remoteproc: k3-r5: Fix IPC-only mode detection
JIRA: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-60788 commit a8631f6d6344d976096b1efafdb2fbb3111bd790 Author: Richard Genoud <richard.genoud@bootlin.com> Date: Fri Jun 21 17:00:55 2024 +0200 remoteproc: k3-r5: Fix IPC-only mode detection ret variable was used to test reset status, get from reset_control_status() call. But this variable was overwritten by ti_sci_proc_get_status() a few lines bellow. And as ti_sci_proc_get_status() returns 0 or a negative value (in this latter case, followed by a return), the expression !ret was always true, Clearly, this was not what was intended: In the comment above it's said that "requires both local and module resets to be deasserted"; if reset_control_status() returns 0 it means that the reset line is deasserted. So, it's pretty clear that the return value of reset_control_status() was intended to be used instead of ti_sci_proc_get_status() return value. This could lead in an incorrect IPC-only mode detection if reset line is asserted (so reset_control_status() return > 0) and c_state != 0 and halted == 0. In this case, the old code would have detected an IPC-only mode instead of a mismatched mode. Fixes: 1168af40b1ad ("remoteproc: k3-r5: Add support for IPC-only mode for all R5Fs") Signed-off-by: Richard Genoud <richard.genoud@bootlin.com> Reviewed-by: Hari Nagalla <hnagalla@ti.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240621150058.319524-2-richard.genoud@bootlin.com Signed-off-by: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Jared Kangas <jkangas@redhat.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
ecb9b07e18
commit
40c2da4d70
|
@ -1144,6 +1144,7 @@ static int k3_r5_rproc_configure_mode(struct k3_r5_rproc *kproc)
|
|||
u32 atcm_enable, btcm_enable, loczrama;
|
||||
struct k3_r5_core *core0;
|
||||
enum cluster_mode mode = cluster->mode;
|
||||
int reset_ctrl_status;
|
||||
int ret;
|
||||
|
||||
core0 = list_first_entry(&cluster->cores, struct k3_r5_core, elem);
|
||||
|
@ -1160,11 +1161,11 @@ static int k3_r5_rproc_configure_mode(struct k3_r5_rproc *kproc)
|
|||
r_state, c_state);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
ret = reset_control_status(core->reset);
|
||||
if (ret < 0) {
|
||||
reset_ctrl_status = reset_control_status(core->reset);
|
||||
if (reset_ctrl_status < 0) {
|
||||
dev_err(cdev, "failed to get initial local reset status, ret = %d\n",
|
||||
ret);
|
||||
return ret;
|
||||
reset_ctrl_status);
|
||||
return reset_ctrl_status;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
|
@ -1199,7 +1200,7 @@ static int k3_r5_rproc_configure_mode(struct k3_r5_rproc *kproc)
|
|||
* irrelevant if module reset is asserted (POR value has local reset
|
||||
* deasserted), and is deemed as remoteproc mode
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (c_state && !ret && !halted) {
|
||||
if (c_state && !reset_ctrl_status && !halted) {
|
||||
dev_info(cdev, "configured R5F for IPC-only mode\n");
|
||||
kproc->rproc->state = RPROC_DETACHED;
|
||||
ret = 1;
|
||||
|
@ -1217,7 +1218,7 @@ static int k3_r5_rproc_configure_mode(struct k3_r5_rproc *kproc)
|
|||
ret = 0;
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
dev_err(cdev, "mismatched mode: local_reset = %s, module_reset = %s, core_state = %s\n",
|
||||
!ret ? "deasserted" : "asserted",
|
||||
!reset_ctrl_status ? "deasserted" : "asserted",
|
||||
c_state ? "deasserted" : "asserted",
|
||||
halted ? "halted" : "unhalted");
|
||||
ret = -EINVAL;
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue