mirror of git://sourceware.org/git/glibc.git
Fix strftime build with GCC 8.
Building with current GCC mainline fails with:
strftime_l.c: In function '__strftime_internal':
strftime_l.c:719:4: error: macro expands to multiple statements [-Werror=multistatement-macros]
digits = d > width ? d : width; \
^
strftime_l.c:1260:6: note: in expansion of macro 'DO_NUMBER'
DO_NUMBER (1, tp->tm_year + TM_YEAR_BASE);
^~~~~~~~~
strftime_l.c:1259:4: note: some parts of macro expansion are not guarded by this 'else' clause
else
^~~~
In fact this particular instance is harmless; the code looks like:
if (modifier == L_('O'))
goto bad_format;
else
DO_NUMBER (1, tp->tm_year + TM_YEAR_BASE);
and because of the goto, it doesn't matter that part of the expansion
isn't under the "else" conditional. But it's also clearly bad style
to rely on that. This patch changes DO_NUMBER and DO_NUMBER_SPACEPAD
to use do { } while (0) to avoid such problems.
Tested (full testsuite) for x86_64 (GCC 6), and with
build-many-glibcs.py with GCC mainline, in conjunction with my libgcc
patch <https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-06/msg02032.html>.
* time/strftime_l.c (DO_NUMBER): Define using do { } while (0).
(DO_NUMBER_SPACEPAD): Likewise.
This commit is contained in:
parent
f8f72bc0c3
commit
e4043b84c4
|
|
@ -1,3 +1,8 @@
|
||||||
|
2017-06-27 Joseph Myers <joseph@codesourcery.com>
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
* time/strftime_l.c (DO_NUMBER): Define using do { } while (0).
|
||||||
|
(DO_NUMBER_SPACEPAD): Likewise.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
2017-06-27 Prakhar Bahuguna <prakhar.bahuguna@arm.com>
|
2017-06-27 Prakhar Bahuguna <prakhar.bahuguna@arm.com>
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
* sysdeps/arm/armv7/multiarch/Makefile: Add memchr_neon to
|
* sysdeps/arm/armv7/multiarch/Makefile: Add memchr_neon to
|
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
@ -716,11 +716,21 @@ __strftime_internal (CHAR_T *s, size_t maxsize, const CHAR_T *format,
|
||||||
switch (format_char)
|
switch (format_char)
|
||||||
{
|
{
|
||||||
#define DO_NUMBER(d, v) \
|
#define DO_NUMBER(d, v) \
|
||||||
|
do \
|
||||||
|
{ \
|
||||||
digits = d > width ? d : width; \
|
digits = d > width ? d : width; \
|
||||||
number_value = v; goto do_number
|
number_value = v; \
|
||||||
|
goto do_number; \
|
||||||
|
} \
|
||||||
|
while (0)
|
||||||
#define DO_NUMBER_SPACEPAD(d, v) \
|
#define DO_NUMBER_SPACEPAD(d, v) \
|
||||||
|
do \
|
||||||
|
{ \
|
||||||
digits = d > width ? d : width; \
|
digits = d > width ? d : width; \
|
||||||
number_value = v; goto do_number_spacepad
|
number_value = v; \
|
||||||
|
goto do_number_spacepad; \
|
||||||
|
} \
|
||||||
|
while (0)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
case L_('%'):
|
case L_('%'):
|
||||||
if (modifier != 0)
|
if (modifier != 0)
|
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
Loading…
Reference in New Issue