extcon: Use dev_of_node(dev) instead of dev->of_node

JIRA: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-37673

commit 9b4aea51cbcaefacaac655392f360bb3929ab63d
Author: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2023 16:40:01 +0200

  The dev_of_node function should be preferred.
  In the result we may drop unneeded NULL check
  of the pointer to the device object.

  Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
  Signed-off-by: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@samsung.com>

Signed-off-by: Desnes Nunes <desnesn@redhat.com>
This commit is contained in:
Desnes Nunes 2024-06-10 14:27:45 -03:00
parent 8573297af4
commit 1c62d44921
1 changed files with 4 additions and 8 deletions

View File

@ -1423,21 +1423,17 @@ out:
*/
struct extcon_dev *extcon_get_edev_by_phandle(struct device *dev, int index)
{
struct device_node *node;
struct device_node *node, *np = dev_of_node(dev);
struct extcon_dev *edev;
if (!dev)
return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
if (!dev->of_node) {
if (!np) {
dev_dbg(dev, "device does not have a device node entry\n");
return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
}
node = of_parse_phandle(dev->of_node, "extcon", index);
node = of_parse_phandle(np, "extcon", index);
if (!node) {
dev_dbg(dev, "failed to get phandle in %pOF node\n",
dev->of_node);
dev_dbg(dev, "failed to get phandle in %pOF node\n", np);
return ERR_PTR(-ENODEV);
}