hugetlb: prioritize surplus allocation from current node
JIRA: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-68966 Tested: by me commit d0f14f7ee0e2d5df447d54487ae0c3aee5a7208f Author: Koichiro Den <koichiro.den@canonical.com> Date: Thu Dec 5 01:55:03 2024 +0900 hugetlb: prioritize surplus allocation from current node Previously, surplus allocations triggered by mmap were typically made from the node where the process was running. On a page fault, the area was reliably dequeued from the hugepage_freelists for that node. However, since commit 003af997c8a9 ("hugetlb: force allocating surplus hugepages on mempolicy allowed nodes"), dequeue_hugetlb_folio_vma() may fall back to other nodes unnecessarily even if there is no MPOL_BIND policy, causing folios to be dequeued from nodes other than the current one. Also, allocating from the node where the current process is running is likely to result in a performance win, as mmap-ing processes often touch the area not so long after allocation. This change minimizes surprises for users relying on the previous behavior while maintaining the benefit introduced by the commit. So, prioritize the node the current process is running on when possible. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241204165503.628784-1-koichiro.den@canonical.com Signed-off-by: Koichiro Den <koichiro.den@canonical.com> Acked-by: Aristeu Rozanski <aris@ruivo.org> Cc: Aristeu Rozanski <aris@redhat.com> Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Cc: Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev> Cc: Vishal Moola (Oracle) <vishal.moola@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Aristeu Rozanski <arozansk@redhat.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
e7bc4c4673
commit
53820ed2e7
20
mm/hugetlb.c
20
mm/hugetlb.c
|
@ -2541,7 +2541,13 @@ static int gather_surplus_pages(struct hstate *h, long delta)
|
|||
long needed, allocated;
|
||||
bool alloc_ok = true;
|
||||
int node;
|
||||
nodemask_t *mbind_nodemask = policy_mbind_nodemask(htlb_alloc_mask(h));
|
||||
nodemask_t *mbind_nodemask, alloc_nodemask;
|
||||
|
||||
mbind_nodemask = policy_mbind_nodemask(htlb_alloc_mask(h));
|
||||
if (mbind_nodemask)
|
||||
nodes_and(alloc_nodemask, *mbind_nodemask, cpuset_current_mems_allowed);
|
||||
else
|
||||
alloc_nodemask = cpuset_current_mems_allowed;
|
||||
|
||||
lockdep_assert_held(&hugetlb_lock);
|
||||
needed = (h->resv_huge_pages + delta) - h->free_huge_pages;
|
||||
|
@ -2557,8 +2563,16 @@ retry:
|
|||
spin_unlock_irq(&hugetlb_lock);
|
||||
for (i = 0; i < needed; i++) {
|
||||
folio = NULL;
|
||||
for_each_node_mask(node, cpuset_current_mems_allowed) {
|
||||
if (!mbind_nodemask || node_isset(node, *mbind_nodemask)) {
|
||||
|
||||
/* Prioritize current node */
|
||||
if (node_isset(numa_mem_id(), alloc_nodemask))
|
||||
folio = alloc_surplus_hugetlb_folio(h, htlb_alloc_mask(h),
|
||||
numa_mem_id(), NULL);
|
||||
|
||||
if (!folio) {
|
||||
for_each_node_mask(node, alloc_nodemask) {
|
||||
if (node == numa_mem_id())
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
folio = alloc_surplus_hugetlb_folio(h, htlb_alloc_mask(h),
|
||||
node, NULL);
|
||||
if (folio)
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue