas with hugetlb_cma may run in to gaps in
physical memory, so that they are not able to allocate that contiguous
physical range from memblock when creating the CMA area.
This can happen, for example, on an AMD system with > 1TB of memory, where
there will be a gap just below the 1TB (40bit DMA) line. If you have set
aside most of memory for potential hugetlb CMA allocation,
cma_declare_contiguous_nid will fail.
hugetlb_cma doesn't need the entire area to be one physically contiguous
range. It just cares about being able to get physically contiguous chunks
of a certain size (e.g. 1G), and it is fine to have the CMA area backed
by multiple physical ranges, as long as it gets 1G contiguous allocations.
Multi-range support is implemented by introducing an array of ranges,
instead of just one big one. Each range has its own bitmap. Effectively,
the allocate and release operations work as before, just per-range. So,
instead of going through one large bitmap, they now go through a number of
smaller ones.
The maximum number of supported ranges is 8, as defined in CMA_MAX_RANGES.
Since some current users of CMA expect a CMA area to just use one
physically contiguous range, only allow for multiple ranges if a new
interface, cma_declare_contiguous_nid_multi, is used. The other
interfaces will work like before, creating only CMA areas with 1 range.
cma_declare_contiguous_nid_multi works as follows, mimicking the
default "bottom-up, above 4G" reservation approach:
0) Try cma_declare_contiguous_nid, which will use only one
region. If this succeeds, return. This makes sure that for
all the cases that currently work, the behavior remains
unchanged even if the caller switches from
cma_declare_contiguous_nid to cma_declare_contiguous_nid_multi.
1) Select the largest free memblock ranges above 4G, with
a maximum number of CMA_MAX_RANGES.
2) If we did not find at most CMA_MAX_RANGES that add
up to the total size requested, return -ENOMEM.
3) Sort the selected ranges by base address.
4) Reserve them bottom-up until we get what we wanted.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20250228182928.2645936-3-fvdl@google.com
Signed-off-by: Frank van der Linden <fvdl@google.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Cc: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Joao Martins <joao.m.martins@oracle.com>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev>
Cc: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Roman Gushchin (Cruise) <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>
Cc: Usama Arif <usamaarif642@gmail.com>
Cc: Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Yu Zhao <yuzhao@google.com>
Cc: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2025-02-28 18:29:03 +00:00
|
|
|
return -EINVAL;
|
2019-07-16 23:26:24 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
2014-08-06 23:05:25 +00:00
|
|
|
base = ALIGN(base, alignment);
|
|
|
|
size = ALIGN(size, alignment);
|
|
|
|
limit &= ~(alignment - 1);
|
|
|
|
|
2014-10-24 10:18:40 +00:00
|
|
|
if (!base)
|
|
|
|
fixed = false;
|
|
|
|
|
2014-08-06 23:05:25 +00:00
|
|
|
/* size should be aligned with order_per_bit */
|
|
|
|
if (!IS_ALIGNED(size >> PAGE_SHIFT, 1 << order_per_bit))
|
|
|
|
return -EINVAL;
|
|
|
|
|
2014-10-09 22:26:47 +00:00
|
|
|
/*
|
2014-10-24 10:18:41 +00:00
|
|
|
* If allocating at a fixed base the request region must not cross the
|
|
|
|
* low/high memory boundary.
|
2014-10-09 22:26:47 +00:00
|
|
|
*/
|
2014-10-24 10:18:41 +00:00
|
|
|
if (fixed && base < highmem_start && base + size > highmem_start) {
|
2014-10-24 10:18:42 +00:00
|
|
|
pr_err("Region at %pa defined on low/high memory boundary (%pa)\n",
|
|
|
|
&base, &highmem_start);
|
mm, cma: support multiple contiguous ranges, if requested
Currently, CMA manages one range of physically contiguous memory.
Creation of larger CMA areas with hugetlb_cma may run in to gaps in
physical memory, so that they are not able to allocate that contiguous
physical range from memblock when creating the CMA area.
This can happen, for example, on an AMD system with > 1TB of memory, where
there will be a gap just below the 1TB (40bit DMA) line. If you have set
aside most of memory for potential hugetlb CMA allocation,
cma_declare_contiguous_nid will fail.
hugetlb_cma doesn't need the entire area to be one physically contiguous
range. It just cares about being able to get physically contiguous chunks
of a certain size (e.g. 1G), and it is fine to have the CMA area backed
by multiple physical ranges, as long as it gets 1G contiguous allocations.
Multi-range support is implemented by introducing an array of ranges,
instead of just one big one. Each range has its own bitmap. Effectively,
the allocate and release operations work as before, just per-range. So,
instead of going through one large bitmap, they now go through a number of
smaller ones.
The maximum number of supported ranges is 8, as defined in CMA_MAX_RANGES.
Since some current users of CMA expect a CMA area to just use one
physically contiguous range, only allow for multiple ranges if a new
interface, cma_declare_contiguous_nid_multi, is used. The other
interfaces will work like before, creating only CMA areas with 1 range.
cma_declare_contiguous_nid_multi works as follows, mimicking the
default "bottom-up, above 4G" reservation approach:
0) Try cma_declare_contiguous_nid, which will use only one
region. If this succeeds, return. This makes sure that for
all the cases that currently work, the behavior remains
unchanged even if the caller switches from
cma_declare_contiguous_nid to cma_declare_contiguous_nid_multi.
1) Select the largest free memblock ranges above 4G, with
a maximum number of CMA_MAX_RANGES.
2) If we did not find at most CMA_MAX_RANGES that add
up to the total size requested, return -ENOMEM.
3) Sort the selected ranges by base address.
4) Reserve them bottom-up until we get what we wanted.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20250228182928.2645936-3-fvdl@google.com
Signed-off-by: Frank van der Linden <fvdl@google.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Cc: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Joao Martins <joao.m.martins@oracle.com>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev>
Cc: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Roman Gushchin (Cruise) <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>
Cc: Usama Arif <usamaarif642@gmail.com>
Cc: Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Yu Zhao <yuzhao@google.com>
Cc: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2025-02-28 18:29:03 +00:00
|
|
|
return -EINVAL;
|
2014-10-09 22:26:47 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2014-10-24 10:18:41 +00:00
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* If the limit is unspecified or above the memblock end, its effective
|
|
|
|
* value will be the memblock end. Set it explicitly to simplify further
|
|
|
|
* checks.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
if (limit == 0 || limit > memblock_end)
|
|
|
|
limit = memblock_end;
|
|
|
|
|
2019-07-16 23:26:24 +00:00
|
|
|
if (base + size > limit) {
|
|
|
|
pr_err("Size (%pa) of region at %pa exceeds limit (%pa)\n",
|
|
|
|
&size, &base, &limit);
|
mm, cma: support multiple contiguous ranges, if requested
Currently, CMA manages one range of physically contiguous memory.
Creation of larger CMA areas with hugetlb_cma may run in to gaps in
physical memory, so that they are not able to allocate that contiguous
physical range from memblock when creating the CMA area.
This can happen, for example, on an AMD system with > 1TB of memory, where
there will be a gap just below the 1TB (40bit DMA) line. If you have set
aside most of memory for potential hugetlb CMA allocation,
cma_declare_contiguous_nid will fail.
hugetlb_cma doesn't need the entire area to be one physically contiguous
range. It just cares about being able to get physically contiguous chunks
of a certain size (e.g. 1G), and it is fine to have the CMA area backed
by multiple physical ranges, as long as it gets 1G contiguous allocations.
Multi-range support is implemented by introducing an array of ranges,
instead of just one big one. Each range has its own bitmap. Effectively,
the allocate and release operations work as before, just per-range. So,
instead of going through one large bitmap, they now go through a number of
smaller ones.
The maximum number of supported ranges is 8, as defined in CMA_MAX_RANGES.
Since some current users of CMA expect a CMA area to just use one
physically contiguous range, only allow for multiple ranges if a new
interface, cma_declare_contiguous_nid_multi, is used. The other
interfaces will work like before, creating only CMA areas with 1 range.
cma_declare_contiguous_nid_multi works as follows, mimicking the
default "bottom-up, above 4G" reservation approach:
0) Try cma_declare_contiguous_nid, which will use only one
region. If this succeeds, return. This makes sure that for
all the cases that currently work, the behavior remains
unchanged even if the caller switches from
cma_declare_contiguous_nid to cma_declare_contiguous_nid_multi.
1) Select the largest free memblock ranges above 4G, with
a maximum number of CMA_MAX_RANGES.
2) If we did not find at most CMA_MAX_RANGES that add
up to the total size requested, return -ENOMEM.
3) Sort the selected ranges by base address.
4) Reserve them bottom-up until we get what we wanted.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20250228182928.2645936-3-fvdl@google.com
Signed-off-by: Frank van der Linden <fvdl@google.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Cc: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Joao Martins <joao.m.martins@oracle.com>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev>
Cc: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Roman Gushchin (Cruise) <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>
Cc: Usama Arif <usamaarif642@gmail.com>
Cc: Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Yu Zhao <yuzhao@google.com>
Cc: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2025-02-28 18:29:03 +00:00
|
|
|
return -EINVAL;
|
2019-07-16 23:26:24 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2014-08-06 23:05:25 +00:00
|
|
|
/* Reserve memory */
|
2014-10-24 10:18:40 +00:00
|
|
|
if (fixed) {
|
2014-08-06 23:05:25 +00:00
|
|
|
if (memblock_is_region_reserved(base, size) ||
|
|
|
|
memblock_reserve(base, size) < 0) {
|
mm, cma: support multiple contiguous ranges, if requested
Currently, CMA manages one range of physically contiguous memory.
Creation of larger CMA areas with hugetlb_cma may run in to gaps in
physical memory, so that they are not able to allocate that contiguous
physical range from memblock when creating the CMA area.
This can happen, for example, on an AMD system with > 1TB of memory, where
there will be a gap just below the 1TB (40bit DMA) line. If you have set
aside most of memory for potential hugetlb CMA allocation,
cma_declare_contiguous_nid will fail.
hugetlb_cma doesn't need the entire area to be one physically contiguous
range. It just cares about being able to get physically contiguous chunks
of a certain size (e.g. 1G), and it is fine to have the CMA area backed
by multiple physical ranges, as long as it gets 1G contiguous allocations.
Multi-range support is implemented by introducing an array of ranges,
instead of just one big one. Each range has its own bitmap. Effectively,
the allocate and release operations work as before, just per-range. So,
instead of going through one large bitmap, they now go through a number of
smaller ones.
The maximum number of supported ranges is 8, as defined in CMA_MAX_RANGES.
Since some current users of CMA expect a CMA area to just use one
physically contiguous range, only allow for multiple ranges if a new
interface, cma_declare_contiguous_nid_multi, is used. The other
interfaces will work like before, creating only CMA areas with 1 range.
cma_declare_contiguous_nid_multi works as follows, mimicking the
default "bottom-up, above 4G" reservation approach:
0) Try cma_declare_contiguous_nid, which will use only one
region. If this succeeds, return. This makes sure that for
all the cases that currently work, the behavior remains
unchanged even if the caller switches from
cma_declare_contiguous_nid to cma_declare_contiguous_nid_multi.
1) Select the largest free memblock ranges above 4G, with
a maximum number of CMA_MAX_RANGES.
2) If we did not find at most CMA_MAX_RANGES that add
up to the total size requested, return -ENOMEM.
3) Sort the selected ranges by base address.
4) Reserve them bottom-up until we get what we wanted.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20250228182928.2645936-3-fvdl@google.com
Signed-off-by: Frank van der Linden <fvdl@google.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Cc: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Joao Martins <joao.m.martins@oracle.com>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev>
Cc: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Roman Gushchin (Cruise) <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>
Cc: Usama Arif <usamaarif642@gmail.com>
Cc: Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Yu Zhao <yuzhao@google.com>
Cc: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2025-02-28 18:29:03 +00:00
|
|
|
return -EBUSY;
|
2014-08-06 23:05:25 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
} else {
|
2014-10-24 10:18:41 +00:00
|
|
|
phys_addr_t addr = 0;
|
|
|
|
|
mm: cma: allocate cma areas bottom-up
Currently cma areas without a fixed base are allocated close to the end of
the node. This placement is sub-optimal because of compaction: it brings
pages into the cma area. In particular, it can bring in hot executable
pages, even if there is a plenty of free memory on the machine. This
results in cma allocation failures.
Instead let's place cma areas close to the beginning of a node. In this
case the compaction will help to free cma areas, resulting in better cma
allocation success rates.
If there is enough memory let's try to allocate bottom-up starting with
4GB to exclude any possible interference with DMA32. On smaller machines
or in a case of a failure, stick with the old behavior.
16GB vm, 2GB cma area:
With this patch:
[ 0.000000] Command line: root=/dev/vda3 rootflags=subvol=/root systemd.unified_cgroup_hierarchy=1 enforcing=0 console=ttyS0,115200 hugetlb_cma=2G
[ 0.002928] hugetlb_cma: reserve 2048 MiB, up to 2048 MiB per node
[ 0.002930] cma: Reserved 2048 MiB at 0x0000000100000000
[ 0.002931] hugetlb_cma: reserved 2048 MiB on node 0
Without this patch:
[ 0.000000] Command line: root=/dev/vda3 rootflags=subvol=/root systemd.unified_cgroup_hierarchy=1 enforcing=0 console=ttyS0,115200 hugetlb_cma=2G
[ 0.002930] hugetlb_cma: reserve 2048 MiB, up to 2048 MiB per node
[ 0.002933] cma: Reserved 2048 MiB at 0x00000003c0000000
[ 0.002934] hugetlb_cma: reserved 2048 MiB on node 0
v2:
- switched to memblock_set_bottom_up(true), by Mike
- start with 4GB, by Mike
[guro@fb.com: whitespace fix, per Mike]
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201221170551.GB3428478@carbon.DHCP.thefacebook.com
[guro@fb.com: fix 32-bit warnings]
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201223163537.GA4011967@carbon.DHCP.thefacebook.com
[guro@fb.com: fix 32-bit systems]
[akpm@linux-foundation.org: build fix]
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201217201214.3414100-1-guro@fb.com
Signed-off-by: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>
Reviewed-by: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Wonhyuk Yang <vvghjk1234@gmail.com>
Cc: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2021-02-26 01:16:33 +00:00
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* If there is enough memory, try a bottom-up allocation first.
|
|
|
|
* It will place the new cma area close to the start of the node
|
|
|
|
* and guarantee that the compaction is moving pages out of the
|
|
|
|
* cma area and not into it.
|
|
|
|
* Avoid using first 4GB to not interfere with constrained zones
|
|
|
|
* like DMA/DMA32.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
#ifdef CONFIG_PHYS_ADDR_T_64BIT
|
|
|
|
if (!memblock_bottom_up() && memblock_end >= SZ_4G + size) {
|
|
|
|
memblock_set_bottom_up(true);
|
|
|
|
addr = memblock_alloc_range_nid(size, alignment, SZ_4G,
|
|
|
|
limit, nid, true);
|
|
|
|
memblock_set_bottom_up(false);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#endif
|
|
|
|
|
2023-01-18 08:05:23 +00:00
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* All pages in the reserved area must come from the same zone.
|
|
|
|
* If the requested region crosses the low/high memory boundary,
|
|
|
|
* try allocating from high memory first and fall back to low
|
|
|
|
* memory in case of failure.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
if (!addr && base < highmem_start && limit > highmem_start) {
|
|
|
|
addr = memblock_alloc_range_nid(size, alignment,
|
|
|
|
highmem_start, limit, nid, true);
|
|
|
|
limit = highmem_start;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2014-08-06 23:05:25 +00:00
|
|
|
if (!addr) {
|
2020-04-10 21:32:42 +00:00
|
|
|
addr = memblock_alloc_range_nid(size, alignment, base,
|
mm/cma.c: use exact_nid true to fix possible per-numa cma leak
Calling cma_declare_contiguous_nid() with false exact_nid for per-numa
reservation can easily cause cma leak and various confusion. For example,
mm/hugetlb.c is trying to reserve per-numa cma for gigantic pages. But it
can easily leak cma and make users confused when system has memoryless
nodes.
In case the system has 4 numa nodes, and only numa node0 has memory. if
we set hugetlb_cma=4G in bootargs, mm/hugetlb.c will get 4 cma areas for 4
different numa nodes. since exact_nid=false in current code, all 4 numa
nodes will get cma successfully from node0, but hugetlb_cma[1 to 3] will
never be available to hugepage will only allocate memory from
hugetlb_cma[0].
In case the system has 4 numa nodes, both numa node0&2 has memory, other
nodes have no memory. if we set hugetlb_cma=4G in bootargs, mm/hugetlb.c
will get 4 cma areas for 4 different numa nodes. since exact_nid=false in
current code, all 4 numa nodes will get cma successfully from node0 or 2,
but hugetlb_cma[1] and [3] will never be available to hugepage as
mm/hugetlb.c will only allocate memory from hugetlb_cma[0] and
hugetlb_cma[2]. This causes permanent leak of the cma areas which are
supposed to be used by memoryless node.
Of cource we can workaround the issue by letting mm/hugetlb.c scan all cma
areas in alloc_gigantic_page() even node_mask includes node0 only. that
means when node_mask includes node0 only, we can get page from
hugetlb_cma[1] to hugetlb_cma[3]. But this will cause kernel crash in
free_gigantic_page() while it wants to free page by:
cma_release(hugetlb_cma[page_to_nid(page)], page, 1 << order)
On the other hand, exact_nid=false won't consider numa distance, it might
be not that useful to leverage cma areas on remote nodes. I feel it is
much simpler to make exact_nid true to make everything clear. After that,
memoryless nodes won't be able to reserve per-numa CMA from other nodes
which have memory.
Fixes: cf11e85fc08c ("mm: hugetlb: optionally allocate gigantic hugepages using cma")
Signed-off-by: Barry Song <song.bao.hua@hisilicon.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Acked-by: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>
Cc: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Cc: Aslan Bakirov <aslan@fb.com>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
Cc: Andreas Schaufler <andreas.schaufler@gmx.de>
Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>
Cc: Joonsoo Kim <js1304@gmail.com>
Cc: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200628074345.27228-1-song.bao.hua@hisilicon.com
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2020-07-03 22:15:24 +00:00
|
|
|
limit, nid, true);
|
mm, cma: support multiple contiguous ranges, if requested
Currently, CMA manages one range of physically contiguous memory.
Creation of larger CMA areas with hugetlb_cma may run in to gaps in
physical memory, so that they are not able to allocate that contiguous
physical range from memblock when creating the CMA area.
This can happen, for example, on an AMD system with > 1TB of memory, where
there will be a gap just below the 1TB (40bit DMA) line. If you have set
aside most of memory for potential hugetlb CMA allocation,
cma_declare_contiguous_nid will fail.
hugetlb_cma doesn't need the entire area to be one physically contiguous
range. It just cares about being able to get physically contiguous chunks
of a certain size (e.g. 1G), and it is fine to have the CMA area backed
by multiple physical ranges, as long as it gets 1G contiguous allocations.
Multi-range support is implemented by introducing an array of ranges,
instead of just one big one. Each range has its own bitmap. Effectively,
the allocate and release operations work as before, just per-range. So,
instead of going through one large bitmap, they now go through a number of
smaller ones.
The maximum number of supported ranges is 8, as defined in CMA_MAX_RANGES.
Since some current users of CMA expect a CMA area to just use one
physically contiguous range, only allow for multiple ranges if a new
interface, cma_declare_contiguous_nid_multi, is used. The other
interfaces will work like before, creating only CMA areas with 1 range.
cma_declare_contiguous_nid_multi works as follows, mimicking the
default "bottom-up, above 4G" reservation approach:
0) Try cma_declare_contiguous_nid, which will use only one
region. If this succeeds, return. This makes sure that for
all the cases that currently work, the behavior remains
unchanged even if the caller switches from
cma_declare_contiguous_nid to cma_declare_contiguous_nid_multi.
1) Select the largest free memblock ranges above 4G, with
a maximum number of CMA_MAX_RANGES.
2) If we did not find at most CMA_MAX_RANGES that add
up to the total size requested, return -ENOMEM.
3) Sort the selected ranges by base address.
4) Reserve them bottom-up until we get what we wanted.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20250228182928.2645936-3-fvdl@google.com
Signed-off-by: Frank van der Linden <fvdl@google.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Cc: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Joao Martins <joao.m.martins@oracle.com>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev>
Cc: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Roman Gushchin (Cruise) <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>
Cc: Usama Arif <usamaarif642@gmail.com>
Cc: Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Yu Zhao <yuzhao@google.com>
Cc: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2025-02-28 18:29:03 +00:00
|
|
|
if (!addr)
|
|
|
|
return -ENOMEM;
|
2014-08-06 23:05:25 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
2014-10-24 10:18:41 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2014-12-13 00:58:31 +00:00
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* kmemleak scans/reads tracked objects for pointers to other
|
|
|
|
* objects but this address isn't mapped and accessible
|
|
|
|
*/
|
2016-10-11 20:55:11 +00:00
|
|
|
kmemleak_ignore_phys(addr);
|
2014-10-24 10:18:41 +00:00
|
|
|
base = addr;
|
2014-08-06 23:05:25 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2017-04-18 18:27:03 +00:00
|
|
|
ret = cma_init_reserved_mem(base, size, order_per_bit, name, res_cma);
|
2025-04-07 16:54:35 +00:00
|
|
|
if (ret) {
|
mm, cma: support multiple contiguous ranges, if requested
Currently, CMA manages one range of physically contiguous memory.
Creation of larger CMA areas with hugetlb_cma may run in to gaps in
physical memory, so that they are not able to allocate that contiguous
physical range from memblock when creating the CMA area.
This can happen, for example, on an AMD system with > 1TB of memory, where
there will be a gap just below the 1TB (40bit DMA) line. If you have set
aside most of memory for potential hugetlb CMA allocation,
cma_declare_contiguous_nid will fail.
hugetlb_cma doesn't need the entire area to be one physically contiguous
range. It just cares about being able to get physically contiguous chunks
of a certain size (e.g. 1G), and it is fine to have the CMA area backed
by multiple physical ranges, as long as it gets 1G contiguous allocations.
Multi-range support is implemented by introducing an array of ranges,
instead of just one big one. Each range has its own bitmap. Effectively,
the allocate and release operations work as before, just per-range. So,
instead of going through one large bitmap, they now go through a number of
smaller ones.
The maximum number of supported ranges is 8, as defined in CMA_MAX_RANGES.
Since some current users of CMA expect a CMA area to just use one
physically contiguous range, only allow for multiple ranges if a new
interface, cma_declare_contiguous_nid_multi, is used. The other
interfaces will work like before, creating only CMA areas with 1 range.
cma_declare_contiguous_nid_multi works as follows, mimicking the
default "bottom-up, above 4G" reservation approach:
0) Try cma_declare_contiguous_nid, which will use only one
region. If this succeeds, return. This makes sure that for
all the cases that currently work, the behavior remains
unchanged even if the caller switches from
cma_declare_contiguous_nid to cma_declare_contiguous_nid_multi.
1) Select the largest free memblock ranges above 4G, with
a maximum number of CMA_MAX_RANGES.
2) If we did not find at most CMA_MAX_RANGES that add
up to the total size requested, return -ENOMEM.
3) Sort the selected ranges by base address.
4) Reserve them bottom-up until we get what we wanted.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20250228182928.2645936-3-fvdl@google.com
Signed-off-by: Frank van der Linden <fvdl@google.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Cc: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Joao Martins <joao.m.martins@oracle.com>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev>
Cc: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Roman Gushchin (Cruise) <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>
Cc: Usama Arif <usamaarif642@gmail.com>
Cc: Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Yu Zhao <yuzhao@google.com>
Cc: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2025-02-28 18:29:03 +00:00
|
|
|
memblock_phys_free(base, size);
|
2025-04-07 16:54:35 +00:00
|
|
|
return ret;
|
|
|
|
}
|
2014-08-06 23:05:25 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2025-02-28 18:29:23 +00:00
|
|
|
(*res_cma)->nid = nid;
|
2025-04-07 16:54:35 +00:00
|
|
|
*basep = base;
|
2025-02-28 18:29:23 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2025-04-07 16:54:35 +00:00
|
|
|
return 0;
|
2014-08-06 23:05:25 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2017-02-24 22:58:50 +00:00
|
|
|
static void cma_debug_show_areas(struct cma *cma)
|
|
|
|
{
|
2019-05-14 00:17:41 +00:00
|
|
|
unsigned long next_zero_bit, next_set_bit, nr_zero;
|
mm, cma: support multiple contiguous ranges, if requested
Currently, CMA manages one range of physically contiguous memory.
Creation of larger CMA areas with hugetlb_cma may run in to gaps in
physical memory, so that they are not able to allocate that contiguous
physical range from memblock when creating the CMA area.
This can happen, for example, on an AMD system with > 1TB of memory, where
there will be a gap just below the 1TB (40bit DMA) line. If you have set
aside most of memory for potential hugetlb CMA allocation,
cma_declare_contiguous_nid will fail.
hugetlb_cma doesn't need the entire area to be one physically contiguous
range. It just cares about being able to get physically contiguous chunks
of a certain size (e.g. 1G), and it is fine to have the CMA area backed
by multiple physical ranges, as long as it gets 1G contiguous allocations.
Multi-range support is implemented by introducing an array of ranges,
instead of just one big one. Each range has its own bitmap. Effectively,
the allocate and release operations work as before, just per-range. So,
instead of going through one large bitmap, they now go through a number of
smaller ones.
The maximum number of supported ranges is 8, as defined in CMA_MAX_RANGES.
Since some current users of CMA expect a CMA area to just use one
physically contiguous range, only allow for multiple ranges if a new
interface, cma_declare_contiguous_nid_multi, is used. The other
interfaces will work like before, creating only CMA areas with 1 range.
cma_declare_contiguous_nid_multi works as follows, mimicking the
default "bottom-up, above 4G" reservation approach:
0) Try cma_declare_contiguous_nid, which will use only one
region. If this succeeds, return. This makes sure that for
all the cases that currently work, the behavior remains
unchanged even if the caller switches from
cma_declare_contiguous_nid to cma_declare_contiguous_nid_multi.
1) Select the largest free memblock ranges above 4G, with
a maximum number of CMA_MAX_RANGES.
2) If we did not find at most CMA_MAX_RANGES that add
up to the total size requested, return -ENOMEM.
3) Sort the selected ranges by base address.
4) Reserve them bottom-up until we get what we wanted.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20250228182928.2645936-3-fvdl@google.com
Signed-off-by: Frank van der Linden <fvdl@google.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Cc: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Joao Martins <joao.m.martins@oracle.com>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev>
Cc: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Roman Gushchin (Cruise) <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>
Cc: Usama Arif <usamaarif642@gmail.com>
Cc: Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Yu Zhao <yuzhao@google.com>
Cc: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2025-02-28 18:29:03 +00:00
|
|
|
unsigned long start;
|
mm/cma: export total and free number of pages for CMA areas
Patch series "hugetlb/CMA improvements for large systems", v5.
On large systems, we observed some issues with hugetlb and CMA:
1) When specifying a large number of hugetlb boot pages (hugepages= on
the commandline), the kernel may run out of memory before it even gets
to HVO. For example, if you have a 3072G system, and want to use 3024
1G hugetlb pages for VMs, that should leave you plenty of space for the
hypervisor, provided you have the hugetlb vmemmap optimization (HVO)
enabled. However, since the vmemmap pages are always allocated first,
and then later in boot freed, you will actually run yourself out of
memory before you can do HVO. This means not getting all the hugetlb
pages you want, and worse, failure to boot if there is an allocation
failure in the system from which it can't recover.
2) There is a system setup where you might want to use hugetlb_cma with
a large value (say, again, 3024 out of 3072G like above), and then
lower that if system usage allows it, to make room for non-hugetlb
processes. For this, a variation of the problem above applies: the
kernel runs out of unmovable space to allocate from before you finish
boot, since your CMA area takes up all the space.
3) CMA wants to use one big contiguous area for allocations. Which
fails if you have the aforementioned 3T system with a gap in the middle
of physical memory (like the < 40bits BIOS DMA area seen on some AMD
systems). You then won't be able to set up a CMA area for one of the
NUMA nodes, leading to loss of half of your hugetlb CMA area.
4) Under the scenario mentioned in 2), when trying to grow the number
of hugetlb pages after dropping it for a while, new CMA allocations may
fail occasionally. This is not unexpected, some transient references
on pages may prevent cma_alloc from succeeding under memory pressure.
However, the hugetlb code then falls back to a normal contiguous alloc,
which may end up succeeding. This is not always desired behavior. If
you have a large CMA area, then the kernel has a restricted amount of
memory it can do unmovable allocations from (a well known issue). A
normal contiguous alloc may eat further in to this space.
To resolve these issues, do the following:
* Add hooks to the section init code to do custom initialization of
memmap pages. Hugetlb bootmem (memblock) allocated pages can then be
pre-HVOed. This avoids allocating a large number of vmemmap pages early
in boot, only to have them be freed again later, and also avoids running
out of memory as described under 1). Using these hooks for hugetlb is
optional. It requires moving hugetlb bootmem allocation to an earlier
spot by the architecture. This has been enabled on x86.
* hugetlb_cma doesn't care about the CMA area it uses being one large
contiguous range. Multiple smaller ranges are fine. The only
requirements are that the areas should be on one NUMA node, and
individual gigantic pages should be allocatable from them. So,
implement multi-range support for CMA, avoiding issue 3).
* Introduce a hugetlb_cma_only option on the commandline. This only
allows allocations from CMA for gigantic pages, if hugetlb_cma= is also
specified.
* With hugetlb_cma_only active, it also makes sense to be able to
pre-allocate gigantic hugetlb pages at boot time from the CMA area(s).
Add a rudimentary early CMA allocation interface, that just grabs a
piece of memblock-allocated space from the CMA area, which gets marked
as allocated in the CMA bitmap when the CMA area is initialized. With
this, hugepages= can be supported with hugetlb_cma=, making scenario 2)
work.
Additionally, fix some minor bugs, with one worth mentioning: since
hugetlb gigantic bootmem pages are allocated by memblock, they may span
multiple zones, as memblock doesn't (and mostly can't) know about zones.
This can cause problems. A hugetlb page spanning multiple zones is bad,
and it's worse with HVO, when the de-HVO step effectively sneakily
re-assigns pages to a different zone than originally configured, since the
tail pages all inherit the zone from the first 60 tail pages. This
condition is not common, but can be easily reproduced using ZONE_MOVABLE.
To fix this, add checks to see if gigantic bootmem pages intersect with
multiple zones, and do not use them if they do, giving them back to the
page allocator instead.
The first patch is kind of along for the ride, except that maintaining an
available_count for a CMA area is convenient for the multiple range
support.
This patch (of 27):
In addition to the number of allocations and releases, system management
software may like to be aware of the size of CMA areas, and how many pages
are available in it. This information is currently not available, so
export it in total_page and available_pages, respectively.
The name 'available_pages' was picked over 'free_pages' because 'free'
implies that the pages are unused. But they might not be, they just
haven't been used by cma_alloc
The number of available pages is tracked regardless of CONFIG_CMA_SYSFS,
allowing for a few minor shortcuts in the code, avoiding bitmap
operations.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20250228182928.2645936-2-fvdl@google.com
Signed-off-by: Frank van der Linden <fvdl@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: Joao Martins <joao.m.martins@oracle.com>
Cc: Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev>
Cc: Roman Gushchin (Cruise) <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>
Cc: Usama Arif <usamaarif642@gmail.com>
Cc: Yu Zhao <yuzhao@google.com>
Cc: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
Cc: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2025-02-28 18:29:02 +00:00
|
|
|
unsigned long nr_part;
|
mm, cma: support multiple contiguous ranges, if requested
Currently, CMA manages one range of physically contiguous memory.
Creation of larger CMA areas with hugetlb_cma may run in to gaps in
physical memory, so that they are not able to allocate that contiguous
physical range from memblock when creating the CMA area.
This can happen, for example, on an AMD system with > 1TB of memory, where
there will be a gap just below the 1TB (40bit DMA) line. If you have set
aside most of memory for potential hugetlb CMA allocation,
cma_declare_contiguous_nid will fail.
hugetlb_cma doesn't need the entire area to be one physically contiguous
range. It just cares about being able to get physically contiguous chunks
of a certain size (e.g. 1G), and it is fine to have the CMA area backed
by multiple physical ranges, as long as it gets 1G contiguous allocations.
Multi-range support is implemented by introducing an array of ranges,
instead of just one big one. Each range has its own bitmap. Effectively,
the allocate and release operations work as before, just per-range. So,
instead of going through one large bitmap, they now go through a number of
smaller ones.
The maximum number of supported ranges is 8, as defined in CMA_MAX_RANGES.
Since some current users of CMA expect a CMA area to just use one
physically contiguous range, only allow for multiple ranges if a new
interface, cma_declare_contiguous_nid_multi, is used. The other
interfaces will work like before, creating only CMA areas with 1 range.
cma_declare_contiguous_nid_multi works as follows, mimicking the
default "bottom-up, above 4G" reservation approach:
0) Try cma_declare_contiguous_nid, which will use only one
region. If this succeeds, return. This makes sure that for
all the cases that currently work, the behavior remains
unchanged even if the caller switches from
cma_declare_contiguous_nid to cma_declare_contiguous_nid_multi.
1) Select the largest free memblock ranges above 4G, with
a maximum number of CMA_MAX_RANGES.
2) If we did not find at most CMA_MAX_RANGES that add
up to the total size requested, return -ENOMEM.
3) Sort the selected ranges by base address.
4) Reserve them bottom-up until we get what we wanted.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20250228182928.2645936-3-fvdl@google.com
Signed-off-by: Frank van der Linden <fvdl@google.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Cc: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Joao Martins <joao.m.martins@oracle.com>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev>
Cc: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Roman Gushchin (Cruise) <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>
Cc: Usama Arif <usamaarif642@gmail.com>
Cc: Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Yu Zhao <yuzhao@google.com>
Cc: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2025-02-28 18:29:03 +00:00
|
|
|
unsigned long nbits;
|
|
|
|
int r;
|
|
|
|
struct cma_memrange *cmr;
|
2017-02-24 22:58:50 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2021-05-05 01:34:44 +00:00
|
|
|
spin_lock_irq(&cma->lock);
|
2017-02-24 22:58:50 +00:00
|
|
|
pr_info("number of available pages: ");
|
mm, cma: support multiple contiguous ranges, if requested
Currently, CMA manages one range of physically contiguous memory.
Creation of larger CMA areas with hugetlb_cma may run in to gaps in
physical memory, so that they are not able to allocate that contiguous
physical range from memblock when creating the CMA area.
This can happen, for example, on an AMD system with > 1TB of memory, where
there will be a gap just below the 1TB (40bit DMA) line. If you have set
aside most of memory for potential hugetlb CMA allocation,
cma_declare_contiguous_nid will fail.
hugetlb_cma doesn't need the entire area to be one physically contiguous
range. It just cares about being able to get physically contiguous chunks
of a certain size (e.g. 1G), and it is fine to have the CMA area backed
by multiple physical ranges, as long as it gets 1G contiguous allocations.
Multi-range support is implemented by introducing an array of ranges,
instead of just one big one. Each range has its own bitmap. Effectively,
the allocate and release operations work as before, just per-range. So,
instead of going through one large bitmap, they now go through a number of
smaller ones.
The maximum number of supported ranges is 8, as defined in CMA_MAX_RANGES.
Since some current users of CMA expect a CMA area to just use one
physically contiguous range, only allow for multiple ranges if a new
interface, cma_declare_contiguous_nid_multi, is used. The other
interfaces will work like before, creating only CMA areas with 1 range.
cma_declare_contiguous_nid_multi works as follows, mimicking the
default "bottom-up, above 4G" reservation approach:
0) Try cma_declare_contiguous_nid, which will use only one
region. If this succeeds, return. This makes sure that for
all the cases that currently work, the behavior remains
unchanged even if the caller switches from
cma_declare_contiguous_nid to cma_declare_contiguous_nid_multi.
1) Select the largest free memblock ranges above 4G, with
a maximum number of CMA_MAX_RANGES.
2) If we did not find at most CMA_MAX_RANGES that add
up to the total size requested, return -ENOMEM.
3) Sort the selected ranges by base address.
4) Reserve them bottom-up until we get what we wanted.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20250228182928.2645936-3-fvdl@google.com
Signed-off-by: Frank van der Linden <fvdl@google.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Cc: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Joao Martins <joao.m.martins@oracle.com>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev>
Cc: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Roman Gushchin (Cruise) <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>
Cc: Usama Arif <usamaarif642@gmail.com>
Cc: Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Yu Zhao <yuzhao@google.com>
Cc: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2025-02-28 18:29:03 +00:00
|
|
|
for (r = 0; r < cma->nranges; r++) {
|
|
|
|
cmr = &cma->ranges[r];
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
start = 0;
|
|
|
|
nbits = cma_bitmap_maxno(cma, cmr);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
pr_info("range %d: ", r);
|
|
|
|
for (;;) {
|
|
|
|
next_zero_bit = find_next_zero_bit(cmr->bitmap,
|
|
|
|
nbits, start);
|
|
|
|
if (next_zero_bit >= nbits)
|
|
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
next_set_bit = find_next_bit(cmr->bitmap, nbits,
|
|
|
|
next_zero_bit);
|
|
|
|
nr_zero = next_set_bit - next_zero_bit;
|
|
|
|
nr_part = nr_zero << cma->order_per_bit;
|
|
|
|
pr_cont("%s%lu@%lu", start ? "+" : "", nr_part,
|
|
|
|
next_zero_bit);
|
|
|
|
start = next_zero_bit + nr_zero;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
pr_info("\n");
|
2017-02-24 22:58:50 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
mm/cma: export total and free number of pages for CMA areas
Patch series "hugetlb/CMA improvements for large systems", v5.
On large systems, we observed some issues with hugetlb and CMA:
1) When specifying a large number of hugetlb boot pages (hugepages= on
the commandline), the kernel may run out of memory before it even gets
to HVO. For example, if you have a 3072G system, and want to use 3024
1G hugetlb pages for VMs, that should leave you plenty of space for the
hypervisor, provided you have the hugetlb vmemmap optimization (HVO)
enabled. However, since the vmemmap pages are always allocated first,
and then later in boot freed, you will actually run yourself out of
memory before you can do HVO. This means not getting all the hugetlb
pages you want, and worse, failure to boot if there is an allocation
failure in the system from which it can't recover.
2) There is a system setup where you might want to use hugetlb_cma with
a large value (say, again, 3024 out of 3072G like above), and then
lower that if system usage allows it, to make room for non-hugetlb
processes. For this, a variation of the problem above applies: the
kernel runs out of unmovable space to allocate from before you finish
boot, since your CMA area takes up all the space.
3) CMA wants to use one big contiguous area for allocations. Which
fails if you have the aforementioned 3T system with a gap in the middle
of physical memory (like the < 40bits BIOS DMA area seen on some AMD
systems). You then won't be able to set up a CMA area for one of the
NUMA nodes, leading to loss of half of your hugetlb CMA area.
4) Under the scenario mentioned in 2), when trying to grow the number
of hugetlb pages after dropping it for a while, new CMA allocations may
fail occasionally. This is not unexpected, some transient references
on pages may prevent cma_alloc from succeeding under memory pressure.
However, the hugetlb code then falls back to a normal contiguous alloc,
which may end up succeeding. This is not always desired behavior. If
you have a large CMA area, then the kernel has a restricted amount of
memory it can do unmovable allocations from (a well known issue). A
normal contiguous alloc may eat further in to this space.
To resolve these issues, do the following:
* Add hooks to the section init code to do custom initialization of
memmap pages. Hugetlb bootmem (memblock) allocated pages can then be
pre-HVOed. This avoids allocating a large number of vmemmap pages early
in boot, only to have them be freed again later, and also avoids running
out of memory as described under 1). Using these hooks for hugetlb is
optional. It requires moving hugetlb bootmem allocation to an earlier
spot by the architecture. This has been enabled on x86.
* hugetlb_cma doesn't care about the CMA area it uses being one large
contiguous range. Multiple smaller ranges are fine. The only
requirements are that the areas should be on one NUMA node, and
individual gigantic pages should be allocatable from them. So,
implement multi-range support for CMA, avoiding issue 3).
* Introduce a hugetlb_cma_only option on the commandline. This only
allows allocations from CMA for gigantic pages, if hugetlb_cma= is also
specified.
* With hugetlb_cma_only active, it also makes sense to be able to
pre-allocate gigantic hugetlb pages at boot time from the CMA area(s).
Add a rudimentary early CMA allocation interface, that just grabs a
piece of memblock-allocated space from the CMA area, which gets marked
as allocated in the CMA bitmap when the CMA area is initialized. With
this, hugepages= can be supported with hugetlb_cma=, making scenario 2)
work.
Additionally, fix some minor bugs, with one worth mentioning: since
hugetlb gigantic bootmem pages are allocated by memblock, they may span
multiple zones, as memblock doesn't (and mostly can't) know about zones.
This can cause problems. A hugetlb page spanning multiple zones is bad,
and it's worse with HVO, when the de-HVO step effectively sneakily
re-assigns pages to a different zone than originally configured, since the
tail pages all inherit the zone from the first 60 tail pages. This
condition is not common, but can be easily reproduced using ZONE_MOVABLE.
To fix this, add checks to see if gigantic bootmem pages intersect with
multiple zones, and do not use them if they do, giving them back to the
page allocator instead.
The first patch is kind of along for the ride, except that maintaining an
available_count for a CMA area is convenient for the multiple range
support.
This patch (of 27):
In addition to the number of allocations and releases, system management
software may like to be aware of the size of CMA areas, and how many pages
are available in it. This information is currently not available, so
export it in total_page and available_pages, respectively.
The name 'available_pages' was picked over 'free_pages' because 'free'
implies that the pages are unused. But they might not be, they just
haven't been used by cma_alloc
The number of available pages is tracked regardless of CONFIG_CMA_SYSFS,
allowing for a few minor shortcuts in the code, avoiding bitmap
operations.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20250228182928.2645936-2-fvdl@google.com
Signed-off-by: Frank van der Linden <fvdl@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: Joao Martins <joao.m.martins@oracle.com>
Cc: Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev>
Cc: Roman Gushchin (Cruise) <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>
Cc: Usama Arif <usamaarif642@gmail.com>
Cc: Yu Zhao <yuzhao@google.com>
Cc: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
Cc: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2025-02-28 18:29:02 +00:00
|
|
|
pr_cont("=> %lu free of %lu total pages\n", cma->available_count,
|
|
|
|
cma->count);
|
2021-05-05 01:34:44 +00:00
|
|
|
spin_unlock_irq(&cma->lock);
|
2017-02-24 22:58:50 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
mm, cma: support multiple contiguous ranges, if requested
Currently, CMA manages one range of physically contiguous memory.
Creation of larger CMA areas with hugetlb_cma may run in to gaps in
physical memory, so that they are not able to allocate that contiguous
physical range from memblock when creating the CMA area.
This can happen, for example, on an AMD system with > 1TB of memory, where
there will be a gap just below the 1TB (40bit DMA) line. If you have set
aside most of memory for potential hugetlb CMA allocation,
cma_declare_contiguous_nid will fail.
hugetlb_cma doesn't need the entire area to be one physically contiguous
range. It just cares about being able to get physically contiguous chunks
of a certain size (e.g. 1G), and it is fine to have the CMA area backed
by multiple physical ranges, as long as it gets 1G contiguous allocations.
Multi-range support is implemented by introducing an array of ranges,
instead of just one big one. Each range has its own bitmap. Effectively,
the allocate and release operations work as before, just per-range. So,
instead of going through one large bitmap, they now go through a number of
smaller ones.
The maximum number of supported ranges is 8, as defined in CMA_MAX_RANGES.
Since some current users of CMA expect a CMA area to just use one
physically contiguous range, only allow for multiple ranges if a new
interface, cma_declare_contiguous_nid_multi, is used. The other
interfaces will work like before, creating only CMA areas with 1 range.
cma_declare_contiguous_nid_multi works as follows, mimicking the
default "bottom-up, above 4G" reservation approach:
0) Try cma_declare_contiguous_nid, which will use only one
region. If this succeeds, return. This makes sure that for
all the cases that currently work, the behavior remains
unchanged even if the caller switches from
cma_declare_contiguous_nid to cma_declare_contiguous_nid_multi.
1) Select the largest free memblock ranges above 4G, with
a maximum number of CMA_MAX_RANGES.
2) If we did not find at most CMA_MAX_RANGES that add
up to the total size requested, return -ENOMEM.
3) Sort the selected ranges by base address.
4) Reserve them bottom-up until we get what we wanted.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20250228182928.2645936-3-fvdl@google.com
Signed-off-by: Frank van der Linden <fvdl@google.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Cc: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Joao Martins <joao.m.martins@oracle.com>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev>
Cc: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Roman Gushchin (Cruise) <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>
Cc: Usama Arif <usamaarif642@gmail.com>
Cc: Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Yu Zhao <yuzhao@google.com>
Cc: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2025-02-28 18:29:03 +00:00
|
|
|
static int cma_range_alloc(struct cma *cma, struct cma_memrange *cmr,
|
|
|
|
unsigned long count, unsigned int align,
|
|
|
|
struct page **pagep, gfp_t gfp)
|
2014-08-06 23:05:25 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
2015-11-06 02:50:08 +00:00
|
|
|
unsigned long mask, offset;
|
|
|
|
unsigned long pfn = -1;
|
|
|
|
unsigned long start = 0;
|
2014-08-06 23:05:25 +00:00
|
|
|
unsigned long bitmap_maxno, bitmap_no, bitmap_count;
|
mm, cma: support multiple contiguous ranges, if requested
Currently, CMA manages one range of physically contiguous memory.
Creation of larger CMA areas with hugetlb_cma may run in to gaps in
physical memory, so that they are not able to allocate that contiguous
physical range from memblock when creating the CMA area.
This can happen, for example, on an AMD system with > 1TB of memory, where
there will be a gap just below the 1TB (40bit DMA) line. If you have set
aside most of memory for potential hugetlb CMA allocation,
cma_declare_contiguous_nid will fail.
hugetlb_cma doesn't need the entire area to be one physically contiguous
range. It just cares about being able to get physically contiguous chunks
of a certain size (e.g. 1G), and it is fine to have the CMA area backed
by multiple physical ranges, as long as it gets 1G contiguous allocations.
Multi-range support is implemented by introducing an array of ranges,
instead of just one big one. Each range has its own bitmap. Effectively,
the allocate and release operations work as before, just per-range. So,
instead of going through one large bitmap, they now go through a number of
smaller ones.
The maximum number of supported ranges is 8, as defined in CMA_MAX_RANGES.
Since some current users of CMA expect a CMA area to just use one
physically contiguous range, only allow for multiple ranges if a new
interface, cma_declare_contiguous_nid_multi, is used. The other
interfaces will work like before, creating only CMA areas with 1 range.
cma_declare_contiguous_nid_multi works as follows, mimicking the
default "bottom-up, above 4G" reservation approach:
0) Try cma_declare_contiguous_nid, which will use only one
region. If this succeeds, return. This makes sure that for
all the cases that currently work, the behavior remains
unchanged even if the caller switches from
cma_declare_contiguous_nid to cma_declare_contiguous_nid_multi.
1) Select the largest free memblock ranges above 4G, with
a maximum number of CMA_MAX_RANGES.
2) If we did not find at most CMA_MAX_RANGES that add
up to the total size requested, return -ENOMEM.
3) Sort the selected ranges by base address.
4) Reserve them bottom-up until we get what we wanted.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20250228182928.2645936-3-fvdl@google.com
Signed-off-by: Frank van der Linden <fvdl@google.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Cc: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Joao Martins <joao.m.martins@oracle.com>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev>
Cc: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Roman Gushchin (Cruise) <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>
Cc: Usama Arif <usamaarif642@gmail.com>
Cc: Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Yu Zhao <yuzhao@google.com>
Cc: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2025-02-28 18:29:03 +00:00
|
|
|
int ret = -EBUSY;
|
2014-08-06 23:05:25 +00:00
|
|
|
struct page *page = NULL;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
mask = cma_bitmap_aligned_mask(cma, align);
|
mm, cma: support multiple contiguous ranges, if requested
Currently, CMA manages one range of physically contiguous memory.
Creation of larger CMA areas with hugetlb_cma may run in to gaps in
physical memory, so that they are not able to allocate that contiguous
physical range from memblock when creating the CMA area.
This can happen, for example, on an AMD system with > 1TB of memory, where
there will be a gap just below the 1TB (40bit DMA) line. If you have set
aside most of memory for potential hugetlb CMA allocation,
cma_declare_contiguous_nid will fail.
hugetlb_cma doesn't need the entire area to be one physically contiguous
range. It just cares about being able to get physically contiguous chunks
of a certain size (e.g. 1G), and it is fine to have the CMA area backed
by multiple physical ranges, as long as it gets 1G contiguous allocations.
Multi-range support is implemented by introducing an array of ranges,
instead of just one big one. Each range has its own bitmap. Effectively,
the allocate and release operations work as before, just per-range. So,
instead of going through one large bitmap, they now go through a number of
smaller ones.
The maximum number of supported ranges is 8, as defined in CMA_MAX_RANGES.
Since some current users of CMA expect a CMA area to just use one
physically contiguous range, only allow for multiple ranges if a new
interface, cma_declare_contiguous_nid_multi, is used. The other
interfaces will work like before, creating only CMA areas with 1 range.
cma_declare_contiguous_nid_multi works as follows, mimicking the
default "bottom-up, above 4G" reservation approach:
0) Try cma_declare_contiguous_nid, which will use only one
region. If this succeeds, return. This makes sure that for
all the cases that currently work, the behavior remains
unchanged even if the caller switches from
cma_declare_contiguous_nid to cma_declare_contiguous_nid_multi.
1) Select the largest free memblock ranges above 4G, with
a maximum number of CMA_MAX_RANGES.
2) If we did not find at most CMA_MAX_RANGES that add
up to the total size requested, return -ENOMEM.
3) Sort the selected ranges by base address.
4) Reserve them bottom-up until we get what we wanted.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20250228182928.2645936-3-fvdl@google.com
Signed-off-by: Frank van der Linden <fvdl@google.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Cc: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Joao Martins <joao.m.martins@oracle.com>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev>
Cc: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Roman Gushchin (Cruise) <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>
Cc: Usama Arif <usamaarif642@gmail.com>
Cc: Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Yu Zhao <yuzhao@google.com>
Cc: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2025-02-28 18:29:03 +00:00
|
|
|
offset = cma_bitmap_aligned_offset(cma, cmr, align);
|
|
|
|
bitmap_maxno = cma_bitmap_maxno(cma, cmr);
|
2014-08-06 23:05:25 +00:00
|
|
|
bitmap_count = cma_bitmap_pages_to_bits(cma, count);
|
|
|
|
|
2016-11-10 18:46:16 +00:00
|
|
|
if (bitmap_count > bitmap_maxno)
|
mm, cma: support multiple contiguous ranges, if requested
Currently, CMA manages one range of physically contiguous memory.
Creation of larger CMA areas with hugetlb_cma may run in to gaps in
physical memory, so that they are not able to allocate that contiguous
physical range from memblock when creating the CMA area.
This can happen, for example, on an AMD system with > 1TB of memory, where
there will be a gap just below the 1TB (40bit DMA) line. If you have set
aside most of memory for potential hugetlb CMA allocation,
cma_declare_contiguous_nid will fail.
hugetlb_cma doesn't need the entire area to be one physically contiguous
range. It just cares about being able to get physically contiguous chunks
of a certain size (e.g. 1G), and it is fine to have the CMA area backed
by multiple physical ranges, as long as it gets 1G contiguous allocations.
Multi-range support is implemented by introducing an array of ranges,
instead of just one big one. Each range has its own bitmap. Effectively,
the allocate and release operations work as before, just per-range. So,
instead of going through one large bitmap, they now go through a number of
smaller ones.
The maximum number of supported ranges is 8, as defined in CMA_MAX_RANGES.
Since some current users of CMA expect a CMA area to just use one
physically contiguous range, only allow for multiple ranges if a new
interface, cma_declare_contiguous_nid_multi, is used. The other
interfaces will work like before, creating only CMA areas with 1 range.
cma_declare_contiguous_nid_multi works as follows, mimicking the
default "bottom-up, above 4G" reservation approach:
0) Try cma_declare_contiguous_nid, which will use only one
region. If this succeeds, return. This makes sure that for
all the cases that currently work, the behavior remains
unchanged even if the caller switches from
cma_declare_contiguous_nid to cma_declare_contiguous_nid_multi.
1) Select the largest free memblock ranges above 4G, with
a maximum number of CMA_MAX_RANGES.
2) If we did not find at most CMA_MAX_RANGES that add
up to the total size requested, return -ENOMEM.
3) Sort the selected ranges by base address.
4) Reserve them bottom-up until we get what we wanted.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20250228182928.2645936-3-fvdl@google.com
Signed-off-by: Frank van der Linden <fvdl@google.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Cc: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Joao Martins <joao.m.martins@oracle.com>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev>
Cc: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Roman Gushchin (Cruise) <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>
Cc: Usama Arif <usamaarif642@gmail.com>
Cc: Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Yu Zhao <yuzhao@google.com>
Cc: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2025-02-28 18:29:03 +00:00
|
|
|
goto out;
|
2016-11-10 18:46:16 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2014-08-06 23:05:25 +00:00
|
|
|
for (;;) {
|
2021-05-05 01:34:44 +00:00
|
|
|
spin_lock_irq(&cma->lock);
|
mm/cma: export total and free number of pages for CMA areas
Patch series "hugetlb/CMA improvements for large systems", v5.
On large systems, we observed some issues with hugetlb and CMA:
1) When specifying a large number of hugetlb boot pages (hugepages= on
the commandline), the kernel may run out of memory before it even gets
to HVO. For example, if you have a 3072G system, and want to use 3024
1G hugetlb pages for VMs, that should leave you plenty of space for the
hypervisor, provided you have the hugetlb vmemmap optimization (HVO)
enabled. However, since the vmemmap pages are always allocated first,
and then later in boot freed, you will actually run yourself out of
memory before you can do HVO. This means not getting all the hugetlb
pages you want, and worse, failure to boot if there is an allocation
failure in the system from which it can't recover.
2) There is a system setup where you might want to use hugetlb_cma with
a large value (say, again, 3024 out of 3072G like above), and then
lower that if system usage allows it, to make room for non-hugetlb
processes. For this, a variation of the problem above applies: the
kernel runs out of unmovable space to allocate from before you finish
boot, since your CMA area takes up all the space.
3) CMA wants to use one big contiguous area for allocations. Which
fails if you have the aforementioned 3T system with a gap in the middle
of physical memory (like the < 40bits BIOS DMA area seen on some AMD
systems). You then won't be able to set up a CMA area for one of the
NUMA nodes, leading to loss of half of your hugetlb CMA area.
4) Under the scenario mentioned in 2), when trying to grow the number
of hugetlb pages after dropping it for a while, new CMA allocations may
fail occasionally. This is not unexpected, some transient references
on pages may prevent cma_alloc from succeeding under memory pressure.
However, the hugetlb code then falls back to a normal contiguous alloc,
which may end up succeeding. This is not always desired behavior. If
you have a large CMA area, then the kernel has a restricted amount of
memory it can do unmovable allocations from (a well known issue). A
normal contiguous alloc may eat further in to this space.
To resolve these issues, do the following:
* Add hooks to the section init code to do custom initialization of
memmap pages. Hugetlb bootmem (memblock) allocated pages can then be
pre-HVOed. This avoids allocating a large number of vmemmap pages early
in boot, only to have them be freed again later, and also avoids running
out of memory as described under 1). Using these hooks for hugetlb is
optional. It requires moving hugetlb bootmem allocation to an earlier
spot by the architecture. This has been enabled on x86.
* hugetlb_cma doesn't care about the CMA area it uses being one large
contiguous range. Multiple smaller ranges are fine. The only
requirements are that the areas should be on one NUMA node, and
individual gigantic pages should be allocatable from them. So,
implement multi-range support for CMA, avoiding issue 3).
* Introduce a hugetlb_cma_only option on the commandline. This only
allows allocations from CMA for gigantic pages, if hugetlb_cma= is also
specified.
* With hugetlb_cma_only active, it also makes sense to be able to
pre-allocate gigantic hugetlb pages at boot time from the CMA area(s).
Add a rudimentary early CMA allocation interface, that just grabs a
piece of memblock-allocated space from the CMA area, which gets marked
as allocated in the CMA bitmap when the CMA area is initialized. With
this, hugepages= can be supported with hugetlb_cma=, making scenario 2)
work.
Additionally, fix some minor bugs, with one worth mentioning: since
hugetlb gigantic bootmem pages are allocated by memblock, they may span
multiple zones, as memblock doesn't (and mostly can't) know about zones.
This can cause problems. A hugetlb page spanning multiple zones is bad,
and it's worse with HVO, when the de-HVO step effectively sneakily
re-assigns pages to a different zone than originally configured, since the
tail pages all inherit the zone from the first 60 tail pages. This
condition is not common, but can be easily reproduced using ZONE_MOVABLE.
To fix this, add checks to see if gigantic bootmem pages intersect with
multiple zones, and do not use them if they do, giving them back to the
page allocator instead.
The first patch is kind of along for the ride, except that maintaining an
available_count for a CMA area is convenient for the multiple range
support.
This patch (of 27):
In addition to the number of allocations and releases, system management
software may like to be aware of the size of CMA areas, and how many pages
are available in it. This information is currently not available, so
export it in total_page and available_pages, respectively.
The name 'available_pages' was picked over 'free_pages' because 'free'
implies that the pages are unused. But they might not be, they just
haven't been used by cma_alloc
The number of available pages is tracked regardless of CONFIG_CMA_SYSFS,
allowing for a few minor shortcuts in the code, avoiding bitmap
operations.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20250228182928.2645936-2-fvdl@google.com
Signed-off-by: Frank van der Linden <fvdl@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: Joao Martins <joao.m.martins@oracle.com>
Cc: Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev>
Cc: Roman Gushchin (Cruise) <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>
Cc: Usama Arif <usamaarif642@gmail.com>
Cc: Yu Zhao <yuzhao@google.com>
Cc: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
Cc: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2025-02-28 18:29:02 +00:00
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* If the request is larger than the available number
|
|
|
|
* of pages, stop right away.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
if (count > cma->available_count) {
|
|
|
|
spin_unlock_irq(&cma->lock);
|
|
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
}
|
mm, cma: support multiple contiguous ranges, if requested
Currently, CMA manages one range of physically contiguous memory.
Creation of larger CMA areas with hugetlb_cma may run in to gaps in
physical memory, so that they are not able to allocate that contiguous
physical range from memblock when creating the CMA area.
This can happen, for example, on an AMD system with > 1TB of memory, where
there will be a gap just below the 1TB (40bit DMA) line. If you have set
aside most of memory for potential hugetlb CMA allocation,
cma_declare_contiguous_nid will fail.
hugetlb_cma doesn't need the entire area to be one physically contiguous
range. It just cares about being able to get physically contiguous chunks
of a certain size (e.g. 1G), and it is fine to have the CMA area backed
by multiple physical ranges, as long as it gets 1G contiguous allocations.
Multi-range support is implemented by introducing an array of ranges,
instead of just one big one. Each range has its own bitmap. Effectively,
the allocate and release operations work as before, just per-range. So,
instead of going through one large bitmap, they now go through a number of
smaller ones.
The maximum number of supported ranges is 8, as defined in CMA_MAX_RANGES.
Since some current users of CMA expect a CMA area to just use one
physically contiguous range, only allow for multiple ranges if a new
interface, cma_declare_contiguous_nid_multi, is used. The other
interfaces will work like before, creating only CMA areas with 1 range.
cma_declare_contiguous_nid_multi works as follows, mimicking the
default "bottom-up, above 4G" reservation approach:
0) Try cma_declare_contiguous_nid, which will use only one
region. If this succeeds, return. This makes sure that for
all the cases that currently work, the behavior remains
unchanged even if the caller switches from
cma_declare_contiguous_nid to cma_declare_contiguous_nid_multi.
1) Select the largest free memblock ranges above 4G, with
a maximum number of CMA_MAX_RANGES.
2) If we did not find at most CMA_MAX_RANGES that add
up to the total size requested, return -ENOMEM.
3) Sort the selected ranges by base address.
4) Reserve them bottom-up until we get what we wanted.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20250228182928.2645936-3-fvdl@google.com
Signed-off-by: Frank van der Linden <fvdl@google.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Cc: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Joao Martins <joao.m.martins@oracle.com>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev>
Cc: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Roman Gushchin (Cruise) <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>
Cc: Usama Arif <usamaarif642@gmail.com>
Cc: Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Yu Zhao <yuzhao@google.com>
Cc: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2025-02-28 18:29:03 +00:00
|
|
|
bitmap_no = bitmap_find_next_zero_area_off(cmr->bitmap,
|
2014-12-13 00:54:48 +00:00
|
|
|
bitmap_maxno, start, bitmap_count, mask,
|
|
|
|
offset);
|
2014-08-06 23:05:25 +00:00
|
|
|
if (bitmap_no >= bitmap_maxno) {
|
2021-05-05 01:34:44 +00:00
|
|
|
spin_unlock_irq(&cma->lock);
|
2014-08-06 23:05:25 +00:00
|
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
}
|
mm, cma: support multiple contiguous ranges, if requested
Currently, CMA manages one range of physically contiguous memory.
Creation of larger CMA areas with hugetlb_cma may run in to gaps in
physical memory, so that they are not able to allocate that contiguous
physical range from memblock when creating the CMA area.
This can happen, for example, on an AMD system with > 1TB of memory, where
there will be a gap just below the 1TB (40bit DMA) line. If you have set
aside most of memory for potential hugetlb CMA allocation,
cma_declare_contiguous_nid will fail.
hugetlb_cma doesn't need the entire area to be one physically contiguous
range. It just cares about being able to get physically contiguous chunks
of a certain size (e.g. 1G), and it is fine to have the CMA area backed
by multiple physical ranges, as long as it gets 1G contiguous allocations.
Multi-range support is implemented by introducing an array of ranges,
instead of just one big one. Each range has its own bitmap. Effectively,
the allocate and release operations work as before, just per-range. So,
instead of going through one large bitmap, they now go through a number of
smaller ones.
The maximum number of supported ranges is 8, as defined in CMA_MAX_RANGES.
Since some current users of CMA expect a CMA area to just use one
physically contiguous range, only allow for multiple ranges if a new
interface, cma_declare_contiguous_nid_multi, is used. The other
interfaces will work like before, creating only CMA areas with 1 range.
cma_declare_contiguous_nid_multi works as follows, mimicking the
default "bottom-up, above 4G" reservation approach:
0) Try cma_declare_contiguous_nid, which will use only one
region. If this succeeds, return. This makes sure that for
all the cases that currently work, the behavior remains
unchanged even if the caller switches from
cma_declare_contiguous_nid to cma_declare_contiguous_nid_multi.
1) Select the largest free memblock ranges above 4G, with
a maximum number of CMA_MAX_RANGES.
2) If we did not find at most CMA_MAX_RANGES that add
up to the total size requested, return -ENOMEM.
3) Sort the selected ranges by base address.
4) Reserve them bottom-up until we get what we wanted.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20250228182928.2645936-3-fvdl@google.com
Signed-off-by: Frank van der Linden <fvdl@google.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Cc: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Joao Martins <joao.m.martins@oracle.com>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev>
Cc: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Roman Gushchin (Cruise) <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>
Cc: Usama Arif <usamaarif642@gmail.com>
Cc: Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Yu Zhao <yuzhao@google.com>
Cc: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2025-02-28 18:29:03 +00:00
|
|
|
bitmap_set(cmr->bitmap, bitmap_no, bitmap_count);
|
mm/cma: export total and free number of pages for CMA areas
Patch series "hugetlb/CMA improvements for large systems", v5.
On large systems, we observed some issues with hugetlb and CMA:
1) When specifying a large number of hugetlb boot pages (hugepages= on
the commandline), the kernel may run out of memory before it even gets
to HVO. For example, if you have a 3072G system, and want to use 3024
1G hugetlb pages for VMs, that should leave you plenty of space for the
hypervisor, provided you have the hugetlb vmemmap optimization (HVO)
enabled. However, since the vmemmap pages are always allocated first,
and then later in boot freed, you will actually run yourself out of
memory before you can do HVO. This means not getting all the hugetlb
pages you want, and worse, failure to boot if there is an allocation
failure in the system from which it can't recover.
2) There is a system setup where you might want to use hugetlb_cma with
a large value (say, again, 3024 out of 3072G like above), and then
lower that if system usage allows it, to make room for non-hugetlb
processes. For this, a variation of the problem above applies: the
kernel runs out of unmovable space to allocate from before you finish
boot, since your CMA area takes up all the space.
3) CMA wants to use one big contiguous area for allocations. Which
fails if you have the aforementioned 3T system with a gap in the middle
of physical memory (like the < 40bits BIOS DMA area seen on some AMD
systems). You then won't be able to set up a CMA area for one of the
NUMA nodes, leading to loss of half of your hugetlb CMA area.
4) Under the scenario mentioned in 2), when trying to grow the number
of hugetlb pages after dropping it for a while, new CMA allocations may
fail occasionally. This is not unexpected, some transient references
on pages may prevent cma_alloc from succeeding under memory pressure.
However, the hugetlb code then falls back to a normal contiguous alloc,
which may end up succeeding. This is not always desired behavior. If
you have a large CMA area, then the kernel has a restricted amount of
memory it can do unmovable allocations from (a well known issue). A
normal contiguous alloc may eat further in to this space.
To resolve these issues, do the following:
* Add hooks to the section init code to do custom initialization of
memmap pages. Hugetlb bootmem (memblock) allocated pages can then be
pre-HVOed. This avoids allocating a large number of vmemmap pages early
in boot, only to have them be freed again later, and also avoids running
out of memory as described under 1). Using these hooks for hugetlb is
optional. It requires moving hugetlb bootmem allocation to an earlier
spot by the architecture. This has been enabled on x86.
* hugetlb_cma doesn't care about the CMA area it uses being one large
contiguous range. Multiple smaller ranges are fine. The only
requirements are that the areas should be on one NUMA node, and
individual gigantic pages should be allocatable from them. So,
implement multi-range support for CMA, avoiding issue 3).
* Introduce a hugetlb_cma_only option on the commandline. This only
allows allocations from CMA for gigantic pages, if hugetlb_cma= is also
specified.
* With hugetlb_cma_only active, it also makes sense to be able to
pre-allocate gigantic hugetlb pages at boot time from the CMA area(s).
Add a rudimentary early CMA allocation interface, that just grabs a
piece of memblock-allocated space from the CMA area, which gets marked
as allocated in the CMA bitmap when the CMA area is initialized. With
this, hugepages= can be supported with hugetlb_cma=, making scenario 2)
work.
Additionally, fix some minor bugs, with one worth mentioning: since
hugetlb gigantic bootmem pages are allocated by memblock, they may span
multiple zones, as memblock doesn't (and mostly can't) know about zones.
This can cause problems. A hugetlb page spanning multiple zones is bad,
and it's worse with HVO, when the de-HVO step effectively sneakily
re-assigns pages to a different zone than originally configured, since the
tail pages all inherit the zone from the first 60 tail pages. This
condition is not common, but can be easily reproduced using ZONE_MOVABLE.
To fix this, add checks to see if gigantic bootmem pages intersect with
multiple zones, and do not use them if they do, giving them back to the
page allocator instead.
The first patch is kind of along for the ride, except that maintaining an
available_count for a CMA area is convenient for the multiple range
support.
This patch (of 27):
In addition to the number of allocations and releases, system management
software may like to be aware of the size of CMA areas, and how many pages
are available in it. This information is currently not available, so
export it in total_page and available_pages, respectively.
The name 'available_pages' was picked over 'free_pages' because 'free'
implies that the pages are unused. But they might not be, they just
haven't been used by cma_alloc
The number of available pages is tracked regardless of CONFIG_CMA_SYSFS,
allowing for a few minor shortcuts in the code, avoiding bitmap
operations.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20250228182928.2645936-2-fvdl@google.com
Signed-off-by: Frank van der Linden <fvdl@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: Joao Martins <joao.m.martins@oracle.com>
Cc: Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev>
Cc: Roman Gushchin (Cruise) <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>
Cc: Usama Arif <usamaarif642@gmail.com>
Cc: Yu Zhao <yuzhao@google.com>
Cc: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
Cc: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2025-02-28 18:29:02 +00:00
|
|
|
cma->available_count -= count;
|
2014-08-06 23:05:25 +00:00
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* It's safe to drop the lock here. We've marked this region for
|
|
|
|
* our exclusive use. If the migration fails we will take the
|
|
|
|
* lock again and unmark it.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
2021-05-05 01:34:44 +00:00
|
|
|
spin_unlock_irq(&cma->lock);
|
2014-08-06 23:05:25 +00:00
|
|
|
|
mm, cma: support multiple contiguous ranges, if requested
Currently, CMA manages one range of physically contiguous memory.
Creation of larger CMA areas with hugetlb_cma may run in to gaps in
physical memory, so that they are not able to allocate that contiguous
physical range from memblock when creating the CMA area.
This can happen, for example, on an AMD system with > 1TB of memory, where
there will be a gap just below the 1TB (40bit DMA) line. If you have set
aside most of memory for potential hugetlb CMA allocation,
cma_declare_contiguous_nid will fail.
hugetlb_cma doesn't need the entire area to be one physically contiguous
range. It just cares about being able to get physically contiguous chunks
of a certain size (e.g. 1G), and it is fine to have the CMA area backed
by multiple physical ranges, as long as it gets 1G contiguous allocations.
Multi-range support is implemented by introducing an array of ranges,
instead of just one big one. Each range has its own bitmap. Effectively,
the allocate and release operations work as before, just per-range. So,
instead of going through one large bitmap, they now go through a number of
smaller ones.
The maximum number of supported ranges is 8, as defined in CMA_MAX_RANGES.
Since some current users of CMA expect a CMA area to just use one
physically contiguous range, only allow for multiple ranges if a new
interface, cma_declare_contiguous_nid_multi, is used. The other
interfaces will work like before, creating only CMA areas with 1 range.
cma_declare_contiguous_nid_multi works as follows, mimicking the
default "bottom-up, above 4G" reservation approach:
0) Try cma_declare_contiguous_nid, which will use only one
region. If this succeeds, return. This makes sure that for
all the cases that currently work, the behavior remains
unchanged even if the caller switches from
cma_declare_contiguous_nid to cma_declare_contiguous_nid_multi.
1) Select the largest free memblock ranges above 4G, with
a maximum number of CMA_MAX_RANGES.
2) If we did not find at most CMA_MAX_RANGES that add
up to the total size requested, return -ENOMEM.
3) Sort the selected ranges by base address.
4) Reserve them bottom-up until we get what we wanted.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20250228182928.2645936-3-fvdl@google.com
Signed-off-by: Frank van der Linden <fvdl@google.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Cc: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Joao Martins <joao.m.martins@oracle.com>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev>
Cc: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Roman Gushchin (Cruise) <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>
Cc: Usama Arif <usamaarif642@gmail.com>
Cc: Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Yu Zhao <yuzhao@google.com>
Cc: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2025-02-28 18:29:03 +00:00
|
|
|
pfn = cmr->base_pfn + (bitmap_no << cma->order_per_bit);
|
2025-02-10 01:56:06 +00:00
|
|
|
mutex_lock(&cma->alloc_mutex);
|
2024-08-14 03:54:50 +00:00
|
|
|
ret = alloc_contig_range(pfn, pfn + count, MIGRATE_CMA, gfp);
|
2025-02-10 01:56:06 +00:00
|
|
|
mutex_unlock(&cma->alloc_mutex);
|
2014-08-06 23:05:25 +00:00
|
|
|
if (ret == 0) {
|
|
|
|
page = pfn_to_page(pfn);
|
|
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
}
|
2014-08-06 23:05:30 +00:00
|
|
|
|
mm, cma: support multiple contiguous ranges, if requested
Currently, CMA manages one range of physically contiguous memory.
Creation of larger CMA areas with hugetlb_cma may run in to gaps in
physical memory, so that they are not able to allocate that contiguous
physical range from memblock when creating the CMA area.
This can happen, for example, on an AMD system with > 1TB of memory, where
there will be a gap just below the 1TB (40bit DMA) line. If you have set
aside most of memory for potential hugetlb CMA allocation,
cma_declare_contiguous_nid will fail.
hugetlb_cma doesn't need the entire area to be one physically contiguous
range. It just cares about being able to get physically contiguous chunks
of a certain size (e.g. 1G), and it is fine to have the CMA area backed
by multiple physical ranges, as long as it gets 1G contiguous allocations.
Multi-range support is implemented by introducing an array of ranges,
instead of just one big one. Each range has its own bitmap. Effectively,
the allocate and release operations work as before, just per-range. So,
instead of going through one large bitmap, they now go through a number of
smaller ones.
The maximum number of supported ranges is 8, as defined in CMA_MAX_RANGES.
Since some current users of CMA expect a CMA area to just use one
physically contiguous range, only allow for multiple ranges if a new
interface, cma_declare_contiguous_nid_multi, is used. The other
interfaces will work like before, creating only CMA areas with 1 range.
cma_declare_contiguous_nid_multi works as follows, mimicking the
default "bottom-up, above 4G" reservation approach:
0) Try cma_declare_contiguous_nid, which will use only one
region. If this succeeds, return. This makes sure that for
all the cases that currently work, the behavior remains
unchanged even if the caller switches from
cma_declare_contiguous_nid to cma_declare_contiguous_nid_multi.
1) Select the largest free memblock ranges above 4G, with
a maximum number of CMA_MAX_RANGES.
2) If we did not find at most CMA_MAX_RANGES that add
up to the total size requested, return -ENOMEM.
3) Sort the selected ranges by base address.
4) Reserve them bottom-up until we get what we wanted.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20250228182928.2645936-3-fvdl@google.com
Signed-off-by: Frank van der Linden <fvdl@google.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Cc: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Joao Martins <joao.m.martins@oracle.com>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev>
Cc: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Roman Gushchin (Cruise) <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>
Cc: Usama Arif <usamaarif642@gmail.com>
Cc: Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Yu Zhao <yuzhao@google.com>
Cc: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2025-02-28 18:29:03 +00:00
|
|
|
cma_clear_bitmap(cma, cmr, pfn, count);
|
2014-08-06 23:05:30 +00:00
|
|
|
if (ret != -EBUSY)
|
|
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
|
2023-06-13 09:25:33 +00:00
|
|
|
pr_debug("%s(): memory range at pfn 0x%lx %p is busy, retrying\n",
|
|
|
|
__func__, pfn, pfn_to_page(pfn));
|
2021-05-05 01:37:25 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2021-05-05 01:37:31 +00:00
|
|
|
trace_cma_alloc_busy_retry(cma->name, pfn, pfn_to_page(pfn),
|
|
|
|
count, align);
|
2014-08-06 23:05:25 +00:00
|
|
|
/* try again with a bit different memory target */
|
|
|
|
start = bitmap_no + mask + 1;
|
|
|
|
}
|
mm, cma: support multiple contiguous ranges, if requested
Currently, CMA manages one range of physically contiguous memory.
Creation of larger CMA areas with hugetlb_cma may run in to gaps in
physical memory, so that they are not able to allocate that contiguous
physical range from memblock when creating the CMA area.
This can happen, for example, on an AMD system with > 1TB of memory, where
there will be a gap just below the 1TB (40bit DMA) line. If you have set
aside most of memory for potential hugetlb CMA allocation,
cma_declare_contiguous_nid will fail.
hugetlb_cma doesn't need the entire area to be one physically contiguous
range. It just cares about being able to get physically contiguous chunks
of a certain size (e.g. 1G), and it is fine to have the CMA area backed
by multiple physical ranges, as long as it gets 1G contiguous allocations.
Multi-range support is implemented by introducing an array of ranges,
instead of just one big one. Each range has its own bitmap. Effectively,
the allocate and release operations work as before, just per-range. So,
instead of going through one large bitmap, they now go through a number of
smaller ones.
The maximum number of supported ranges is 8, as defined in CMA_MAX_RANGES.
Since some current users of CMA expect a CMA area to just use one
physically contiguous range, only allow for multiple ranges if a new
interface, cma_declare_contiguous_nid_multi, is used. The other
interfaces will work like before, creating only CMA areas with 1 range.
cma_declare_contiguous_nid_multi works as follows, mimicking the
default "bottom-up, above 4G" reservation approach:
0) Try cma_declare_contiguous_nid, which will use only one
region. If this succeeds, return. This makes sure that for
all the cases that currently work, the behavior remains
unchanged even if the caller switches from
cma_declare_contiguous_nid to cma_declare_contiguous_nid_multi.
1) Select the largest free memblock ranges above 4G, with
a maximum number of CMA_MAX_RANGES.
2) If we did not find at most CMA_MAX_RANGES that add
up to the total size requested, return -ENOMEM.
3) Sort the selected ranges by base address.
4) Reserve them bottom-up until we get what we wanted.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20250228182928.2645936-3-fvdl@google.com
Signed-off-by: Frank van der Linden <fvdl@google.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Cc: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Joao Martins <joao.m.martins@oracle.com>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev>
Cc: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Roman Gushchin (Cruise) <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>
Cc: Usama Arif <usamaarif642@gmail.com>
Cc: Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Yu Zhao <yuzhao@google.com>
Cc: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2025-02-28 18:29:03 +00:00
|
|
|
out:
|
|
|
|
*pagep = page;
|
|
|
|
return ret;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static struct page *__cma_alloc(struct cma *cma, unsigned long count,
|
|
|
|
unsigned int align, gfp_t gfp)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
struct page *page = NULL;
|
|
|
|
int ret = -ENOMEM, r;
|
|
|
|
unsigned long i;
|
|
|
|
const char *name = cma ? cma->name : NULL;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
trace_cma_alloc_start(name, count, align);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (!cma || !cma->count)
|
|
|
|
return page;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
pr_debug("%s(cma %p, name: %s, count %lu, align %d)\n", __func__,
|
|
|
|
(void *)cma, cma->name, count, align);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (!count)
|
|
|
|
return page;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for (r = 0; r < cma->nranges; r++) {
|
|
|
|
page = NULL;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ret = cma_range_alloc(cma, &cma->ranges[r], count, align,
|
|
|
|
&page, gfp);
|
|
|
|
if (ret != -EBUSY || page)
|
|
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
}
|
2014-08-06 23:05:25 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2018-12-28 08:30:57 +00:00
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* CMA can allocate multiple page blocks, which results in different
|
|
|
|
* blocks being marked with different tags. Reset the tags to ignore
|
|
|
|
* those page blocks.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
if (page) {
|
|
|
|
for (i = 0; i < count; i++)
|
mm/cma: use nth_page() in place of direct struct page manipulation
Patch series "Use nth_page() in place of direct struct page manipulation",
v3.
On SPARSEMEM without VMEMMAP, struct page is not guaranteed to be
contiguous, since each memory section's memmap might be allocated
independently. hugetlb pages can go beyond a memory section size, thus
direct struct page manipulation on hugetlb pages/subpages might give wrong
struct page. Kernel provides nth_page() to do the manipulation properly.
Use that whenever code can see hugetlb pages.
This patch (of 5):
When dealing with hugetlb pages, manipulating struct page pointers
directly can get to wrong struct page, since struct page is not guaranteed
to be contiguous on SPARSEMEM without VMEMMAP. Use nth_page() to handle
it properly.
Without the fix, page_kasan_tag_reset() could reset wrong page tags,
causing a wrong kasan result. No related bug is reported. The fix
comes from code inspection.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230913201248.452081-1-zi.yan@sent.com
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230913201248.452081-2-zi.yan@sent.com
Fixes: 2813b9c02962 ("kasan, mm, arm64: tag non slab memory allocated via pagealloc")
Signed-off-by: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org>
Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
Cc: Mike Rapoport (IBM) <rppt@kernel.org>
Cc: Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@alpha.franken.de>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2023-09-13 20:12:44 +00:00
|
|
|
page_kasan_tag_reset(nth_page(page, i));
|
2018-12-28 08:30:57 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2024-08-14 03:54:50 +00:00
|
|
|
if (ret && !(gfp & __GFP_NOWARN)) {
|
2021-05-05 01:37:34 +00:00
|
|
|
pr_err_ratelimited("%s: %s: alloc failed, req-size: %lu pages, ret: %d\n",
|
2021-05-05 01:37:22 +00:00
|
|
|
__func__, cma->name, count, ret);
|
2017-02-24 22:58:50 +00:00
|
|
|
cma_debug_show_areas(cma);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2014-08-06 23:05:25 +00:00
|
|
|
pr_debug("%s(): returned %p\n", __func__, page);
|
mm, cma: support multiple contiguous ranges, if requested
Currently, CMA manages one range of physically contiguous memory.
Creation of larger CMA areas with hugetlb_cma may run in to gaps in
physical memory, so that they are not able to allocate that contiguous
physical range from memblock when creating the CMA area.
This can happen, for example, on an AMD system with > 1TB of memory, where
there will be a gap just below the 1TB (40bit DMA) line. If you have set
aside most of memory for potential hugetlb CMA allocation,
cma_declare_contiguous_nid will fail.
hugetlb_cma doesn't need the entire area to be one physically contiguous
range. It just cares about being able to get physically contiguous chunks
of a certain size (e.g. 1G), and it is fine to have the CMA area backed
by multiple physical ranges, as long as it gets 1G contiguous allocations.
Multi-range support is implemented by introducing an array of ranges,
instead of just one big one. Each range has its own bitmap. Effectively,
the allocate and release operations work as before, just per-range. So,
instead of going through one large bitmap, they now go through a number of
smaller ones.
The maximum number of supported ranges is 8, as defined in CMA_MAX_RANGES.
Since some current users of CMA expect a CMA area to just use one
physically contiguous range, only allow for multiple ranges if a new
interface, cma_declare_contiguous_nid_multi, is used. The other
interfaces will work like before, creating only CMA areas with 1 range.
cma_declare_contiguous_nid_multi works as follows, mimicking the
default "bottom-up, above 4G" reservation approach:
0) Try cma_declare_contiguous_nid, which will use only one
region. If this succeeds, return. This makes sure that for
all the cases that currently work, the behavior remains
unchanged even if the caller switches from
cma_declare_contiguous_nid to cma_declare_contiguous_nid_multi.
1) Select the largest free memblock ranges above 4G, with
a maximum number of CMA_MAX_RANGES.
2) If we did not find at most CMA_MAX_RANGES that add
up to the total size requested, return -ENOMEM.
3) Sort the selected ranges by base address.
4) Reserve them bottom-up until we get what we wanted.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20250228182928.2645936-3-fvdl@google.com
Signed-off-by: Frank van der Linden <fvdl@google.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Cc: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Joao Martins <joao.m.martins@oracle.com>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev>
Cc: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Roman Gushchin (Cruise) <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>
Cc: Usama Arif <usamaarif642@gmail.com>
Cc: Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Yu Zhao <yuzhao@google.com>
Cc: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2025-02-28 18:29:03 +00:00
|
|
|
trace_cma_alloc_finish(name, page ? page_to_pfn(page) : 0,
|
|
|
|
page, count, align, ret);
|
2021-05-05 01:37:28 +00:00
|
|
|
if (page) {
|
2021-05-05 01:37:19 +00:00
|
|
|
count_vm_event(CMA_ALLOC_SUCCESS);
|
2021-05-05 01:37:28 +00:00
|
|
|
cma_sysfs_account_success_pages(cma, count);
|
|
|
|
} else {
|
2021-05-05 01:37:19 +00:00
|
|
|
count_vm_event(CMA_ALLOC_FAIL);
|
2024-02-01 02:37:14 +00:00
|
|
|
cma_sysfs_account_fail_pages(cma, count);
|
2021-05-05 01:37:28 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
2021-05-05 01:37:19 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2014-08-06 23:05:25 +00:00
|
|
|
return page;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2024-08-14 03:54:50 +00:00
|
|
|
/**
|
|
|
|
* cma_alloc() - allocate pages from contiguous area
|
|
|
|
* @cma: Contiguous memory region for which the allocation is performed.
|
|
|
|
* @count: Requested number of pages.
|
|
|
|
* @align: Requested alignment of pages (in PAGE_SIZE order).
|
|
|
|
* @no_warn: Avoid printing message about failed allocation
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* This function allocates part of contiguous memory on specific
|
|
|
|
* contiguous memory area.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
struct page *cma_alloc(struct cma *cma, unsigned long count,
|
|
|
|
unsigned int align, bool no_warn)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
return __cma_alloc(cma, count, align, GFP_KERNEL | (no_warn ? __GFP_NOWARN : 0));
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
struct folio *cma_alloc_folio(struct cma *cma, int order, gfp_t gfp)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
struct page *page;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (WARN_ON(!order || !(gfp & __GFP_COMP)))
|
|
|
|
return NULL;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
page = __cma_alloc(cma, 1 << order, order, gfp);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return page ? page_folio(page) : NULL;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2021-11-05 20:41:23 +00:00
|
|
|
bool cma_pages_valid(struct cma *cma, const struct page *pages,
|
|
|
|
unsigned long count)
|
|
|
|
{
|
mm, cma: support multiple contiguous ranges, if requested
Currently, CMA manages one range of physically contiguous memory.
Creation of larger CMA areas with hugetlb_cma may run in to gaps in
physical memory, so that they are not able to allocate that contiguous
physical range from memblock when creating the CMA area.
This can happen, for example, on an AMD system with > 1TB of memory, where
there will be a gap just below the 1TB (40bit DMA) line. If you have set
aside most of memory for potential hugetlb CMA allocation,
cma_declare_contiguous_nid will fail.
hugetlb_cma doesn't need the entire area to be one physically contiguous
range. It just cares about being able to get physically contiguous chunks
of a certain size (e.g. 1G), and it is fine to have the CMA area backed
by multiple physical ranges, as long as it gets 1G contiguous allocations.
Multi-range support is implemented by introducing an array of ranges,
instead of just one big one. Each range has its own bitmap. Effectively,
the allocate and release operations work as before, just per-range. So,
instead of going through one large bitmap, they now go through a number of
smaller ones.
The maximum number of supported ranges is 8, as defined in CMA_MAX_RANGES.
Since some current users of CMA expect a CMA area to just use one
physically contiguous range, only allow for multiple ranges if a new
interface, cma_declare_contiguous_nid_multi, is used. The other
interfaces will work like before, creating only CMA areas with 1 range.
cma_declare_contiguous_nid_multi works as follows, mimicking the
default "bottom-up, above 4G" reservation approach:
0) Try cma_declare_contiguous_nid, which will use only one
region. If this succeeds, return. This makes sure that for
all the cases that currently work, the behavior remains
unchanged even if the caller switches from
cma_declare_contiguous_nid to cma_declare_contiguous_nid_multi.
1) Select the largest free memblock ranges above 4G, with
a maximum number of CMA_MAX_RANGES.
2) If we did not find at most CMA_MAX_RANGES that add
up to the total size requested, return -ENOMEM.
3) Sort the selected ranges by base address.
4) Reserve them bottom-up until we get what we wanted.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20250228182928.2645936-3-fvdl@google.com
Signed-off-by: Frank van der Linden <fvdl@google.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Cc: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Joao Martins <joao.m.martins@oracle.com>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev>
Cc: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Roman Gushchin (Cruise) <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>
Cc: Usama Arif <usamaarif642@gmail.com>
Cc: Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Yu Zhao <yuzhao@google.com>
Cc: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2025-02-28 18:29:03 +00:00
|
|
|
unsigned long pfn, end;
|
|
|
|
int r;
|
|
|
|
struct cma_memrange *cmr;
|
|
|
|
bool ret;
|
2021-11-05 20:41:23 +00:00
|
|
|
|
mm, cma: support multiple contiguous ranges, if requested
Currently, CMA manages one range of physically contiguous memory.
Creation of larger CMA areas with hugetlb_cma may run in to gaps in
physical memory, so that they are not able to allocate that contiguous
physical range from memblock when creating the CMA area.
This can happen, for example, on an AMD system with > 1TB of memory, where
there will be a gap just below the 1TB (40bit DMA) line. If you have set
aside most of memory for potential hugetlb CMA allocation,
cma_declare_contiguous_nid will fail.
hugetlb_cma doesn't need the entire area to be one physically contiguous
range. It just cares about being able to get physically contiguous chunks
of a certain size (e.g. 1G), and it is fine to have the CMA area backed
by multiple physical ranges, as long as it gets 1G contiguous allocations.
Multi-range support is implemented by introducing an array of ranges,
instead of just one big one. Each range has its own bitmap. Effectively,
the allocate and release operations work as before, just per-range. So,
instead of going through one large bitmap, they now go through a number of
smaller ones.
The maximum number of supported ranges is 8, as defined in CMA_MAX_RANGES.
Since some current users of CMA expect a CMA area to just use one
physically contiguous range, only allow for multiple ranges if a new
interface, cma_declare_contiguous_nid_multi, is used. The other
interfaces will work like before, creating only CMA areas with 1 range.
cma_declare_contiguous_nid_multi works as follows, mimicking the
default "bottom-up, above 4G" reservation approach:
0) Try cma_declare_contiguous_nid, which will use only one
region. If this succeeds, return. This makes sure that for
all the cases that currently work, the behavior remains
unchanged even if the caller switches from
cma_declare_contiguous_nid to cma_declare_contiguous_nid_multi.
1) Select the largest free memblock ranges above 4G, with
a maximum number of CMA_MAX_RANGES.
2) If we did not find at most CMA_MAX_RANGES that add
up to the total size requested, return -ENOMEM.
3) Sort the selected ranges by base address.
4) Reserve them bottom-up until we get what we wanted.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20250228182928.2645936-3-fvdl@google.com
Signed-off-by: Frank van der Linden <fvdl@google.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Cc: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Joao Martins <joao.m.martins@oracle.com>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev>
Cc: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Roman Gushchin (Cruise) <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>
Cc: Usama Arif <usamaarif642@gmail.com>
Cc: Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Yu Zhao <yuzhao@google.com>
Cc: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2025-02-28 18:29:03 +00:00
|
|
|
if (!cma || !pages || count > cma->count)
|
2021-11-05 20:41:23 +00:00
|
|
|
return false;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
pfn = page_to_pfn(pages);
|
mm, cma: support multiple contiguous ranges, if requested
Currently, CMA manages one range of physically contiguous memory.
Creation of larger CMA areas with hugetlb_cma may run in to gaps in
physical memory, so that they are not able to allocate that contiguous
physical range from memblock when creating the CMA area.
This can happen, for example, on an AMD system with > 1TB of memory, where
there will be a gap just below the 1TB (40bit DMA) line. If you have set
aside most of memory for potential hugetlb CMA allocation,
cma_declare_contiguous_nid will fail.
hugetlb_cma doesn't need the entire area to be one physically contiguous
range. It just cares about being able to get physically contiguous chunks
of a certain size (e.g. 1G), and it is fine to have the CMA area backed
by multiple physical ranges, as long as it gets 1G contiguous allocations.
Multi-range support is implemented by introducing an array of ranges,
instead of just one big one. Each range has its own bitmap. Effectively,
the allocate and release operations work as before, just per-range. So,
instead of going through one large bitmap, they now go through a number of
smaller ones.
The maximum number of supported ranges is 8, as defined in CMA_MAX_RANGES.
Since some current users of CMA expect a CMA area to just use one
physically contiguous range, only allow for multiple ranges if a new
interface, cma_declare_contiguous_nid_multi, is used. The other
interfaces will work like before, creating only CMA areas with 1 range.
cma_declare_contiguous_nid_multi works as follows, mimicking the
default "bottom-up, above 4G" reservation approach:
0) Try cma_declare_contiguous_nid, which will use only one
region. If this succeeds, return. This makes sure that for
all the cases that currently work, the behavior remains
unchanged even if the caller switches from
cma_declare_contiguous_nid to cma_declare_contiguous_nid_multi.
1) Select the largest free memblock ranges above 4G, with
a maximum number of CMA_MAX_RANGES.
2) If we did not find at most CMA_MAX_RANGES that add
up to the total size requested, return -ENOMEM.
3) Sort the selected ranges by base address.
4) Reserve them bottom-up until we get what we wanted.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20250228182928.2645936-3-fvdl@google.com
Signed-off-by: Frank van der Linden <fvdl@google.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Cc: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Joao Martins <joao.m.martins@oracle.com>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev>
Cc: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Roman Gushchin (Cruise) <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>
Cc: Usama Arif <usamaarif642@gmail.com>
Cc: Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Yu Zhao <yuzhao@google.com>
Cc: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2025-02-28 18:29:03 +00:00
|
|
|
ret = false;
|
2021-11-05 20:41:23 +00:00
|
|
|
|
mm, cma: support multiple contiguous ranges, if requested
Currently, CMA manages one range of physically contiguous memory.
Creation of larger CMA areas with hugetlb_cma may run in to gaps in
physical memory, so that they are not able to allocate that contiguous
physical range from memblock when creating the CMA area.
This can happen, for example, on an AMD system with > 1TB of memory, where
there will be a gap just below the 1TB (40bit DMA) line. If you have set
aside most of memory for potential hugetlb CMA allocation,
cma_declare_contiguous_nid will fail.
hugetlb_cma doesn't need the entire area to be one physically contiguous
range. It just cares about being able to get physically contiguous chunks
of a certain size (e.g. 1G), and it is fine to have the CMA area backed
by multiple physical ranges, as long as it gets 1G contiguous allocations.
Multi-range support is implemented by introducing an array of ranges,
instead of just one big one. Each range has its own bitmap. Effectively,
the allocate and release operations work as before, just per-range. So,
instead of going through one large bitmap, they now go through a number of
smaller ones.
The maximum number of supported ranges is 8, as defined in CMA_MAX_RANGES.
Since some current users of CMA expect a CMA area to just use one
physically contiguous range, only allow for multiple ranges if a new
interface, cma_declare_contiguous_nid_multi, is used. The other
interfaces will work like before, creating only CMA areas with 1 range.
cma_declare_contiguous_nid_multi works as follows, mimicking the
default "bottom-up, above 4G" reservation approach:
0) Try cma_declare_contiguous_nid, which will use only one
region. If this succeeds, return. This makes sure that for
all the cases that currently work, the behavior remains
unchanged even if the caller switches from
cma_declare_contiguous_nid to cma_declare_contiguous_nid_multi.
1) Select the largest free memblock ranges above 4G, with
a maximum number of CMA_MAX_RANGES.
2) If we did not find at most CMA_MAX_RANGES that add
up to the total size requested, return -ENOMEM.
3) Sort the selected ranges by base address.
4) Reserve them bottom-up until we get what we wanted.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20250228182928.2645936-3-fvdl@google.com
Signed-off-by: Frank van der Linden <fvdl@google.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Cc: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Joao Martins <joao.m.martins@oracle.com>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev>
Cc: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Roman Gushchin (Cruise) <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>
Cc: Usama Arif <usamaarif642@gmail.com>
Cc: Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Yu Zhao <yuzhao@google.com>
Cc: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2025-02-28 18:29:03 +00:00
|
|
|
for (r = 0; r < cma->nranges; r++) {
|
|
|
|
cmr = &cma->ranges[r];
|
|
|
|
end = cmr->base_pfn + cmr->count;
|
|
|
|
if (pfn >= cmr->base_pfn && pfn < end) {
|
|
|
|
ret = pfn + count <= end;
|
|
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
}
|
2021-11-05 20:41:23 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
mm, cma: support multiple contiguous ranges, if requested
Currently, CMA manages one range of physically contiguous memory.
Creation of larger CMA areas with hugetlb_cma may run in to gaps in
physical memory, so that they are not able to allocate that contiguous
physical range from memblock when creating the CMA area.
This can happen, for example, on an AMD system with > 1TB of memory, where
there will be a gap just below the 1TB (40bit DMA) line. If you have set
aside most of memory for potential hugetlb CMA allocation,
cma_declare_contiguous_nid will fail.
hugetlb_cma doesn't need the entire area to be one physically contiguous
range. It just cares about being able to get physically contiguous chunks
of a certain size (e.g. 1G), and it is fine to have the CMA area backed
by multiple physical ranges, as long as it gets 1G contiguous allocations.
Multi-range support is implemented by introducing an array of ranges,
instead of just one big one. Each range has its own bitmap. Effectively,
the allocate and release operations work as before, just per-range. So,
instead of going through one large bitmap, they now go through a number of
smaller ones.
The maximum number of supported ranges is 8, as defined in CMA_MAX_RANGES.
Since some current users of CMA expect a CMA area to just use one
physically contiguous range, only allow for multiple ranges if a new
interface, cma_declare_contiguous_nid_multi, is used. The other
interfaces will work like before, creating only CMA areas with 1 range.
cma_declare_contiguous_nid_multi works as follows, mimicking the
default "bottom-up, above 4G" reservation approach:
0) Try cma_declare_contiguous_nid, which will use only one
region. If this succeeds, return. This makes sure that for
all the cases that currently work, the behavior remains
unchanged even if the caller switches from
cma_declare_contiguous_nid to cma_declare_contiguous_nid_multi.
1) Select the largest free memblock ranges above 4G, with
a maximum number of CMA_MAX_RANGES.
2) If we did not find at most CMA_MAX_RANGES that add
up to the total size requested, return -ENOMEM.
3) Sort the selected ranges by base address.
4) Reserve them bottom-up until we get what we wanted.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20250228182928.2645936-3-fvdl@google.com
Signed-off-by: Frank van der Linden <fvdl@google.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Cc: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Joao Martins <joao.m.martins@oracle.com>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev>
Cc: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Roman Gushchin (Cruise) <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>
Cc: Usama Arif <usamaarif642@gmail.com>
Cc: Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Yu Zhao <yuzhao@google.com>
Cc: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2025-02-28 18:29:03 +00:00
|
|
|
if (!ret)
|
|
|
|
pr_debug("%s(page %p, count %lu)\n",
|
|
|
|
__func__, (void *)pages, count);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return ret;
|
2021-11-05 20:41:23 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2014-08-06 23:05:25 +00:00
|
|
|
/**
|
|
|
|
* cma_release() - release allocated pages
|
|
|
|
* @cma: Contiguous memory region for which the allocation is performed.
|
|
|
|
* @pages: Allocated pages.
|
|
|
|
* @count: Number of allocated pages.
|
|
|
|
*
|
2019-07-16 23:26:00 +00:00
|
|
|
* This function releases memory allocated by cma_alloc().
|
2014-08-06 23:05:25 +00:00
|
|
|
* It returns false when provided pages do not belong to contiguous area and
|
|
|
|
* true otherwise.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
2021-05-05 01:37:34 +00:00
|
|
|
bool cma_release(struct cma *cma, const struct page *pages,
|
|
|
|
unsigned long count)
|
2014-08-06 23:05:25 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
mm, cma: support multiple contiguous ranges, if requested
Currently, CMA manages one range of physically contiguous memory.
Creation of larger CMA areas with hugetlb_cma may run in to gaps in
physical memory, so that they are not able to allocate that contiguous
physical range from memblock when creating the CMA area.
This can happen, for example, on an AMD system with > 1TB of memory, where
there will be a gap just below the 1TB (40bit DMA) line. If you have set
aside most of memory for potential hugetlb CMA allocation,
cma_declare_contiguous_nid will fail.
hugetlb_cma doesn't need the entire area to be one physically contiguous
range. It just cares about being able to get physically contiguous chunks
of a certain size (e.g. 1G), and it is fine to have the CMA area backed
by multiple physical ranges, as long as it gets 1G contiguous allocations.
Multi-range support is implemented by introducing an array of ranges,
instead of just one big one. Each range has its own bitmap. Effectively,
the allocate and release operations work as before, just per-range. So,
instead of going through one large bitmap, they now go through a number of
smaller ones.
The maximum number of supported ranges is 8, as defined in CMA_MAX_RANGES.
Since some current users of CMA expect a CMA area to just use one
physically contiguous range, only allow for multiple ranges if a new
interface, cma_declare_contiguous_nid_multi, is used. The other
interfaces will work like before, creating only CMA areas with 1 range.
cma_declare_contiguous_nid_multi works as follows, mimicking the
default "bottom-up, above 4G" reservation approach:
0) Try cma_declare_contiguous_nid, which will use only one
region. If this succeeds, return. This makes sure that for
all the cases that currently work, the behavior remains
unchanged even if the caller switches from
cma_declare_contiguous_nid to cma_declare_contiguous_nid_multi.
1) Select the largest free memblock ranges above 4G, with
a maximum number of CMA_MAX_RANGES.
2) If we did not find at most CMA_MAX_RANGES that add
up to the total size requested, return -ENOMEM.
3) Sort the selected ranges by base address.
4) Reserve them bottom-up until we get what we wanted.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20250228182928.2645936-3-fvdl@google.com
Signed-off-by: Frank van der Linden <fvdl@google.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Cc: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Joao Martins <joao.m.martins@oracle.com>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev>
Cc: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Roman Gushchin (Cruise) <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>
Cc: Usama Arif <usamaarif642@gmail.com>
Cc: Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Yu Zhao <yuzhao@google.com>
Cc: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2025-02-28 18:29:03 +00:00
|
|
|
struct cma_memrange *cmr;
|
|
|
|
unsigned long pfn, end_pfn;
|
|
|
|
int r;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
pr_debug("%s(page %p, count %lu)\n", __func__, (void *)pages, count);
|
2014-08-06 23:05:25 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2021-11-05 20:41:23 +00:00
|
|
|
if (!cma_pages_valid(cma, pages, count))
|
2014-08-06 23:05:25 +00:00
|
|
|
return false;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
pfn = page_to_pfn(pages);
|
mm, cma: support multiple contiguous ranges, if requested
Currently, CMA manages one range of physically contiguous memory.
Creation of larger CMA areas with hugetlb_cma may run in to gaps in
physical memory, so that they are not able to allocate that contiguous
physical range from memblock when creating the CMA area.
This can happen, for example, on an AMD system with > 1TB of memory, where
there will be a gap just below the 1TB (40bit DMA) line. If you have set
aside most of memory for potential hugetlb CMA allocation,
cma_declare_contiguous_nid will fail.
hugetlb_cma doesn't need the entire area to be one physically contiguous
range. It just cares about being able to get physically contiguous chunks
of a certain size (e.g. 1G), and it is fine to have the CMA area backed
by multiple physical ranges, as long as it gets 1G contiguous allocations.
Multi-range support is implemented by introducing an array of ranges,
instead of just one big one. Each range has its own bitmap. Effectively,
the allocate and release operations work as before, just per-range. So,
instead of going through one large bitmap, they now go through a number of
smaller ones.
The maximum number of supported ranges is 8, as defined in CMA_MAX_RANGES.
Since some current users of CMA expect a CMA area to just use one
physically contiguous range, only allow for multiple ranges if a new
interface, cma_declare_contiguous_nid_multi, is used. The other
interfaces will work like before, creating only CMA areas with 1 range.
cma_declare_contiguous_nid_multi works as follows, mimicking the
default "bottom-up, above 4G" reservation approach:
0) Try cma_declare_contiguous_nid, which will use only one
region. If this succeeds, return. This makes sure that for
all the cases that currently work, the behavior remains
unchanged even if the caller switches from
cma_declare_contiguous_nid to cma_declare_contiguous_nid_multi.
1) Select the largest free memblock ranges above 4G, with
a maximum number of CMA_MAX_RANGES.
2) If we did not find at most CMA_MAX_RANGES that add
up to the total size requested, return -ENOMEM.
3) Sort the selected ranges by base address.
4) Reserve them bottom-up until we get what we wanted.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20250228182928.2645936-3-fvdl@google.com
Signed-off-by: Frank van der Linden <fvdl@google.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Cc: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Joao Martins <joao.m.martins@oracle.com>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev>
Cc: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Roman Gushchin (Cruise) <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>
Cc: Usama Arif <usamaarif642@gmail.com>
Cc: Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Yu Zhao <yuzhao@google.com>
Cc: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2025-02-28 18:29:03 +00:00
|
|
|
end_pfn = pfn + count;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for (r = 0; r < cma->nranges; r++) {
|
|
|
|
cmr = &cma->ranges[r];
|
|
|
|
if (pfn >= cmr->base_pfn &&
|
|
|
|
pfn < (cmr->base_pfn + cmr->count)) {
|
|
|
|
VM_BUG_ON(end_pfn > cmr->base_pfn + cmr->count);
|
|
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
2014-08-06 23:05:25 +00:00
|
|
|
|
mm, cma: support multiple contiguous ranges, if requested
Currently, CMA manages one range of physically contiguous memory.
Creation of larger CMA areas with hugetlb_cma may run in to gaps in
physical memory, so that they are not able to allocate that contiguous
physical range from memblock when creating the CMA area.
This can happen, for example, on an AMD system with > 1TB of memory, where
there will be a gap just below the 1TB (40bit DMA) line. If you have set
aside most of memory for potential hugetlb CMA allocation,
cma_declare_contiguous_nid will fail.
hugetlb_cma doesn't need the entire area to be one physically contiguous
range. It just cares about being able to get physically contiguous chunks
of a certain size (e.g. 1G), and it is fine to have the CMA area backed
by multiple physical ranges, as long as it gets 1G contiguous allocations.
Multi-range support is implemented by introducing an array of ranges,
instead of just one big one. Each range has its own bitmap. Effectively,
the allocate and release operations work as before, just per-range. So,
instead of going through one large bitmap, they now go through a number of
smaller ones.
The maximum number of supported ranges is 8, as defined in CMA_MAX_RANGES.
Since some current users of CMA expect a CMA area to just use one
physically contiguous range, only allow for multiple ranges if a new
interface, cma_declare_contiguous_nid_multi, is used. The other
interfaces will work like before, creating only CMA areas with 1 range.
cma_declare_contiguous_nid_multi works as follows, mimicking the
default "bottom-up, above 4G" reservation approach:
0) Try cma_declare_contiguous_nid, which will use only one
region. If this succeeds, return. This makes sure that for
all the cases that currently work, the behavior remains
unchanged even if the caller switches from
cma_declare_contiguous_nid to cma_declare_contiguous_nid_multi.
1) Select the largest free memblock ranges above 4G, with
a maximum number of CMA_MAX_RANGES.
2) If we did not find at most CMA_MAX_RANGES that add
up to the total size requested, return -ENOMEM.
3) Sort the selected ranges by base address.
4) Reserve them bottom-up until we get what we wanted.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20250228182928.2645936-3-fvdl@google.com
Signed-off-by: Frank van der Linden <fvdl@google.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Cc: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Joao Martins <joao.m.martins@oracle.com>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev>
Cc: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Roman Gushchin (Cruise) <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>
Cc: Usama Arif <usamaarif642@gmail.com>
Cc: Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Yu Zhao <yuzhao@google.com>
Cc: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2025-02-28 18:29:03 +00:00
|
|
|
if (r == cma->nranges)
|
|
|
|
return false;
|
2014-08-06 23:05:25 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
free_contig_range(pfn, count);
|
mm, cma: support multiple contiguous ranges, if requested
Currently, CMA manages one range of physically contiguous memory.
Creation of larger CMA areas with hugetlb_cma may run in to gaps in
physical memory, so that they are not able to allocate that contiguous
physical range from memblock when creating the CMA area.
This can happen, for example, on an AMD system with > 1TB of memory, where
there will be a gap just below the 1TB (40bit DMA) line. If you have set
aside most of memory for potential hugetlb CMA allocation,
cma_declare_contiguous_nid will fail.
hugetlb_cma doesn't need the entire area to be one physically contiguous
range. It just cares about being able to get physically contiguous chunks
of a certain size (e.g. 1G), and it is fine to have the CMA area backed
by multiple physical ranges, as long as it gets 1G contiguous allocations.
Multi-range support is implemented by introducing an array of ranges,
instead of just one big one. Each range has its own bitmap. Effectively,
the allocate and release operations work as before, just per-range. So,
instead of going through one large bitmap, they now go through a number of
smaller ones.
The maximum number of supported ranges is 8, as defined in CMA_MAX_RANGES.
Since some current users of CMA expect a CMA area to just use one
physically contiguous range, only allow for multiple ranges if a new
interface, cma_declare_contiguous_nid_multi, is used. The other
interfaces will work like before, creating only CMA areas with 1 range.
cma_declare_contiguous_nid_multi works as follows, mimicking the
default "bottom-up, above 4G" reservation approach:
0) Try cma_declare_contiguous_nid, which will use only one
region. If this succeeds, return. This makes sure that for
all the cases that currently work, the behavior remains
unchanged even if the caller switches from
cma_declare_contiguous_nid to cma_declare_contiguous_nid_multi.
1) Select the largest free memblock ranges above 4G, with
a maximum number of CMA_MAX_RANGES.
2) If we did not find at most CMA_MAX_RANGES that add
up to the total size requested, return -ENOMEM.
3) Sort the selected ranges by base address.
4) Reserve them bottom-up until we get what we wanted.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20250228182928.2645936-3-fvdl@google.com
Signed-off-by: Frank van der Linden <fvdl@google.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Cc: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Joao Martins <joao.m.martins@oracle.com>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev>
Cc: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Roman Gushchin (Cruise) <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>
Cc: Usama Arif <usamaarif642@gmail.com>
Cc: Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Yu Zhao <yuzhao@google.com>
Cc: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2025-02-28 18:29:03 +00:00
|
|
|
cma_clear_bitmap(cma, cmr, pfn, count);
|
2024-02-06 04:57:31 +00:00
|
|
|
cma_sysfs_account_release_pages(cma, count);
|
2021-05-05 01:37:31 +00:00
|
|
|
trace_cma_release(cma->name, pfn, pages, count);
|
2014-08-06 23:05:25 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return true;
|
|
|
|
}
|
2017-04-18 18:27:04 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2024-08-14 03:54:50 +00:00
|
|
|
bool cma_free_folio(struct cma *cma, const struct folio *folio)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
if (WARN_ON(!folio_test_large(folio)))
|
|
|
|
return false;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return cma_release(cma, &folio->page, folio_nr_pages(folio));
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2017-04-18 18:27:04 +00:00
|
|
|
int cma_for_each_area(int (*it)(struct cma *cma, void *data), void *data)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
int i;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for (i = 0; i < cma_area_count; i++) {
|
|
|
|
int ret = it(&cma_areas[i], data);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (ret)
|
|
|
|
return ret;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return 0;
|
|
|
|
}
|
2025-02-28 18:29:04 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
bool cma_intersects(struct cma *cma, unsigned long start, unsigned long end)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
int r;
|
|
|
|
struct cma_memrange *cmr;
|
|
|
|
unsigned long rstart, rend;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for (r = 0; r < cma->nranges; r++) {
|
|
|
|
cmr = &cma->ranges[r];
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
rstart = PFN_PHYS(cmr->base_pfn);
|
|
|
|
rend = PFN_PHYS(cmr->base_pfn + cmr->count);
|
|
|
|
if (end < rstart)
|
|
|
|
continue;
|
|
|
|
if (start >= rend)
|
|
|
|
continue;
|
|
|
|
return true;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return false;
|
|
|
|
}
|
2025-02-28 18:29:25 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* Very basic function to reserve memory from a CMA area that has not
|
|
|
|
* yet been activated. This is expected to be called early, when the
|
|
|
|
* system is single-threaded, so there is no locking. The alignment
|
|
|
|
* checking is restrictive - only pageblock-aligned areas
|
|
|
|
* (CMA_MIN_ALIGNMENT_BYTES) may be reserved through this function.
|
|
|
|
* This keeps things simple, and is enough for the current use case.
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* The CMA bitmaps have not yet been allocated, so just start
|
|
|
|
* reserving from the bottom up, using a PFN to keep track
|
|
|
|
* of what has been reserved. Unreserving is not possible.
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* The caller is responsible for initializing the page structures
|
|
|
|
* in the area properly, since this just points to memblock-allocated
|
|
|
|
* memory. The caller should subsequently use init_cma_pageblock to
|
|
|
|
* set the migrate type and CMA stats the pageblocks that were reserved.
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* If the CMA area fails to activate later, memory obtained through
|
|
|
|
* this interface is not handed to the page allocator, this is
|
|
|
|
* the responsibility of the caller (e.g. like normal memblock-allocated
|
|
|
|
* memory).
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
void __init *cma_reserve_early(struct cma *cma, unsigned long size)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
int r;
|
|
|
|
struct cma_memrange *cmr;
|
|
|
|
unsigned long available;
|
|
|
|
void *ret = NULL;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (!cma || !cma->count)
|
|
|
|
return NULL;
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* Can only be called early in init.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
if (test_bit(CMA_ACTIVATED, &cma->flags))
|
|
|
|
return NULL;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (!IS_ALIGNED(size, CMA_MIN_ALIGNMENT_BYTES))
|
|
|
|
return NULL;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (!IS_ALIGNED(size, (PAGE_SIZE << cma->order_per_bit)))
|
|
|
|
return NULL;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
size >>= PAGE_SHIFT;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (size > cma->available_count)
|
|
|
|
return NULL;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for (r = 0; r < cma->nranges; r++) {
|
|
|
|
cmr = &cma->ranges[r];
|
|
|
|
available = cmr->count - (cmr->early_pfn - cmr->base_pfn);
|
|
|
|
if (size <= available) {
|
|
|
|
ret = phys_to_virt(PFN_PHYS(cmr->early_pfn));
|
|
|
|
cmr->early_pfn += size;
|
|
|
|
cma->available_count -= size;
|
|
|
|
return ret;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return ret;
|
|
|
|
}
|