linux-kernelorg-stable/include/linux/mmap_lock.h

457 lines
14 KiB
C
Raw Normal View History

/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
mmap locking API: initial implementation as rwsem wrappers This patch series adds a new mmap locking API replacing the existing mmap_sem lock and unlocks. Initially the API is just implemente in terms of inlined rwsem calls, so it doesn't provide any new functionality. There are two justifications for the new API: - At first, it provides an easy hooking point to instrument mmap_sem locking latencies independently of any other rwsems. - In the future, it may be a starting point for replacing the rwsem implementation with a different one, such as range locks. This is something that is being explored, even though there is no wide concensus about this possible direction yet. (see https://patchwork.kernel.org/cover/11401483/) This patch (of 12): This change wraps the existing mmap_sem related rwsem calls into a new mmap locking API. There are two justifications for the new API: - At first, it provides an easy hooking point to instrument mmap_sem locking latencies independently of any other rwsems. - In the future, it may be a starting point for replacing the rwsem implementation with a different one, such as range locks. Signed-off-by: Michel Lespinasse <walken@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Reviewed-by: Daniel Jordan <daniel.m.jordan@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@suse.de> Reviewed-by: Laurent Dufour <ldufour@linux.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Liam Howlett <Liam.Howlett@oracle.com> Cc: Jerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Cc: Ying Han <yinghan@google.com> Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca> Cc: John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com> Cc: Michel Lespinasse <walken@google.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200520052908.204642-1-walken@google.com Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200520052908.204642-2-walken@google.com Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2020-06-09 04:33:14 +00:00
#ifndef _LINUX_MMAP_LOCK_H
#define _LINUX_MMAP_LOCK_H
/* Avoid a dependency loop by declaring here. */
extern int rcuwait_wake_up(struct rcuwait *w);
mm: mmap_lock: add tracepoints around lock acquisition The goal of these tracepoints is to be able to debug lock contention issues. This lock is acquired on most (all?) mmap / munmap / page fault operations, so a multi-threaded process which does a lot of these can experience significant contention. We trace just before we start acquisition, when the acquisition returns (whether it succeeded or not), and when the lock is released (or downgraded). The events are broken out by lock type (read / write). The events are also broken out by memcg path. For container-based workloads, users often think of several processes in a memcg as a single logical "task", so collecting statistics at this level is useful. The end goal is to get latency information. This isn't directly included in the trace events. Instead, users are expected to compute the time between "start locking" and "acquire returned", using e.g. synthetic events or BPF. The benefit we get from this is simpler code. Because we use tracepoint_enabled() to decide whether or not to trace, this patch has effectively no overhead unless tracepoints are enabled at runtime. If tracepoints are enabled, there is a performance impact, but how much depends on exactly what e.g. the BPF program does. [axelrasmussen@google.com: fix use-after-free race and css ref leak in tracepoints] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201130233504.3725241-1-axelrasmussen@google.com [axelrasmussen@google.com: v3] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201207213358.573750-1-axelrasmussen@google.com [rostedt@goodmis.org: in-depth examples of tracepoint_enabled() usage, and per-cpu-per-context buffer design] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201105211739.568279-2-axelrasmussen@google.com Signed-off-by: Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@google.com> Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> Cc: Michel Lespinasse <walken@google.com> Cc: Daniel Jordan <daniel.m.jordan@oracle.com> Cc: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com> Cc: Chinwen Chang <chinwen.chang@mediatek.com> Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@suse.de> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Laurent Dufour <ldufour@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2020-12-15 03:07:55 +00:00
#include <linux/lockdep.h>
#include <linux/mm_types.h>
#include <linux/mmdebug.h>
mm: mmap_lock: add tracepoints around lock acquisition The goal of these tracepoints is to be able to debug lock contention issues. This lock is acquired on most (all?) mmap / munmap / page fault operations, so a multi-threaded process which does a lot of these can experience significant contention. We trace just before we start acquisition, when the acquisition returns (whether it succeeded or not), and when the lock is released (or downgraded). The events are broken out by lock type (read / write). The events are also broken out by memcg path. For container-based workloads, users often think of several processes in a memcg as a single logical "task", so collecting statistics at this level is useful. The end goal is to get latency information. This isn't directly included in the trace events. Instead, users are expected to compute the time between "start locking" and "acquire returned", using e.g. synthetic events or BPF. The benefit we get from this is simpler code. Because we use tracepoint_enabled() to decide whether or not to trace, this patch has effectively no overhead unless tracepoints are enabled at runtime. If tracepoints are enabled, there is a performance impact, but how much depends on exactly what e.g. the BPF program does. [axelrasmussen@google.com: fix use-after-free race and css ref leak in tracepoints] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201130233504.3725241-1-axelrasmussen@google.com [axelrasmussen@google.com: v3] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201207213358.573750-1-axelrasmussen@google.com [rostedt@goodmis.org: in-depth examples of tracepoint_enabled() usage, and per-cpu-per-context buffer design] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201105211739.568279-2-axelrasmussen@google.com Signed-off-by: Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@google.com> Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> Cc: Michel Lespinasse <walken@google.com> Cc: Daniel Jordan <daniel.m.jordan@oracle.com> Cc: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com> Cc: Chinwen Chang <chinwen.chang@mediatek.com> Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@suse.de> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Laurent Dufour <ldufour@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2020-12-15 03:07:55 +00:00
#include <linux/rwsem.h>
#include <linux/tracepoint-defs.h>
#include <linux/types.h>
#include <linux/cleanup.h>
#define MMAP_LOCK_INITIALIZER(name) \
.mmap_lock = __RWSEM_INITIALIZER((name).mmap_lock),
mm: mmap_lock: add tracepoints around lock acquisition The goal of these tracepoints is to be able to debug lock contention issues. This lock is acquired on most (all?) mmap / munmap / page fault operations, so a multi-threaded process which does a lot of these can experience significant contention. We trace just before we start acquisition, when the acquisition returns (whether it succeeded or not), and when the lock is released (or downgraded). The events are broken out by lock type (read / write). The events are also broken out by memcg path. For container-based workloads, users often think of several processes in a memcg as a single logical "task", so collecting statistics at this level is useful. The end goal is to get latency information. This isn't directly included in the trace events. Instead, users are expected to compute the time between "start locking" and "acquire returned", using e.g. synthetic events or BPF. The benefit we get from this is simpler code. Because we use tracepoint_enabled() to decide whether or not to trace, this patch has effectively no overhead unless tracepoints are enabled at runtime. If tracepoints are enabled, there is a performance impact, but how much depends on exactly what e.g. the BPF program does. [axelrasmussen@google.com: fix use-after-free race and css ref leak in tracepoints] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201130233504.3725241-1-axelrasmussen@google.com [axelrasmussen@google.com: v3] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201207213358.573750-1-axelrasmussen@google.com [rostedt@goodmis.org: in-depth examples of tracepoint_enabled() usage, and per-cpu-per-context buffer design] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201105211739.568279-2-axelrasmussen@google.com Signed-off-by: Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@google.com> Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> Cc: Michel Lespinasse <walken@google.com> Cc: Daniel Jordan <daniel.m.jordan@oracle.com> Cc: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com> Cc: Chinwen Chang <chinwen.chang@mediatek.com> Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@suse.de> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Laurent Dufour <ldufour@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2020-12-15 03:07:55 +00:00
DECLARE_TRACEPOINT(mmap_lock_start_locking);
DECLARE_TRACEPOINT(mmap_lock_acquire_returned);
DECLARE_TRACEPOINT(mmap_lock_released);
#ifdef CONFIG_TRACING
void __mmap_lock_do_trace_start_locking(struct mm_struct *mm, bool write);
void __mmap_lock_do_trace_acquire_returned(struct mm_struct *mm, bool write,
bool success);
void __mmap_lock_do_trace_released(struct mm_struct *mm, bool write);
static inline void __mmap_lock_trace_start_locking(struct mm_struct *mm,
bool write)
{
if (tracepoint_enabled(mmap_lock_start_locking))
__mmap_lock_do_trace_start_locking(mm, write);
}
static inline void __mmap_lock_trace_acquire_returned(struct mm_struct *mm,
bool write, bool success)
{
if (tracepoint_enabled(mmap_lock_acquire_returned))
__mmap_lock_do_trace_acquire_returned(mm, write, success);
}
static inline void __mmap_lock_trace_released(struct mm_struct *mm, bool write)
{
if (tracepoint_enabled(mmap_lock_released))
__mmap_lock_do_trace_released(mm, write);
}
#else /* !CONFIG_TRACING */
static inline void __mmap_lock_trace_start_locking(struct mm_struct *mm,
bool write)
{
}
static inline void __mmap_lock_trace_acquire_returned(struct mm_struct *mm,
bool write, bool success)
{
}
static inline void __mmap_lock_trace_released(struct mm_struct *mm, bool write)
{
}
#endif /* CONFIG_TRACING */
static inline void mmap_assert_locked(const struct mm_struct *mm)
{
rwsem_assert_held(&mm->mmap_lock);
}
static inline void mmap_assert_write_locked(const struct mm_struct *mm)
{
rwsem_assert_held_write(&mm->mmap_lock);
}
#ifdef CONFIG_PER_VMA_LOCK
static inline void mm_lock_seqcount_init(struct mm_struct *mm)
{
seqcount_init(&mm->mm_lock_seq);
}
static inline void mm_lock_seqcount_begin(struct mm_struct *mm)
{
do_raw_write_seqcount_begin(&mm->mm_lock_seq);
}
static inline void mm_lock_seqcount_end(struct mm_struct *mm)
{
ASSERT_EXCLUSIVE_WRITER(mm->mm_lock_seq);
do_raw_write_seqcount_end(&mm->mm_lock_seq);
}
static inline bool mmap_lock_speculate_try_begin(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned int *seq)
{
/*
* Since mmap_lock is a sleeping lock, and waiting for it to become
* unlocked is more or less equivalent with taking it ourselves, don't
* bother with the speculative path if mmap_lock is already write-locked
* and take the slow path, which takes the lock.
*/
return raw_seqcount_try_begin(&mm->mm_lock_seq, *seq);
}
static inline bool mmap_lock_speculate_retry(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned int seq)
{
return read_seqcount_retry(&mm->mm_lock_seq, seq);
}
static inline void vma_lock_init(struct vm_area_struct *vma, bool reset_refcnt)
{
#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC
static struct lock_class_key lockdep_key;
lockdep_init_map(&vma->vmlock_dep_map, "vm_lock", &lockdep_key, 0);
#endif
if (reset_refcnt)
refcount_set(&vma->vm_refcnt, 0);
vma->vm_lock_seq = UINT_MAX;
}
static inline bool is_vma_writer_only(int refcnt)
{
/*
* With a writer and no readers, refcnt is VMA_LOCK_OFFSET if the vma
* is detached and (VMA_LOCK_OFFSET + 1) if it is attached. Waiting on
* a detached vma happens only in vma_mark_detached() and is a rare
* case, therefore most of the time there will be no unnecessary wakeup.
*/
return refcnt & VMA_LOCK_OFFSET && refcnt <= VMA_LOCK_OFFSET + 1;
}
static inline void vma_refcount_put(struct vm_area_struct *vma)
{
/* Use a copy of vm_mm in case vma is freed after we drop vm_refcnt */
struct mm_struct *mm = vma->vm_mm;
int oldcnt;
rwsem_release(&vma->vmlock_dep_map, _RET_IP_);
if (!__refcount_dec_and_test(&vma->vm_refcnt, &oldcnt)) {
if (is_vma_writer_only(oldcnt - 1))
rcuwait_wake_up(&mm->vma_writer_wait);
}
}
/*
* Try to read-lock a vma. The function is allowed to occasionally yield false
* locked result to avoid performance overhead, in which case we fall back to
* using mmap_lock. The function should never yield false unlocked result.
* False locked result is possible if mm_lock_seq overflows or if vma gets
* reused and attached to a different mm before we lock it.
* Returns the vma on success, NULL on failure to lock and EAGAIN if vma got
* detached.
*/
static inline struct vm_area_struct *vma_start_read(struct mm_struct *mm,
struct vm_area_struct *vma)
{
int oldcnt;
/*
* Check before locking. A race might cause false locked result.
* We can use READ_ONCE() for the mm_lock_seq here, and don't need
* ACQUIRE semantics, because this is just a lockless check whose result
* we don't rely on for anything - the mm_lock_seq read against which we
* need ordering is below.
*/
if (READ_ONCE(vma->vm_lock_seq) == READ_ONCE(mm->mm_lock_seq.sequence))
return NULL;
/*
* If VMA_LOCK_OFFSET is set, __refcount_inc_not_zero_limited_acquire()
* will fail because VMA_REF_LIMIT is less than VMA_LOCK_OFFSET.
* Acquire fence is required here to avoid reordering against later
* vm_lock_seq check and checks inside lock_vma_under_rcu().
*/
if (unlikely(!__refcount_inc_not_zero_limited_acquire(&vma->vm_refcnt, &oldcnt,
VMA_REF_LIMIT))) {
/* return EAGAIN if vma got detached from under us */
return oldcnt ? NULL : ERR_PTR(-EAGAIN);
}
rwsem_acquire_read(&vma->vmlock_dep_map, 0, 1, _RET_IP_);
/*
* Overflow of vm_lock_seq/mm_lock_seq might produce false locked result.
* False unlocked result is impossible because we modify and check
* vma->vm_lock_seq under vma->vm_refcnt protection and mm->mm_lock_seq
* modification invalidates all existing locks.
*
* We must use ACQUIRE semantics for the mm_lock_seq so that if we are
* racing with vma_end_write_all(), we only start reading from the VMA
* after it has been unlocked.
* This pairs with RELEASE semantics in vma_end_write_all().
*/
if (unlikely(vma->vm_lock_seq == raw_read_seqcount(&mm->mm_lock_seq))) {
vma_refcount_put(vma);
return NULL;
}
return vma;
}
/*
* Use only while holding mmap read lock which guarantees that locking will not
* fail (nobody can concurrently write-lock the vma). vma_start_read() should
* not be used in such cases because it might fail due to mm_lock_seq overflow.
* This functionality is used to obtain vma read lock and drop the mmap read lock.
*/
static inline bool vma_start_read_locked_nested(struct vm_area_struct *vma, int subclass)
{
int oldcnt;
mmap_assert_locked(vma->vm_mm);
if (unlikely(!__refcount_inc_not_zero_limited_acquire(&vma->vm_refcnt, &oldcnt,
VMA_REF_LIMIT)))
return false;
rwsem_acquire_read(&vma->vmlock_dep_map, 0, 1, _RET_IP_);
return true;
}
/*
* Use only while holding mmap read lock which guarantees that locking will not
* fail (nobody can concurrently write-lock the vma). vma_start_read() should
* not be used in such cases because it might fail due to mm_lock_seq overflow.
* This functionality is used to obtain vma read lock and drop the mmap read lock.
*/
static inline bool vma_start_read_locked(struct vm_area_struct *vma)
{
return vma_start_read_locked_nested(vma, 0);
}
static inline void vma_end_read(struct vm_area_struct *vma)
{
vma_refcount_put(vma);
}
/* WARNING! Can only be used if mmap_lock is expected to be write-locked */
static bool __is_vma_write_locked(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned int *mm_lock_seq)
{
mmap_assert_write_locked(vma->vm_mm);
/*
* current task is holding mmap_write_lock, both vma->vm_lock_seq and
* mm->mm_lock_seq can't be concurrently modified.
*/
*mm_lock_seq = vma->vm_mm->mm_lock_seq.sequence;
return (vma->vm_lock_seq == *mm_lock_seq);
}
void __vma_start_write(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned int mm_lock_seq);
/*
* Begin writing to a VMA.
* Exclude concurrent readers under the per-VMA lock until the currently
* write-locked mmap_lock is dropped or downgraded.
*/
static inline void vma_start_write(struct vm_area_struct *vma)
{
unsigned int mm_lock_seq;
if (__is_vma_write_locked(vma, &mm_lock_seq))
return;
__vma_start_write(vma, mm_lock_seq);
}
static inline void vma_assert_write_locked(struct vm_area_struct *vma)
{
unsigned int mm_lock_seq;
VM_BUG_ON_VMA(!__is_vma_write_locked(vma, &mm_lock_seq), vma);
}
static inline void vma_assert_locked(struct vm_area_struct *vma)
{
unsigned int mm_lock_seq;
VM_BUG_ON_VMA(refcount_read(&vma->vm_refcnt) <= 1 &&
!__is_vma_write_locked(vma, &mm_lock_seq), vma);
}
/*
* WARNING: to avoid racing with vma_mark_attached()/vma_mark_detached(), these
* assertions should be made either under mmap_write_lock or when the object
* has been isolated under mmap_write_lock, ensuring no competing writers.
*/
static inline void vma_assert_attached(struct vm_area_struct *vma)
{
WARN_ON_ONCE(!refcount_read(&vma->vm_refcnt));
}
static inline void vma_assert_detached(struct vm_area_struct *vma)
{
WARN_ON_ONCE(refcount_read(&vma->vm_refcnt));
}
static inline void vma_mark_attached(struct vm_area_struct *vma)
{
vma_assert_write_locked(vma);
vma_assert_detached(vma);
refcount_set_release(&vma->vm_refcnt, 1);
}
void vma_mark_detached(struct vm_area_struct *vma);
struct vm_area_struct *lock_vma_under_rcu(struct mm_struct *mm,
unsigned long address);
#else /* CONFIG_PER_VMA_LOCK */
static inline void mm_lock_seqcount_init(struct mm_struct *mm) {}
static inline void mm_lock_seqcount_begin(struct mm_struct *mm) {}
static inline void mm_lock_seqcount_end(struct mm_struct *mm) {}
static inline bool mmap_lock_speculate_try_begin(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned int *seq)
{
return false;
}
static inline bool mmap_lock_speculate_retry(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned int seq)
{
return true;
}
static inline void vma_lock_init(struct vm_area_struct *vma, bool reset_refcnt) {}
static inline struct vm_area_struct *vma_start_read(struct mm_struct *mm,
struct vm_area_struct *vma)
{ return NULL; }
static inline void vma_end_read(struct vm_area_struct *vma) {}
static inline void vma_start_write(struct vm_area_struct *vma) {}
static inline void vma_assert_write_locked(struct vm_area_struct *vma)
{ mmap_assert_write_locked(vma->vm_mm); }
static inline void vma_assert_attached(struct vm_area_struct *vma) {}
static inline void vma_assert_detached(struct vm_area_struct *vma) {}
static inline void vma_mark_attached(struct vm_area_struct *vma) {}
static inline void vma_mark_detached(struct vm_area_struct *vma) {}
static inline struct vm_area_struct *lock_vma_under_rcu(struct mm_struct *mm,
unsigned long address)
{
return NULL;
}
static inline void vma_assert_locked(struct vm_area_struct *vma)
{
mmap_assert_locked(vma->vm_mm);
}
#endif /* CONFIG_PER_VMA_LOCK */
mmap locking API: initial implementation as rwsem wrappers This patch series adds a new mmap locking API replacing the existing mmap_sem lock and unlocks. Initially the API is just implemente in terms of inlined rwsem calls, so it doesn't provide any new functionality. There are two justifications for the new API: - At first, it provides an easy hooking point to instrument mmap_sem locking latencies independently of any other rwsems. - In the future, it may be a starting point for replacing the rwsem implementation with a different one, such as range locks. This is something that is being explored, even though there is no wide concensus about this possible direction yet. (see https://patchwork.kernel.org/cover/11401483/) This patch (of 12): This change wraps the existing mmap_sem related rwsem calls into a new mmap locking API. There are two justifications for the new API: - At first, it provides an easy hooking point to instrument mmap_sem locking latencies independently of any other rwsems. - In the future, it may be a starting point for replacing the rwsem implementation with a different one, such as range locks. Signed-off-by: Michel Lespinasse <walken@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Reviewed-by: Daniel Jordan <daniel.m.jordan@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@suse.de> Reviewed-by: Laurent Dufour <ldufour@linux.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Liam Howlett <Liam.Howlett@oracle.com> Cc: Jerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Cc: Ying Han <yinghan@google.com> Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca> Cc: John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com> Cc: Michel Lespinasse <walken@google.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200520052908.204642-1-walken@google.com Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200520052908.204642-2-walken@google.com Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2020-06-09 04:33:14 +00:00
static inline void mmap_write_lock(struct mm_struct *mm)
{
mm: mmap_lock: add tracepoints around lock acquisition The goal of these tracepoints is to be able to debug lock contention issues. This lock is acquired on most (all?) mmap / munmap / page fault operations, so a multi-threaded process which does a lot of these can experience significant contention. We trace just before we start acquisition, when the acquisition returns (whether it succeeded or not), and when the lock is released (or downgraded). The events are broken out by lock type (read / write). The events are also broken out by memcg path. For container-based workloads, users often think of several processes in a memcg as a single logical "task", so collecting statistics at this level is useful. The end goal is to get latency information. This isn't directly included in the trace events. Instead, users are expected to compute the time between "start locking" and "acquire returned", using e.g. synthetic events or BPF. The benefit we get from this is simpler code. Because we use tracepoint_enabled() to decide whether or not to trace, this patch has effectively no overhead unless tracepoints are enabled at runtime. If tracepoints are enabled, there is a performance impact, but how much depends on exactly what e.g. the BPF program does. [axelrasmussen@google.com: fix use-after-free race and css ref leak in tracepoints] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201130233504.3725241-1-axelrasmussen@google.com [axelrasmussen@google.com: v3] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201207213358.573750-1-axelrasmussen@google.com [rostedt@goodmis.org: in-depth examples of tracepoint_enabled() usage, and per-cpu-per-context buffer design] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201105211739.568279-2-axelrasmussen@google.com Signed-off-by: Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@google.com> Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> Cc: Michel Lespinasse <walken@google.com> Cc: Daniel Jordan <daniel.m.jordan@oracle.com> Cc: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com> Cc: Chinwen Chang <chinwen.chang@mediatek.com> Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@suse.de> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Laurent Dufour <ldufour@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2020-12-15 03:07:55 +00:00
__mmap_lock_trace_start_locking(mm, true);
down_write(&mm->mmap_lock);
mm_lock_seqcount_begin(mm);
mm: mmap_lock: add tracepoints around lock acquisition The goal of these tracepoints is to be able to debug lock contention issues. This lock is acquired on most (all?) mmap / munmap / page fault operations, so a multi-threaded process which does a lot of these can experience significant contention. We trace just before we start acquisition, when the acquisition returns (whether it succeeded or not), and when the lock is released (or downgraded). The events are broken out by lock type (read / write). The events are also broken out by memcg path. For container-based workloads, users often think of several processes in a memcg as a single logical "task", so collecting statistics at this level is useful. The end goal is to get latency information. This isn't directly included in the trace events. Instead, users are expected to compute the time between "start locking" and "acquire returned", using e.g. synthetic events or BPF. The benefit we get from this is simpler code. Because we use tracepoint_enabled() to decide whether or not to trace, this patch has effectively no overhead unless tracepoints are enabled at runtime. If tracepoints are enabled, there is a performance impact, but how much depends on exactly what e.g. the BPF program does. [axelrasmussen@google.com: fix use-after-free race and css ref leak in tracepoints] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201130233504.3725241-1-axelrasmussen@google.com [axelrasmussen@google.com: v3] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201207213358.573750-1-axelrasmussen@google.com [rostedt@goodmis.org: in-depth examples of tracepoint_enabled() usage, and per-cpu-per-context buffer design] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201105211739.568279-2-axelrasmussen@google.com Signed-off-by: Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@google.com> Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> Cc: Michel Lespinasse <walken@google.com> Cc: Daniel Jordan <daniel.m.jordan@oracle.com> Cc: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com> Cc: Chinwen Chang <chinwen.chang@mediatek.com> Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@suse.de> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Laurent Dufour <ldufour@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2020-12-15 03:07:55 +00:00
__mmap_lock_trace_acquire_returned(mm, true, true);
mmap locking API: initial implementation as rwsem wrappers This patch series adds a new mmap locking API replacing the existing mmap_sem lock and unlocks. Initially the API is just implemente in terms of inlined rwsem calls, so it doesn't provide any new functionality. There are two justifications for the new API: - At first, it provides an easy hooking point to instrument mmap_sem locking latencies independently of any other rwsems. - In the future, it may be a starting point for replacing the rwsem implementation with a different one, such as range locks. This is something that is being explored, even though there is no wide concensus about this possible direction yet. (see https://patchwork.kernel.org/cover/11401483/) This patch (of 12): This change wraps the existing mmap_sem related rwsem calls into a new mmap locking API. There are two justifications for the new API: - At first, it provides an easy hooking point to instrument mmap_sem locking latencies independently of any other rwsems. - In the future, it may be a starting point for replacing the rwsem implementation with a different one, such as range locks. Signed-off-by: Michel Lespinasse <walken@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Reviewed-by: Daniel Jordan <daniel.m.jordan@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@suse.de> Reviewed-by: Laurent Dufour <ldufour@linux.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Liam Howlett <Liam.Howlett@oracle.com> Cc: Jerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Cc: Ying Han <yinghan@google.com> Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca> Cc: John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com> Cc: Michel Lespinasse <walken@google.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200520052908.204642-1-walken@google.com Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200520052908.204642-2-walken@google.com Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2020-06-09 04:33:14 +00:00
}
static inline void mmap_write_lock_nested(struct mm_struct *mm, int subclass)
{
mm: mmap_lock: add tracepoints around lock acquisition The goal of these tracepoints is to be able to debug lock contention issues. This lock is acquired on most (all?) mmap / munmap / page fault operations, so a multi-threaded process which does a lot of these can experience significant contention. We trace just before we start acquisition, when the acquisition returns (whether it succeeded or not), and when the lock is released (or downgraded). The events are broken out by lock type (read / write). The events are also broken out by memcg path. For container-based workloads, users often think of several processes in a memcg as a single logical "task", so collecting statistics at this level is useful. The end goal is to get latency information. This isn't directly included in the trace events. Instead, users are expected to compute the time between "start locking" and "acquire returned", using e.g. synthetic events or BPF. The benefit we get from this is simpler code. Because we use tracepoint_enabled() to decide whether or not to trace, this patch has effectively no overhead unless tracepoints are enabled at runtime. If tracepoints are enabled, there is a performance impact, but how much depends on exactly what e.g. the BPF program does. [axelrasmussen@google.com: fix use-after-free race and css ref leak in tracepoints] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201130233504.3725241-1-axelrasmussen@google.com [axelrasmussen@google.com: v3] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201207213358.573750-1-axelrasmussen@google.com [rostedt@goodmis.org: in-depth examples of tracepoint_enabled() usage, and per-cpu-per-context buffer design] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201105211739.568279-2-axelrasmussen@google.com Signed-off-by: Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@google.com> Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> Cc: Michel Lespinasse <walken@google.com> Cc: Daniel Jordan <daniel.m.jordan@oracle.com> Cc: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com> Cc: Chinwen Chang <chinwen.chang@mediatek.com> Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@suse.de> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Laurent Dufour <ldufour@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2020-12-15 03:07:55 +00:00
__mmap_lock_trace_start_locking(mm, true);
down_write_nested(&mm->mmap_lock, subclass);
mm_lock_seqcount_begin(mm);
mm: mmap_lock: add tracepoints around lock acquisition The goal of these tracepoints is to be able to debug lock contention issues. This lock is acquired on most (all?) mmap / munmap / page fault operations, so a multi-threaded process which does a lot of these can experience significant contention. We trace just before we start acquisition, when the acquisition returns (whether it succeeded or not), and when the lock is released (or downgraded). The events are broken out by lock type (read / write). The events are also broken out by memcg path. For container-based workloads, users often think of several processes in a memcg as a single logical "task", so collecting statistics at this level is useful. The end goal is to get latency information. This isn't directly included in the trace events. Instead, users are expected to compute the time between "start locking" and "acquire returned", using e.g. synthetic events or BPF. The benefit we get from this is simpler code. Because we use tracepoint_enabled() to decide whether or not to trace, this patch has effectively no overhead unless tracepoints are enabled at runtime. If tracepoints are enabled, there is a performance impact, but how much depends on exactly what e.g. the BPF program does. [axelrasmussen@google.com: fix use-after-free race and css ref leak in tracepoints] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201130233504.3725241-1-axelrasmussen@google.com [axelrasmussen@google.com: v3] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201207213358.573750-1-axelrasmussen@google.com [rostedt@goodmis.org: in-depth examples of tracepoint_enabled() usage, and per-cpu-per-context buffer design] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201105211739.568279-2-axelrasmussen@google.com Signed-off-by: Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@google.com> Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> Cc: Michel Lespinasse <walken@google.com> Cc: Daniel Jordan <daniel.m.jordan@oracle.com> Cc: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com> Cc: Chinwen Chang <chinwen.chang@mediatek.com> Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@suse.de> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Laurent Dufour <ldufour@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2020-12-15 03:07:55 +00:00
__mmap_lock_trace_acquire_returned(mm, true, true);
}
mmap locking API: initial implementation as rwsem wrappers This patch series adds a new mmap locking API replacing the existing mmap_sem lock and unlocks. Initially the API is just implemente in terms of inlined rwsem calls, so it doesn't provide any new functionality. There are two justifications for the new API: - At first, it provides an easy hooking point to instrument mmap_sem locking latencies independently of any other rwsems. - In the future, it may be a starting point for replacing the rwsem implementation with a different one, such as range locks. This is something that is being explored, even though there is no wide concensus about this possible direction yet. (see https://patchwork.kernel.org/cover/11401483/) This patch (of 12): This change wraps the existing mmap_sem related rwsem calls into a new mmap locking API. There are two justifications for the new API: - At first, it provides an easy hooking point to instrument mmap_sem locking latencies independently of any other rwsems. - In the future, it may be a starting point for replacing the rwsem implementation with a different one, such as range locks. Signed-off-by: Michel Lespinasse <walken@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Reviewed-by: Daniel Jordan <daniel.m.jordan@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@suse.de> Reviewed-by: Laurent Dufour <ldufour@linux.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Liam Howlett <Liam.Howlett@oracle.com> Cc: Jerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Cc: Ying Han <yinghan@google.com> Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca> Cc: John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com> Cc: Michel Lespinasse <walken@google.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200520052908.204642-1-walken@google.com Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200520052908.204642-2-walken@google.com Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2020-06-09 04:33:14 +00:00
static inline int mmap_write_lock_killable(struct mm_struct *mm)
{
mm: mmap_lock: add tracepoints around lock acquisition The goal of these tracepoints is to be able to debug lock contention issues. This lock is acquired on most (all?) mmap / munmap / page fault operations, so a multi-threaded process which does a lot of these can experience significant contention. We trace just before we start acquisition, when the acquisition returns (whether it succeeded or not), and when the lock is released (or downgraded). The events are broken out by lock type (read / write). The events are also broken out by memcg path. For container-based workloads, users often think of several processes in a memcg as a single logical "task", so collecting statistics at this level is useful. The end goal is to get latency information. This isn't directly included in the trace events. Instead, users are expected to compute the time between "start locking" and "acquire returned", using e.g. synthetic events or BPF. The benefit we get from this is simpler code. Because we use tracepoint_enabled() to decide whether or not to trace, this patch has effectively no overhead unless tracepoints are enabled at runtime. If tracepoints are enabled, there is a performance impact, but how much depends on exactly what e.g. the BPF program does. [axelrasmussen@google.com: fix use-after-free race and css ref leak in tracepoints] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201130233504.3725241-1-axelrasmussen@google.com [axelrasmussen@google.com: v3] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201207213358.573750-1-axelrasmussen@google.com [rostedt@goodmis.org: in-depth examples of tracepoint_enabled() usage, and per-cpu-per-context buffer design] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201105211739.568279-2-axelrasmussen@google.com Signed-off-by: Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@google.com> Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> Cc: Michel Lespinasse <walken@google.com> Cc: Daniel Jordan <daniel.m.jordan@oracle.com> Cc: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com> Cc: Chinwen Chang <chinwen.chang@mediatek.com> Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@suse.de> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Laurent Dufour <ldufour@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2020-12-15 03:07:55 +00:00
int ret;
__mmap_lock_trace_start_locking(mm, true);
ret = down_write_killable(&mm->mmap_lock);
if (!ret)
mm_lock_seqcount_begin(mm);
mm: mmap_lock: add tracepoints around lock acquisition The goal of these tracepoints is to be able to debug lock contention issues. This lock is acquired on most (all?) mmap / munmap / page fault operations, so a multi-threaded process which does a lot of these can experience significant contention. We trace just before we start acquisition, when the acquisition returns (whether it succeeded or not), and when the lock is released (or downgraded). The events are broken out by lock type (read / write). The events are also broken out by memcg path. For container-based workloads, users often think of several processes in a memcg as a single logical "task", so collecting statistics at this level is useful. The end goal is to get latency information. This isn't directly included in the trace events. Instead, users are expected to compute the time between "start locking" and "acquire returned", using e.g. synthetic events or BPF. The benefit we get from this is simpler code. Because we use tracepoint_enabled() to decide whether or not to trace, this patch has effectively no overhead unless tracepoints are enabled at runtime. If tracepoints are enabled, there is a performance impact, but how much depends on exactly what e.g. the BPF program does. [axelrasmussen@google.com: fix use-after-free race and css ref leak in tracepoints] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201130233504.3725241-1-axelrasmussen@google.com [axelrasmussen@google.com: v3] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201207213358.573750-1-axelrasmussen@google.com [rostedt@goodmis.org: in-depth examples of tracepoint_enabled() usage, and per-cpu-per-context buffer design] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201105211739.568279-2-axelrasmussen@google.com Signed-off-by: Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@google.com> Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> Cc: Michel Lespinasse <walken@google.com> Cc: Daniel Jordan <daniel.m.jordan@oracle.com> Cc: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com> Cc: Chinwen Chang <chinwen.chang@mediatek.com> Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@suse.de> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Laurent Dufour <ldufour@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2020-12-15 03:07:55 +00:00
__mmap_lock_trace_acquire_returned(mm, true, ret == 0);
return ret;
mmap locking API: initial implementation as rwsem wrappers This patch series adds a new mmap locking API replacing the existing mmap_sem lock and unlocks. Initially the API is just implemente in terms of inlined rwsem calls, so it doesn't provide any new functionality. There are two justifications for the new API: - At first, it provides an easy hooking point to instrument mmap_sem locking latencies independently of any other rwsems. - In the future, it may be a starting point for replacing the rwsem implementation with a different one, such as range locks. This is something that is being explored, even though there is no wide concensus about this possible direction yet. (see https://patchwork.kernel.org/cover/11401483/) This patch (of 12): This change wraps the existing mmap_sem related rwsem calls into a new mmap locking API. There are two justifications for the new API: - At first, it provides an easy hooking point to instrument mmap_sem locking latencies independently of any other rwsems. - In the future, it may be a starting point for replacing the rwsem implementation with a different one, such as range locks. Signed-off-by: Michel Lespinasse <walken@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Reviewed-by: Daniel Jordan <daniel.m.jordan@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@suse.de> Reviewed-by: Laurent Dufour <ldufour@linux.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Liam Howlett <Liam.Howlett@oracle.com> Cc: Jerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Cc: Ying Han <yinghan@google.com> Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca> Cc: John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com> Cc: Michel Lespinasse <walken@google.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200520052908.204642-1-walken@google.com Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200520052908.204642-2-walken@google.com Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2020-06-09 04:33:14 +00:00
}
/*
* Drop all currently-held per-VMA locks.
* This is called from the mmap_lock implementation directly before releasing
* a write-locked mmap_lock (or downgrading it to read-locked).
* This should normally NOT be called manually from other places.
* If you want to call this manually anyway, keep in mind that this will release
* *all* VMA write locks, including ones from further up the stack.
*/
static inline void vma_end_write_all(struct mm_struct *mm)
{
mmap_assert_write_locked(mm);
mm_lock_seqcount_end(mm);
}
mmap locking API: initial implementation as rwsem wrappers This patch series adds a new mmap locking API replacing the existing mmap_sem lock and unlocks. Initially the API is just implemente in terms of inlined rwsem calls, so it doesn't provide any new functionality. There are two justifications for the new API: - At first, it provides an easy hooking point to instrument mmap_sem locking latencies independently of any other rwsems. - In the future, it may be a starting point for replacing the rwsem implementation with a different one, such as range locks. This is something that is being explored, even though there is no wide concensus about this possible direction yet. (see https://patchwork.kernel.org/cover/11401483/) This patch (of 12): This change wraps the existing mmap_sem related rwsem calls into a new mmap locking API. There are two justifications for the new API: - At first, it provides an easy hooking point to instrument mmap_sem locking latencies independently of any other rwsems. - In the future, it may be a starting point for replacing the rwsem implementation with a different one, such as range locks. Signed-off-by: Michel Lespinasse <walken@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Reviewed-by: Daniel Jordan <daniel.m.jordan@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@suse.de> Reviewed-by: Laurent Dufour <ldufour@linux.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Liam Howlett <Liam.Howlett@oracle.com> Cc: Jerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Cc: Ying Han <yinghan@google.com> Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca> Cc: John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com> Cc: Michel Lespinasse <walken@google.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200520052908.204642-1-walken@google.com Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200520052908.204642-2-walken@google.com Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2020-06-09 04:33:14 +00:00
static inline void mmap_write_unlock(struct mm_struct *mm)
{
mm: mmap_lock: add tracepoints around lock acquisition The goal of these tracepoints is to be able to debug lock contention issues. This lock is acquired on most (all?) mmap / munmap / page fault operations, so a multi-threaded process which does a lot of these can experience significant contention. We trace just before we start acquisition, when the acquisition returns (whether it succeeded or not), and when the lock is released (or downgraded). The events are broken out by lock type (read / write). The events are also broken out by memcg path. For container-based workloads, users often think of several processes in a memcg as a single logical "task", so collecting statistics at this level is useful. The end goal is to get latency information. This isn't directly included in the trace events. Instead, users are expected to compute the time between "start locking" and "acquire returned", using e.g. synthetic events or BPF. The benefit we get from this is simpler code. Because we use tracepoint_enabled() to decide whether or not to trace, this patch has effectively no overhead unless tracepoints are enabled at runtime. If tracepoints are enabled, there is a performance impact, but how much depends on exactly what e.g. the BPF program does. [axelrasmussen@google.com: fix use-after-free race and css ref leak in tracepoints] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201130233504.3725241-1-axelrasmussen@google.com [axelrasmussen@google.com: v3] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201207213358.573750-1-axelrasmussen@google.com [rostedt@goodmis.org: in-depth examples of tracepoint_enabled() usage, and per-cpu-per-context buffer design] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201105211739.568279-2-axelrasmussen@google.com Signed-off-by: Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@google.com> Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> Cc: Michel Lespinasse <walken@google.com> Cc: Daniel Jordan <daniel.m.jordan@oracle.com> Cc: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com> Cc: Chinwen Chang <chinwen.chang@mediatek.com> Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@suse.de> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Laurent Dufour <ldufour@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2020-12-15 03:07:55 +00:00
__mmap_lock_trace_released(mm, true);
vma_end_write_all(mm);
up_write(&mm->mmap_lock);
mmap locking API: initial implementation as rwsem wrappers This patch series adds a new mmap locking API replacing the existing mmap_sem lock and unlocks. Initially the API is just implemente in terms of inlined rwsem calls, so it doesn't provide any new functionality. There are two justifications for the new API: - At first, it provides an easy hooking point to instrument mmap_sem locking latencies independently of any other rwsems. - In the future, it may be a starting point for replacing the rwsem implementation with a different one, such as range locks. This is something that is being explored, even though there is no wide concensus about this possible direction yet. (see https://patchwork.kernel.org/cover/11401483/) This patch (of 12): This change wraps the existing mmap_sem related rwsem calls into a new mmap locking API. There are two justifications for the new API: - At first, it provides an easy hooking point to instrument mmap_sem locking latencies independently of any other rwsems. - In the future, it may be a starting point for replacing the rwsem implementation with a different one, such as range locks. Signed-off-by: Michel Lespinasse <walken@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Reviewed-by: Daniel Jordan <daniel.m.jordan@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@suse.de> Reviewed-by: Laurent Dufour <ldufour@linux.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Liam Howlett <Liam.Howlett@oracle.com> Cc: Jerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Cc: Ying Han <yinghan@google.com> Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca> Cc: John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com> Cc: Michel Lespinasse <walken@google.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200520052908.204642-1-walken@google.com Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200520052908.204642-2-walken@google.com Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2020-06-09 04:33:14 +00:00
}
static inline void mmap_write_downgrade(struct mm_struct *mm)
{
mm: mmap_lock: add tracepoints around lock acquisition The goal of these tracepoints is to be able to debug lock contention issues. This lock is acquired on most (all?) mmap / munmap / page fault operations, so a multi-threaded process which does a lot of these can experience significant contention. We trace just before we start acquisition, when the acquisition returns (whether it succeeded or not), and when the lock is released (or downgraded). The events are broken out by lock type (read / write). The events are also broken out by memcg path. For container-based workloads, users often think of several processes in a memcg as a single logical "task", so collecting statistics at this level is useful. The end goal is to get latency information. This isn't directly included in the trace events. Instead, users are expected to compute the time between "start locking" and "acquire returned", using e.g. synthetic events or BPF. The benefit we get from this is simpler code. Because we use tracepoint_enabled() to decide whether or not to trace, this patch has effectively no overhead unless tracepoints are enabled at runtime. If tracepoints are enabled, there is a performance impact, but how much depends on exactly what e.g. the BPF program does. [axelrasmussen@google.com: fix use-after-free race and css ref leak in tracepoints] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201130233504.3725241-1-axelrasmussen@google.com [axelrasmussen@google.com: v3] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201207213358.573750-1-axelrasmussen@google.com [rostedt@goodmis.org: in-depth examples of tracepoint_enabled() usage, and per-cpu-per-context buffer design] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201105211739.568279-2-axelrasmussen@google.com Signed-off-by: Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@google.com> Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> Cc: Michel Lespinasse <walken@google.com> Cc: Daniel Jordan <daniel.m.jordan@oracle.com> Cc: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com> Cc: Chinwen Chang <chinwen.chang@mediatek.com> Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@suse.de> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Laurent Dufour <ldufour@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2020-12-15 03:07:55 +00:00
__mmap_lock_trace_acquire_returned(mm, false, true);
vma_end_write_all(mm);
downgrade_write(&mm->mmap_lock);
mmap locking API: initial implementation as rwsem wrappers This patch series adds a new mmap locking API replacing the existing mmap_sem lock and unlocks. Initially the API is just implemente in terms of inlined rwsem calls, so it doesn't provide any new functionality. There are two justifications for the new API: - At first, it provides an easy hooking point to instrument mmap_sem locking latencies independently of any other rwsems. - In the future, it may be a starting point for replacing the rwsem implementation with a different one, such as range locks. This is something that is being explored, even though there is no wide concensus about this possible direction yet. (see https://patchwork.kernel.org/cover/11401483/) This patch (of 12): This change wraps the existing mmap_sem related rwsem calls into a new mmap locking API. There are two justifications for the new API: - At first, it provides an easy hooking point to instrument mmap_sem locking latencies independently of any other rwsems. - In the future, it may be a starting point for replacing the rwsem implementation with a different one, such as range locks. Signed-off-by: Michel Lespinasse <walken@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Reviewed-by: Daniel Jordan <daniel.m.jordan@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@suse.de> Reviewed-by: Laurent Dufour <ldufour@linux.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Liam Howlett <Liam.Howlett@oracle.com> Cc: Jerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Cc: Ying Han <yinghan@google.com> Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca> Cc: John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com> Cc: Michel Lespinasse <walken@google.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200520052908.204642-1-walken@google.com Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200520052908.204642-2-walken@google.com Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2020-06-09 04:33:14 +00:00
}
static inline void mmap_read_lock(struct mm_struct *mm)
{
mm: mmap_lock: add tracepoints around lock acquisition The goal of these tracepoints is to be able to debug lock contention issues. This lock is acquired on most (all?) mmap / munmap / page fault operations, so a multi-threaded process which does a lot of these can experience significant contention. We trace just before we start acquisition, when the acquisition returns (whether it succeeded or not), and when the lock is released (or downgraded). The events are broken out by lock type (read / write). The events are also broken out by memcg path. For container-based workloads, users often think of several processes in a memcg as a single logical "task", so collecting statistics at this level is useful. The end goal is to get latency information. This isn't directly included in the trace events. Instead, users are expected to compute the time between "start locking" and "acquire returned", using e.g. synthetic events or BPF. The benefit we get from this is simpler code. Because we use tracepoint_enabled() to decide whether or not to trace, this patch has effectively no overhead unless tracepoints are enabled at runtime. If tracepoints are enabled, there is a performance impact, but how much depends on exactly what e.g. the BPF program does. [axelrasmussen@google.com: fix use-after-free race and css ref leak in tracepoints] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201130233504.3725241-1-axelrasmussen@google.com [axelrasmussen@google.com: v3] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201207213358.573750-1-axelrasmussen@google.com [rostedt@goodmis.org: in-depth examples of tracepoint_enabled() usage, and per-cpu-per-context buffer design] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201105211739.568279-2-axelrasmussen@google.com Signed-off-by: Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@google.com> Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> Cc: Michel Lespinasse <walken@google.com> Cc: Daniel Jordan <daniel.m.jordan@oracle.com> Cc: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com> Cc: Chinwen Chang <chinwen.chang@mediatek.com> Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@suse.de> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Laurent Dufour <ldufour@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2020-12-15 03:07:55 +00:00
__mmap_lock_trace_start_locking(mm, false);
down_read(&mm->mmap_lock);
mm: mmap_lock: add tracepoints around lock acquisition The goal of these tracepoints is to be able to debug lock contention issues. This lock is acquired on most (all?) mmap / munmap / page fault operations, so a multi-threaded process which does a lot of these can experience significant contention. We trace just before we start acquisition, when the acquisition returns (whether it succeeded or not), and when the lock is released (or downgraded). The events are broken out by lock type (read / write). The events are also broken out by memcg path. For container-based workloads, users often think of several processes in a memcg as a single logical "task", so collecting statistics at this level is useful. The end goal is to get latency information. This isn't directly included in the trace events. Instead, users are expected to compute the time between "start locking" and "acquire returned", using e.g. synthetic events or BPF. The benefit we get from this is simpler code. Because we use tracepoint_enabled() to decide whether or not to trace, this patch has effectively no overhead unless tracepoints are enabled at runtime. If tracepoints are enabled, there is a performance impact, but how much depends on exactly what e.g. the BPF program does. [axelrasmussen@google.com: fix use-after-free race and css ref leak in tracepoints] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201130233504.3725241-1-axelrasmussen@google.com [axelrasmussen@google.com: v3] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201207213358.573750-1-axelrasmussen@google.com [rostedt@goodmis.org: in-depth examples of tracepoint_enabled() usage, and per-cpu-per-context buffer design] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201105211739.568279-2-axelrasmussen@google.com Signed-off-by: Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@google.com> Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> Cc: Michel Lespinasse <walken@google.com> Cc: Daniel Jordan <daniel.m.jordan@oracle.com> Cc: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com> Cc: Chinwen Chang <chinwen.chang@mediatek.com> Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@suse.de> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Laurent Dufour <ldufour@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2020-12-15 03:07:55 +00:00
__mmap_lock_trace_acquire_returned(mm, false, true);
mmap locking API: initial implementation as rwsem wrappers This patch series adds a new mmap locking API replacing the existing mmap_sem lock and unlocks. Initially the API is just implemente in terms of inlined rwsem calls, so it doesn't provide any new functionality. There are two justifications for the new API: - At first, it provides an easy hooking point to instrument mmap_sem locking latencies independently of any other rwsems. - In the future, it may be a starting point for replacing the rwsem implementation with a different one, such as range locks. This is something that is being explored, even though there is no wide concensus about this possible direction yet. (see https://patchwork.kernel.org/cover/11401483/) This patch (of 12): This change wraps the existing mmap_sem related rwsem calls into a new mmap locking API. There are two justifications for the new API: - At first, it provides an easy hooking point to instrument mmap_sem locking latencies independently of any other rwsems. - In the future, it may be a starting point for replacing the rwsem implementation with a different one, such as range locks. Signed-off-by: Michel Lespinasse <walken@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Reviewed-by: Daniel Jordan <daniel.m.jordan@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@suse.de> Reviewed-by: Laurent Dufour <ldufour@linux.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Liam Howlett <Liam.Howlett@oracle.com> Cc: Jerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Cc: Ying Han <yinghan@google.com> Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca> Cc: John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com> Cc: Michel Lespinasse <walken@google.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200520052908.204642-1-walken@google.com Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200520052908.204642-2-walken@google.com Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2020-06-09 04:33:14 +00:00
}
static inline int mmap_read_lock_killable(struct mm_struct *mm)
{
mm: mmap_lock: add tracepoints around lock acquisition The goal of these tracepoints is to be able to debug lock contention issues. This lock is acquired on most (all?) mmap / munmap / page fault operations, so a multi-threaded process which does a lot of these can experience significant contention. We trace just before we start acquisition, when the acquisition returns (whether it succeeded or not), and when the lock is released (or downgraded). The events are broken out by lock type (read / write). The events are also broken out by memcg path. For container-based workloads, users often think of several processes in a memcg as a single logical "task", so collecting statistics at this level is useful. The end goal is to get latency information. This isn't directly included in the trace events. Instead, users are expected to compute the time between "start locking" and "acquire returned", using e.g. synthetic events or BPF. The benefit we get from this is simpler code. Because we use tracepoint_enabled() to decide whether or not to trace, this patch has effectively no overhead unless tracepoints are enabled at runtime. If tracepoints are enabled, there is a performance impact, but how much depends on exactly what e.g. the BPF program does. [axelrasmussen@google.com: fix use-after-free race and css ref leak in tracepoints] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201130233504.3725241-1-axelrasmussen@google.com [axelrasmussen@google.com: v3] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201207213358.573750-1-axelrasmussen@google.com [rostedt@goodmis.org: in-depth examples of tracepoint_enabled() usage, and per-cpu-per-context buffer design] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201105211739.568279-2-axelrasmussen@google.com Signed-off-by: Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@google.com> Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> Cc: Michel Lespinasse <walken@google.com> Cc: Daniel Jordan <daniel.m.jordan@oracle.com> Cc: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com> Cc: Chinwen Chang <chinwen.chang@mediatek.com> Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@suse.de> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Laurent Dufour <ldufour@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2020-12-15 03:07:55 +00:00
int ret;
__mmap_lock_trace_start_locking(mm, false);
ret = down_read_killable(&mm->mmap_lock);
__mmap_lock_trace_acquire_returned(mm, false, ret == 0);
return ret;
mmap locking API: initial implementation as rwsem wrappers This patch series adds a new mmap locking API replacing the existing mmap_sem lock and unlocks. Initially the API is just implemente in terms of inlined rwsem calls, so it doesn't provide any new functionality. There are two justifications for the new API: - At first, it provides an easy hooking point to instrument mmap_sem locking latencies independently of any other rwsems. - In the future, it may be a starting point for replacing the rwsem implementation with a different one, such as range locks. This is something that is being explored, even though there is no wide concensus about this possible direction yet. (see https://patchwork.kernel.org/cover/11401483/) This patch (of 12): This change wraps the existing mmap_sem related rwsem calls into a new mmap locking API. There are two justifications for the new API: - At first, it provides an easy hooking point to instrument mmap_sem locking latencies independently of any other rwsems. - In the future, it may be a starting point for replacing the rwsem implementation with a different one, such as range locks. Signed-off-by: Michel Lespinasse <walken@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Reviewed-by: Daniel Jordan <daniel.m.jordan@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@suse.de> Reviewed-by: Laurent Dufour <ldufour@linux.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Liam Howlett <Liam.Howlett@oracle.com> Cc: Jerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Cc: Ying Han <yinghan@google.com> Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca> Cc: John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com> Cc: Michel Lespinasse <walken@google.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200520052908.204642-1-walken@google.com Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200520052908.204642-2-walken@google.com Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2020-06-09 04:33:14 +00:00
}
static inline bool mmap_read_trylock(struct mm_struct *mm)
{
mm: mmap_lock: add tracepoints around lock acquisition The goal of these tracepoints is to be able to debug lock contention issues. This lock is acquired on most (all?) mmap / munmap / page fault operations, so a multi-threaded process which does a lot of these can experience significant contention. We trace just before we start acquisition, when the acquisition returns (whether it succeeded or not), and when the lock is released (or downgraded). The events are broken out by lock type (read / write). The events are also broken out by memcg path. For container-based workloads, users often think of several processes in a memcg as a single logical "task", so collecting statistics at this level is useful. The end goal is to get latency information. This isn't directly included in the trace events. Instead, users are expected to compute the time between "start locking" and "acquire returned", using e.g. synthetic events or BPF. The benefit we get from this is simpler code. Because we use tracepoint_enabled() to decide whether or not to trace, this patch has effectively no overhead unless tracepoints are enabled at runtime. If tracepoints are enabled, there is a performance impact, but how much depends on exactly what e.g. the BPF program does. [axelrasmussen@google.com: fix use-after-free race and css ref leak in tracepoints] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201130233504.3725241-1-axelrasmussen@google.com [axelrasmussen@google.com: v3] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201207213358.573750-1-axelrasmussen@google.com [rostedt@goodmis.org: in-depth examples of tracepoint_enabled() usage, and per-cpu-per-context buffer design] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201105211739.568279-2-axelrasmussen@google.com Signed-off-by: Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@google.com> Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> Cc: Michel Lespinasse <walken@google.com> Cc: Daniel Jordan <daniel.m.jordan@oracle.com> Cc: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com> Cc: Chinwen Chang <chinwen.chang@mediatek.com> Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@suse.de> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Laurent Dufour <ldufour@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2020-12-15 03:07:55 +00:00
bool ret;
__mmap_lock_trace_start_locking(mm, false);
ret = down_read_trylock(&mm->mmap_lock) != 0;
__mmap_lock_trace_acquire_returned(mm, false, ret);
return ret;
mmap locking API: initial implementation as rwsem wrappers This patch series adds a new mmap locking API replacing the existing mmap_sem lock and unlocks. Initially the API is just implemente in terms of inlined rwsem calls, so it doesn't provide any new functionality. There are two justifications for the new API: - At first, it provides an easy hooking point to instrument mmap_sem locking latencies independently of any other rwsems. - In the future, it may be a starting point for replacing the rwsem implementation with a different one, such as range locks. This is something that is being explored, even though there is no wide concensus about this possible direction yet. (see https://patchwork.kernel.org/cover/11401483/) This patch (of 12): This change wraps the existing mmap_sem related rwsem calls into a new mmap locking API. There are two justifications for the new API: - At first, it provides an easy hooking point to instrument mmap_sem locking latencies independently of any other rwsems. - In the future, it may be a starting point for replacing the rwsem implementation with a different one, such as range locks. Signed-off-by: Michel Lespinasse <walken@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Reviewed-by: Daniel Jordan <daniel.m.jordan@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@suse.de> Reviewed-by: Laurent Dufour <ldufour@linux.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Liam Howlett <Liam.Howlett@oracle.com> Cc: Jerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Cc: Ying Han <yinghan@google.com> Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca> Cc: John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com> Cc: Michel Lespinasse <walken@google.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200520052908.204642-1-walken@google.com Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200520052908.204642-2-walken@google.com Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2020-06-09 04:33:14 +00:00
}
static inline void mmap_read_unlock(struct mm_struct *mm)
{
mm: mmap_lock: add tracepoints around lock acquisition The goal of these tracepoints is to be able to debug lock contention issues. This lock is acquired on most (all?) mmap / munmap / page fault operations, so a multi-threaded process which does a lot of these can experience significant contention. We trace just before we start acquisition, when the acquisition returns (whether it succeeded or not), and when the lock is released (or downgraded). The events are broken out by lock type (read / write). The events are also broken out by memcg path. For container-based workloads, users often think of several processes in a memcg as a single logical "task", so collecting statistics at this level is useful. The end goal is to get latency information. This isn't directly included in the trace events. Instead, users are expected to compute the time between "start locking" and "acquire returned", using e.g. synthetic events or BPF. The benefit we get from this is simpler code. Because we use tracepoint_enabled() to decide whether or not to trace, this patch has effectively no overhead unless tracepoints are enabled at runtime. If tracepoints are enabled, there is a performance impact, but how much depends on exactly what e.g. the BPF program does. [axelrasmussen@google.com: fix use-after-free race and css ref leak in tracepoints] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201130233504.3725241-1-axelrasmussen@google.com [axelrasmussen@google.com: v3] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201207213358.573750-1-axelrasmussen@google.com [rostedt@goodmis.org: in-depth examples of tracepoint_enabled() usage, and per-cpu-per-context buffer design] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201105211739.568279-2-axelrasmussen@google.com Signed-off-by: Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@google.com> Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> Cc: Michel Lespinasse <walken@google.com> Cc: Daniel Jordan <daniel.m.jordan@oracle.com> Cc: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com> Cc: Chinwen Chang <chinwen.chang@mediatek.com> Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@suse.de> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Laurent Dufour <ldufour@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2020-12-15 03:07:55 +00:00
__mmap_lock_trace_released(mm, false);
up_read(&mm->mmap_lock);
mmap locking API: initial implementation as rwsem wrappers This patch series adds a new mmap locking API replacing the existing mmap_sem lock and unlocks. Initially the API is just implemente in terms of inlined rwsem calls, so it doesn't provide any new functionality. There are two justifications for the new API: - At first, it provides an easy hooking point to instrument mmap_sem locking latencies independently of any other rwsems. - In the future, it may be a starting point for replacing the rwsem implementation with a different one, such as range locks. This is something that is being explored, even though there is no wide concensus about this possible direction yet. (see https://patchwork.kernel.org/cover/11401483/) This patch (of 12): This change wraps the existing mmap_sem related rwsem calls into a new mmap locking API. There are two justifications for the new API: - At first, it provides an easy hooking point to instrument mmap_sem locking latencies independently of any other rwsems. - In the future, it may be a starting point for replacing the rwsem implementation with a different one, such as range locks. Signed-off-by: Michel Lespinasse <walken@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Reviewed-by: Daniel Jordan <daniel.m.jordan@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@suse.de> Reviewed-by: Laurent Dufour <ldufour@linux.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Liam Howlett <Liam.Howlett@oracle.com> Cc: Jerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Cc: Ying Han <yinghan@google.com> Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca> Cc: John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com> Cc: Michel Lespinasse <walken@google.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200520052908.204642-1-walken@google.com Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200520052908.204642-2-walken@google.com Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2020-06-09 04:33:14 +00:00
}
DEFINE_GUARD(mmap_read_lock, struct mm_struct *,
mmap_read_lock(_T), mmap_read_unlock(_T))
static inline void mmap_read_unlock_non_owner(struct mm_struct *mm)
{
mm: mmap_lock: add tracepoints around lock acquisition The goal of these tracepoints is to be able to debug lock contention issues. This lock is acquired on most (all?) mmap / munmap / page fault operations, so a multi-threaded process which does a lot of these can experience significant contention. We trace just before we start acquisition, when the acquisition returns (whether it succeeded or not), and when the lock is released (or downgraded). The events are broken out by lock type (read / write). The events are also broken out by memcg path. For container-based workloads, users often think of several processes in a memcg as a single logical "task", so collecting statistics at this level is useful. The end goal is to get latency information. This isn't directly included in the trace events. Instead, users are expected to compute the time between "start locking" and "acquire returned", using e.g. synthetic events or BPF. The benefit we get from this is simpler code. Because we use tracepoint_enabled() to decide whether or not to trace, this patch has effectively no overhead unless tracepoints are enabled at runtime. If tracepoints are enabled, there is a performance impact, but how much depends on exactly what e.g. the BPF program does. [axelrasmussen@google.com: fix use-after-free race and css ref leak in tracepoints] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201130233504.3725241-1-axelrasmussen@google.com [axelrasmussen@google.com: v3] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201207213358.573750-1-axelrasmussen@google.com [rostedt@goodmis.org: in-depth examples of tracepoint_enabled() usage, and per-cpu-per-context buffer design] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201105211739.568279-2-axelrasmussen@google.com Signed-off-by: Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@google.com> Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> Cc: Michel Lespinasse <walken@google.com> Cc: Daniel Jordan <daniel.m.jordan@oracle.com> Cc: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com> Cc: Chinwen Chang <chinwen.chang@mediatek.com> Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@suse.de> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Laurent Dufour <ldufour@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2020-12-15 03:07:55 +00:00
__mmap_lock_trace_released(mm, false);
up_read_non_owner(&mm->mmap_lock);
}
mmap locking API: add mmap_lock_is_contended() Patch series "Try to release mmap_lock temporarily in smaps_rollup", v4. Recently, we have observed some janky issues caused by unpleasantly long contention on mmap_lock which is held by smaps_rollup when probing large processes. To address the problem, we let smaps_rollup detect if anyone wants to acquire mmap_lock for write attempts. If yes, just release the lock temporarily to ease the contention. smaps_rollup is a procfs interface which allows users to summarize the process's memory usage without the overhead of seq_* calls. Android uses it to sample the memory usage of various processes to balance its memory pool sizes. If no one wants to take the lock for write requests, smaps_rollup with this patch will behave like the original one. Although there are on-going mmap_lock optimizations like range-based locks, the lock applied to smaps_rollup would be the coarse one, which is hard to avoid the occurrence of aforementioned issues. So the detection and temporary release for write attempts on mmap_lock in smaps_rollup is still necessary. This patch (of 3): Add new API to query if someone wants to acquire mmap_lock for write attempts. Using this instead of rwsem_is_contended makes it more tolerant of future changes to the lock type. Signed-off-by: Chinwen Chang <chinwen.chang@mediatek.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Reviewed-by: Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com> Acked-by: Michel Lespinasse <walken@google.com> Cc: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com> Cc: Daniel Jordan <daniel.m.jordan@oracle.com> Cc: Daniel Kiss <daniel.kiss@arm.com> Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@suse.de> Cc: Huang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com> Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca> Cc: Jimmy Assarsson <jimmyassarsson@gmail.com> Cc: Laurent Dufour <ldufour@linux.ibm.com> Cc: "Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com> Cc: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com> Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1597715898-3854-1-git-send-email-chinwen.chang@mediatek.com Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1597715898-3854-2-git-send-email-chinwen.chang@mediatek.com Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2020-10-13 23:53:39 +00:00
static inline int mmap_lock_is_contended(struct mm_struct *mm)
{
return rwsem_is_contended(&mm->mmap_lock);
}
mmap locking API: initial implementation as rwsem wrappers This patch series adds a new mmap locking API replacing the existing mmap_sem lock and unlocks. Initially the API is just implemente in terms of inlined rwsem calls, so it doesn't provide any new functionality. There are two justifications for the new API: - At first, it provides an easy hooking point to instrument mmap_sem locking latencies independently of any other rwsems. - In the future, it may be a starting point for replacing the rwsem implementation with a different one, such as range locks. This is something that is being explored, even though there is no wide concensus about this possible direction yet. (see https://patchwork.kernel.org/cover/11401483/) This patch (of 12): This change wraps the existing mmap_sem related rwsem calls into a new mmap locking API. There are two justifications for the new API: - At first, it provides an easy hooking point to instrument mmap_sem locking latencies independently of any other rwsems. - In the future, it may be a starting point for replacing the rwsem implementation with a different one, such as range locks. Signed-off-by: Michel Lespinasse <walken@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Reviewed-by: Daniel Jordan <daniel.m.jordan@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@suse.de> Reviewed-by: Laurent Dufour <ldufour@linux.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Liam Howlett <Liam.Howlett@oracle.com> Cc: Jerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Cc: Ying Han <yinghan@google.com> Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca> Cc: John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com> Cc: Michel Lespinasse <walken@google.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200520052908.204642-1-walken@google.com Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200520052908.204642-2-walken@google.com Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2020-06-09 04:33:14 +00:00
#endif /* _LINUX_MMAP_LOCK_H */