Commit Graph

1 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Viktor Malik badd0cfc65 selftests/bpf: Add verifier test exercising jit PROBE_MEM logic
Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/2178930

commit 59fe41b5255f7b8a19a3347ec4b03fd830d6f4aa
Author: Dave Marchevsky <davemarchevsky@fb.com>
Date:   Fri Dec 16 13:43:19 2022 -0800

    selftests/bpf: Add verifier test exercising jit PROBE_MEM logic
    
    This patch adds a test exercising logic that was fixed / improved in
    the previous patch in the series, as well as general sanity checking for
    jit's PROBE_MEM logic which should've been unaffected by the previous
    patch.
    
    The added verifier test does the following:
    
      * Acquire a referenced kptr to struct prog_test_ref_kfunc using
        existing net/bpf/test_run.c kfunc
        * Helper returns ptr to a specific prog_test_ref_kfunc whose first
          two fields - both ints - have been prepopulated w/ vals 42 and
          108, respectively
      * kptr_xchg the acquired ptr into an arraymap
      * Do a direct map_value load of the just-added ptr
        * Goal of all this setup is to get an unreferenced kptr pointing to
          struct with ints of known value, which is the result of this step
      * Using unreferenced kptr obtained in previous step, do loads of
        prog_test_ref_kfunc.a (offset 0) and .b (offset 4)
      * Then incr the kptr by 8 and load prog_test_ref_kfunc.a again (this
        time at offset -8)
      * Add all the loaded ints together and return
    
    Before the PROBE_MEM fixes in previous patch, the loads at offset 0 and
    4 would succeed, while the load at offset -8 would incorrectly fail
    runtime check emitted by the JIT and 0 out dst reg as a result. This
    confirmed by retval of 150 for this test before previous patch - since
    second .a read is 0'd out - and a retval of 192 with the fixed logic.
    
    The test exercises the two optimizations to fixed logic added in last
    patch as well:
    
      * First load, with insn "r8 = *(u32 *)(r9 + 0)" exercises "insn->off
        is 0, no need to add / sub from src_reg" optimization
      * Third load, with insn "r9 = *(u32 *)(r9 - 8)" exercises "src_reg ==
        dst_reg, no need to restore src_reg after load" optimization
    
    Signed-off-by: Dave Marchevsky <davemarchevsky@fb.com>
    Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
    Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
    Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20221216214319.3408356-2-davemarchevsky@fb.com

Signed-off-by: Viktor Malik <vmalik@redhat.com>
2023-06-13 22:44:26 +02:00