qiurui
/
glibc
mirror of git://sourceware.org/git/glibc.git
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity
glibc/linuxthreads/spinlock.c

721 lines
21 KiB
C
Raw Blame History

/* Linuxthreads - a simple clone()-based implementation of Posix */
/* threads for Linux. */
/* Copyright (C) 1998 Xavier Leroy (Xavier.Leroy@inria.fr) */
/* */
/* This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or */
/* modify it under the terms of the GNU Library General Public License */
/* as published by the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 */
/* of the License, or (at your option) any later version. */
/* */
/* This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, */
/* but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of */
/* MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the */
/* GNU Library General Public License for more details. */
/* Internal locks */
#include <errno.h>
#include <sched.h>
#include <time.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <limits.h>
#include "pthread.h"
#include "internals.h"
#include "spinlock.h"
#include "restart.h"
static void __pthread_acquire(int * spinlock);
static inline void __pthread_release(int * spinlock)
{
WRITE_MEMORY_BARRIER();
*spinlock = __LT_SPINLOCK_INIT;
__asm __volatile ("" : "=m" (*spinlock) : "0" (*spinlock));
}
/* The status field of a spinlock is a pointer whose least significant
bit is a locked flag.
Thus the field values have the following meanings:
status == 0: spinlock is free
status == 1: spinlock is taken; no thread is waiting on it
(status & 1) == 1: spinlock is taken and (status & ~1L) is a
pointer to the first waiting thread; other
waiting threads are linked via the p_nextlock
field.
(status & 1) == 0: same as above, but spinlock is not taken.
The waiting list is not sorted by priority order.
Actually, we always insert at top of list (sole insertion mode
that can be performed without locking).
For __pthread_unlock, we perform a linear search in the list
to find the highest-priority, oldest waiting thread.
This is safe because there are no concurrent __pthread_unlock
operations -- only the thread that locked the mutex can unlock it. */
void internal_function __pthread_lock(struct _pthread_fastlock * lock,
pthread_descr self)
{
#if defined HAS_COMPARE_AND_SWAP
long oldstatus, newstatus;
int successful_seizure, spurious_wakeup_count;
int spin_count;
#endif
#if defined TEST_FOR_COMPARE_AND_SWAP
if (!__pthread_has_cas)
#endif
#if !defined HAS_COMPARE_AND_SWAP || defined TEST_FOR_COMPARE_AND_SWAP
{
__pthread_acquire(&lock->__spinlock);
return;
}
#endif
#if defined HAS_COMPARE_AND_SWAP
/* First try it without preparation. Maybe it's a completely
uncontested lock. */
if (lock->__status == 0 && __compare_and_swap (&lock->__status, 0, 1))
return;
spurious_wakeup_count = 0;
spin_count = 0;
/* On SMP, try spinning to get the lock. */
if (__pthread_smp_kernel) {
int max_count = lock->__spinlock * 2 + 10;
if (max_count > MAX_ADAPTIVE_SPIN_COUNT)
max_count = MAX_ADAPTIVE_SPIN_COUNT;
for (spin_count = 0; spin_count < max_count; spin_count++) {
if (((oldstatus = lock->__status) & 1) == 0) {
if(__compare_and_swap(&lock->__status, oldstatus, oldstatus | 1))
{
if (spin_count)
lock->__spinlock += (spin_count - lock->__spinlock) / 8;
READ_MEMORY_BARRIER();
return;
}
}
#ifdef BUSY_WAIT_NOP
BUSY_WAIT_NOP;
#endif
__asm __volatile ("" : "=m" (lock->__status) : "0" (lock->__status));
}
lock->__spinlock += (spin_count - lock->__spinlock) / 8;
}
again:
/* No luck, try once more or suspend. */
do {
oldstatus = lock->__status;
successful_seizure = 0;
if ((oldstatus & 1) == 0) {
newstatus = oldstatus | 1;
successful_seizure = 1;
} else {
if (self == NULL)
self = thread_self();
newstatus = (long) self | 1;
}
if (self != NULL) {
THREAD_SETMEM(self, p_nextlock, (pthread_descr) (oldstatus));
/* Make sure the store in p_nextlock completes before performing
the compare-and-swap */
MEMORY_BARRIER();
}
} while(! __compare_and_swap(&lock->__status, oldstatus, newstatus));
/* Suspend with guard against spurious wakeup.
This can happen in pthread_cond_timedwait_relative, when the thread
wakes up due to timeout and is still on the condvar queue, and then
locks the queue to remove itself. At that point it may still be on the
queue, and may be resumed by a condition signal. */
if (!successful_seizure) {
for (;;) {
suspend(self);
if (self->p_nextlock != NULL) {
/* Count resumes that don't belong to us. */
spurious_wakeup_count++;
continue;
}
break;
}
goto again;
}
/* Put back any resumes we caught that don't belong to us. */
while (spurious_wakeup_count--)
restart(self);
READ_MEMORY_BARRIER();
#endif
}
int __pthread_unlock(struct _pthread_fastlock * lock)
{
#if defined HAS_COMPARE_AND_SWAP
long oldstatus;
pthread_descr thr, * ptr, * maxptr;
int maxprio;
#endif
#if defined TEST_FOR_COMPARE_AND_SWAP
if (!__pthread_has_cas)
#endif
#if !defined HAS_COMPARE_AND_SWAP || defined TEST_FOR_COMPARE_AND_SWAP
{
__pthread_release(&lock->__spinlock);
return 0;
}
#endif
#if defined HAS_COMPARE_AND_SWAP
WRITE_MEMORY_BARRIER();
again:
while ((oldstatus = lock->__status) == 1) {
if (__compare_and_swap_with_release_semantics(&lock->__status,
oldstatus, 0))
return 0;
}
/* Find thread in waiting queue with maximal priority */
ptr = (pthread_descr *) &lock->__status;
thr = (pthread_descr) (oldstatus & ~1L);
maxprio = 0;
maxptr = ptr;
/* Before we iterate over the wait queue, we need to execute
a read barrier, otherwise we may read stale contents of nodes that may
just have been inserted by other processors. One read barrier is enough to
ensure we have a stable list; we don't need one for each pointer chase
through the list, because we are the owner of the lock; other threads
can only add nodes at the front; if a front node is consistent,
the ones behind it must also be. */
READ_MEMORY_BARRIER();
while (thr != 0) {
if (thr->p_priority >= maxprio) {
maxptr = ptr;
maxprio = thr->p_priority;
}
ptr = &(thr->p_nextlock);
thr = (pthread_descr)((long)(thr->p_nextlock) & ~1L);
}
/* Remove max prio thread from waiting list. */
if (maxptr == (pthread_descr *) &lock->__status) {
/* If max prio thread is at head, remove it with compare-and-swap
to guard against concurrent lock operation. This removal
also has the side effect of marking the lock as released
because the new status comes from thr->p_nextlock whose
least significant bit is clear. */
thr = (pthread_descr) (oldstatus & ~1L);
if (! __compare_and_swap_with_release_semantics
(&lock->__status, oldstatus, (long)(thr->p_nextlock) & ~1L))
goto again;
} else {
/* No risk of concurrent access, remove max prio thread normally.
But in this case we must also flip the least significant bit
of the status to mark the lock as released. */
thr = (pthread_descr)((long)*maxptr & ~1L);
*maxptr = thr->p_nextlock;
/* Ensure deletion from linked list completes before we
release the lock. */
WRITE_MEMORY_BARRIER();
do {
oldstatus = lock->__status;
} while (!__compare_and_swap_with_release_semantics(&lock->__status,
oldstatus, oldstatus & ~1L));
}
/* Wake up the selected waiting thread. Woken thread can check
its own p_nextlock field for NULL to detect that it has been removed. No
barrier is needed here, since restart() and suspend() take
care of memory synchronization. */
thr->p_nextlock = NULL;
restart(thr);
return 0;
#endif
}
/*
* Alternate fastlocks do not queue threads directly. Instead, they queue
* these wait queue node structures. When a timed wait wakes up due to
* a timeout, it can leave its wait node in the queue (because there
* is no safe way to remove from the quue). Some other thread will
* deallocate the abandoned node.
*/
struct wait_node {
struct wait_node *next; /* Next node in null terminated linked list */
pthread_descr thr; /* The thread waiting with this node */
int abandoned; /* Atomic flag */
};
static long wait_node_free_list;
static int wait_node_free_list_spinlock;
/* Allocate a new node from the head of the free list using an atomic
operation, or else using malloc if that list is empty. A fundamental
assumption here is that we can safely access wait_node_free_list->next.
That's because we never free nodes once we allocate them, so a pointer to a
node remains valid indefinitely. */
static struct wait_node *wait_node_alloc(void)
{
struct wait_node *new_node = 0;
__pthread_acquire(&wait_node_free_list_spinlock);
if (wait_node_free_list != 0) {
new_node = (struct wait_node *) wait_node_free_list;
wait_node_free_list = (long) new_node->next;
}
WRITE_MEMORY_BARRIER();
__pthread_release(&wait_node_free_list_spinlock);
if (new_node == 0)
return malloc(sizeof *wait_node_alloc());
return new_node;
}
/* Return a node to the head of the free list using an atomic
operation. */
static void wait_node_free(struct wait_node *wn)
{
__pthread_acquire(&wait_node_free_list_spinlock);
wn->next = (struct wait_node *) wait_node_free_list;
wait_node_free_list = (long) wn;
WRITE_MEMORY_BARRIER();
__pthread_release(&wait_node_free_list_spinlock);
return;
}
#if defined HAS_COMPARE_AND_SWAP
/* Remove a wait node from the specified queue. It is assumed
that the removal takes place concurrently with only atomic insertions at the
head of the queue. */
static void wait_node_dequeue(struct wait_node **pp_head,
struct wait_node **pp_node,
struct wait_node *p_node)
{
/* If the node is being deleted from the head of the
list, it must be deleted using atomic compare-and-swap.
Otherwise it can be deleted in the straightforward way. */
if (pp_node == pp_head) {
/* We don't need a read barrier between these next two loads,
because it is assumed that the caller has already ensured
the stability of *p_node with respect to p_node. */
long oldvalue = (long) p_node;
long newvalue = (long) p_node->next;
if (__compare_and_swap((long *) pp_node, oldvalue, newvalue))
return;
/* Oops! Compare and swap failed, which means the node is
no longer first. We delete it using the ordinary method. But we don't
know the identity of the node which now holds the pointer to the node
being deleted, so we must search from the beginning. */
for (pp_node = pp_head; p_node != *pp_node; ) {
pp_node = &(*pp_node)->next;
READ_MEMORY_BARRIER(); /* Stabilize *pp_node for next iteration. */
}
}
*pp_node = p_node->next;
return;
}
#endif
void __pthread_alt_lock(struct _pthread_fastlock * lock,
pthread_descr self)
{
#if defined HAS_COMPARE_AND_SWAP
long oldstatus, newstatus;
#endif
struct wait_node wait_node;
#if defined TEST_FOR_COMPARE_AND_SWAP
if (!__pthread_has_cas)
#endif
#if !defined HAS_COMPARE_AND_SWAP || defined TEST_FOR_COMPARE_AND_SWAP
{
int suspend_needed = 0;
__pthread_acquire(&lock->__spinlock);
if (lock->__status == 0)
lock->__status = 1;
else {
if (self == NULL)
self = thread_self();
wait_node.abandoned = 0;
wait_node.next = (struct wait_node *) lock->__status;
wait_node.thr = self;
lock->__status = (long) &wait_node;
suspend_needed = 1;
}
__pthread_release(&lock->__spinlock);
if (suspend_needed)
suspend (self);
return;
}
#endif
#if defined HAS_COMPARE_AND_SWAP
do {
oldstatus = lock->__status;
if (oldstatus == 0) {
newstatus = 1;
} else {
if (self == NULL)
self = thread_self();
wait_node.thr = self;
newstatus = (long) &wait_node;
}
wait_node.abandoned = 0;
wait_node.next = (struct wait_node *) oldstatus;
/* Make sure the store in wait_node.next completes before performing
the compare-and-swap */
MEMORY_BARRIER();
} while(! __compare_and_swap(&lock->__status, oldstatus, newstatus));
/* Suspend. Note that unlike in __pthread_lock, we don't worry
here about spurious wakeup. That's because this lock is not
used in situations where that can happen; the restart can
only come from the previous lock owner. */
if (oldstatus != 0)
suspend(self);
READ_MEMORY_BARRIER();
#endif
}
/* Timed-out lock operation; returns 0 to indicate timeout. */
int __pthread_alt_timedlock(struct _pthread_fastlock * lock,
pthread_descr self, const struct timespec *abstime)
{
long oldstatus = 0;
#if defined HAS_COMPARE_AND_SWAP
long newstatus;
#endif
struct wait_node *p_wait_node = wait_node_alloc();
/* Out of memory, just give up and do ordinary lock. */
if (p_wait_node == 0) {
__pthread_alt_lock(lock, self);
return 1;
}
#if defined TEST_FOR_COMPARE_AND_SWAP
if (!__pthread_has_cas)
#endif
#if !defined HAS_COMPARE_AND_SWAP || defined TEST_FOR_COMPARE_AND_SWAP
{
__pthread_acquire(&lock->__spinlock);
if (lock->__status == 0)
lock->__status = 1;
else {
if (self == NULL)
self = thread_self();
p_wait_node->abandoned = 0;
p_wait_node->next = (struct wait_node *) lock->__status;
p_wait_node->thr = self;
lock->__status = (long) p_wait_node;
oldstatus = 1; /* force suspend */
}
__pthread_release(&lock->__spinlock);
goto suspend;
}
#endif
#if defined HAS_COMPARE_AND_SWAP
do {
oldstatus = lock->__status;
if (oldstatus == 0) {
newstatus = 1;
} else {
if (self == NULL)
self = thread_self();
p_wait_node->thr = self;
newstatus = (long) p_wait_node;
}
p_wait_node->abandoned = 0;
p_wait_node->next = (struct wait_node *) oldstatus;
/* Make sure the store in wait_node.next completes before performing
the compare-and-swap */
MEMORY_BARRIER();
} while(! __compare_and_swap(&lock->__status, oldstatus, newstatus));
#endif
#if !defined HAS_COMPARE_AND_SWAP || defined TEST_FOR_COMPARE_AND_SWAP
suspend:
#endif
/* If we did not get the lock, do a timed suspend. If we wake up due
to a timeout, then there is a race; the old lock owner may try
to remove us from the queue. This race is resolved by us and the owner
doing an atomic testandset() to change the state of the wait node from 0
to 1. If we succeed, then it's a timeout and we abandon the node in the
queue. If we fail, it means the owner gave us the lock. */
if (oldstatus != 0) {
if (timedsuspend(self, abstime) == 0) {
if (!testandset(&p_wait_node->abandoned))
return 0; /* Timeout! */
/* Eat oustanding resume from owner, otherwise wait_node_free() below
will race with owner's wait_node_dequeue(). */
suspend(self);
}
}
wait_node_free(p_wait_node);
READ_MEMORY_BARRIER();
return 1; /* Got the lock! */
}
void __pthread_alt_unlock(struct _pthread_fastlock *lock)
{
struct wait_node *p_node, **pp_node, *p_max_prio, **pp_max_prio;
struct wait_node ** const pp_head = (struct wait_node **) &lock->__status;
int maxprio;
WRITE_MEMORY_BARRIER();
#if defined TEST_FOR_COMPARE_AND_SWAP
if (!__pthread_has_cas)
#endif
#if !defined HAS_COMPARE_AND_SWAP || defined TEST_FOR_COMPARE_AND_SWAP
{
__pthread_acquire(&lock->__spinlock);
}
#endif
while (1) {
/* If no threads are waiting for this lock, try to just
atomically release it. */
#if defined TEST_FOR_COMPARE_AND_SWAP
if (!__pthread_has_cas)
#endif
#if !defined HAS_COMPARE_AND_SWAP || defined TEST_FOR_COMPARE_AND_SWAP
{
if (lock->__status == 0 || lock->__status == 1) {
lock->__status = 0;
break;
}
}
#endif
#if defined TEST_FOR_COMPARE_AND_SWAP
else
#endif
#if defined HAS_COMPARE_AND_SWAP
{
long oldstatus = lock->__status;
if (oldstatus == 0 || oldstatus == 1) {
if (__compare_and_swap_with_release_semantics (&lock->__status, oldstatus, 0))
break;
else
continue;
}
}
#endif
/* Process the entire queue of wait nodes. Remove all abandoned
wait nodes and put them into the global free queue, and
remember the one unabandoned node which refers to the thread
having the highest priority. */
pp_max_prio = pp_node = pp_head;
p_max_prio = p_node = *pp_head;
maxprio = INT_MIN;
READ_MEMORY_BARRIER(); /* Prevent access to stale data through p_node */
while (p_node != (struct wait_node *) 1) {
int prio;
if (p_node->abandoned) {
/* Remove abandoned node. */
#if defined TEST_FOR_COMPARE_AND_SWAP
if (!__pthread_has_cas)
#endif
#if !defined HAS_COMPARE_AND_SWAP || defined TEST_FOR_COMPARE_AND_SWAP
*pp_node = p_node->next;
#endif
#if defined TEST_FOR_COMPARE_AND_SWAP
else
#endif
#if defined HAS_COMPARE_AND_SWAP
wait_node_dequeue(pp_head, pp_node, p_node);
#endif
wait_node_free(p_node);
/* Note that the next assignment may take us to the beginning
of the queue, to newly inserted nodes, if pp_node == pp_head.
In that case we need a memory barrier to stabilize the first of
these new nodes. */
p_node = *pp_node;
if (pp_node == pp_head)
READ_MEMORY_BARRIER(); /* No stale reads through p_node */
continue;
} else if ((prio = p_node->thr->p_priority) >= maxprio) {
/* Otherwise remember it if its thread has a higher or equal priority
compared to that of any node seen thus far. */
maxprio = prio;
pp_max_prio = pp_node;
p_max_prio = p_node;
}
/* This canno6 jump backward in the list, so no further read
barrier is needed. */
pp_node = &p_node->next;
p_node = *pp_node;
}
/* If all threads abandoned, go back to top */
if (maxprio == INT_MIN)
continue;
ASSERT (p_max_prio != (struct wait_node *) 1);
/* Now we want to to remove the max priority thread's wait node from
the list. Before we can do this, we must atomically try to change the
node's abandon state from zero to nonzero. If we succeed, that means we
have the node that we will wake up. If we failed, then it means the
thread timed out and abandoned the node in which case we repeat the
whole unlock operation. */
if (!testandset(&p_max_prio->abandoned)) {
#if defined TEST_FOR_COMPARE_AND_SWAP
if (!__pthread_has_cas)
#endif
#if !defined HAS_COMPARE_AND_SWAP || defined TEST_FOR_COMPARE_AND_SWAP
*pp_max_prio = p_max_prio->next;
#endif
#if defined TEST_FOR_COMPARE_AND_SWAP
else
#endif
#if defined HAS_COMPARE_AND_SWAP
wait_node_dequeue(pp_head, pp_max_prio, p_max_prio);
#endif
restart(p_max_prio->thr);
break;
}
}
#if defined TEST_FOR_COMPARE_AND_SWAP
if (!__pthread_has_cas)
#endif
#if !defined HAS_COMPARE_AND_SWAP || defined TEST_FOR_COMPARE_AND_SWAP
{
__pthread_release(&lock->__spinlock);
}
#endif
}
/* Compare-and-swap emulation with a spinlock */
#ifdef TEST_FOR_COMPARE_AND_SWAP
int __pthread_has_cas = 0;
#endif
#if !defined HAS_COMPARE_AND_SWAP || defined TEST_FOR_COMPARE_AND_SWAP
int __pthread_compare_and_swap(long * ptr, long oldval, long newval,
int * spinlock)
{
int res;
__pthread_acquire(spinlock);
if (*ptr == oldval) {
*ptr = newval; res = 1;
} else {
res = 0;
}
__pthread_release(spinlock);
return res;
}
#endif
/* The retry strategy is as follows:
- We test and set the spinlock MAX_SPIN_COUNT times, calling
sched_yield() each time. This gives ample opportunity for other
threads with priority >= our priority to make progress and
release the spinlock.
- If a thread with priority < our priority owns the spinlock,
calling sched_yield() repeatedly is useless, since we're preventing
the owning thread from making progress and releasing the spinlock.
So, after MAX_SPIN_LOCK attemps, we suspend the calling thread
using nanosleep(). This again should give time to the owning thread
for releasing the spinlock.
Notice that the nanosleep() interval must not be too small,
since the kernel does busy-waiting for short intervals in a realtime
process (!). The smallest duration that guarantees thread
suspension is currently 2ms.
- When nanosleep() returns, we try again, doing MAX_SPIN_COUNT
sched_yield(), then sleeping again if needed. */
static void __pthread_acquire(int * spinlock)
{
int cnt = 0;
struct timespec tm;
READ_MEMORY_BARRIER();
while (testandset(spinlock)) {
if (cnt < MAX_SPIN_COUNT) {
sched_yield();
cnt++;
} else {
tm.tv_sec = 0;
tm.tv_nsec = SPIN_SLEEP_DURATION;
nanosleep(&tm, NULL);
cnt = 0;
}
}
}
Reference in New Issue View Git Blame Copy Permalink