remoteproc: k3-r5: Fix IPC-only mode detection

JIRA: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-60788

commit a8631f6d6344d976096b1efafdb2fbb3111bd790
Author: Richard Genoud <richard.genoud@bootlin.com>
Date:   Fri Jun 21 17:00:55 2024 +0200

    remoteproc: k3-r5: Fix IPC-only mode detection

    ret variable was used to test reset status, get from
    reset_control_status() call. But this variable was overwritten by
    ti_sci_proc_get_status() a few lines bellow.
    And as ti_sci_proc_get_status() returns 0 or a negative value (in this
    latter case, followed by a return), the expression !ret was always true,

    Clearly, this was not what was intended:
    In the comment above it's said that "requires both local and module
    resets to be deasserted"; if reset_control_status() returns 0 it means
    that the reset line is deasserted.
    So, it's pretty clear that the return value of reset_control_status()
    was intended to be used instead of ti_sci_proc_get_status() return
    value.

    This could lead in an incorrect IPC-only mode detection if reset line is
    asserted (so reset_control_status() return > 0) and c_state != 0 and
    halted == 0.
    In this case, the old code would have detected an IPC-only mode instead
    of a mismatched mode.

    Fixes: 1168af40b1ad ("remoteproc: k3-r5: Add support for IPC-only mode for all R5Fs")
    Signed-off-by: Richard Genoud <richard.genoud@bootlin.com>
    Reviewed-by: Hari Nagalla <hnagalla@ti.com>
    Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240621150058.319524-2-richard.genoud@bootlin.com
    Signed-off-by: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>

Signed-off-by: Jared Kangas <jkangas@redhat.com>
This commit is contained in:
Jared Kangas 2024-09-27 17:50:55 -07:00
parent ecb9b07e18
commit 40c2da4d70
1 changed files with 7 additions and 6 deletions

View File

@ -1144,6 +1144,7 @@ static int k3_r5_rproc_configure_mode(struct k3_r5_rproc *kproc)
u32 atcm_enable, btcm_enable, loczrama;
struct k3_r5_core *core0;
enum cluster_mode mode = cluster->mode;
int reset_ctrl_status;
int ret;
core0 = list_first_entry(&cluster->cores, struct k3_r5_core, elem);
@ -1160,11 +1161,11 @@ static int k3_r5_rproc_configure_mode(struct k3_r5_rproc *kproc)
r_state, c_state);
}
ret = reset_control_status(core->reset);
if (ret < 0) {
reset_ctrl_status = reset_control_status(core->reset);
if (reset_ctrl_status < 0) {
dev_err(cdev, "failed to get initial local reset status, ret = %d\n",
ret);
return ret;
reset_ctrl_status);
return reset_ctrl_status;
}
/*
@ -1199,7 +1200,7 @@ static int k3_r5_rproc_configure_mode(struct k3_r5_rproc *kproc)
* irrelevant if module reset is asserted (POR value has local reset
* deasserted), and is deemed as remoteproc mode
*/
if (c_state && !ret && !halted) {
if (c_state && !reset_ctrl_status && !halted) {
dev_info(cdev, "configured R5F for IPC-only mode\n");
kproc->rproc->state = RPROC_DETACHED;
ret = 1;
@ -1217,7 +1218,7 @@ static int k3_r5_rproc_configure_mode(struct k3_r5_rproc *kproc)
ret = 0;
} else {
dev_err(cdev, "mismatched mode: local_reset = %s, module_reset = %s, core_state = %s\n",
!ret ? "deasserted" : "asserted",
!reset_ctrl_status ? "deasserted" : "asserted",
c_state ? "deasserted" : "asserted",
halted ? "halted" : "unhalted");
ret = -EINVAL;