JIRA: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-24205
Conflicts: Conflict due to missing cb55f27ac932
("fs/proc: Introduce list_for_each_table_entry for proc sysctl")
commit f1aa2eb5ea05ccd1fd92d235346e60e90a1ed949
Author: Ondrej Mosnacek <omosnace@redhat.com>
Date: Fri Feb 10 15:58:23 2023 +0100
sysctl: fix proc_dobool() usability
Currently proc_dobool expects a (bool *) in table->data, but sizeof(int)
in table->maxsize, because it uses do_proc_dointvec() directly.
This is unsafe for at least two reasons:
1. A sysctl table definition may use { .data = &variable, .maxsize =
sizeof(variable) }, not realizing that this makes the sysctl unusable
(see the Fixes: tag) and that they need to use the completely
counterintuitive sizeof(int) instead.
2. proc_dobool() will currently try to parse an array of values if given
.maxsize >= 2*sizeof(int), but will try to write values of type bool
by offsets of sizeof(int), so it will not work correctly with neither
an (int *) nor a (bool *). There is no .maxsize validation to prevent
this.
Fix this by:
1. Constraining proc_dobool() to allow only one value and .maxsize ==
sizeof(bool).
2. Wrapping the original struct ctl_table in a temporary one with .data
pointing to a local int variable and .maxsize set to sizeof(int) and
passing this one to proc_dointvec(), converting the value to/from
bool as needed (using proc_dou8vec_minmax() as an example).
3. Extending sysctl_check_table() to enforce proc_dobool() expectations.
4. Fixing the proc_dobool() docstring (it was just copy-pasted from
proc_douintvec, apparently...).
5. Converting all existing proc_dobool() users to set .maxsize to
sizeof(bool) instead of sizeof(int).
Fixes: 83efeeeb3d04 ("tty: Allow TIOCSTI to be disabled")
Fixes: a2071573d634 ("sysctl: introduce new proc handler proc_dobool")
Signed-off-by: Ondrej Mosnacek <omosnace@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Halaney <ahalaney@redhat.com>
16b2a9a32a