Centos-kernel-stream-9/drivers/gpio/gpio-grgpio.c

467 lines
11 KiB
C
Raw Normal View History

// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later
/*
* Driver for Aeroflex Gaisler GRGPIO General Purpose I/O cores.
*
* 2013 (c) Aeroflex Gaisler AB
*
* This driver supports the GRGPIO GPIO core available in the GRLIB VHDL
* IP core library.
*
* Full documentation of the GRGPIO core can be found here:
* http://www.gaisler.com/products/grlib/grip.pdf
*
* See "Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio-grgpio.txt" for
* information on open firmware properties.
*
* Contributors: Andreas Larsson <andreas@gaisler.com>
*/
#include <linux/kernel.h>
#include <linux/module.h>
#include <linux/init.h>
#include <linux/spinlock.h>
#include <linux/io.h>
#include <linux/of.h>
#include <linux/of_platform.h>
#include <linux/gpio/driver.h>
#include <linux/slab.h>
#include <linux/err.h>
#include <linux/interrupt.h>
#include <linux/irq.h>
#include <linux/irqdomain.h>
#include <linux/bitops.h>
#define GRGPIO_MAX_NGPIO 32
#define GRGPIO_DATA 0x00
#define GRGPIO_OUTPUT 0x04
#define GRGPIO_DIR 0x08
#define GRGPIO_IMASK 0x0c
#define GRGPIO_IPOL 0x10
#define GRGPIO_IEDGE 0x14
#define GRGPIO_BYPASS 0x18
#define GRGPIO_IMAP_BASE 0x20
/* Structure for an irq of the core - called an underlying irq */
struct grgpio_uirq {
u8 refcnt; /* Reference counter to manage requesting/freeing of uirq */
u8 uirq; /* Underlying irq of the gpio driver */
};
/*
* Structure for an irq of a gpio line handed out by this driver. The index is
* used to map to the corresponding underlying irq.
*/
struct grgpio_lirq {
s8 index; /* Index into struct grgpio_priv's uirqs, or -1 */
u8 irq; /* irq for the gpio line */
};
struct grgpio_priv {
gpio: generic: factor into gpio_chip struct The separate struct bgpio_chip has been a pain to handle, both by being confusingly similar in name to struct gpio_chip and for being contained inside a struct so that struct gpio_chip is contained in a struct contained in a struct, making several steps of dereferencing necessary. Make things simpler: include the fields directly into <linux/gpio/driver.h>, #ifdef:ed for CONFIG_GENERIC_GPIO, and get rid of the <linux/basic_mmio_gpio.h> altogether. Prefix some of the member variables with bgpio_* and add proper kerneldoc while we're at it. Modify all users to handle the change and use a struct gpio_chip directly. And while we're at it: replace all container_of() dereferencing by gpiochip_get_data() and registering the gpio_chip with gpiochip_add_data(). Cc: arm@kernel.org Cc: Alexander Shiyan <shc_work@mail.ru> Cc: Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org> Cc: Sascha Hauer <kernel@pengutronix.de> Cc: Kukjin Kim <kgene@kernel.org> Cc: Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@gmail.com> Cc: Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com> Cc: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> Cc: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> Cc: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com> Cc: Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@linaro.org> Cc: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net> Cc: Vladimir Zapolskiy <vladimir_zapolskiy@mentor.com> Cc: Rabin Vincent <rabin@rab.in> Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org Cc: bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com Acked-by: Gregory Fong <gregory.0xf0@gmail.com> Acked-by: Liviu Dudau <Liviu.Dudau@arm.com> Acked-by: H Hartley Sweeten <hsweeten@visionengravers.com> Acked-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com> Acked-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
2015-12-04 13:02:58 +00:00
struct gpio_chip gc;
void __iomem *regs;
struct device *dev;
u32 imask; /* irq mask shadow register */
/*
* The grgpio core can have multiple "underlying" irqs. The gpio lines
* can be mapped to any one or none of these underlying irqs
* independently of each other. This driver sets up an irq domain and
* hands out separate irqs to each gpio line
*/
struct irq_domain *domain;
/*
* This array contains information on each underlying irq, each
* irq of the grgpio core itself.
*/
struct grgpio_uirq uirqs[GRGPIO_MAX_NGPIO];
/*
* This array contains information for each gpio line on the irqs
* obtains from this driver. An index value of -1 for a certain gpio
* line indicates that the line has no irq. Otherwise the index connects
* the irq to the underlying irq by pointing into the uirqs array.
*/
struct grgpio_lirq lirqs[GRGPIO_MAX_NGPIO];
};
static void grgpio_set_imask(struct grgpio_priv *priv, unsigned int offset,
int val)
{
gpio: generic: factor into gpio_chip struct The separate struct bgpio_chip has been a pain to handle, both by being confusingly similar in name to struct gpio_chip and for being contained inside a struct so that struct gpio_chip is contained in a struct contained in a struct, making several steps of dereferencing necessary. Make things simpler: include the fields directly into <linux/gpio/driver.h>, #ifdef:ed for CONFIG_GENERIC_GPIO, and get rid of the <linux/basic_mmio_gpio.h> altogether. Prefix some of the member variables with bgpio_* and add proper kerneldoc while we're at it. Modify all users to handle the change and use a struct gpio_chip directly. And while we're at it: replace all container_of() dereferencing by gpiochip_get_data() and registering the gpio_chip with gpiochip_add_data(). Cc: arm@kernel.org Cc: Alexander Shiyan <shc_work@mail.ru> Cc: Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org> Cc: Sascha Hauer <kernel@pengutronix.de> Cc: Kukjin Kim <kgene@kernel.org> Cc: Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@gmail.com> Cc: Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com> Cc: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> Cc: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> Cc: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com> Cc: Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@linaro.org> Cc: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net> Cc: Vladimir Zapolskiy <vladimir_zapolskiy@mentor.com> Cc: Rabin Vincent <rabin@rab.in> Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org Cc: bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com Acked-by: Gregory Fong <gregory.0xf0@gmail.com> Acked-by: Liviu Dudau <Liviu.Dudau@arm.com> Acked-by: H Hartley Sweeten <hsweeten@visionengravers.com> Acked-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com> Acked-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
2015-12-04 13:02:58 +00:00
struct gpio_chip *gc = &priv->gc;
if (val)
priv->imask |= BIT(offset);
else
priv->imask &= ~BIT(offset);
gpio: generic: factor into gpio_chip struct The separate struct bgpio_chip has been a pain to handle, both by being confusingly similar in name to struct gpio_chip and for being contained inside a struct so that struct gpio_chip is contained in a struct contained in a struct, making several steps of dereferencing necessary. Make things simpler: include the fields directly into <linux/gpio/driver.h>, #ifdef:ed for CONFIG_GENERIC_GPIO, and get rid of the <linux/basic_mmio_gpio.h> altogether. Prefix some of the member variables with bgpio_* and add proper kerneldoc while we're at it. Modify all users to handle the change and use a struct gpio_chip directly. And while we're at it: replace all container_of() dereferencing by gpiochip_get_data() and registering the gpio_chip with gpiochip_add_data(). Cc: arm@kernel.org Cc: Alexander Shiyan <shc_work@mail.ru> Cc: Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org> Cc: Sascha Hauer <kernel@pengutronix.de> Cc: Kukjin Kim <kgene@kernel.org> Cc: Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@gmail.com> Cc: Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com> Cc: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> Cc: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> Cc: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com> Cc: Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@linaro.org> Cc: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net> Cc: Vladimir Zapolskiy <vladimir_zapolskiy@mentor.com> Cc: Rabin Vincent <rabin@rab.in> Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org Cc: bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com Acked-by: Gregory Fong <gregory.0xf0@gmail.com> Acked-by: Liviu Dudau <Liviu.Dudau@arm.com> Acked-by: H Hartley Sweeten <hsweeten@visionengravers.com> Acked-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com> Acked-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
2015-12-04 13:02:58 +00:00
gc->write_reg(priv->regs + GRGPIO_IMASK, priv->imask);
}
static int grgpio_to_irq(struct gpio_chip *gc, unsigned offset)
{
gpio: generic: factor into gpio_chip struct The separate struct bgpio_chip has been a pain to handle, both by being confusingly similar in name to struct gpio_chip and for being contained inside a struct so that struct gpio_chip is contained in a struct contained in a struct, making several steps of dereferencing necessary. Make things simpler: include the fields directly into <linux/gpio/driver.h>, #ifdef:ed for CONFIG_GENERIC_GPIO, and get rid of the <linux/basic_mmio_gpio.h> altogether. Prefix some of the member variables with bgpio_* and add proper kerneldoc while we're at it. Modify all users to handle the change and use a struct gpio_chip directly. And while we're at it: replace all container_of() dereferencing by gpiochip_get_data() and registering the gpio_chip with gpiochip_add_data(). Cc: arm@kernel.org Cc: Alexander Shiyan <shc_work@mail.ru> Cc: Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org> Cc: Sascha Hauer <kernel@pengutronix.de> Cc: Kukjin Kim <kgene@kernel.org> Cc: Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@gmail.com> Cc: Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com> Cc: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> Cc: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> Cc: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com> Cc: Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@linaro.org> Cc: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net> Cc: Vladimir Zapolskiy <vladimir_zapolskiy@mentor.com> Cc: Rabin Vincent <rabin@rab.in> Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org Cc: bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com Acked-by: Gregory Fong <gregory.0xf0@gmail.com> Acked-by: Liviu Dudau <Liviu.Dudau@arm.com> Acked-by: H Hartley Sweeten <hsweeten@visionengravers.com> Acked-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com> Acked-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
2015-12-04 13:02:58 +00:00
struct grgpio_priv *priv = gpiochip_get_data(gc);
if (offset >= gc->ngpio)
return -ENXIO;
if (priv->lirqs[offset].index < 0)
return -ENXIO;
return irq_create_mapping(priv->domain, offset);
}
/* -------------------- IRQ chip functions -------------------- */
static int grgpio_irq_set_type(struct irq_data *d, unsigned int type)
{
struct grgpio_priv *priv = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
unsigned long flags;
u32 mask = BIT(d->hwirq);
u32 ipol;
u32 iedge;
u32 pol;
u32 edge;
switch (type) {
case IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW:
pol = 0;
edge = 0;
break;
case IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH:
pol = mask;
edge = 0;
break;
case IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_FALLING:
pol = 0;
edge = mask;
break;
case IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING:
pol = mask;
edge = mask;
break;
default:
return -EINVAL;
}
gpio: use raw spinlock for gpio chip shadowed data Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2071835 Tested: This is one of a series of patch sets to enable Arm SystemReady IR support in the kernel for NXP i.MX8 platforms. This set updates GPIO support. It has been tested via simple boot tests and by using the kernel GPIO tools to verify pins are being identified and can be used. Conflicts: drivers/gpio/gpio-mlxbf2.c Not a supported device, but made the spinlock changes in order to allow the module to compile. commit 3c938cc5cebcbd2291fe97f523c0705a2c24c77d Author: Schspa Shi <schspa@gmail.com> Date: Tue Apr 19 09:28:10 2022 +0800 gpio: use raw spinlock for gpio chip shadowed data In case of PREEMPT_RT, there is a raw_spinlock -> spinlock dependency as the lockdep report shows. __irq_set_handler irq_get_desc_buslock __irq_get_desc_lock raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&desc->lock, *flags); // raw spinlock get here __irq_do_set_handler mask_ack_irq dwapb_irq_ack spin_lock_irqsave(&gc->bgpio_lock, flags); // sleep able spinlock irq_put_desc_busunlock Replace with a raw lock to avoid BUGs. This lock is only used to access registers, and It's safe to replace with the raw lock without bad influence. [ 15.090359][ T1] ============================= [ 15.090365][ T1] [ BUG: Invalid wait context ] [ 15.090373][ T1] 5.10.59-rt52-00983-g186a6841c682-dirty #3 Not tainted [ 15.090386][ T1] ----------------------------- [ 15.090392][ T1] swapper/0/1 is trying to lock: [ 15.090402][ T1] 70ff00018507c188 (&gc->bgpio_lock){....}-{3:3}, at: _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x1c/0x28 [ 15.090470][ T1] other info that might help us debug this: [ 15.090477][ T1] context-{5:5} [ 15.090485][ T1] 3 locks held by swapper/0/1: [ 15.090497][ T1] #0: c2ff0001816de1a0 (&dev->mutex){....}-{4:4}, at: __device_driver_lock+0x98/0x104 [ 15.090553][ T1] #1: ffff90001485b4b8 (irq_domain_mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: irq_domain_associate+0xbc/0x6d4 [ 15.090606][ T1] #2: 4bff000185d7a8e0 (lock_class){....}-{2:2}, at: _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x1c/0x28 [ 15.090654][ T1] stack backtrace: [ 15.090661][ T1] CPU: 4 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 5.10.59-rt52-00983-g186a6841c682-dirty #3 [ 15.090682][ T1] Hardware name: Horizon Robotics Journey 5 DVB (DT) [ 15.090692][ T1] Call trace: ...... [ 15.090811][ T1] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x1c/0x28 [ 15.090828][ T1] dwapb_irq_ack+0xb4/0x300 [ 15.090846][ T1] __irq_do_set_handler+0x494/0xb2c [ 15.090864][ T1] __irq_set_handler+0x74/0x114 [ 15.090881][ T1] irq_set_chip_and_handler_name+0x44/0x58 [ 15.090900][ T1] gpiochip_irq_map+0x210/0x644 Signed-off-by: Schspa Shi <schspa@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com> Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> Acked-by: Doug Berger <opendmb@gmail.com> Acked-by: Serge Semin <fancer.lancer@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl> (cherry picked from commit 3c938cc5cebcbd2291fe97f523c0705a2c24c77d) Signed-off-by: Al Stone <ahs3@redhat.com>
2022-08-24 19:28:52 +00:00
raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&priv->gc.bgpio_lock, flags);
gpio: generic: factor into gpio_chip struct The separate struct bgpio_chip has been a pain to handle, both by being confusingly similar in name to struct gpio_chip and for being contained inside a struct so that struct gpio_chip is contained in a struct contained in a struct, making several steps of dereferencing necessary. Make things simpler: include the fields directly into <linux/gpio/driver.h>, #ifdef:ed for CONFIG_GENERIC_GPIO, and get rid of the <linux/basic_mmio_gpio.h> altogether. Prefix some of the member variables with bgpio_* and add proper kerneldoc while we're at it. Modify all users to handle the change and use a struct gpio_chip directly. And while we're at it: replace all container_of() dereferencing by gpiochip_get_data() and registering the gpio_chip with gpiochip_add_data(). Cc: arm@kernel.org Cc: Alexander Shiyan <shc_work@mail.ru> Cc: Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org> Cc: Sascha Hauer <kernel@pengutronix.de> Cc: Kukjin Kim <kgene@kernel.org> Cc: Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@gmail.com> Cc: Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com> Cc: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> Cc: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> Cc: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com> Cc: Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@linaro.org> Cc: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net> Cc: Vladimir Zapolskiy <vladimir_zapolskiy@mentor.com> Cc: Rabin Vincent <rabin@rab.in> Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org Cc: bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com Acked-by: Gregory Fong <gregory.0xf0@gmail.com> Acked-by: Liviu Dudau <Liviu.Dudau@arm.com> Acked-by: H Hartley Sweeten <hsweeten@visionengravers.com> Acked-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com> Acked-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
2015-12-04 13:02:58 +00:00
ipol = priv->gc.read_reg(priv->regs + GRGPIO_IPOL) & ~mask;
iedge = priv->gc.read_reg(priv->regs + GRGPIO_IEDGE) & ~mask;
gpio: generic: factor into gpio_chip struct The separate struct bgpio_chip has been a pain to handle, both by being confusingly similar in name to struct gpio_chip and for being contained inside a struct so that struct gpio_chip is contained in a struct contained in a struct, making several steps of dereferencing necessary. Make things simpler: include the fields directly into <linux/gpio/driver.h>, #ifdef:ed for CONFIG_GENERIC_GPIO, and get rid of the <linux/basic_mmio_gpio.h> altogether. Prefix some of the member variables with bgpio_* and add proper kerneldoc while we're at it. Modify all users to handle the change and use a struct gpio_chip directly. And while we're at it: replace all container_of() dereferencing by gpiochip_get_data() and registering the gpio_chip with gpiochip_add_data(). Cc: arm@kernel.org Cc: Alexander Shiyan <shc_work@mail.ru> Cc: Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org> Cc: Sascha Hauer <kernel@pengutronix.de> Cc: Kukjin Kim <kgene@kernel.org> Cc: Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@gmail.com> Cc: Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com> Cc: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> Cc: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> Cc: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com> Cc: Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@linaro.org> Cc: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net> Cc: Vladimir Zapolskiy <vladimir_zapolskiy@mentor.com> Cc: Rabin Vincent <rabin@rab.in> Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org Cc: bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com Acked-by: Gregory Fong <gregory.0xf0@gmail.com> Acked-by: Liviu Dudau <Liviu.Dudau@arm.com> Acked-by: H Hartley Sweeten <hsweeten@visionengravers.com> Acked-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com> Acked-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
2015-12-04 13:02:58 +00:00
priv->gc.write_reg(priv->regs + GRGPIO_IPOL, ipol | pol);
priv->gc.write_reg(priv->regs + GRGPIO_IEDGE, iedge | edge);
gpio: use raw spinlock for gpio chip shadowed data Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2071835 Tested: This is one of a series of patch sets to enable Arm SystemReady IR support in the kernel for NXP i.MX8 platforms. This set updates GPIO support. It has been tested via simple boot tests and by using the kernel GPIO tools to verify pins are being identified and can be used. Conflicts: drivers/gpio/gpio-mlxbf2.c Not a supported device, but made the spinlock changes in order to allow the module to compile. commit 3c938cc5cebcbd2291fe97f523c0705a2c24c77d Author: Schspa Shi <schspa@gmail.com> Date: Tue Apr 19 09:28:10 2022 +0800 gpio: use raw spinlock for gpio chip shadowed data In case of PREEMPT_RT, there is a raw_spinlock -> spinlock dependency as the lockdep report shows. __irq_set_handler irq_get_desc_buslock __irq_get_desc_lock raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&desc->lock, *flags); // raw spinlock get here __irq_do_set_handler mask_ack_irq dwapb_irq_ack spin_lock_irqsave(&gc->bgpio_lock, flags); // sleep able spinlock irq_put_desc_busunlock Replace with a raw lock to avoid BUGs. This lock is only used to access registers, and It's safe to replace with the raw lock without bad influence. [ 15.090359][ T1] ============================= [ 15.090365][ T1] [ BUG: Invalid wait context ] [ 15.090373][ T1] 5.10.59-rt52-00983-g186a6841c682-dirty #3 Not tainted [ 15.090386][ T1] ----------------------------- [ 15.090392][ T1] swapper/0/1 is trying to lock: [ 15.090402][ T1] 70ff00018507c188 (&gc->bgpio_lock){....}-{3:3}, at: _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x1c/0x28 [ 15.090470][ T1] other info that might help us debug this: [ 15.090477][ T1] context-{5:5} [ 15.090485][ T1] 3 locks held by swapper/0/1: [ 15.090497][ T1] #0: c2ff0001816de1a0 (&dev->mutex){....}-{4:4}, at: __device_driver_lock+0x98/0x104 [ 15.090553][ T1] #1: ffff90001485b4b8 (irq_domain_mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: irq_domain_associate+0xbc/0x6d4 [ 15.090606][ T1] #2: 4bff000185d7a8e0 (lock_class){....}-{2:2}, at: _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x1c/0x28 [ 15.090654][ T1] stack backtrace: [ 15.090661][ T1] CPU: 4 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 5.10.59-rt52-00983-g186a6841c682-dirty #3 [ 15.090682][ T1] Hardware name: Horizon Robotics Journey 5 DVB (DT) [ 15.090692][ T1] Call trace: ...... [ 15.090811][ T1] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x1c/0x28 [ 15.090828][ T1] dwapb_irq_ack+0xb4/0x300 [ 15.090846][ T1] __irq_do_set_handler+0x494/0xb2c [ 15.090864][ T1] __irq_set_handler+0x74/0x114 [ 15.090881][ T1] irq_set_chip_and_handler_name+0x44/0x58 [ 15.090900][ T1] gpiochip_irq_map+0x210/0x644 Signed-off-by: Schspa Shi <schspa@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com> Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> Acked-by: Doug Berger <opendmb@gmail.com> Acked-by: Serge Semin <fancer.lancer@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl> (cherry picked from commit 3c938cc5cebcbd2291fe97f523c0705a2c24c77d) Signed-off-by: Al Stone <ahs3@redhat.com>
2022-08-24 19:28:52 +00:00
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&priv->gc.bgpio_lock, flags);
return 0;
}
static void grgpio_irq_mask(struct irq_data *d)
{
struct grgpio_priv *priv = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
int offset = d->hwirq;
unsigned long flags;
gpio: use raw spinlock for gpio chip shadowed data Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2071835 Tested: This is one of a series of patch sets to enable Arm SystemReady IR support in the kernel for NXP i.MX8 platforms. This set updates GPIO support. It has been tested via simple boot tests and by using the kernel GPIO tools to verify pins are being identified and can be used. Conflicts: drivers/gpio/gpio-mlxbf2.c Not a supported device, but made the spinlock changes in order to allow the module to compile. commit 3c938cc5cebcbd2291fe97f523c0705a2c24c77d Author: Schspa Shi <schspa@gmail.com> Date: Tue Apr 19 09:28:10 2022 +0800 gpio: use raw spinlock for gpio chip shadowed data In case of PREEMPT_RT, there is a raw_spinlock -> spinlock dependency as the lockdep report shows. __irq_set_handler irq_get_desc_buslock __irq_get_desc_lock raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&desc->lock, *flags); // raw spinlock get here __irq_do_set_handler mask_ack_irq dwapb_irq_ack spin_lock_irqsave(&gc->bgpio_lock, flags); // sleep able spinlock irq_put_desc_busunlock Replace with a raw lock to avoid BUGs. This lock is only used to access registers, and It's safe to replace with the raw lock without bad influence. [ 15.090359][ T1] ============================= [ 15.090365][ T1] [ BUG: Invalid wait context ] [ 15.090373][ T1] 5.10.59-rt52-00983-g186a6841c682-dirty #3 Not tainted [ 15.090386][ T1] ----------------------------- [ 15.090392][ T1] swapper/0/1 is trying to lock: [ 15.090402][ T1] 70ff00018507c188 (&gc->bgpio_lock){....}-{3:3}, at: _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x1c/0x28 [ 15.090470][ T1] other info that might help us debug this: [ 15.090477][ T1] context-{5:5} [ 15.090485][ T1] 3 locks held by swapper/0/1: [ 15.090497][ T1] #0: c2ff0001816de1a0 (&dev->mutex){....}-{4:4}, at: __device_driver_lock+0x98/0x104 [ 15.090553][ T1] #1: ffff90001485b4b8 (irq_domain_mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: irq_domain_associate+0xbc/0x6d4 [ 15.090606][ T1] #2: 4bff000185d7a8e0 (lock_class){....}-{2:2}, at: _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x1c/0x28 [ 15.090654][ T1] stack backtrace: [ 15.090661][ T1] CPU: 4 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 5.10.59-rt52-00983-g186a6841c682-dirty #3 [ 15.090682][ T1] Hardware name: Horizon Robotics Journey 5 DVB (DT) [ 15.090692][ T1] Call trace: ...... [ 15.090811][ T1] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x1c/0x28 [ 15.090828][ T1] dwapb_irq_ack+0xb4/0x300 [ 15.090846][ T1] __irq_do_set_handler+0x494/0xb2c [ 15.090864][ T1] __irq_set_handler+0x74/0x114 [ 15.090881][ T1] irq_set_chip_and_handler_name+0x44/0x58 [ 15.090900][ T1] gpiochip_irq_map+0x210/0x644 Signed-off-by: Schspa Shi <schspa@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com> Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> Acked-by: Doug Berger <opendmb@gmail.com> Acked-by: Serge Semin <fancer.lancer@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl> (cherry picked from commit 3c938cc5cebcbd2291fe97f523c0705a2c24c77d) Signed-off-by: Al Stone <ahs3@redhat.com>
2022-08-24 19:28:52 +00:00
raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&priv->gc.bgpio_lock, flags);
grgpio_set_imask(priv, offset, 0);
gpio: use raw spinlock for gpio chip shadowed data Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2071835 Tested: This is one of a series of patch sets to enable Arm SystemReady IR support in the kernel for NXP i.MX8 platforms. This set updates GPIO support. It has been tested via simple boot tests and by using the kernel GPIO tools to verify pins are being identified and can be used. Conflicts: drivers/gpio/gpio-mlxbf2.c Not a supported device, but made the spinlock changes in order to allow the module to compile. commit 3c938cc5cebcbd2291fe97f523c0705a2c24c77d Author: Schspa Shi <schspa@gmail.com> Date: Tue Apr 19 09:28:10 2022 +0800 gpio: use raw spinlock for gpio chip shadowed data In case of PREEMPT_RT, there is a raw_spinlock -> spinlock dependency as the lockdep report shows. __irq_set_handler irq_get_desc_buslock __irq_get_desc_lock raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&desc->lock, *flags); // raw spinlock get here __irq_do_set_handler mask_ack_irq dwapb_irq_ack spin_lock_irqsave(&gc->bgpio_lock, flags); // sleep able spinlock irq_put_desc_busunlock Replace with a raw lock to avoid BUGs. This lock is only used to access registers, and It's safe to replace with the raw lock without bad influence. [ 15.090359][ T1] ============================= [ 15.090365][ T1] [ BUG: Invalid wait context ] [ 15.090373][ T1] 5.10.59-rt52-00983-g186a6841c682-dirty #3 Not tainted [ 15.090386][ T1] ----------------------------- [ 15.090392][ T1] swapper/0/1 is trying to lock: [ 15.090402][ T1] 70ff00018507c188 (&gc->bgpio_lock){....}-{3:3}, at: _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x1c/0x28 [ 15.090470][ T1] other info that might help us debug this: [ 15.090477][ T1] context-{5:5} [ 15.090485][ T1] 3 locks held by swapper/0/1: [ 15.090497][ T1] #0: c2ff0001816de1a0 (&dev->mutex){....}-{4:4}, at: __device_driver_lock+0x98/0x104 [ 15.090553][ T1] #1: ffff90001485b4b8 (irq_domain_mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: irq_domain_associate+0xbc/0x6d4 [ 15.090606][ T1] #2: 4bff000185d7a8e0 (lock_class){....}-{2:2}, at: _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x1c/0x28 [ 15.090654][ T1] stack backtrace: [ 15.090661][ T1] CPU: 4 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 5.10.59-rt52-00983-g186a6841c682-dirty #3 [ 15.090682][ T1] Hardware name: Horizon Robotics Journey 5 DVB (DT) [ 15.090692][ T1] Call trace: ...... [ 15.090811][ T1] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x1c/0x28 [ 15.090828][ T1] dwapb_irq_ack+0xb4/0x300 [ 15.090846][ T1] __irq_do_set_handler+0x494/0xb2c [ 15.090864][ T1] __irq_set_handler+0x74/0x114 [ 15.090881][ T1] irq_set_chip_and_handler_name+0x44/0x58 [ 15.090900][ T1] gpiochip_irq_map+0x210/0x644 Signed-off-by: Schspa Shi <schspa@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com> Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> Acked-by: Doug Berger <opendmb@gmail.com> Acked-by: Serge Semin <fancer.lancer@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl> (cherry picked from commit 3c938cc5cebcbd2291fe97f523c0705a2c24c77d) Signed-off-by: Al Stone <ahs3@redhat.com>
2022-08-24 19:28:52 +00:00
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&priv->gc.bgpio_lock, flags);
}
static void grgpio_irq_unmask(struct irq_data *d)
{
struct grgpio_priv *priv = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
int offset = d->hwirq;
unsigned long flags;
gpio: use raw spinlock for gpio chip shadowed data Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2071835 Tested: This is one of a series of patch sets to enable Arm SystemReady IR support in the kernel for NXP i.MX8 platforms. This set updates GPIO support. It has been tested via simple boot tests and by using the kernel GPIO tools to verify pins are being identified and can be used. Conflicts: drivers/gpio/gpio-mlxbf2.c Not a supported device, but made the spinlock changes in order to allow the module to compile. commit 3c938cc5cebcbd2291fe97f523c0705a2c24c77d Author: Schspa Shi <schspa@gmail.com> Date: Tue Apr 19 09:28:10 2022 +0800 gpio: use raw spinlock for gpio chip shadowed data In case of PREEMPT_RT, there is a raw_spinlock -> spinlock dependency as the lockdep report shows. __irq_set_handler irq_get_desc_buslock __irq_get_desc_lock raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&desc->lock, *flags); // raw spinlock get here __irq_do_set_handler mask_ack_irq dwapb_irq_ack spin_lock_irqsave(&gc->bgpio_lock, flags); // sleep able spinlock irq_put_desc_busunlock Replace with a raw lock to avoid BUGs. This lock is only used to access registers, and It's safe to replace with the raw lock without bad influence. [ 15.090359][ T1] ============================= [ 15.090365][ T1] [ BUG: Invalid wait context ] [ 15.090373][ T1] 5.10.59-rt52-00983-g186a6841c682-dirty #3 Not tainted [ 15.090386][ T1] ----------------------------- [ 15.090392][ T1] swapper/0/1 is trying to lock: [ 15.090402][ T1] 70ff00018507c188 (&gc->bgpio_lock){....}-{3:3}, at: _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x1c/0x28 [ 15.090470][ T1] other info that might help us debug this: [ 15.090477][ T1] context-{5:5} [ 15.090485][ T1] 3 locks held by swapper/0/1: [ 15.090497][ T1] #0: c2ff0001816de1a0 (&dev->mutex){....}-{4:4}, at: __device_driver_lock+0x98/0x104 [ 15.090553][ T1] #1: ffff90001485b4b8 (irq_domain_mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: irq_domain_associate+0xbc/0x6d4 [ 15.090606][ T1] #2: 4bff000185d7a8e0 (lock_class){....}-{2:2}, at: _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x1c/0x28 [ 15.090654][ T1] stack backtrace: [ 15.090661][ T1] CPU: 4 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 5.10.59-rt52-00983-g186a6841c682-dirty #3 [ 15.090682][ T1] Hardware name: Horizon Robotics Journey 5 DVB (DT) [ 15.090692][ T1] Call trace: ...... [ 15.090811][ T1] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x1c/0x28 [ 15.090828][ T1] dwapb_irq_ack+0xb4/0x300 [ 15.090846][ T1] __irq_do_set_handler+0x494/0xb2c [ 15.090864][ T1] __irq_set_handler+0x74/0x114 [ 15.090881][ T1] irq_set_chip_and_handler_name+0x44/0x58 [ 15.090900][ T1] gpiochip_irq_map+0x210/0x644 Signed-off-by: Schspa Shi <schspa@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com> Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> Acked-by: Doug Berger <opendmb@gmail.com> Acked-by: Serge Semin <fancer.lancer@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl> (cherry picked from commit 3c938cc5cebcbd2291fe97f523c0705a2c24c77d) Signed-off-by: Al Stone <ahs3@redhat.com>
2022-08-24 19:28:52 +00:00
raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&priv->gc.bgpio_lock, flags);
grgpio_set_imask(priv, offset, 1);
gpio: use raw spinlock for gpio chip shadowed data Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2071835 Tested: This is one of a series of patch sets to enable Arm SystemReady IR support in the kernel for NXP i.MX8 platforms. This set updates GPIO support. It has been tested via simple boot tests and by using the kernel GPIO tools to verify pins are being identified and can be used. Conflicts: drivers/gpio/gpio-mlxbf2.c Not a supported device, but made the spinlock changes in order to allow the module to compile. commit 3c938cc5cebcbd2291fe97f523c0705a2c24c77d Author: Schspa Shi <schspa@gmail.com> Date: Tue Apr 19 09:28:10 2022 +0800 gpio: use raw spinlock for gpio chip shadowed data In case of PREEMPT_RT, there is a raw_spinlock -> spinlock dependency as the lockdep report shows. __irq_set_handler irq_get_desc_buslock __irq_get_desc_lock raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&desc->lock, *flags); // raw spinlock get here __irq_do_set_handler mask_ack_irq dwapb_irq_ack spin_lock_irqsave(&gc->bgpio_lock, flags); // sleep able spinlock irq_put_desc_busunlock Replace with a raw lock to avoid BUGs. This lock is only used to access registers, and It's safe to replace with the raw lock without bad influence. [ 15.090359][ T1] ============================= [ 15.090365][ T1] [ BUG: Invalid wait context ] [ 15.090373][ T1] 5.10.59-rt52-00983-g186a6841c682-dirty #3 Not tainted [ 15.090386][ T1] ----------------------------- [ 15.090392][ T1] swapper/0/1 is trying to lock: [ 15.090402][ T1] 70ff00018507c188 (&gc->bgpio_lock){....}-{3:3}, at: _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x1c/0x28 [ 15.090470][ T1] other info that might help us debug this: [ 15.090477][ T1] context-{5:5} [ 15.090485][ T1] 3 locks held by swapper/0/1: [ 15.090497][ T1] #0: c2ff0001816de1a0 (&dev->mutex){....}-{4:4}, at: __device_driver_lock+0x98/0x104 [ 15.090553][ T1] #1: ffff90001485b4b8 (irq_domain_mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: irq_domain_associate+0xbc/0x6d4 [ 15.090606][ T1] #2: 4bff000185d7a8e0 (lock_class){....}-{2:2}, at: _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x1c/0x28 [ 15.090654][ T1] stack backtrace: [ 15.090661][ T1] CPU: 4 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 5.10.59-rt52-00983-g186a6841c682-dirty #3 [ 15.090682][ T1] Hardware name: Horizon Robotics Journey 5 DVB (DT) [ 15.090692][ T1] Call trace: ...... [ 15.090811][ T1] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x1c/0x28 [ 15.090828][ T1] dwapb_irq_ack+0xb4/0x300 [ 15.090846][ T1] __irq_do_set_handler+0x494/0xb2c [ 15.090864][ T1] __irq_set_handler+0x74/0x114 [ 15.090881][ T1] irq_set_chip_and_handler_name+0x44/0x58 [ 15.090900][ T1] gpiochip_irq_map+0x210/0x644 Signed-off-by: Schspa Shi <schspa@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com> Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> Acked-by: Doug Berger <opendmb@gmail.com> Acked-by: Serge Semin <fancer.lancer@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl> (cherry picked from commit 3c938cc5cebcbd2291fe97f523c0705a2c24c77d) Signed-off-by: Al Stone <ahs3@redhat.com>
2022-08-24 19:28:52 +00:00
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&priv->gc.bgpio_lock, flags);
}
static struct irq_chip grgpio_irq_chip = {
.name = "grgpio",
.irq_mask = grgpio_irq_mask,
.irq_unmask = grgpio_irq_unmask,
.irq_set_type = grgpio_irq_set_type,
};
static irqreturn_t grgpio_irq_handler(int irq, void *dev)
{
struct grgpio_priv *priv = dev;
gpio: generic: factor into gpio_chip struct The separate struct bgpio_chip has been a pain to handle, both by being confusingly similar in name to struct gpio_chip and for being contained inside a struct so that struct gpio_chip is contained in a struct contained in a struct, making several steps of dereferencing necessary. Make things simpler: include the fields directly into <linux/gpio/driver.h>, #ifdef:ed for CONFIG_GENERIC_GPIO, and get rid of the <linux/basic_mmio_gpio.h> altogether. Prefix some of the member variables with bgpio_* and add proper kerneldoc while we're at it. Modify all users to handle the change and use a struct gpio_chip directly. And while we're at it: replace all container_of() dereferencing by gpiochip_get_data() and registering the gpio_chip with gpiochip_add_data(). Cc: arm@kernel.org Cc: Alexander Shiyan <shc_work@mail.ru> Cc: Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org> Cc: Sascha Hauer <kernel@pengutronix.de> Cc: Kukjin Kim <kgene@kernel.org> Cc: Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@gmail.com> Cc: Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com> Cc: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> Cc: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> Cc: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com> Cc: Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@linaro.org> Cc: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net> Cc: Vladimir Zapolskiy <vladimir_zapolskiy@mentor.com> Cc: Rabin Vincent <rabin@rab.in> Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org Cc: bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com Acked-by: Gregory Fong <gregory.0xf0@gmail.com> Acked-by: Liviu Dudau <Liviu.Dudau@arm.com> Acked-by: H Hartley Sweeten <hsweeten@visionengravers.com> Acked-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com> Acked-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
2015-12-04 13:02:58 +00:00
int ngpio = priv->gc.ngpio;
unsigned long flags;
int i;
int match = 0;
gpio: use raw spinlock for gpio chip shadowed data Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2071835 Tested: This is one of a series of patch sets to enable Arm SystemReady IR support in the kernel for NXP i.MX8 platforms. This set updates GPIO support. It has been tested via simple boot tests and by using the kernel GPIO tools to verify pins are being identified and can be used. Conflicts: drivers/gpio/gpio-mlxbf2.c Not a supported device, but made the spinlock changes in order to allow the module to compile. commit 3c938cc5cebcbd2291fe97f523c0705a2c24c77d Author: Schspa Shi <schspa@gmail.com> Date: Tue Apr 19 09:28:10 2022 +0800 gpio: use raw spinlock for gpio chip shadowed data In case of PREEMPT_RT, there is a raw_spinlock -> spinlock dependency as the lockdep report shows. __irq_set_handler irq_get_desc_buslock __irq_get_desc_lock raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&desc->lock, *flags); // raw spinlock get here __irq_do_set_handler mask_ack_irq dwapb_irq_ack spin_lock_irqsave(&gc->bgpio_lock, flags); // sleep able spinlock irq_put_desc_busunlock Replace with a raw lock to avoid BUGs. This lock is only used to access registers, and It's safe to replace with the raw lock without bad influence. [ 15.090359][ T1] ============================= [ 15.090365][ T1] [ BUG: Invalid wait context ] [ 15.090373][ T1] 5.10.59-rt52-00983-g186a6841c682-dirty #3 Not tainted [ 15.090386][ T1] ----------------------------- [ 15.090392][ T1] swapper/0/1 is trying to lock: [ 15.090402][ T1] 70ff00018507c188 (&gc->bgpio_lock){....}-{3:3}, at: _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x1c/0x28 [ 15.090470][ T1] other info that might help us debug this: [ 15.090477][ T1] context-{5:5} [ 15.090485][ T1] 3 locks held by swapper/0/1: [ 15.090497][ T1] #0: c2ff0001816de1a0 (&dev->mutex){....}-{4:4}, at: __device_driver_lock+0x98/0x104 [ 15.090553][ T1] #1: ffff90001485b4b8 (irq_domain_mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: irq_domain_associate+0xbc/0x6d4 [ 15.090606][ T1] #2: 4bff000185d7a8e0 (lock_class){....}-{2:2}, at: _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x1c/0x28 [ 15.090654][ T1] stack backtrace: [ 15.090661][ T1] CPU: 4 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 5.10.59-rt52-00983-g186a6841c682-dirty #3 [ 15.090682][ T1] Hardware name: Horizon Robotics Journey 5 DVB (DT) [ 15.090692][ T1] Call trace: ...... [ 15.090811][ T1] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x1c/0x28 [ 15.090828][ T1] dwapb_irq_ack+0xb4/0x300 [ 15.090846][ T1] __irq_do_set_handler+0x494/0xb2c [ 15.090864][ T1] __irq_set_handler+0x74/0x114 [ 15.090881][ T1] irq_set_chip_and_handler_name+0x44/0x58 [ 15.090900][ T1] gpiochip_irq_map+0x210/0x644 Signed-off-by: Schspa Shi <schspa@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com> Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> Acked-by: Doug Berger <opendmb@gmail.com> Acked-by: Serge Semin <fancer.lancer@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl> (cherry picked from commit 3c938cc5cebcbd2291fe97f523c0705a2c24c77d) Signed-off-by: Al Stone <ahs3@redhat.com>
2022-08-24 19:28:52 +00:00
raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&priv->gc.bgpio_lock, flags);
/*
* For each gpio line, call its interrupt handler if it its underlying
* irq matches the current irq that is handled.
*/
for (i = 0; i < ngpio; i++) {
struct grgpio_lirq *lirq = &priv->lirqs[i];
if (priv->imask & BIT(i) && lirq->index >= 0 &&
priv->uirqs[lirq->index].uirq == irq) {
generic_handle_irq(lirq->irq);
match = 1;
}
}
gpio: use raw spinlock for gpio chip shadowed data Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2071835 Tested: This is one of a series of patch sets to enable Arm SystemReady IR support in the kernel for NXP i.MX8 platforms. This set updates GPIO support. It has been tested via simple boot tests and by using the kernel GPIO tools to verify pins are being identified and can be used. Conflicts: drivers/gpio/gpio-mlxbf2.c Not a supported device, but made the spinlock changes in order to allow the module to compile. commit 3c938cc5cebcbd2291fe97f523c0705a2c24c77d Author: Schspa Shi <schspa@gmail.com> Date: Tue Apr 19 09:28:10 2022 +0800 gpio: use raw spinlock for gpio chip shadowed data In case of PREEMPT_RT, there is a raw_spinlock -> spinlock dependency as the lockdep report shows. __irq_set_handler irq_get_desc_buslock __irq_get_desc_lock raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&desc->lock, *flags); // raw spinlock get here __irq_do_set_handler mask_ack_irq dwapb_irq_ack spin_lock_irqsave(&gc->bgpio_lock, flags); // sleep able spinlock irq_put_desc_busunlock Replace with a raw lock to avoid BUGs. This lock is only used to access registers, and It's safe to replace with the raw lock without bad influence. [ 15.090359][ T1] ============================= [ 15.090365][ T1] [ BUG: Invalid wait context ] [ 15.090373][ T1] 5.10.59-rt52-00983-g186a6841c682-dirty #3 Not tainted [ 15.090386][ T1] ----------------------------- [ 15.090392][ T1] swapper/0/1 is trying to lock: [ 15.090402][ T1] 70ff00018507c188 (&gc->bgpio_lock){....}-{3:3}, at: _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x1c/0x28 [ 15.090470][ T1] other info that might help us debug this: [ 15.090477][ T1] context-{5:5} [ 15.090485][ T1] 3 locks held by swapper/0/1: [ 15.090497][ T1] #0: c2ff0001816de1a0 (&dev->mutex){....}-{4:4}, at: __device_driver_lock+0x98/0x104 [ 15.090553][ T1] #1: ffff90001485b4b8 (irq_domain_mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: irq_domain_associate+0xbc/0x6d4 [ 15.090606][ T1] #2: 4bff000185d7a8e0 (lock_class){....}-{2:2}, at: _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x1c/0x28 [ 15.090654][ T1] stack backtrace: [ 15.090661][ T1] CPU: 4 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 5.10.59-rt52-00983-g186a6841c682-dirty #3 [ 15.090682][ T1] Hardware name: Horizon Robotics Journey 5 DVB (DT) [ 15.090692][ T1] Call trace: ...... [ 15.090811][ T1] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x1c/0x28 [ 15.090828][ T1] dwapb_irq_ack+0xb4/0x300 [ 15.090846][ T1] __irq_do_set_handler+0x494/0xb2c [ 15.090864][ T1] __irq_set_handler+0x74/0x114 [ 15.090881][ T1] irq_set_chip_and_handler_name+0x44/0x58 [ 15.090900][ T1] gpiochip_irq_map+0x210/0x644 Signed-off-by: Schspa Shi <schspa@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com> Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> Acked-by: Doug Berger <opendmb@gmail.com> Acked-by: Serge Semin <fancer.lancer@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl> (cherry picked from commit 3c938cc5cebcbd2291fe97f523c0705a2c24c77d) Signed-off-by: Al Stone <ahs3@redhat.com>
2022-08-24 19:28:52 +00:00
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&priv->gc.bgpio_lock, flags);
if (!match)
dev_warn(priv->dev, "No gpio line matched irq %d\n", irq);
return IRQ_HANDLED;
}
/*
* This function will be called as a consequence of the call to
* irq_create_mapping in grgpio_to_irq
*/
static int grgpio_irq_map(struct irq_domain *d, unsigned int irq,
irq_hw_number_t hwirq)
{
struct grgpio_priv *priv = d->host_data;
struct grgpio_lirq *lirq;
struct grgpio_uirq *uirq;
unsigned long flags;
int offset = hwirq;
int ret = 0;
if (!priv)
return -EINVAL;
lirq = &priv->lirqs[offset];
if (lirq->index < 0)
return -EINVAL;
dev_dbg(priv->dev, "Mapping irq %d for gpio line %d\n",
irq, offset);
gpio: use raw spinlock for gpio chip shadowed data Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2071835 Tested: This is one of a series of patch sets to enable Arm SystemReady IR support in the kernel for NXP i.MX8 platforms. This set updates GPIO support. It has been tested via simple boot tests and by using the kernel GPIO tools to verify pins are being identified and can be used. Conflicts: drivers/gpio/gpio-mlxbf2.c Not a supported device, but made the spinlock changes in order to allow the module to compile. commit 3c938cc5cebcbd2291fe97f523c0705a2c24c77d Author: Schspa Shi <schspa@gmail.com> Date: Tue Apr 19 09:28:10 2022 +0800 gpio: use raw spinlock for gpio chip shadowed data In case of PREEMPT_RT, there is a raw_spinlock -> spinlock dependency as the lockdep report shows. __irq_set_handler irq_get_desc_buslock __irq_get_desc_lock raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&desc->lock, *flags); // raw spinlock get here __irq_do_set_handler mask_ack_irq dwapb_irq_ack spin_lock_irqsave(&gc->bgpio_lock, flags); // sleep able spinlock irq_put_desc_busunlock Replace with a raw lock to avoid BUGs. This lock is only used to access registers, and It's safe to replace with the raw lock without bad influence. [ 15.090359][ T1] ============================= [ 15.090365][ T1] [ BUG: Invalid wait context ] [ 15.090373][ T1] 5.10.59-rt52-00983-g186a6841c682-dirty #3 Not tainted [ 15.090386][ T1] ----------------------------- [ 15.090392][ T1] swapper/0/1 is trying to lock: [ 15.090402][ T1] 70ff00018507c188 (&gc->bgpio_lock){....}-{3:3}, at: _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x1c/0x28 [ 15.090470][ T1] other info that might help us debug this: [ 15.090477][ T1] context-{5:5} [ 15.090485][ T1] 3 locks held by swapper/0/1: [ 15.090497][ T1] #0: c2ff0001816de1a0 (&dev->mutex){....}-{4:4}, at: __device_driver_lock+0x98/0x104 [ 15.090553][ T1] #1: ffff90001485b4b8 (irq_domain_mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: irq_domain_associate+0xbc/0x6d4 [ 15.090606][ T1] #2: 4bff000185d7a8e0 (lock_class){....}-{2:2}, at: _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x1c/0x28 [ 15.090654][ T1] stack backtrace: [ 15.090661][ T1] CPU: 4 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 5.10.59-rt52-00983-g186a6841c682-dirty #3 [ 15.090682][ T1] Hardware name: Horizon Robotics Journey 5 DVB (DT) [ 15.090692][ T1] Call trace: ...... [ 15.090811][ T1] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x1c/0x28 [ 15.090828][ T1] dwapb_irq_ack+0xb4/0x300 [ 15.090846][ T1] __irq_do_set_handler+0x494/0xb2c [ 15.090864][ T1] __irq_set_handler+0x74/0x114 [ 15.090881][ T1] irq_set_chip_and_handler_name+0x44/0x58 [ 15.090900][ T1] gpiochip_irq_map+0x210/0x644 Signed-off-by: Schspa Shi <schspa@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com> Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> Acked-by: Doug Berger <opendmb@gmail.com> Acked-by: Serge Semin <fancer.lancer@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl> (cherry picked from commit 3c938cc5cebcbd2291fe97f523c0705a2c24c77d) Signed-off-by: Al Stone <ahs3@redhat.com>
2022-08-24 19:28:52 +00:00
raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&priv->gc.bgpio_lock, flags);
/* Request underlying irq if not already requested */
lirq->irq = irq;
uirq = &priv->uirqs[lirq->index];
if (uirq->refcnt == 0) {
gpio: use raw spinlock for gpio chip shadowed data Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2071835 Tested: This is one of a series of patch sets to enable Arm SystemReady IR support in the kernel for NXP i.MX8 platforms. This set updates GPIO support. It has been tested via simple boot tests and by using the kernel GPIO tools to verify pins are being identified and can be used. Conflicts: drivers/gpio/gpio-mlxbf2.c Not a supported device, but made the spinlock changes in order to allow the module to compile. commit 3c938cc5cebcbd2291fe97f523c0705a2c24c77d Author: Schspa Shi <schspa@gmail.com> Date: Tue Apr 19 09:28:10 2022 +0800 gpio: use raw spinlock for gpio chip shadowed data In case of PREEMPT_RT, there is a raw_spinlock -> spinlock dependency as the lockdep report shows. __irq_set_handler irq_get_desc_buslock __irq_get_desc_lock raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&desc->lock, *flags); // raw spinlock get here __irq_do_set_handler mask_ack_irq dwapb_irq_ack spin_lock_irqsave(&gc->bgpio_lock, flags); // sleep able spinlock irq_put_desc_busunlock Replace with a raw lock to avoid BUGs. This lock is only used to access registers, and It's safe to replace with the raw lock without bad influence. [ 15.090359][ T1] ============================= [ 15.090365][ T1] [ BUG: Invalid wait context ] [ 15.090373][ T1] 5.10.59-rt52-00983-g186a6841c682-dirty #3 Not tainted [ 15.090386][ T1] ----------------------------- [ 15.090392][ T1] swapper/0/1 is trying to lock: [ 15.090402][ T1] 70ff00018507c188 (&gc->bgpio_lock){....}-{3:3}, at: _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x1c/0x28 [ 15.090470][ T1] other info that might help us debug this: [ 15.090477][ T1] context-{5:5} [ 15.090485][ T1] 3 locks held by swapper/0/1: [ 15.090497][ T1] #0: c2ff0001816de1a0 (&dev->mutex){....}-{4:4}, at: __device_driver_lock+0x98/0x104 [ 15.090553][ T1] #1: ffff90001485b4b8 (irq_domain_mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: irq_domain_associate+0xbc/0x6d4 [ 15.090606][ T1] #2: 4bff000185d7a8e0 (lock_class){....}-{2:2}, at: _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x1c/0x28 [ 15.090654][ T1] stack backtrace: [ 15.090661][ T1] CPU: 4 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 5.10.59-rt52-00983-g186a6841c682-dirty #3 [ 15.090682][ T1] Hardware name: Horizon Robotics Journey 5 DVB (DT) [ 15.090692][ T1] Call trace: ...... [ 15.090811][ T1] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x1c/0x28 [ 15.090828][ T1] dwapb_irq_ack+0xb4/0x300 [ 15.090846][ T1] __irq_do_set_handler+0x494/0xb2c [ 15.090864][ T1] __irq_set_handler+0x74/0x114 [ 15.090881][ T1] irq_set_chip_and_handler_name+0x44/0x58 [ 15.090900][ T1] gpiochip_irq_map+0x210/0x644 Signed-off-by: Schspa Shi <schspa@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com> Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> Acked-by: Doug Berger <opendmb@gmail.com> Acked-by: Serge Semin <fancer.lancer@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl> (cherry picked from commit 3c938cc5cebcbd2291fe97f523c0705a2c24c77d) Signed-off-by: Al Stone <ahs3@redhat.com>
2022-08-24 19:28:52 +00:00
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&priv->gc.bgpio_lock, flags);
ret = request_irq(uirq->uirq, grgpio_irq_handler, 0,
dev_name(priv->dev), priv);
if (ret) {
dev_err(priv->dev,
"Could not request underlying irq %d\n",
uirq->uirq);
return ret;
}
gpio: use raw spinlock for gpio chip shadowed data Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2071835 Tested: This is one of a series of patch sets to enable Arm SystemReady IR support in the kernel for NXP i.MX8 platforms. This set updates GPIO support. It has been tested via simple boot tests and by using the kernel GPIO tools to verify pins are being identified and can be used. Conflicts: drivers/gpio/gpio-mlxbf2.c Not a supported device, but made the spinlock changes in order to allow the module to compile. commit 3c938cc5cebcbd2291fe97f523c0705a2c24c77d Author: Schspa Shi <schspa@gmail.com> Date: Tue Apr 19 09:28:10 2022 +0800 gpio: use raw spinlock for gpio chip shadowed data In case of PREEMPT_RT, there is a raw_spinlock -> spinlock dependency as the lockdep report shows. __irq_set_handler irq_get_desc_buslock __irq_get_desc_lock raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&desc->lock, *flags); // raw spinlock get here __irq_do_set_handler mask_ack_irq dwapb_irq_ack spin_lock_irqsave(&gc->bgpio_lock, flags); // sleep able spinlock irq_put_desc_busunlock Replace with a raw lock to avoid BUGs. This lock is only used to access registers, and It's safe to replace with the raw lock without bad influence. [ 15.090359][ T1] ============================= [ 15.090365][ T1] [ BUG: Invalid wait context ] [ 15.090373][ T1] 5.10.59-rt52-00983-g186a6841c682-dirty #3 Not tainted [ 15.090386][ T1] ----------------------------- [ 15.090392][ T1] swapper/0/1 is trying to lock: [ 15.090402][ T1] 70ff00018507c188 (&gc->bgpio_lock){....}-{3:3}, at: _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x1c/0x28 [ 15.090470][ T1] other info that might help us debug this: [ 15.090477][ T1] context-{5:5} [ 15.090485][ T1] 3 locks held by swapper/0/1: [ 15.090497][ T1] #0: c2ff0001816de1a0 (&dev->mutex){....}-{4:4}, at: __device_driver_lock+0x98/0x104 [ 15.090553][ T1] #1: ffff90001485b4b8 (irq_domain_mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: irq_domain_associate+0xbc/0x6d4 [ 15.090606][ T1] #2: 4bff000185d7a8e0 (lock_class){....}-{2:2}, at: _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x1c/0x28 [ 15.090654][ T1] stack backtrace: [ 15.090661][ T1] CPU: 4 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 5.10.59-rt52-00983-g186a6841c682-dirty #3 [ 15.090682][ T1] Hardware name: Horizon Robotics Journey 5 DVB (DT) [ 15.090692][ T1] Call trace: ...... [ 15.090811][ T1] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x1c/0x28 [ 15.090828][ T1] dwapb_irq_ack+0xb4/0x300 [ 15.090846][ T1] __irq_do_set_handler+0x494/0xb2c [ 15.090864][ T1] __irq_set_handler+0x74/0x114 [ 15.090881][ T1] irq_set_chip_and_handler_name+0x44/0x58 [ 15.090900][ T1] gpiochip_irq_map+0x210/0x644 Signed-off-by: Schspa Shi <schspa@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com> Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> Acked-by: Doug Berger <opendmb@gmail.com> Acked-by: Serge Semin <fancer.lancer@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl> (cherry picked from commit 3c938cc5cebcbd2291fe97f523c0705a2c24c77d) Signed-off-by: Al Stone <ahs3@redhat.com>
2022-08-24 19:28:52 +00:00
raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&priv->gc.bgpio_lock, flags);
}
uirq->refcnt++;
gpio: use raw spinlock for gpio chip shadowed data Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2071835 Tested: This is one of a series of patch sets to enable Arm SystemReady IR support in the kernel for NXP i.MX8 platforms. This set updates GPIO support. It has been tested via simple boot tests and by using the kernel GPIO tools to verify pins are being identified and can be used. Conflicts: drivers/gpio/gpio-mlxbf2.c Not a supported device, but made the spinlock changes in order to allow the module to compile. commit 3c938cc5cebcbd2291fe97f523c0705a2c24c77d Author: Schspa Shi <schspa@gmail.com> Date: Tue Apr 19 09:28:10 2022 +0800 gpio: use raw spinlock for gpio chip shadowed data In case of PREEMPT_RT, there is a raw_spinlock -> spinlock dependency as the lockdep report shows. __irq_set_handler irq_get_desc_buslock __irq_get_desc_lock raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&desc->lock, *flags); // raw spinlock get here __irq_do_set_handler mask_ack_irq dwapb_irq_ack spin_lock_irqsave(&gc->bgpio_lock, flags); // sleep able spinlock irq_put_desc_busunlock Replace with a raw lock to avoid BUGs. This lock is only used to access registers, and It's safe to replace with the raw lock without bad influence. [ 15.090359][ T1] ============================= [ 15.090365][ T1] [ BUG: Invalid wait context ] [ 15.090373][ T1] 5.10.59-rt52-00983-g186a6841c682-dirty #3 Not tainted [ 15.090386][ T1] ----------------------------- [ 15.090392][ T1] swapper/0/1 is trying to lock: [ 15.090402][ T1] 70ff00018507c188 (&gc->bgpio_lock){....}-{3:3}, at: _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x1c/0x28 [ 15.090470][ T1] other info that might help us debug this: [ 15.090477][ T1] context-{5:5} [ 15.090485][ T1] 3 locks held by swapper/0/1: [ 15.090497][ T1] #0: c2ff0001816de1a0 (&dev->mutex){....}-{4:4}, at: __device_driver_lock+0x98/0x104 [ 15.090553][ T1] #1: ffff90001485b4b8 (irq_domain_mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: irq_domain_associate+0xbc/0x6d4 [ 15.090606][ T1] #2: 4bff000185d7a8e0 (lock_class){....}-{2:2}, at: _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x1c/0x28 [ 15.090654][ T1] stack backtrace: [ 15.090661][ T1] CPU: 4 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 5.10.59-rt52-00983-g186a6841c682-dirty #3 [ 15.090682][ T1] Hardware name: Horizon Robotics Journey 5 DVB (DT) [ 15.090692][ T1] Call trace: ...... [ 15.090811][ T1] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x1c/0x28 [ 15.090828][ T1] dwapb_irq_ack+0xb4/0x300 [ 15.090846][ T1] __irq_do_set_handler+0x494/0xb2c [ 15.090864][ T1] __irq_set_handler+0x74/0x114 [ 15.090881][ T1] irq_set_chip_and_handler_name+0x44/0x58 [ 15.090900][ T1] gpiochip_irq_map+0x210/0x644 Signed-off-by: Schspa Shi <schspa@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com> Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> Acked-by: Doug Berger <opendmb@gmail.com> Acked-by: Serge Semin <fancer.lancer@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl> (cherry picked from commit 3c938cc5cebcbd2291fe97f523c0705a2c24c77d) Signed-off-by: Al Stone <ahs3@redhat.com>
2022-08-24 19:28:52 +00:00
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&priv->gc.bgpio_lock, flags);
/* Setup irq */
irq_set_chip_data(irq, priv);
irq_set_chip_and_handler(irq, &grgpio_irq_chip,
handle_simple_irq);
irq_set_noprobe(irq);
return ret;
}
static void grgpio_irq_unmap(struct irq_domain *d, unsigned int irq)
{
struct grgpio_priv *priv = d->host_data;
int index;
struct grgpio_lirq *lirq;
struct grgpio_uirq *uirq;
unsigned long flags;
gpio: generic: factor into gpio_chip struct The separate struct bgpio_chip has been a pain to handle, both by being confusingly similar in name to struct gpio_chip and for being contained inside a struct so that struct gpio_chip is contained in a struct contained in a struct, making several steps of dereferencing necessary. Make things simpler: include the fields directly into <linux/gpio/driver.h>, #ifdef:ed for CONFIG_GENERIC_GPIO, and get rid of the <linux/basic_mmio_gpio.h> altogether. Prefix some of the member variables with bgpio_* and add proper kerneldoc while we're at it. Modify all users to handle the change and use a struct gpio_chip directly. And while we're at it: replace all container_of() dereferencing by gpiochip_get_data() and registering the gpio_chip with gpiochip_add_data(). Cc: arm@kernel.org Cc: Alexander Shiyan <shc_work@mail.ru> Cc: Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org> Cc: Sascha Hauer <kernel@pengutronix.de> Cc: Kukjin Kim <kgene@kernel.org> Cc: Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@gmail.com> Cc: Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com> Cc: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> Cc: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> Cc: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com> Cc: Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@linaro.org> Cc: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net> Cc: Vladimir Zapolskiy <vladimir_zapolskiy@mentor.com> Cc: Rabin Vincent <rabin@rab.in> Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org Cc: bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com Acked-by: Gregory Fong <gregory.0xf0@gmail.com> Acked-by: Liviu Dudau <Liviu.Dudau@arm.com> Acked-by: H Hartley Sweeten <hsweeten@visionengravers.com> Acked-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com> Acked-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
2015-12-04 13:02:58 +00:00
int ngpio = priv->gc.ngpio;
int i;
irq_set_chip_and_handler(irq, NULL, NULL);
irq_set_chip_data(irq, NULL);
gpio: use raw spinlock for gpio chip shadowed data Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2071835 Tested: This is one of a series of patch sets to enable Arm SystemReady IR support in the kernel for NXP i.MX8 platforms. This set updates GPIO support. It has been tested via simple boot tests and by using the kernel GPIO tools to verify pins are being identified and can be used. Conflicts: drivers/gpio/gpio-mlxbf2.c Not a supported device, but made the spinlock changes in order to allow the module to compile. commit 3c938cc5cebcbd2291fe97f523c0705a2c24c77d Author: Schspa Shi <schspa@gmail.com> Date: Tue Apr 19 09:28:10 2022 +0800 gpio: use raw spinlock for gpio chip shadowed data In case of PREEMPT_RT, there is a raw_spinlock -> spinlock dependency as the lockdep report shows. __irq_set_handler irq_get_desc_buslock __irq_get_desc_lock raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&desc->lock, *flags); // raw spinlock get here __irq_do_set_handler mask_ack_irq dwapb_irq_ack spin_lock_irqsave(&gc->bgpio_lock, flags); // sleep able spinlock irq_put_desc_busunlock Replace with a raw lock to avoid BUGs. This lock is only used to access registers, and It's safe to replace with the raw lock without bad influence. [ 15.090359][ T1] ============================= [ 15.090365][ T1] [ BUG: Invalid wait context ] [ 15.090373][ T1] 5.10.59-rt52-00983-g186a6841c682-dirty #3 Not tainted [ 15.090386][ T1] ----------------------------- [ 15.090392][ T1] swapper/0/1 is trying to lock: [ 15.090402][ T1] 70ff00018507c188 (&gc->bgpio_lock){....}-{3:3}, at: _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x1c/0x28 [ 15.090470][ T1] other info that might help us debug this: [ 15.090477][ T1] context-{5:5} [ 15.090485][ T1] 3 locks held by swapper/0/1: [ 15.090497][ T1] #0: c2ff0001816de1a0 (&dev->mutex){....}-{4:4}, at: __device_driver_lock+0x98/0x104 [ 15.090553][ T1] #1: ffff90001485b4b8 (irq_domain_mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: irq_domain_associate+0xbc/0x6d4 [ 15.090606][ T1] #2: 4bff000185d7a8e0 (lock_class){....}-{2:2}, at: _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x1c/0x28 [ 15.090654][ T1] stack backtrace: [ 15.090661][ T1] CPU: 4 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 5.10.59-rt52-00983-g186a6841c682-dirty #3 [ 15.090682][ T1] Hardware name: Horizon Robotics Journey 5 DVB (DT) [ 15.090692][ T1] Call trace: ...... [ 15.090811][ T1] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x1c/0x28 [ 15.090828][ T1] dwapb_irq_ack+0xb4/0x300 [ 15.090846][ T1] __irq_do_set_handler+0x494/0xb2c [ 15.090864][ T1] __irq_set_handler+0x74/0x114 [ 15.090881][ T1] irq_set_chip_and_handler_name+0x44/0x58 [ 15.090900][ T1] gpiochip_irq_map+0x210/0x644 Signed-off-by: Schspa Shi <schspa@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com> Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> Acked-by: Doug Berger <opendmb@gmail.com> Acked-by: Serge Semin <fancer.lancer@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl> (cherry picked from commit 3c938cc5cebcbd2291fe97f523c0705a2c24c77d) Signed-off-by: Al Stone <ahs3@redhat.com>
2022-08-24 19:28:52 +00:00
raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&priv->gc.bgpio_lock, flags);
/* Free underlying irq if last user unmapped */
index = -1;
for (i = 0; i < ngpio; i++) {
lirq = &priv->lirqs[i];
if (lirq->irq == irq) {
grgpio_set_imask(priv, i, 0);
lirq->irq = 0;
index = lirq->index;
break;
}
}
WARN_ON(index < 0);
if (index >= 0) {
uirq = &priv->uirqs[lirq->index];
uirq->refcnt--;
if (uirq->refcnt == 0) {
gpio: use raw spinlock for gpio chip shadowed data Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2071835 Tested: This is one of a series of patch sets to enable Arm SystemReady IR support in the kernel for NXP i.MX8 platforms. This set updates GPIO support. It has been tested via simple boot tests and by using the kernel GPIO tools to verify pins are being identified and can be used. Conflicts: drivers/gpio/gpio-mlxbf2.c Not a supported device, but made the spinlock changes in order to allow the module to compile. commit 3c938cc5cebcbd2291fe97f523c0705a2c24c77d Author: Schspa Shi <schspa@gmail.com> Date: Tue Apr 19 09:28:10 2022 +0800 gpio: use raw spinlock for gpio chip shadowed data In case of PREEMPT_RT, there is a raw_spinlock -> spinlock dependency as the lockdep report shows. __irq_set_handler irq_get_desc_buslock __irq_get_desc_lock raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&desc->lock, *flags); // raw spinlock get here __irq_do_set_handler mask_ack_irq dwapb_irq_ack spin_lock_irqsave(&gc->bgpio_lock, flags); // sleep able spinlock irq_put_desc_busunlock Replace with a raw lock to avoid BUGs. This lock is only used to access registers, and It's safe to replace with the raw lock without bad influence. [ 15.090359][ T1] ============================= [ 15.090365][ T1] [ BUG: Invalid wait context ] [ 15.090373][ T1] 5.10.59-rt52-00983-g186a6841c682-dirty #3 Not tainted [ 15.090386][ T1] ----------------------------- [ 15.090392][ T1] swapper/0/1 is trying to lock: [ 15.090402][ T1] 70ff00018507c188 (&gc->bgpio_lock){....}-{3:3}, at: _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x1c/0x28 [ 15.090470][ T1] other info that might help us debug this: [ 15.090477][ T1] context-{5:5} [ 15.090485][ T1] 3 locks held by swapper/0/1: [ 15.090497][ T1] #0: c2ff0001816de1a0 (&dev->mutex){....}-{4:4}, at: __device_driver_lock+0x98/0x104 [ 15.090553][ T1] #1: ffff90001485b4b8 (irq_domain_mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: irq_domain_associate+0xbc/0x6d4 [ 15.090606][ T1] #2: 4bff000185d7a8e0 (lock_class){....}-{2:2}, at: _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x1c/0x28 [ 15.090654][ T1] stack backtrace: [ 15.090661][ T1] CPU: 4 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 5.10.59-rt52-00983-g186a6841c682-dirty #3 [ 15.090682][ T1] Hardware name: Horizon Robotics Journey 5 DVB (DT) [ 15.090692][ T1] Call trace: ...... [ 15.090811][ T1] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x1c/0x28 [ 15.090828][ T1] dwapb_irq_ack+0xb4/0x300 [ 15.090846][ T1] __irq_do_set_handler+0x494/0xb2c [ 15.090864][ T1] __irq_set_handler+0x74/0x114 [ 15.090881][ T1] irq_set_chip_and_handler_name+0x44/0x58 [ 15.090900][ T1] gpiochip_irq_map+0x210/0x644 Signed-off-by: Schspa Shi <schspa@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com> Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> Acked-by: Doug Berger <opendmb@gmail.com> Acked-by: Serge Semin <fancer.lancer@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl> (cherry picked from commit 3c938cc5cebcbd2291fe97f523c0705a2c24c77d) Signed-off-by: Al Stone <ahs3@redhat.com>
2022-08-24 19:28:52 +00:00
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&priv->gc.bgpio_lock, flags);
free_irq(uirq->uirq, priv);
return;
}
}
gpio: use raw spinlock for gpio chip shadowed data Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2071835 Tested: This is one of a series of patch sets to enable Arm SystemReady IR support in the kernel for NXP i.MX8 platforms. This set updates GPIO support. It has been tested via simple boot tests and by using the kernel GPIO tools to verify pins are being identified and can be used. Conflicts: drivers/gpio/gpio-mlxbf2.c Not a supported device, but made the spinlock changes in order to allow the module to compile. commit 3c938cc5cebcbd2291fe97f523c0705a2c24c77d Author: Schspa Shi <schspa@gmail.com> Date: Tue Apr 19 09:28:10 2022 +0800 gpio: use raw spinlock for gpio chip shadowed data In case of PREEMPT_RT, there is a raw_spinlock -> spinlock dependency as the lockdep report shows. __irq_set_handler irq_get_desc_buslock __irq_get_desc_lock raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&desc->lock, *flags); // raw spinlock get here __irq_do_set_handler mask_ack_irq dwapb_irq_ack spin_lock_irqsave(&gc->bgpio_lock, flags); // sleep able spinlock irq_put_desc_busunlock Replace with a raw lock to avoid BUGs. This lock is only used to access registers, and It's safe to replace with the raw lock without bad influence. [ 15.090359][ T1] ============================= [ 15.090365][ T1] [ BUG: Invalid wait context ] [ 15.090373][ T1] 5.10.59-rt52-00983-g186a6841c682-dirty #3 Not tainted [ 15.090386][ T1] ----------------------------- [ 15.090392][ T1] swapper/0/1 is trying to lock: [ 15.090402][ T1] 70ff00018507c188 (&gc->bgpio_lock){....}-{3:3}, at: _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x1c/0x28 [ 15.090470][ T1] other info that might help us debug this: [ 15.090477][ T1] context-{5:5} [ 15.090485][ T1] 3 locks held by swapper/0/1: [ 15.090497][ T1] #0: c2ff0001816de1a0 (&dev->mutex){....}-{4:4}, at: __device_driver_lock+0x98/0x104 [ 15.090553][ T1] #1: ffff90001485b4b8 (irq_domain_mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: irq_domain_associate+0xbc/0x6d4 [ 15.090606][ T1] #2: 4bff000185d7a8e0 (lock_class){....}-{2:2}, at: _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x1c/0x28 [ 15.090654][ T1] stack backtrace: [ 15.090661][ T1] CPU: 4 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 5.10.59-rt52-00983-g186a6841c682-dirty #3 [ 15.090682][ T1] Hardware name: Horizon Robotics Journey 5 DVB (DT) [ 15.090692][ T1] Call trace: ...... [ 15.090811][ T1] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x1c/0x28 [ 15.090828][ T1] dwapb_irq_ack+0xb4/0x300 [ 15.090846][ T1] __irq_do_set_handler+0x494/0xb2c [ 15.090864][ T1] __irq_set_handler+0x74/0x114 [ 15.090881][ T1] irq_set_chip_and_handler_name+0x44/0x58 [ 15.090900][ T1] gpiochip_irq_map+0x210/0x644 Signed-off-by: Schspa Shi <schspa@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com> Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> Acked-by: Doug Berger <opendmb@gmail.com> Acked-by: Serge Semin <fancer.lancer@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl> (cherry picked from commit 3c938cc5cebcbd2291fe97f523c0705a2c24c77d) Signed-off-by: Al Stone <ahs3@redhat.com>
2022-08-24 19:28:52 +00:00
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&priv->gc.bgpio_lock, flags);
}
static const struct irq_domain_ops grgpio_irq_domain_ops = {
.map = grgpio_irq_map,
.unmap = grgpio_irq_unmap,
};
/* ------------------------------------------------------------ */
static int grgpio_probe(struct platform_device *ofdev)
{
struct device_node *np = ofdev->dev.of_node;
void __iomem *regs;
struct gpio_chip *gc;
struct grgpio_priv *priv;
int err;
u32 prop;
s32 *irqmap;
int size;
int i;
priv = devm_kzalloc(&ofdev->dev, sizeof(*priv), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!priv)
return -ENOMEM;
regs = devm_platform_ioremap_resource(ofdev, 0);
if (IS_ERR(regs))
return PTR_ERR(regs);
gpio: generic: factor into gpio_chip struct The separate struct bgpio_chip has been a pain to handle, both by being confusingly similar in name to struct gpio_chip and for being contained inside a struct so that struct gpio_chip is contained in a struct contained in a struct, making several steps of dereferencing necessary. Make things simpler: include the fields directly into <linux/gpio/driver.h>, #ifdef:ed for CONFIG_GENERIC_GPIO, and get rid of the <linux/basic_mmio_gpio.h> altogether. Prefix some of the member variables with bgpio_* and add proper kerneldoc while we're at it. Modify all users to handle the change and use a struct gpio_chip directly. And while we're at it: replace all container_of() dereferencing by gpiochip_get_data() and registering the gpio_chip with gpiochip_add_data(). Cc: arm@kernel.org Cc: Alexander Shiyan <shc_work@mail.ru> Cc: Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org> Cc: Sascha Hauer <kernel@pengutronix.de> Cc: Kukjin Kim <kgene@kernel.org> Cc: Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@gmail.com> Cc: Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com> Cc: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> Cc: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> Cc: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com> Cc: Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@linaro.org> Cc: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net> Cc: Vladimir Zapolskiy <vladimir_zapolskiy@mentor.com> Cc: Rabin Vincent <rabin@rab.in> Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org Cc: bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com Acked-by: Gregory Fong <gregory.0xf0@gmail.com> Acked-by: Liviu Dudau <Liviu.Dudau@arm.com> Acked-by: H Hartley Sweeten <hsweeten@visionengravers.com> Acked-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com> Acked-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
2015-12-04 13:02:58 +00:00
gc = &priv->gc;
err = bgpio_init(gc, &ofdev->dev, 4, regs + GRGPIO_DATA,
regs + GRGPIO_OUTPUT, NULL, regs + GRGPIO_DIR, NULL,
BGPIOF_BIG_ENDIAN_BYTE_ORDER);
if (err) {
dev_err(&ofdev->dev, "bgpio_init() failed\n");
return err;
}
priv->regs = regs;
gpio: generic: factor into gpio_chip struct The separate struct bgpio_chip has been a pain to handle, both by being confusingly similar in name to struct gpio_chip and for being contained inside a struct so that struct gpio_chip is contained in a struct contained in a struct, making several steps of dereferencing necessary. Make things simpler: include the fields directly into <linux/gpio/driver.h>, #ifdef:ed for CONFIG_GENERIC_GPIO, and get rid of the <linux/basic_mmio_gpio.h> altogether. Prefix some of the member variables with bgpio_* and add proper kerneldoc while we're at it. Modify all users to handle the change and use a struct gpio_chip directly. And while we're at it: replace all container_of() dereferencing by gpiochip_get_data() and registering the gpio_chip with gpiochip_add_data(). Cc: arm@kernel.org Cc: Alexander Shiyan <shc_work@mail.ru> Cc: Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org> Cc: Sascha Hauer <kernel@pengutronix.de> Cc: Kukjin Kim <kgene@kernel.org> Cc: Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@gmail.com> Cc: Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com> Cc: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> Cc: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> Cc: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com> Cc: Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@linaro.org> Cc: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net> Cc: Vladimir Zapolskiy <vladimir_zapolskiy@mentor.com> Cc: Rabin Vincent <rabin@rab.in> Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org Cc: bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com Acked-by: Gregory Fong <gregory.0xf0@gmail.com> Acked-by: Liviu Dudau <Liviu.Dudau@arm.com> Acked-by: H Hartley Sweeten <hsweeten@visionengravers.com> Acked-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com> Acked-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
2015-12-04 13:02:58 +00:00
priv->imask = gc->read_reg(regs + GRGPIO_IMASK);
priv->dev = &ofdev->dev;
gc->owner = THIS_MODULE;
gc->to_irq = grgpio_to_irq;
gc->label = devm_kasprintf(&ofdev->dev, GFP_KERNEL, "%pOF", np);
gc->base = -1;
err = of_property_read_u32(np, "nbits", &prop);
if (err || prop <= 0 || prop > GRGPIO_MAX_NGPIO) {
gc->ngpio = GRGPIO_MAX_NGPIO;
dev_dbg(&ofdev->dev,
"No or invalid nbits property: assume %d\n", gc->ngpio);
} else {
gc->ngpio = prop;
}
/*
* The irqmap contains the index values indicating which underlying irq,
* if anyone, is connected to that line
*/
irqmap = (s32 *)of_get_property(np, "irqmap", &size);
if (irqmap) {
if (size < gc->ngpio) {
dev_err(&ofdev->dev,
"irqmap shorter than ngpio (%d < %d)\n",
size, gc->ngpio);
return -EINVAL;
}
priv->domain = irq_domain_add_linear(np, gc->ngpio,
&grgpio_irq_domain_ops,
priv);
if (!priv->domain) {
dev_err(&ofdev->dev, "Could not add irq domain\n");
return -EINVAL;
}
for (i = 0; i < gc->ngpio; i++) {
struct grgpio_lirq *lirq;
int ret;
lirq = &priv->lirqs[i];
lirq->index = irqmap[i];
if (lirq->index < 0)
continue;
ret = platform_get_irq(ofdev, lirq->index);
if (ret <= 0) {
/*
* Continue without irq functionality for that
* gpio line
*/
continue;
}
priv->uirqs[lirq->index].uirq = ret;
}
}
platform_set_drvdata(ofdev, priv);
gpio: generic: factor into gpio_chip struct The separate struct bgpio_chip has been a pain to handle, both by being confusingly similar in name to struct gpio_chip and for being contained inside a struct so that struct gpio_chip is contained in a struct contained in a struct, making several steps of dereferencing necessary. Make things simpler: include the fields directly into <linux/gpio/driver.h>, #ifdef:ed for CONFIG_GENERIC_GPIO, and get rid of the <linux/basic_mmio_gpio.h> altogether. Prefix some of the member variables with bgpio_* and add proper kerneldoc while we're at it. Modify all users to handle the change and use a struct gpio_chip directly. And while we're at it: replace all container_of() dereferencing by gpiochip_get_data() and registering the gpio_chip with gpiochip_add_data(). Cc: arm@kernel.org Cc: Alexander Shiyan <shc_work@mail.ru> Cc: Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org> Cc: Sascha Hauer <kernel@pengutronix.de> Cc: Kukjin Kim <kgene@kernel.org> Cc: Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@gmail.com> Cc: Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com> Cc: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> Cc: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> Cc: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com> Cc: Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@linaro.org> Cc: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net> Cc: Vladimir Zapolskiy <vladimir_zapolskiy@mentor.com> Cc: Rabin Vincent <rabin@rab.in> Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org Cc: bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com Acked-by: Gregory Fong <gregory.0xf0@gmail.com> Acked-by: Liviu Dudau <Liviu.Dudau@arm.com> Acked-by: H Hartley Sweeten <hsweeten@visionengravers.com> Acked-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com> Acked-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
2015-12-04 13:02:58 +00:00
err = gpiochip_add_data(gc, priv);
if (err) {
dev_err(&ofdev->dev, "Could not add gpiochip\n");
if (priv->domain)
irq_domain_remove(priv->domain);
return err;
}
dev_info(&ofdev->dev, "regs=0x%p, base=%d, ngpio=%d, irqs=%s\n",
priv->regs, gc->base, gc->ngpio, priv->domain ? "on" : "off");
return 0;
}
static int grgpio_remove(struct platform_device *ofdev)
{
struct grgpio_priv *priv = platform_get_drvdata(ofdev);
gpio: generic: factor into gpio_chip struct The separate struct bgpio_chip has been a pain to handle, both by being confusingly similar in name to struct gpio_chip and for being contained inside a struct so that struct gpio_chip is contained in a struct contained in a struct, making several steps of dereferencing necessary. Make things simpler: include the fields directly into <linux/gpio/driver.h>, #ifdef:ed for CONFIG_GENERIC_GPIO, and get rid of the <linux/basic_mmio_gpio.h> altogether. Prefix some of the member variables with bgpio_* and add proper kerneldoc while we're at it. Modify all users to handle the change and use a struct gpio_chip directly. And while we're at it: replace all container_of() dereferencing by gpiochip_get_data() and registering the gpio_chip with gpiochip_add_data(). Cc: arm@kernel.org Cc: Alexander Shiyan <shc_work@mail.ru> Cc: Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org> Cc: Sascha Hauer <kernel@pengutronix.de> Cc: Kukjin Kim <kgene@kernel.org> Cc: Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@gmail.com> Cc: Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com> Cc: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> Cc: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> Cc: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com> Cc: Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@linaro.org> Cc: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net> Cc: Vladimir Zapolskiy <vladimir_zapolskiy@mentor.com> Cc: Rabin Vincent <rabin@rab.in> Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org Cc: bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com Acked-by: Gregory Fong <gregory.0xf0@gmail.com> Acked-by: Liviu Dudau <Liviu.Dudau@arm.com> Acked-by: H Hartley Sweeten <hsweeten@visionengravers.com> Acked-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com> Acked-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
2015-12-04 13:02:58 +00:00
gpiochip_remove(&priv->gc);
if (priv->domain)
irq_domain_remove(priv->domain);
return 0;
}
static const struct of_device_id grgpio_match[] = {
{.name = "GAISLER_GPIO"},
{.name = "01_01a"},
{},
};
MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, grgpio_match);
static struct platform_driver grgpio_driver = {
.driver = {
.name = "grgpio",
.of_match_table = grgpio_match,
},
.probe = grgpio_probe,
.remove = grgpio_remove,
};
module_platform_driver(grgpio_driver);
MODULE_AUTHOR("Aeroflex Gaisler AB.");
MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Driver for Aeroflex Gaisler GRGPIO");
MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");